Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 426 - 443 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010 İndeks Tarihi: 22-05-2022

Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach

Öz:
In this action research study, the researcher aimed to find and address a problem that English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in her class come across to improve their language learning process. The action research study adopted mixed methods design using both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. Firstly, to identify the problem, the researcher observed the students closely, analyzed their midterm scores, and administered a diagnostic survey to the students. The data collected through these procedures indicated that vocabulary is the most problematic area for learners. Then, to diagnose the source of the problem, the researcher used a think-aloud protocol. In this way, rich verbal data about students’ reasoning during a vocabulary task were collected. After identifying that the source of the problem was a lack of strategy use, strategy training for contextual clues was implemented as an intervention for five weeks. Finally, the effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated through a paired-samples t-test. The analysis showed that students had significantly higher results in the vocabulary section of the second midterm compared to the first midterm. This study found that strategy training for using contextual clues is effective in improving EFL learners’ vocabulary mastery, independent of their language level.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Almunawaroh, N. F. (2018). Teaching vocabulary through context clues strategy. English Empower, 3(2), 27–33.
  • Alsaawi, A. A. (2013). To what extent guessing the meaning from the context is helpful in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Education: Communication and Language Sciences, 10, 130–146. [CrossRef]
  • Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 655–670. [CrossRef]
  • Ebrahimain, A., & Nabifar, N. (2015). The effect of three vocabulary learning strategies of wordpart, word-card and context-clue on Iranian high school students’ immediate and delayed English vocabulary learning and retention. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(17), 42–63.
  • Fraser, C.A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 225–241. [CrossRef]
  • Fudhla, N., Solusia, C., & Oktoviandry, R. (2019). Context clues as a vocabulary learning strategy: A view of its implementation in EFL classroom. Advances in Social Science: Education and Humanities Research, 411, 83–87.
  • Huckin, T., & Jin, Z. (1987). Inferring word-meaning from context: A study in second language acquisition. In F. Marshall, A. Miller, & Z. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the third eastern states conference on linguistics. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Waurn Ponds: Deakin University Press.
  • Kesler, T. (2010). Shared reading to build vocabulary and comprehension. Reading Teacher, 64(4), 272–277. [CrossRef]
  • Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc.
  • Kweldju, S. (2004). Lexically-based language teaching: An innovative step for ELT in Indonesia. In B. Y. Cahyono & U. Widiati (Eds.), The tapestry of English language teaching and learning in Indonesia (pp. 37–56). Malang: State University of Malang Press.
  • Laufer, B., & Bensoussan M. (1982). Meaning is in the eye of the beholder. English Teaching Forum, 20(2), 10–13.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Ma, T. T. (2017). The effectiveness of guessing vocabulary meaning using contextual clues and learning word lists in terms of vocabulary retention. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
  • Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 vocabulary learning from the context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645–670. [CrossRef]
  • Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley: Newbury House.
  • Porte, G. (1988). Poor language learners and their strategies for dealing with new vocabulary. ELT Journal, 42(3), 167–172. [CrossRef]
  • Priyono. (2004). Logical problems of teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia. In B. Y. Cahyono & U. Widiati (Eds.), The tapestry of English language teaching and learning in Indonesia (pp. 17–28). Malang: State University of Malang Press.
  • Richard, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching an anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rouhani, M., & Behzad, P. (2013). The effect of games on learning vocabulary. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(11), 3540–3543.
  • Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15–30). London: Prentice-Hall.
  • Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. [CrossRef]
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science, 26(1/2), 127–140. [CrossRef]
  • Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Utami, Y. S. (2014). Improving students’ vocabulary mastery using crossword puzzles for grade 7 (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Indonesia: Yogyakarta State University.
  • Walters, J. D. (2006). Methods of teaching inferring meaning from context. RELC Journal, 37(2), 176–190. [CrossRef]
  • Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Cambridge: MFT Press.
APA tekir s (2021). Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. , 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
Chicago tekir serpil Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. (2021): 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
MLA tekir serpil Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. , 2021, ss.426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
AMA tekir s Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. . 2021; 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
Vancouver tekir s Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. . 2021; 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
IEEE tekir s "Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach." , ss.426 - 443, 2021. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
ISNAD tekir, serpil. "Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach". (2021), 426-443. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
APA tekir s (2021). Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. Hayef:journal of education (Online), 18(3), 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
Chicago tekir serpil Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. Hayef:journal of education (Online) 18, no.3 (2021): 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
MLA tekir serpil Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. Hayef:journal of education (Online), vol.18, no.3, 2021, ss.426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
AMA tekir s Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2021; 18(3): 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
Vancouver tekir s Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2021; 18(3): 426 - 443. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
IEEE tekir s "Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach." Hayef:journal of education (Online), 18, ss.426 - 443, 2021. 10.5152/hayef.2021.21010
ISNAD tekir, serpil. "Improving EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Mastery: An Action Research Approach". Hayef:journal of education (Online) 18/3 (2021), 426-443. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.21010