Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 59 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 7 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/tao.2021.6100 İndeks Tarihi: 25-05-2022

Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model

Öz:
Objective: Septal mucosal-perichondrial flaps can be lacerated during the elevation of the flaps. Appropriate repair of the lacerations is essential to prevent the development of septal perforation during the healing process. We aimed to determine the superior suture type and suture distance to use in repairing the lacerations of nasal septal mucosal-perichondrial flaps. Methods: The study used 128 nasal septal mucosal-perichondrial flaps prepared from sheep heads. Experimentally induced lacerations on the mucosal-perichondrial flaps were sutured with two interrupted sutures using one of four suture materials (4-0/5-0 Polyglactin 910, 4-0/5-0 Polydioxanone) and leaving either 5 mm or 10 mm distance between the sutures. Maximum tissue holding strength (HSmax) was measured for each suture material and suture distance used. Results: Mean HSmax values were higher for Polyglactin 910 sutures (p<0.001) and 10 mm suture distance (p=0.008) when the groups were compared in terms of suture material and suture distance, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean HSmax values of sutures with 4-0 and 5-0 diameters (p=0.057). Conclusion: Polyglactin 910 suture material with 10 mm space between two adjacent sutures may be more durable than the other suture materials when repairing nasal septal mucosal lacerations.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Brain DJ. Septo-rhinoplasty: the closure of septal perforations. J Laryngol Otol 1980; 94: 495-505. [Crossref ]
  • 2. Dosen LK, Haye R. Surgical closure of nasal septal perforation. Early and long term observations. Rhinology 2011; 49: 486-91. [Crossref ]
  • 3. Flavill E, Gilmore JE. Septal perforation repair without intraoperative mucosal closure. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 1112-7. [Crossref ]
  • 4. Yildirim G, Cingi C, Kaya E. Septal stapler use during septum surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 939-43. [Crossref ]
  • 5. Nawrocki JG, Nonnenmann H, Mooney M, Sutton N, Schmitz ND. A high-strength, absorbable, antibacterial knotless tissue control device for fascial closure. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 2017; 6: 175-81. [Crossref ]
  • 6. Kazkayasi M, Yalcinozan ET. Uncinate process in the repair of nasoseptal perforation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35: 878-81. [Crossref ]
  • 7. Özkuvanci Ü, Akpinar H, Karadag MA, Dönmez Mİ, Altunrende F. Holding strength of suture: an experimental study using porcine kidney. JSLS 2017; 21: e2017.00029. [Crossref ]
  • 8. Rodrigues SP, Horeman T, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW. Suturing intraabdominal organs: when do we cause tissue damage? Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1005-9. [Crossref ]
  • 9. Tarin T, Kimm S, Chung B, Shinghal R, Reese J. Comparison of holding strength of suture anchors on human renal capsule. J Endourol 2010; 24: 293-7. [Crossref ]
  • 10. Trimbos JB, Van Rijssel EJ, Klopper PJ. Performance of sliding knots in monofilament and multifilament suture material. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 425-30. [Crossref ]
  • 11. Van Leeuwen N, Trimbos JB. Strength of sliding knots in multifilament resorbable suture materials. Gynecol Surg 2012;9: 433-7. [Crossref ]
  • 12. Silver E, Wu R, Grady J, Song L. Knot security-how is it affected by suture technique, material, size, and number of throws? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 1304-12. [Crossref ]
  • 13. Karabulut R, Sonmez K, Turkyilmaz Z, Bagbanci B, Basaklar AC, Kale N. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of tensile strength and durability of seven suture materials in various pH and different conditions: an experimental study in rats. Indian J Surg 2010; 72: 386-90. [Crossref ]
  • 14. Rosen J, Brown JD, De S, Sinanan M, Hannaford B. Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. J Biomech Eng 2008; 130: 021020. [Crossref ]
APA Köycü A, Hizal E, Erol O, Buyuklu F (2021). Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. , 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
Chicago Köycü Alper,Hizal Evren,Erol Ozan,Buyuklu Fuat Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. (2021): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
MLA Köycü Alper,Hizal Evren,Erol Ozan,Buyuklu Fuat Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. , 2021, ss.1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
AMA Köycü A,Hizal E,Erol O,Buyuklu F Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. . 2021; 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
Vancouver Köycü A,Hizal E,Erol O,Buyuklu F Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. . 2021; 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
IEEE Köycü A,Hizal E,Erol O,Buyuklu F "Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model." , ss.1 - 7, 2021. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
ISNAD Köycü, Alper vd. "Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model". (2021), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2021.6100
APA Köycü A, Hizal E, Erol O, Buyuklu F (2021). Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology , 59(1), 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
Chicago Köycü Alper,Hizal Evren,Erol Ozan,Buyuklu Fuat Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology 59, no.1 (2021): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
MLA Köycü Alper,Hizal Evren,Erol Ozan,Buyuklu Fuat Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology , vol.59, no.1, 2021, ss.1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
AMA Köycü A,Hizal E,Erol O,Buyuklu F Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology . 2021; 59(1): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
Vancouver Köycü A,Hizal E,Erol O,Buyuklu F Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology . 2021; 59(1): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
IEEE Köycü A,Hizal E,Erol O,Buyuklu F "Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model." Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology , 59, ss.1 - 7, 2021. 10.4274/tao.2021.6100
ISNAD Köycü, Alper vd. "Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model". Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology 59/1 (2021), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2021.6100