Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 272 - 279 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/bej.2021.24482 İndeks Tarihi: 31-05-2022

Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients

Öz:
Objectives: Keratoconus (KCN) is a disorder that usually appears during adolescence and progressively reduces visual acuity. KCN may lead to differences in personality features as a result of vision loss and the numerous clinical examinations and treatment methods used from a young age. The aim of this study was to better understand the psychological characteristics of KCN patients and to define possible correlations between corneal topographic parameters and psychological state. Methods: A total of 59 KCN cases were included in the study group and were compared with 65 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. All of the participants underwent a routine ophthalmic examination that included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), biomicroscopy, and fundoscopy. The KCN patients were evaluated busing Scheimpflug corneal topography. Psychiatric evaluations were performed using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Short Form (EPQ), the Self-Confidence Scale, the Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (MOCI), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Results: The mean age of the case and control groups was 23.98±5.7 years and 25.82±5.4 years, respectively. The KCN cases had significantly higher EPQ neuroticism subscale scores; higher MOCI subscale scores, with the exception of the doubting subscale; and higher BDI scores. Analysis of the KCN duration revealed a positive correlation with the checking and slowness subscales of the MOCI, however, there was no significant correlation between the psychometric scale scores, corneal topographic parameters, and CDVA. Conclusion: A substantially asymmetrical course and a relatively long period for KCN to result in severe vision loss might explain the lack of correlations between psychological parameters and visual acuity. Nonetheless, the apparent effect of vision loss on emotional distress cannot be disregarded; the day-to-day progressive loss of visual acuity and multiple, costly interventions may initiate or contribute to a depressive mood in KCN patients. A vicious depressive cycle and the exhaustion of long-term coping mechanisms might be underlying factors for the higher neuroticism scores seen among KCN patients. Both the personality traits and mental state of KCN patients demonstrate distinguishing properties; clinicians working with these patients should consider their mental state in addition to other factors in order to achieve better treatment outcomes.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: A review. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:157– 66.
  • 2. Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, Tuft SJ. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye. 2014;28:189–95.
  • 3. Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, Saatchi M, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea 2020;39:263–70.
  • 4. Giedd KK, Mannis MJ, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Personality in keratoconus in a sample of patients derived from the internet. Cornea 2005;24:301–7.
  • 5. Alves VLR, Alves MR, Lane STM. The diagnostic communication of keratoconus and its influence on the social representation that the patient has of his/her illness. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2007;70:790–96.
  • 6. Mannis MJ, Zadnik K, Morrison TL, Holland EJ, Krachmer JH. Personality trends in keratoconus: an analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:798–800.
  • 7. Moschos MM, Gouliopoulos NS, Kalogeropoulos C, Androudi S, Kitsos G, Ladas D, et al. Psychological aspects and depression in patients with symptomatic keratoconus. J Ophthalmol 2018;2018:7314308.
  • 8. Schürhoff F, Leboyer M, Szöke A. Comorbidity between schizophrenia and keratoconus. Psychiatry Res 2017;247:315–6.
  • 9. Rudisch B, D’Orio B, Compton MT. Keratoconus and psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:1011.
  • 10. Karancı AN, Dirik G, Yorulmaz O. Eysenck Kişilik Anketi – Gözden Geçirilmiş Kısaltılmış Formu’nun (EKA-GGK) Türkiye’de geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2007;18:254 – 61.
  • 11. Akın A. Öz-güven ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özellikleri. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2007;7:165–75.
  • 12. Hodgson RJ, Rachman S. Obsessional-compulsive complaints. Behav Res Ther 1977;15:389–95.
  • 13. Erol N, Savaşır I. Maudsley Obsesif-Kompulsif Soru Listesi. 24. Ulusal Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Kongresi bilimsel çalışma kitabı. Ankara: GATA Basımevi; 1988. p. 107–14.
  • 14. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–71.
  • 15. Hisli, N. A reliability and validity study of Beck Depression Inventory in a university student sample. J Psychol 1989;7:3–13. Available at: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10028183802. Accessed May 4, 2021.
  • 16. Vazirani J, Basu S. Keratoconus: Current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:2019–30.
  • 17. Mannis MJ, Ling JJ, Kyrillos R, Barnett M. Keratoconus and personality - a review. Cornea 2018;37:400–4.
  • 18. Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K, Gordon MO. Quality of life in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:527–35.
  • 19. Moreira LB, Alchieri JC, Belfort R, Moreira H. Psychological and social aspects of patients with keratoconus. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2007;70:317–22.
  • 20. Swartz NG, Cohen EJ, Scott DG, Genvert GI, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Personality and keratoconus. CLAO J 1990;16:62–4.
  • 21. Moschos M, Chatzirallis A, Chatziralli I. Psychological aspects and depression in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015;25:459–62.
  • 22. Augustin A, Sahel JA, Bandello F, Dardennes R, Maurel F, Negrini C, et al. Anxiety and depression prevalence rates in age-related macular degeneration. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1498–503.
  • 23. Skalicky S, Goldberg I. Depression and quality of life in patients with glaucoma: A cross-sectional analysis using the geriatric depression scale-15, assessment of function related to vision, and the glaucoma quality of life-15. J Glaucoma 2008;17:546–51.
  • 24. Moschos MM, Nitoda E, Lavaris A. Estimation of depression prevalence in patients with stargardt disease using PHQ-9 and zung scores. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015;26:268–72.
  • 25. Cingu AK, Bez Y, Cinar Y, Turkcu FM, Yildirim A, Sahin A, et al. Impact of collagen cross-linking on psychological distress and vision and health-related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 2015;41:349–53.
  • 26. Thulasidas M, Teotia P. Evaluation of corneal topography and tomography in fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients for early detection of subclinical keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:2415–20.
  • 27. Kim E, Saha M, Ehrmann K. Mechanical properties of contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens Sci Clin Pract 2018;44:148–56.
  • 28. Mazharian A, Panthier C, Courtin R, Jung C, Rampat R, Saad A, et al. Incorrect sleeping position and eye rubbing in patients with unilateral or highly asymmetric keratoconus: a case-control study. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;258:2431– 9.
  • 29. Saraç Ö, Çağıl N. New Developments in the etiopathogenesis of keratoconus: oxidative stress, ınflammation and apoptosis. Turkiye Klin J Ophthalmol 2018;27:140–7.
APA Aslan M, Besenek M, Akgoz H, Satılmaz M, Hocaoglu C (2021). Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. , 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
Chicago Aslan Mehmet Gökhan,Besenek Mert,Akgoz Hasan,Satılmaz Muhammed Fatih,Hocaoglu Cicek Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. (2021): 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
MLA Aslan Mehmet Gökhan,Besenek Mert,Akgoz Hasan,Satılmaz Muhammed Fatih,Hocaoglu Cicek Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. , 2021, ss.272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
AMA Aslan M,Besenek M,Akgoz H,Satılmaz M,Hocaoglu C Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. . 2021; 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
Vancouver Aslan M,Besenek M,Akgoz H,Satılmaz M,Hocaoglu C Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. . 2021; 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
IEEE Aslan M,Besenek M,Akgoz H,Satılmaz M,Hocaoglu C "Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients." , ss.272 - 279, 2021. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
ISNAD Aslan, Mehmet Gökhan vd. "Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients". (2021), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2021.24482
APA Aslan M, Besenek M, Akgoz H, Satılmaz M, Hocaoglu C (2021). Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, 6(4), 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
Chicago Aslan Mehmet Gökhan,Besenek Mert,Akgoz Hasan,Satılmaz Muhammed Fatih,Hocaoglu Cicek Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL 6, no.4 (2021): 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
MLA Aslan Mehmet Gökhan,Besenek Mert,Akgoz Hasan,Satılmaz Muhammed Fatih,Hocaoglu Cicek Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, vol.6, no.4, 2021, ss.272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
AMA Aslan M,Besenek M,Akgoz H,Satılmaz M,Hocaoglu C Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL. 2021; 6(4): 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
Vancouver Aslan M,Besenek M,Akgoz H,Satılmaz M,Hocaoglu C Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL. 2021; 6(4): 272 - 279. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
IEEE Aslan M,Besenek M,Akgoz H,Satılmaz M,Hocaoglu C "Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients." BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, 6, ss.272 - 279, 2021. 10.14744/bej.2021.24482
ISNAD Aslan, Mehmet Gökhan vd. "Evaluation of Personality Features and Mental State of Keratoconus Patients". BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL 6/4 (2021), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2021.24482