Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 59 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 393 - 399 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791 İndeks Tarihi: 03-06-2022

Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying

Öz:
Aim: Peer bullying is thought to be negatively affected by high school students in many respects such as cognitive, emotional, psychological and physical. It is aimed to examine the relationship between cognitive flexibility levels and cognitive emotion regulation strategies of high school students who were exposed to peer bullying. Furthermore, it is examined whether these variables differ according to sociodemographic differences. Methods: The sample of the study consists of 400 high school students reached via the internet from different cities of Turkey in 2020. The data in the study were obtained using “the peer bullying scale”, “cognitive flexibility scale”, “cognitive emotion regulation scale” and “sociodemographic information form” prepared by the researcher. Results: It was found statistically significant that boys were subjected to more bullying on the peer bullying scale in the subscales of terror, teasing, and open attack. The rates of bullying students in vocational and technical high schools, who had poor school success and friendship relationships, were also found to be statistically significant (p<0.005). Students with good school achievement and friendship relationships had higher levels of cognitive flexibility, while boy students and those with very good friendship relationships scored highly on the “refocusing on planning” subscale of the cognitive emotion regulation scale (p<0.05). Conclusion: According to our research, cognitive flexibility decreases as peer bullying levels increase. The use of maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies also appear to increase.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Mahmoudi Souran H, Sanagouyemoharer GR, Shirazi M. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Improves Psychological Flexibility of Students with Thalassemia Major: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Practice in Clin Psychol 2019;7:107-16.
  • 2. Bilgin M. Some variables predicting cognitive flexibility. Çukurova Üniv. Eğ Fak Derg 2009;3:142-57.
  • 3. Waltmann M, Schlagenhauf F, Deserno L. Retest-Reliability of the Cognitive Flexibility Metrics of a Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task. Psychiatry Biol 2021;89:S130-1.
  • 4. Thompson RA. Emotion dysregulation: A theme in search of definition. Dev Psychopathol 2019;31:805-15.
  • 5. Thompson RA. Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1994;59:25-52.
  • 6. Capps S, Foster R. Association of Child Emotion Understanding and Emotion-Related Behavior during a Delay of Gratification Task 2019.
  • 7. Li L, Chen X, Li H. Bullying victimization, school belonging, academic engagement and achievement in adolescents in rural China: A serial mediation model. Children and youth services review 2020;113:1-8.
  • 8. Gültekin Z, Sayil M. Developing the scale of determining peer bullying . Turk Psychol Articl 2005;8:47-61.
  • 9. Mynard H, Joseph S. Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior: Aggress Behav. 2000;26:169-78.
  • 10. Bilgin M. Developing a cognitive flexibility scale: Validity and reliability studies. Soc Behav Pers 2009;37:343-54.
  • 11. Buelga S, Martínez-Ferrer B, Cava M-J, Ortega-Barón J. Psychometric properties of the CYBVICS cyber-victimization scale and its relationship with psychosocial variables. Soc Sci 2019;8:13.
  • 12. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Leiderdorp, The Netherlands: DATEC. 2002.
  • 13. Ataman E. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in determining the level of depression and anxiety in the face of stressful life events. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara. 2011.
  • 14. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire-development of a short 18-item version (CERQshort). Pers Individ Differ 2006;41:1045-53.
  • 15. Olweus D. Bullying at school. Basic facts and an effective intervention programme. Promot Educ 1994;1:27-31, 48.
  • 16. Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health 2009;45:368-75.
  • 17. Kepenekci YK, Cinkir S. Bullying among Turkish high school students. Child Abuse Negl 2006;30:193-204.
  • 18. Kavşut F. Examination of the relationship between peer bullying and emotional intelligence in adolescents. Unpublished master's thesis) Abant İzzet Baysal University/ Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu. 2009.
  • 19. Erbiçer ES. Examination of Cyber Bullying and Cyber Victimizarion According to Social Adjustment and Certain Demographic Variables. Pamukkale J Facult Educ 2019:1-24.
  • 20. Craig WM, Pepler DJ. Identifying and targeting risk for involvement in bullying and victimization. Can J Psychiat 2003;48:577-82.
  • 21. Yuile A, Pepler D, Craig W, Connolly J. 5. The Ethics of Peeking behind the Fence: Issues Related to Studying Children’s Aggression and Victimization. Ethical issues in community-based research with children and youth: University of Toronto Press, 2016, pp. 70-90. https://doi. org/10.3138/9781442674653-008.
  • 22. Demanet J, Van Houtte M. The impact of bullying and victimization on students' relationships. Am J Health Educ 2012;43:104-13.
  • 23. Suna HE, Mahmut Ö. The Achivement Gap between Turkish Schools and Realtionship between Achivement and Socioeconomic Status in Turkey. J Measurement and Evalu Education and Psychol 2021;12:54-70.
  • 24. Stad FE, Van Heijningen CJ, Wiedl KH, Resing WC. Predicting school achievement: differential effects of dynamic testing measures and cognitive flexibility for math performance. Learn Individ Differ 2018;67:117-2
  • 25. Majidpoor Tehrani L, Aftab R. The mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and worry in the relationship between resilience and anxiety of being infected by COVID-19. J Clin Psychol 2021;13:75-86.
  • 26. Demirci OO, Güneri E. The Effects of Cognitive Flexibility on Cognitive Emotional Regulation. Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sci J Social Sci 2020;21:651-84.
  • 27. Zlomke KR, Hahn KS. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies: Gender differences and associations to worry. Pers Individ Differ. 2010;48:408-13.
  • 28. Tatlı-Harmancı ÖGS, Güngör-Aytar FA. The Review The Scales Developed or Adapted in Turkey Related to Emotion Regulation. J Pearson Soc Sci Humanities 2021;6:171-85.
  • 29. Asıcı E, İkiz F. A Pathway to Happiness: Cognitive Flexibility. Mehmet Akif Ersoy J Educ Faculty 2015;1:191-211. 30. Stevens AD. Social problem-solving and cognitive flexibility: Relations to social skills and problem behavior of at-risk young children: Seattle Pacific University; 2009.
  • 31. Öztürk S. Cognitive Flexibility and Emotional Autonomy in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies. Master's Thesis, Cukurova Institute Soc Sci. 2019.
  • 32. Aery A. Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Resilience: Adler University; 2019.
  • 33. Salehi A. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in the prediction of depression. Knowledge & Research Appl Psychol 2017;16:108-17.
  • 34. Rodríguez-Menchón M, Orgilés M, Fernández-Martínez I, Espada JP, Morales A. Rumination, Catastrophizing, and Other-Blame: The Cognitive-Emotional Regulation Strategies Involved in Anxiety-Related Life Interference in Anxious Children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2021;52:63-76.
  • 35. Goetter EM. An empirical investigation of depressive rumination: implications for cognitive flexibility, problem solving and depression. 2010.
  • 36. Gülüm IV, Dağ İ. The Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study of the Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire and the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory. Journal Anatol. Psych. 2012;13.
  • 37. Bedel A, Ulubey E. The Role of Cognitive Flexibility on Explanation Adolescent's Coping Strategies. Electronic J Soc Sci. 2015;14:291-300.
  • 38. Pope SM, Fagot J, Meguerditchian A, Washburn DA, Hopkins WD. Enhanced cognitive flexibility in the seminomadic Himba. J Cross Cult Psychol 2019;50:47-62.
APA BİLGİÇ B, onal sonmez a, erdogan a (2021). Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. , 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
Chicago BİLGİÇ BEHİYE SÜMEYRA,onal sonmez arzu,erdogan ayten Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. (2021): 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
MLA BİLGİÇ BEHİYE SÜMEYRA,onal sonmez arzu,erdogan ayten Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. , 2021, ss.393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
AMA BİLGİÇ B,onal sonmez a,erdogan a Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. . 2021; 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
Vancouver BİLGİÇ B,onal sonmez a,erdogan a Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. . 2021; 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
IEEE BİLGİÇ B,onal sonmez a,erdogan a "Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying." , ss.393 - 399, 2021. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
ISNAD BİLGİÇ, BEHİYE SÜMEYRA vd. "Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying". (2021), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
APA BİLGİÇ B, onal sonmez a, erdogan a (2021). Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, 59(5), 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
Chicago BİLGİÇ BEHİYE SÜMEYRA,onal sonmez arzu,erdogan ayten Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. Haseki Tıp Bülteni 59, no.5 (2021): 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
MLA BİLGİÇ BEHİYE SÜMEYRA,onal sonmez arzu,erdogan ayten Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, vol.59, no.5, 2021, ss.393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
AMA BİLGİÇ B,onal sonmez a,erdogan a Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2021; 59(5): 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
Vancouver BİLGİÇ B,onal sonmez a,erdogan a Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2021; 59(5): 393 - 399. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
IEEE BİLGİÇ B,onal sonmez a,erdogan a "Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying." Haseki Tıp Bülteni, 59, ss.393 - 399, 2021. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791
ISNAD BİLGİÇ, BEHİYE SÜMEYRA vd. "Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility Levels in High School Students Subjected to Peer Bullying". Haseki Tıp Bülteni 59/5 (2021), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7791