Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri

Özge Gizem CABADAĞ, (Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi AD, Ankara, Türkiye)
Ferhan EĞİLMEZ (Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi AD, Ankara, Türkiye)
Selcuk Dental Journal
13 3
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 580 - 590 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441 İndeks Tarihi: 03-06-2022

Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri

Öz:
Diş hekimliğinde kullanılan restoratif materyallerin klinik başarısında diş dokularıyla uyumlu materyal seçimi büyük rol oynamaktadır. Doğal dişlerle uyumlu görünümde restorasyonlar oluşturabilmek için de bu materyallerin translüsensi, renk tonu (hue), renk doygunluğu (chroma), opalesans gibi optik özelliklerinin bilinmesi büyük öneme sahiptir. Estetik açıdan endikasyonları karşılayabilmek için farklı yapıda CAD/CAM materyalleri piyasaya sunulmuştur. Polimer yapılı CAD/CAM materyallerin rengi, matriks veya monomer kompozisyonu, kimyasal kompozisyon, doldurucu büyüklüğü veya doldurucu miktarı vb. materyale bağlı farklılıklardan etkilenebileceği gibi, arka zemin rengi, siman ve materyale bağlı diğer özellikler gibi klinik faktörlerden de etkilenmektedir. Bu literatür derlemesinin amacı, polimer yapılı CAD/CAM materyallerin optik özelliklerinin daha iyi anlaşılabilmesi için konuyla ilgili çalışmaları irdeleyerek değerlendirme yapmaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Optical Properties of Polymer-Based CAD/CAM Materials

Öz:
The choice of materials compatible with dental tissues plays a major role in the clinical success of restorative materials used in dentistry. It is of great importance to know the optical properties of these materials, such as translucence, hue, chroma opalescence, in order to fabricate restorations that are in harmony with natural teeth. In order to meet the aesthetic indications, different CAD/CAM materials have been introduced to the market. Color of polymer-based CAD/CAM materials could be affected by matrix or monomer composition, chemical composition, filler size or filler volume, etc. or material-related differences, as well as clinical factors such as background color, cement and other material-related properties. The aim of this review was to evaluate the studies about optical properties of polymer-based CAD/CAM materials to provide a better understanding
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 559-570.
  • 2. Ruse N, Sadoun M. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1232-1234.
  • 3. Holand W, Beall GH. Glass-ceramic technology, 2nd edn. ABD: Wiley, 2012.
  • 4. Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvêa CVD, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of CAD/CAM materials for monolithic dental restorations. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: e587-e594.
  • 5. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1141-1150.
  • 6. Van der Burgt T, Ten Bosch J, Borsboom P, Kortsmit W. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 155-162.
  • 7. Nogueira AD, Della Bona A. The effect of a coupling medium on color and translucency of CAD–CAM ceramics. J Dent 2013; 41: e18-e23.
  • 8. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Comparative color and surface parameters of current esthetic restorative CAD/CAM materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10: 32-42.
  • 9. Alp G, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Optical properties and surface roughness of prepolymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 347-352.
  • 10.Gunal B, Ulusoy MM. Optical properties of contemporary monolithic CAD‐CAM restorative materials at different thicknesses. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: 434-441.
  • 11.Güth J-F, Kauling AEC, Ueda K, Florian B, Stimmelmayr M. Transmission of light in the visible spectrum (400–700 nm) and blue spectrum (360– 540 nm) through CAD/CAM polymers. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 2501-2506.
  • 12.Jan-Frederik Güth P. Optical integration of CAD/CAM materials. Int J Esthet Dent 2016; 11: 394-409.
  • 13.Kiran R, Walsh LJ, Forrest A, Tennant M, Chapman J. Forensic applications: Fluorescence properties of tooth-coloured restorative materials using a fluorescence DSLR camera. Forensic Sci Int 2017; 273: 20-28.
  • 14.Pulgar R, Lucena C, Espinar C, Pecho OE, Ruiz- López J, Della Bona A et al. Optical and colorimetric evaluation of a multi-color polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2019; 35: e131-e139.
  • 15.Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
  • 16.Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 587-593.
  • 17.Mainjot A, Dupont N, Oudkerk J, Dewael T, Sadoun M. From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 487-495.
  • 18.Shetty R, Shenoy K, Dandekeri S, Suhaim KS, Ragher M, Francis J. Resin-matrix ceramics: an overview. Int J Cur Sci Res 2015; 6: 7414-7417.
  • 19.Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Oezcan M, Haemmerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass- ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 377-383.
  • 20.Koller M, Arnetzl G, Holly L, Arnetzl G. Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/CAM: customization case study. Int J Comput Dent 2012; 15: 159-164.
  • 21.Acar B, Egilmez F. Effects of various polishing techniques and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color change of polymer-based CAD/CAM materials. Am J Dent 2018; 31: 91-96.
  • 22.Ekici MA, Egilmez F, Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G. Physical characteristics of ceramic/glass- polymer based CAD/CAM materials: Effect of finishing and polishing techniques. J Adv Prosthodont 2019; 11: 128-137.
  • 23.Kılınç H, Turgut S, Ayaz EA, Bağış B. Güncel nanoseramik ve hibrit CAD/CAM materyalleri. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2018; 28: 592- 598.
  • 24.Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth J-F. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016; 55: 1-11.
  • 25.Swain M, Coldea A, Bilkhair A, Guess P. Interpenetrating network ceramic-resin composite dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 34-42.
  • 26.Üstün Ö, Büyükhatipoğlu IK, Seçilmiş A. Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2018; 27: 748-754.
  • 27.Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J 2013; 7: 118- 122.
  • 28.Klosa K, Boesch I, Kem M. Long-term bond of glass ceramic and resin cement: evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative etching agent for lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15: 377-383.
  • 29.Dano D, Stiteler M, Giordano R. Prosthetically driven computer-guided implant placement and restoration using CEREC: A case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018; 39: 311-317.
  • 30.Sen N, Us YO. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 593-599.
  • 31.Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Light Transmission of novel CAD/CAM materials and their influence on the degree of conversion of a dualcuring resin cement. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 39-48.
  • 32.Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Ilie N. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113: 534-540.
  • 33.Özarslan MM, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Barutcigil Ç, Arslan M, Türker N, Barutcigil K. Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface roughness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8: 16-20.
  • 34.Kurtulmus Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ongun S, Karakaya I. The effect of surface treatments on the mechanical and optical behaviors of CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: e496-e503.
  • 35.Arocha MA, Basilio J, Llopis J, Di Bella E, Roig M, Ardu S et al. Colour stainability of indirect CAD–CAM processed composites vs. conventionally laboratory processed composites after immersion in staining solutions. J Dent 2014; 42: 831-838.
  • 36.Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology 2017; 105: 162-169.
  • 37.Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Gloss and stain resistance of ceramic‐polymer CAD/CAM restorative blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: S40-S45.
  • 38.Sarıkaya I, Yerliyurt K, Hayran Y. Effect of surface finishing on the colour stability and translucency of dental ceramics. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 40.
  • 39.Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, Sagsoz NP, Yildiz M. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8: 417-422.
  • 40.Quek S, Yap A, Rosa V, Tan K, Teoh K. Effect of staining beverages on color and translucency of CAD/CAM composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: E9-E17.
  • 41.Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 71-75.
  • 42.Liebermann A, Vehling D, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Impact of storage media and temperature on color stability of tooth-colored CAD/CAM materials for final restorations. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2019; 17: 1-7.
  • 43.Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. In‐office bleaching efficacy on stain removal from CAD/CAM and direct resin composite materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: 51-58.
  • 44.Gasparik C, Culic B, Varvara MA, Grecu A, Burde A, Dudea D. Effect of accelerated staining and bleaching on chairside CAD/CAM materials with high and low translucency. Dent Mater J 2019; 38: 987-993.
  • 45.Karakaya İ, Cengiz E. Effect of 2 bleaching agents with a content of high concentrated hydrogen peroxide on stained 2 CAD/CAM blocks and a nanohybrid composite resin: An AFM evaluation. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 11.
  • 46.Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 705-710.
  • 47.Leung BT, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Pow EH. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental fluorophlogopite glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 440-446.
  • 48.Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 414-419.
  • 49.Heimer S, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Discoloration of PMMA, composite, and PEEK. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 1191-1200.
  • 50.Zeighami S, Mirmohammadrezaei S, Safi M, Falahchai SM. The Effect of Core and Veneering Design on the Optical Properties of Polyether Ether Ketone. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017; 25: 201-208.
  • 51.Stawarczyk B, Schmid P, Roos M, Eichberger M, Schmidlin P. Spectrophotometric evaluation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a core material and a comparison with gold standard core materials. Materials 2016; 9: 491.
APA yenidünya ö, EGILMEZ F (2021). Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. , 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
Chicago yenidünya özge gizem,EGILMEZ Ferhan Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. (2021): 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
MLA yenidünya özge gizem,EGILMEZ Ferhan Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. , 2021, ss.580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
AMA yenidünya ö,EGILMEZ F Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. . 2021; 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
Vancouver yenidünya ö,EGILMEZ F Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. . 2021; 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
IEEE yenidünya ö,EGILMEZ F "Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri." , ss.580 - 590, 2021. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
ISNAD yenidünya, özge gizem - EGILMEZ, Ferhan. "Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri". (2021), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
APA yenidünya ö, EGILMEZ F (2021). Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. Selcuk Dental Journal, 8(2), 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
Chicago yenidünya özge gizem,EGILMEZ Ferhan Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. Selcuk Dental Journal 8, no.2 (2021): 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
MLA yenidünya özge gizem,EGILMEZ Ferhan Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol.8, no.2, 2021, ss.580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
AMA yenidünya ö,EGILMEZ F Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021; 8(2): 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
Vancouver yenidünya ö,EGILMEZ F Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021; 8(2): 580 - 590. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
IEEE yenidünya ö,EGILMEZ F "Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri." Selcuk Dental Journal, 8, ss.580 - 590, 2021. 10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
ISNAD yenidünya, özge gizem - EGILMEZ, Ferhan. "Polimer Yapılı CAD/CAM Materyallerin Optik Özellikleri". Selcuk Dental Journal 8/2 (2021), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.676441
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 22:49

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları