Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 346 - 355 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262 İndeks Tarihi: 09-06-2022

Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation

Öz:
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors affecting psychosocial outcomes of living liver donors after liver transplantations. Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of living liver donors followed by 2 liver transplantation centers in 2 private hospitals in 2 different provinces, between August 2017 and October 2019. All the living liver donors were contacted without a time frame after donation and all the participants were evaluated once. The Beck Depression Scale, SF-36, General Self- Efficacy Scale, and Perceived Available Support Scale were used to collect data. The t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and Pearson correlation analysis were used for data analysis. Results: The mean age of the patients was 34.31 ± 8.22 years. There was a positive, weak correlation between age and physical func- tion. Gender, marital status, financial status, and education levels significantly affected physical components, social function, vitality, depression, and self-efficacy scores. High depression levels negatively affected the physical component, self-efficacy, and social sup- port scores of the living liver donors. High self-efficacy positively affected social support. Conclusion: The study revealed that gender, marital status, employment status, and education levels were associated with psychosocial outcomes. The financial status was the main factor affecting each psychosocial variable. Financial status needs to be assessed in detail before and after the operation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Newsletter Transplant. International figures on donation and transplantation, EDQM. 2018. Available at: https://www.europarl. europa.eu/EPRS/Newsletter_Transplant_2019.pdf Accessed: Janu- ary 2022.
  • 2. The Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism. International summit on transplant tourism and organ traf- ficking. Transplantation. 2008;86(8):1013-1018. [CrossRef]
  • 3. IRODaT. International registry on organ donation and transplan- tation−2019. 2019. Available at: https://www.irodat.org, Accessed May 2020.
  • 4. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Proce- dures to collect post-donation follow-up data from living donors. 2019. Available at: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/professionals/ by-topic/guidance/procedures-to-collect-post-donation-follow- up-data-from-living-donors/ Accessed: January 2022., Accessed March 2020.
  • 5. The European Parliament, The Council of the European Union. Directive 2010/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 7 July 2010 on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation. 2010. Available at: https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32010L0053 Accessed: January 2022.
  • 6. Sixty-Third World Assembly, World Health Organization. WHO guiding principles on human cell, tissue and organ transplantation. Cell Tissue Bank. 2010;11(4):413-419. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Dew MA, Butt Z, Humar A, DiMartini AF. Long-term medical and psychosocial outcomes in living liver donors. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(4):880-892. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Manyalich M, Ricart A, Martínez I, et al. EULID project: European living donation and public health. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(6):2021- 2024. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Lennerling A, Lovén C, Dor FJMF, et al. Living organ donation prac- tices in Europe - results from an online survey. Transpl Int. 2013;26(2):145-153. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Manyalich M, Menjívar A, Yucetin L, et al. Living donor psychoso- cial assessment/follow-up practices in the partners’ countries of the ELIPSY project. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(7):2246-2249. [CrossRef]
  • 11. LIDOBS. Living Donor Knowledge Community: experience, research and consensus-LIDOBS. 2017. Brussels, Belgium: The Euro- pean Commission. Available at: http://www.eulivingdonor.eu/lidobs/, Accessed May 17, 2020.
  • 12. Chadran B, Bharathan VK, Mathew JS, et al. Quality of life of donors following donor hepatectomy. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017;36(2):92-98.
  • 13. Dew MA, DiMartini AF, Ladner DP, et al. Psychosocial outcomes 3 to 10 years after donation in the adult to adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study. Transplantation. 2016;100(6):1257- 1269. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Humphreville VR, Radosevich DM, Humar A, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life after living liver donation. Liver Transpl. 2016;22(1):53-62. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Gill P, Lowes L. Gift exchange and organ donation: donor and recipient experiences of live related kidney transplantation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(11):1607-1617. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Thys K, Schwering KL, Siebelink M, et al. Psychosocial impact of pediatric living-donor kidney and liver transplantation on recipients, donors, and the family: A systematic review. Transpl Int. 2015;28(3):270-280. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Ladner DP, Dew MA, Forney S, et al. Long-term quality of life after liver donation in the adult toadult living donor liver transplantation cohort study (A2ALL). J Hepatol. 2015;62(2):346-353. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psy- chol Rev. 1988;8(1):77-100. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Hisli N. Reliability and validity of Beck Depression Inventory in university students. Turk J Psychiatry. 1989;7:3-13.
  • 20. Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epi- demiol. 1998;51(11):903-912. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form-36 (SF-36): a study in a group of patients with rheumatic diseases [in Turkish]. İlaç Tedavi Derg. 1999;12:102-106.
  • 22. Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psy- chol Rep. 1982;51(2):663-671. [CrossRef]
  • 23. YıldırımF, İlhan Ö. The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the general self-efficacy scale. J Turk Psychiatry. 2010:1-8. PMID 21125505
  • 24. Schulz U, Schwarzer R. Soziale Unterstützung bei der krankheits- bewältigung: die Berliner social support Skalen (BSSS) [Social sup- port in coping with illness: the Berlin social support scales, (BSSS)]. Diagnostica. 2003;49(2):73-82. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Kapıkıran Ş, Acun-Kapıkıran N. Adaptation of perceived support- ive support scale to Turkish: validity and reliability study. Journal of Faculty of Health. Scientific University of Ankara. 2010;3(2):51-73.
  • 26. Hesimov I, Kirimker EO, Duman B, et al. Health-related quality of life of liver donors: a prospective longitudinal study. Transplant Proc. 2018;50(10):3076-3081. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Janik MK, Księżopolska A, Kostrzewa K, et al. Long-term health- related quality of life in living liver donors. Ann Transplant. 2019;24:45-51. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Morooka Y, Umeshita K, Taketomi A, et al. Long-term donor qual- ity of life after living donor liver transplantation in Japan. Clin Trans- plant. 2019;33(6):e13584. [CrossRef]
  • 29. El-Meteini M, Shorub E, Mahmoud DAM, Elkholy H, El-Missiry A, Hashim R. Psychosocial profile and psychiatric morbidity among Egyptian patients after living donor liver transplantation. Middle East Curr Psychiatry. 2019;26(1):1-8. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Dew MA, Butt ZB, Liu Q, et al. Prevalence and predictors of patient-reported long-term mental and physical health after dona- tion in the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study. Transplantation. 2018;102(1):105-118. [CrossRef]
  • 31. Krause S, Pritlove C, Abbey S, Jung J. Growth through adversity: posttraumatic growth in anonymous living liver donors. Disabil Rehabil. 2020:1-5. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Duerinckx N, Timmerman L, Van Gogh J, et al. Predonation psy- chosocial evaluation of living kidney and liver donor candidates: a systematic literature review. Transpl Int. 2014;27(1):2-18. [CrossRef]
  • 33. DiMartini A, Dew MA, Liu Q, et al. Social and financial outcomes of living liver donation: a prospective investigation within the adult- to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study 2 (A2ALL-2). Am J Transplant. 2017;17(4):1081-1096. [CrossRef]
  • 34. Duman B, Herdi O, Sayar-Akaslan D, et al. Live Donor Assess- ment Tool (LDAT): a Turkish validity and reliability study. Turk J Gas- troenterol. 2020;31(12):917-922. [CrossRef]
APA ORDİN Y, HARMANCI SEREN A, karayurt o, KUL G, kılıç m, BOZOKLAR C, Tokat Y (2022). Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. , 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
Chicago ORDİN YAPRAK SARIGÖL,HARMANCI SEREN Arzu Kader,karayurt ozgul,KUL Gülay Aksu,kılıç murat,BOZOKLAR Cemal Ata,Tokat Yaman Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. (2022): 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
MLA ORDİN YAPRAK SARIGÖL,HARMANCI SEREN Arzu Kader,karayurt ozgul,KUL Gülay Aksu,kılıç murat,BOZOKLAR Cemal Ata,Tokat Yaman Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. , 2022, ss.346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
AMA ORDİN Y,HARMANCI SEREN A,karayurt o,KUL G,kılıç m,BOZOKLAR C,Tokat Y Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. . 2022; 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
Vancouver ORDİN Y,HARMANCI SEREN A,karayurt o,KUL G,kılıç m,BOZOKLAR C,Tokat Y Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. . 2022; 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
IEEE ORDİN Y,HARMANCI SEREN A,karayurt o,KUL G,kılıç m,BOZOKLAR C,Tokat Y "Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation." , ss.346 - 355, 2022. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
ISNAD ORDİN, YAPRAK SARIGÖL vd. "Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation". (2022), 346-355. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
APA ORDİN Y, HARMANCI SEREN A, karayurt o, KUL G, kılıç m, BOZOKLAR C, Tokat Y (2022). Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 33(4), 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
Chicago ORDİN YAPRAK SARIGÖL,HARMANCI SEREN Arzu Kader,karayurt ozgul,KUL Gülay Aksu,kılıç murat,BOZOKLAR Cemal Ata,Tokat Yaman Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 33, no.4 (2022): 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
MLA ORDİN YAPRAK SARIGÖL,HARMANCI SEREN Arzu Kader,karayurt ozgul,KUL Gülay Aksu,kılıç murat,BOZOKLAR Cemal Ata,Tokat Yaman Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, vol.33, no.4, 2022, ss.346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
AMA ORDİN Y,HARMANCI SEREN A,karayurt o,KUL G,kılıç m,BOZOKLAR C,Tokat Y Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 33(4): 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
Vancouver ORDİN Y,HARMANCI SEREN A,karayurt o,KUL G,kılıç m,BOZOKLAR C,Tokat Y Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 33(4): 346 - 355. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
IEEE ORDİN Y,HARMANCI SEREN A,karayurt o,KUL G,kılıç m,BOZOKLAR C,Tokat Y "Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation." Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 33, ss.346 - 355, 2022. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21262
ISNAD ORDİN, YAPRAK SARIGÖL vd. "Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation". Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 33/4 (2022), 346-355. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2022.21262