Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file
system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris
via using it with different reciprocal angles

Kaya, Sadullah; ADIGÜZEL, Özkan; Çelik, Nezif

doi:10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10

Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles

Nezif ÇELİK, (Harran Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)

Sadullah KAYA, (Dicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Diyarbakır, Türkiye)

Özkan ADIGÜZEL (Dicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Diyarbakır, Türkiye)

International Dental Research

1 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: Supplement 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 63 - 66 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10 İndeks Tarihi: 10-06-2022

Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles

Öz:

Aim: To compare the amount of apically extruded debris using Reciproc (R25) file with different reciprocal angles. Methodology: In this research, 60 extracted mandibular premolars with a single root, a single canal, and a single apical foramen were used. Specimens, the working length of which was determined by a stainless steel 10-K file, were randomly distributed into three experimental groups (n = 20) as follows: Group 1 150° counterclockwise (CCW)-30° clockwise (CW); Group 2 180° CCW-60° CW; and Group 3 210° CCW-90° CW. For the irrigation, 10 mL of distilled water was administered via a syringe pump. The extruded debris was collected into Eppendorf tubes tared in advance. The distribution of data was analyzed using a Shapiro-Wilk test. A KruskalWallis H test was used for statistical analysis. The null hypothesis is no significant difference between the groups in terms of the amount of apical extrusion of debris. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to amount of apical extrusion of debris (p>0.05). Nevertheless, the highest average amount of extrusion of debris was detected in group 1 and the lowest in group 3. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, different reciprocal angles during chemomechanical preparation have no significant effect on the amount of apical extrusion of debris.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J. Endod 2012;38(6):850-852. (Crossref)
2. Kustarci A, Akdemir N, Siso SH, Altunbas D. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris using two engine driven and step-back instrumentation techniques: an in-vitro study. Eur. J. Dent. 2008;2(04):233-239. (Crossref)
3. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J. Endod 2004;30(7):476-481. (Crossref)
4. Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, et al. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J. Endod 2002;28(6):457-460. (Crossref)
5. Shen Y, Zhou H-m, Zheng Y-f, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J. Endod 2013;39(2):163-172. (Crossref)
6. Kirchhoff AL, Fariniuk LF, Mello I. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. J. Endod 2015;41(2):237-241. (Crossref)
7. Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single‐file systems: R eciproc, F360 and One Shape versus M two. Int. Endod. J. 2014;47(5):405-409.
8. Yared G, Alasmar Ramli G. Single file reciprocation: A literature review. Endodontic Practice Today 2013;7(3).
9. Yared G. Canal preparation using one reciprocating instrument without prior hand filing: A new concept. Int Dent SA 2011;2:78-87.
10. Koçak S, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Türker SA, Sağsen B, Er Ö. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J. Endod 2013;39(10):1278-1280. (Crossref)
11. De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, Mendonça TA, Lourenço C, Calixto C, et al. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system. Clin Oral Invest 2015;19(2):357-361. (Crossref)
12. Arslan H, Doğanay E, Alsancak M, Çapar I, Karataş E, Gündüz H. Comparison of apically extruded debris after root canal instrumentation using Reciproc® instruments with various kinematics. Int. Endod. J. 2016;49(3):307-310. (Crossref)
13. Chapman C. The correlation between apical infection and instrumentation in endodontics. Int. Endod. J. 1971;5(4):76-80.
14. Druttman A, Stock C. An in vitro comparison of ultrasonic and conventional methods of irrigant replacement. Int. Endod. J. 1989;22(4):174-178. (Crossref)
15. VandeVisse JE, Brilliant JD. Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. J. Endod. 1975;1(7):243-246. (Crossref)
16. Lambrianidis T, Tosounidou E, Tzoanopoulou M. The effect of maintaining apical patency on periapical extrusion. J. Endod 2001;27(11):696-698. (Crossref)
17. Madhusudhana K, Mathew VB, Reddy NM. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems–An in vitro study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2010;1(4):234.
18. Hinrichs RE, Walker III WA, Schindler WG. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. J. Endod 1998;24(2):102- 106. (Crossref)
19. Leonardi LE, Atlas DM, Raiden G. Apical extrusion of debris by manual and mechanical instrumentation. Braz. Dent. J. 2007;18(1):16-19. (Crossref)

APA	Çelik N, Kaya S, ADIGÜZEL Ö (2021). Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. , 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
Chicago	Çelik Nezif,Kaya Sadullah,ADIGÜZEL Özkan Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. (2021): 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
MLA	Çelik Nezif,Kaya Sadullah,ADIGÜZEL Özkan Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. , 2021, ss.63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
AMA	Çelik N,Kaya S,ADIGÜZEL Ö Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. . 2021; 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
Vancouver	Çelik N,Kaya S,ADIGÜZEL Ö Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. . 2021; 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
IEEE	Çelik N,Kaya S,ADIGÜZEL Ö "Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles." , ss.63 - 66, 2021. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
ISNAD	Çelik, Nezif vd. "Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles". (2021), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10

APA	Çelik N, Kaya S, ADIGÜZEL Ö (2021). Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. International Dental Research, 11(Supplement 1), 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
Chicago	Çelik Nezif,Kaya Sadullah,ADIGÜZEL Özkan Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. International Dental Research 11, no.Supplement 1 (2021): 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
MLA	Çelik Nezif,Kaya Sadullah,ADIGÜZEL Özkan Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. International Dental Research, vol.11, no.Supplement 1, 2021, ss.63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
AMA	Çelik N,Kaya S,ADIGÜZEL Ö Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(Supplement 1): 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
Vancouver	Çelik N,Kaya S,ADIGÜZEL Ö Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(Supplement 1): 63 - 66. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
IEEE	Çelik N,Kaya S,ADIGÜZEL Ö "Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles." International Dental Research, 11, ss.63 - 66, 2021. 10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10
ISNAD	Çelik, Nezif vd. "Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles". International Dental Research 11/Supplement 1 (2021), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10