Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty
for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study

DURGUT, Fatih; Aydin, Bahattin Kerem; Çiftci, Sadettin; Sahin, Erdem

doi:10.55730/1300-0144.5334

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study

Fatih DURGUT, (Dicle Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Diyarbakır, Türkiye)

Erdem ŞAHİN, (Erzurum Bölge Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Sadettin ÇİFTÇİ, (Selçuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)

Bahattin Kerem AYDIN (Selçuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

8 1

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 52 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 463 - 466 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5334 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2022

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study

Öz:

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative complications and overall survival of patients who underwent proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and patients who underwent cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty (CCRH) for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged 75 years and older. Materials and methods: A total of 94 patients who underwent PFNA or CCRH between 2010 and 2012 because of femur fracture (A2.2 and A2.3 according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification) were analyzed retrospectively. Hospitalization times, blood transfusion needs, reoperation rates, and overall survival were compared. Results: Forty-eight patients in the PFNA group and 46 patients in the CCRH group were included for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospitalization times, blood transfusion needs, reoperation rates, and survival rates. Conclusions: Both PFNA and CCRH techniques can be used for surgical treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Miyamoto RG, Kaplan KM, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2008;16(10):596- 607. doi:10.5435/00124635-200810000-00005
2. Zuckerman JD. Hip fracture. The New England journal of medicine 1996;334(23):1519-1525. doi:10.1056/NEJM199606063342307
3. Lindskog DM, Baumgaertner MR. Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2004;12(3):179-190. doi:10.5435/00124635-200405000-00006
4. Kang SY, Lee EW, Kang KS, Lee S, Park YU et al. Mode of fixation failures of dynamic hip screw with TSP in the treatment of unstable proximal femur fracture: biomechanical analysis and a report of 3 cases. Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Surgeon 2006;41(1):176- 80. doi:10.4055/JKOA.2006.41.1.176
5. Setiobudi T, Ng YH, Lim CT, Liang S, Lee K, Das DS. Clinical outcome following treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2011;40:482–7. doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V40N11p482
6. Li J, Chen JK, Zhou K, Shen B, Ni XM, Chen L. Application of dynamic hip screw with modified reamer in intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology 2011; 24:362–5. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1003-0034.2011.05.002
7. Kaplan K, Miyamoto R, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2008;16(11):665-673. doi:10.5435/00124635-200811000-00007
8. Görmeli G, Korkmaz MF, Görmeli CA, Adanaş C, Karataş T, Şimşek SA. Comparison of femur intertrochanteric fracture fixation with hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail systems. Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery 2015; 21(6):503-508. doi:10.5505/tjtes.2015.96166
9. Yang YH, Wang YR, Jiang SD, Jiang LS. Proximal femoral nail antirotation and third-generation Gamma nail: which is a better device for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures?. Singapore medical journal 2013;54(8):446-450. doi:10.11622/smedj.2013152
10. Chan KC, Gill GS. Cemented hemiarthroplasties for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2000;(371):206-215. doi:10.1097/00003086-200002000-00025
11. Tronzo RG. The use of an endoprosthesis for severely comminuted trochanteric fractures. The Orthopedic clinics of North America 1974; 5(4):679-81.
12. Kumar P, Rajnish RK, Sharma S, Dhillon MS. Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International orthopaedics 2020;44(4):623-633. doi:10.1007/s00264-019-04351-9
13. Pietak S, Holmes J, Matthews R, Petrasek A, Porter B. Cardiovascular collapse after femoral prosthesis surgery for acute hip fracture. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d’anesthesie 1997; 44(2):198-201. doi:10.1007/ BF03013009
14. Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ, Kenny NW. Bone cement implantation syndrome. British journal of anaesthesia 2009;102(1):12-22. doi:10.1093/bja/aen328. doi:10.1093/bja/ aen328

APA	DURGUT F, Sahin E, Çiftci S, Aydin B (2022). Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. , 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
Chicago	DURGUT Fatih,Sahin Erdem,Çiftci Sadettin,Aydin Bahattin Kerem Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. (2022): 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
MLA	DURGUT Fatih,Sahin Erdem,Çiftci Sadettin,Aydin Bahattin Kerem Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. , 2022, ss.463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
AMA	DURGUT F,Sahin E,Çiftci S,Aydin B Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. . 2022; 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
Vancouver	DURGUT F,Sahin E,Çiftci S,Aydin B Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. . 2022; 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
IEEE	DURGUT F,Sahin E,Çiftci S,Aydin B "Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study." , ss.463 - 466, 2022. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
ISNAD	DURGUT, Fatih vd. "Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study". (2022), 463-466. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5334

APA	DURGUT F, Sahin E, Çiftci S, Aydin B (2022). Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 52(2), 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
Chicago	DURGUT Fatih,Sahin Erdem,Çiftci Sadettin,Aydin Bahattin Kerem Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 52, no.2 (2022): 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
MLA	DURGUT Fatih,Sahin Erdem,Çiftci Sadettin,Aydin Bahattin Kerem Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.52, no.2, 2022, ss.463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
AMA	DURGUT F,Sahin E,Çiftci S,Aydin B Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022; 52(2): 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
Vancouver	DURGUT F,Sahin E,Çiftci S,Aydin B Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022; 52(2): 463 - 466. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
IEEE	DURGUT F,Sahin E,Çiftci S,Aydin B "Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 52, ss.463 - 466, 2022. 10.55730/1300-0144.5334
ISNAD	DURGUT, Fatih vd. "Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 52/2 (2022), 463-466. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5334