Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 2 - 15 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/jems.2021.56689 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2022

Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping

Öz:
The vital role of container liner shipping in international trade suggests that understanding why container liner firms go bankrupt is crucial to the sustainability of the maritime supply chain to improve resilience. Considering the insolvency of Hanjin Shipping as a case study, this paper investigates the probabilistic relationships among the bankruptcy causal factors that are disclosed qualitatively and quantitatively, exploiting a fuzzy Bayes network approach. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to increase the accuracy of the findings. Outcomes of the paper reveal that an integrated approach comprising of both endogenous and exogenous causal factors is a more powerful approach to explain the demise of Hanjin Shipping. Compared to exogenous factors, endogenous factors account more for the collapse of the firm. Furthermore, it is found that government support would have been a more influential measure to mitigate the negative effects of the demise compared to the merging and acquisition practice. Competitor liner operators, policymakers, and stakeholders in the maritime supply chain ecosystem can utilize the outcomes of this research to mitigate the bankruptcy risk and improve the maritime supply chain resilience capacity.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] A. Ergin, and M. F. Ergin. “The role of antifouling coating in the marine industry.” Research & Reviews in Engineering, 53.
  • [2] Review of Maritime Transport, 2020.
  • [3] Review of Maritime Transport, 2021.
  • [4] Z. Li and B. Dong. “A Game Theory Analysis of China’s Maritime Cross-Border Insolvency Policy: From the Perspective of Hanjin Shipping’s Bankruptcy Case.” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 48, pp. 419-31, Jun 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/030888 39.2020.1779366.
  • [5] “Hanjin: Final Curtain Falls On Shipping Saga”. 2021. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38953144.
  • [6] “Global Trade Review”. Nov/Dec 2016. https://fhr. rapidratings.com/hubfs/Global%20Trade%20Review. pdf?t=1481914337944.
  • [7] J. Sheppard, and S. D. Chowdhury. “Riding the wrong wave: organizational failure as a failed turnaround.” Long Range Planning, vol. 38, pp. 239-60, June 2005.
  • [8] H. Ooghe, and S. D. Prijcker. “Failure processes and causes of company bankruptcy: a typology.” Management Decision, vol. 46 pp. 223-42, March 2008.
  • [9] M. Eling, and R. Jia. “Business failure, efficiency, and volatility: evidence from the European insurance industry” International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 59, pp. 58-76, Oct 2018.
  • [10] Y. Shi, and X. Li. “An overview of bankruptcy prediction models for corporate firms: a systematic literature review.” Intangible Capital, vol. 15, pp. 114-27, Oct 2019.
  • [11] J. Amankwah-Amoah, R. E. Hinson, B. Honyenuga, and Y. Lu. “Accounting for the transitions after entrepreneurial business failure: an emerging market perspective” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 50 pp. 148-58, Sep 2019.
  • [12] C. Th. Grammenos, N. K. Nomikos, and N. C. Papapostolou. “Estimating the probability of default for shipping high yield bond issues.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 44, pp. 1123-38, Nov 2008.
  • [13] R. Adland, and H. Jia. “Charter market default risk: a conceptual approach” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics And Transportation Review, vol. 44, pp. 152-63, Jan 2008.
  • [14] H. Yeo, “Solvency and liquidity in shipping companies.” Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 32, pp. 235-41, Dec 2016.
  • [15] J. Haider, Z. Ou, and S. Pettit. “Predicting corporate failure for listed shipping companies.” Maritime Economics and Logistics, vol. 21 pp. 415-38, Feb 2018.
  • [16] J. Pauli and M. Wolf. 2017. “Hanjin Shipping : Slow-Steaming into Bankruptcy Causes and Effects.” https://gupea.ub.gu.se/ bitstream/2077/52799/1/gupea_2077_52799_1.pdf.
  • [17] S. Dong-Wook, S. Young Joon, and K. Dong-Wook. “Learning from Hanjin Shipping’s failure: A holistic interpretation on its causes and reasons.” Transport Policy, vol. 82 pp. 77-87, Oct 2019.
  • [18] S.H. Shin, P. Tae-Woo Lee, and S.W. Lee. “Lessons from bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping Company in chartering.” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 46, pp. 136-55, Feb 2019.
  • [19] N. Kalyan, and A. Sridhar. “A predictive system for detection of bankruptcy using machine learning techniques.” International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process vol. 5, pp. 29-40, Feb 2015.
  • [20] M. Aydin, S. S. Arici, E. Akyuz, and O. Arslan, “A probabilistic risk assessment for asphyxiation during gas inerting process in chemical tanker ship.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 155. pp. 532-542, Nov 2021.
  • [21] E. Cakir, C. Sevgili, and R. Fiskin, “An analysis of severity of oil spill caused by vessel accidents.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 90, pp. 102662, Jan 2021.
  • [22] B. Kamal, “The use of fuzzy-bayes approach on the causal factors of empty container repositioning.” Marine Technology Society Journal, vol. 55, pp. 20-38, Sep/Oct 2021.
  • [23] M. Aydin, E. Akyuz, O. Turan, and O. Arslan, “Validation of risk analysis for ship collision in narrow waters by using fuzzy Bayesian networks approach.” Ocean Engineering, vol. 231, pp. 108973, July 2021.
  • [24] S. Pristrom, Z. Yang, J. Wang, and X. Yan. “A novel flexible model for piracy and robbery assessment of merchant ship operations.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety vol. 155, pp. 196-211, Nov 2016.
  • [25] P. Weber, G. Medina-Oliva, C. Simon, and B. Iung. “Overview on Bayesian Networks Applications for Dependability, Risk Analysis and Maintenance Areas.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 25, pp. 671-82, June 2012.
  • [26] S. Mahadevan, R. Zhang, and N. Smith. “Bayesian Networks for System Reliability Reassessment.” Structural Safety, vol. 23, pp. 231-51, Sep 2001.
  • [27] E. Zarei, M. Yazdi, R. Abbassi, and F. Khan. “A hybrid model for human factor analysis in process accidents: FBN-HFACS.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 57, pp. 142-55, Jan 2019.
  • [28] L.A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control vol. 8, pp. 338- 53, June 1965.
  • [29] H-M. Hsu, and C-T. Chen. “Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, pp. 279- 85, May 1996.
  • [30] M. Aydin, G. Camliyurt, E. Akyuz, and O. Arslan, “Analyzing human error contributions to maritime environmental risk in oil/ chemical tanker ship.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 27, pp. 1-22, May 2021.
  • [31] S. Rajakarunakaran, A.M. Kumar, and V.A. Prabhu. “Applications of Fuzzy Faulty Tree Analysis and Expert Elicitation for Evaluation of Risks in LPG Refuelling Station.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 33, pp. 109-23, Jan 2015.
  • [32] B. Kamal, G. Kara, and O. Okşaş, “An Application Of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process To Overcapacity Absorbing Methods In Container Shipping.” International Journal of Maritime Engineering, vol. 162, pp. 331-44, 2020.
  • [33] Y. E. Senol, and F. Yasli, “A risk analysis study for chemical cargo tank cleaning process using Fuzzy Bayesian Network.” Ocean Engineering, vol. 235, pp. 109360, June 2021.
  • [34] B. Kamal, and Ş. Kutay, “Assessment of causal mechanism of ship bunkering oil pollution.” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 215, pp. 105939, Dec 2021.
  • [35] S. Sarıalioğlu, Ö. Uğurlu, M. Aydın, B. Vardar, and J. Wang. “A hybrid model for human-factor analysis of engine-room fires on ships: HFACS-PV&FFTA.” Ocean Engineering, vol. 217, pp. 107992, Dec 2020.
  • [36] W-J. Wang, “New Similarity Measures on Fuzzy Sets and on Elements.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 85 pp. 305-9, Feb 1997.
  • [37] C. Şakar, and Y. Zorba. “A Study on Safety and Risk Assessment of Dangerous Cargo Operations in Oil/Chemical Tankers.” Journal of ETA Maritime Science, vol. 5 pp. 396-413, Dec 2017.
  • [38] Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research. Reprint, London: Sage Publication, 2014.
  • [39] K.M. Eisenhardt, “Building theories from case study research” Academy Of Management Review, vol. 14, pp. 532-550, Oct 1989.
  • [40] K. Mellahi, and A. Wilkinson, “Organizational failure: a critique of recent research and a proposed integrative framework.” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 5, pp. 21-41, Apr 2004.
  • [41] O. Lukason, Characteristics of firm failure processes in an international context (Doctoral dissertation), 2016.
  • [42] “Analysis On Hanjin Group And Main Credit Issues”. 2015. https://www.nicerating.com/common/fileDown.do? docId=1LOmbiLBYkv.
  • [43] M. Wackett, “Revealed: who’s owed the most out of thousands of hanjin creditors - the loadstar”. The Loadstar, 2016. https:// theloadstar.com/revealed-largest-thousands-hanjin-creditors/.
  • [44] P.M. Panayides, and R. Wiedmer. “Strategic Alliances in Container Liner Shipping.” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 32, pp. 25-38, 2011.
  • [45] “UNCTAD”. 2017. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ rmt2017_en.pdf.
  • [46] “BRS Annual Review 2017”. BRS Group. https://www. brsbrokers.com/flipbook_en2017/files/downloads/BRSANNUAL- REVIEW-2017_EN.pdf.
  • [47] T-W. Lee, “Restructuring of the economy and its impacts on the Korean maritime industry.” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 26, pp. 311-25, 1999.
  • [48] H.A. Thanopoulou, D-K. Ryoo, and T-W. Lee. “Korean liner shipping in the era of global alliances.” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 26 pp. 209-29, 1999.
  • [49] L. Jensen, “Maritime-News: Debate Over State Aid For Container Shipping Flares Anew”. Joc.Com., 2020. https:// www.joc.com/maritime-news/state-aid-inseparable-containershipping_ 20200528.html.
  • [50] J. Lee, “Hanjin Lost ‘Game Of Chicken’ Among Global Shippers, Chairman Says”. U.S., 2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/ usJhanjinJshippingJdebtJidUSKCN1240JC?il=0#.
  • [51] G. Alexandrou, D. Gounopoulos, and H. M. Thomas, “Mergers and acquisitions in shipping.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 61, pp. 212-234, Jan 2014.
  • [52] C. Tan, “The Economic Effects Of Huge Shipping Company - Hanjin Group’S Bankruptcies: Case Study On Hanjin Shipping Group (South Korea) Bankruptcy.” Master Thesis. University of South- Eastern Norway, 2018.
  • [53] “UNCTAD”. 2018. https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/ presspb2018d6_en.pdf.
  • [54] D. Braden, “Shipper Exposure To Hanjin Collapse Goes Far Beyond CKYHE, Report Shows”. The Journal of Commerce online. Sep 2016. https://www.joc.com/maritime-news/ container-lines/shipper-exposure-hanjin-collapse-goes-farbeyond- ckyhe-report-shows_20160914.html.
  • [55] B. G. Marcot, “Metrics for Evaluating Performance and Uncertainty of Bayesian Network Models.” Ecological Modelling, vol. 230, pp. 50-62, Apr 2012.
  • [56] R. Carter, and V. A. Howard, “Small Firm Bankruptcy.” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 44 pp. 493-512, Sep 2006.
  • [57] J. Ropega, “The Reasons and Symptoms of Failure in SME.” International Advances in Economic Research vol. 17 pp. 476-83, July 2011.
  • [58] O. Lukason, and C. H. Richard, “Section 2. Management in Firms and Organizations: Firm Failure Causes: A Population Level
  • Study.” Problems and Perspectives in Management vol. 13, pp. 45- 55, March 2015.
  • [59] G. Hall, “Reasons for Insolvency amongst Small Firms - A Review and Fresh Evidence.” Small Business Economics, vol. 4 pp. 237- 50, Sep 1992.
  • [60] L. R. Gaskill, H. E. Van Auken, R. A. Manning. “A factor analytic study of the perceived causes of small business failure” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 31, pp. 18-31, Oct 1993.
  • [61] D. Arditi, A. Koksal, and S. Kale. “Business Failures In The Construction Industry.” Engineering Construction And Architectural Management, vol. 7, pp. 120-132, Feb 2000.
  • [62] J. Baldwin et al. 1997. "Failing concerns: business bankruptcy in Canada”. Analytical Studies Branch, Statistics Canada.
APA AYDIN M, kamal b (2022). Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. , 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
Chicago AYDIN MUHAMMET,kamal bünyamin Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. (2022): 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
MLA AYDIN MUHAMMET,kamal bünyamin Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. , 2022, ss.2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
AMA AYDIN M,kamal b Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. . 2022; 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
Vancouver AYDIN M,kamal b Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. . 2022; 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
IEEE AYDIN M,kamal b "Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping." , ss.2 - 15, 2022. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
ISNAD AYDIN, MUHAMMET - kamal, bünyamin. "Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping". (2022), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.56689
APA AYDIN M, kamal b (2022). Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 10(1), 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
Chicago AYDIN MUHAMMET,kamal bünyamin Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 10, no.1 (2022): 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
MLA AYDIN MUHAMMET,kamal bünyamin Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.10, no.1, 2022, ss.2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
AMA AYDIN M,kamal b Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2022; 10(1): 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
Vancouver AYDIN M,kamal b Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2022; 10(1): 2 - 15. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
IEEE AYDIN M,kamal b "Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 10, ss.2 - 15, 2022. 10.4274/jems.2021.56689
ISNAD AYDIN, MUHAMMET - kamal, bünyamin. "Fuzzy-Bayesian Approach on the Bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 10/1 (2022), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.56689