Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 26 - 31 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2022

Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas

Öz:
Objective: Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma. Evidence suggests that the relationship between the tumor and inflammatory cells is important in tumor progression and the treatment response. We evaluated the stromal lymphoid response in micropapillary urothelial carcinomas and compared it with conventional urothelial carcinomas. Material and Method: Among bladder transurethral resection materials diagnosed as ‘invasive urothelial carcinoma’ between January 2010-March 2017, cases with at least 5% micropapillary urothelial carcinoma were evaluated for age, gender, grade, stage, micropapillary urothelial carcinoma percentage, presence/percentage of accompanying conventional urothelial carcinoma/urothelial carcinoma variants, in situ urothelial carcinoma/micropapillary urothelial carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, necrosis, and stromal lymphoid response. Stromal lymphoid response was scored as 0-1-2-3. All parameters were evaluated in 50 pure conventional urothelial carcinomas. Results: Among 47 micropapillary urothelial carcinomas, 41 were male. The mean age was 69 years. pT1/pT2 was 23/24. Six cases were pure MPUC. Lymphovascular invasion was present in 8, necrosis in 9 cases. Stromal lymphoid response was present and scored as 1-2-3 in 32 micropapillary urothelial carcinomas (68.1%) and 48 conventional urothelial carcinomas (96%). Micropapillary urothelial carcinomas had significantly higher lymphovascular invasion and pT2 rates and lower stromal lymphoid response. Conclusion: Low stromal lymphoid response in micropapillary urothelial carcinomas can be responsible for the poor clinical outcome and impaired response to treatment of these tumors. This is the first study in the English literature to demonstrate a lower stromal lymphoid response rate in micropapillary urothelial carcinomas compared to conventional urothelial carcinomas.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter V. WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2016.
  • 2. Amin MB, Ro JY, el-Sharkawy T, Lee KM, Troncoso P, Silva EG, Ordóñez NG, Ayala AG. Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18:1224-32.
  • 3. Alvarado-Cabrero I, Sierra-Santiesteban FI, Mantilla-Morales A, Hernandez-Hernandez DM. Micropapillary carcinoma of the urothelial tract. A clinicopathologic study of 38 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2005;9:1-5.
  • 4. Alkibay T, Sozen S, Gurocak S, Isik Gonul I, Poyraz A, Ure I. Micropapillary pattern in urothelial carcinoma: A clinicopathological analysis. Urol Int. 2009;83:300-5.
  • 5. Kamat AM, Gee JR, Dinney CP, Grossman HB, Swanson DA, Millikan RE, Detry MA, Robinson TL, Pisters LL. The case for early cystectomy in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive micropapillary bladder carcinoma. J Urol. 2006;175:881-5.
  • 6. Siriaunkgul S, Tavassoli FA. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Mod Pathol. 1993;6:660-2.
  • 7. Johansson SL, Borghede G, Holmang S. Micropapillary bladder carcinoma: A clinicopathological study of 20 cases. J Urol. 1999;161:1798-802.
  • 8. Heudel P, El Karak F, Ismaili N, Droz JP, Flechon A. Micropapillary bladder cancer: A review of Leon Berard Cancer Center experience. BMC Urol. 2009;9:5.
  • 9. Comperat E, Roupret M, Conort P, Chartier-Kastler E, Bitker MO, Richard F, Capron F, Haertig A, Cussenot O, Camparo P. Aurora-A/STK-15 is differentially expressed in the micropapillary variant of bladder cancer. Urol Int. 2009;82:312-7.
  • 10. Huang HS, Su HY, Li PH, Chiang PH, Huang CH, Chen CH, Hsieh MC. Prognostic impact of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes on patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving platinum based chemotherapy. Sci Rep. 2018;8:7485.
  • 11. de Visser KE, Eichten A, Coussens LM. Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:24-37.
  • 12. Adams S, Gray RJ, Demaria S, Goldstein L, Perez EA, Shulman LN, Martino S, Wang M, Jones VE, Saphner TJ, Wolff AC, Wood WC, Davidson NE, Sledge GW, Sparano JA, Badve SS. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers from two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2959- 66.
  • 13. Bremnes RM, Busund LT, Kilvaer TL, Andersen S, Richardsen E, Paulsen EE, Hald S, Khanehkenari MR, Cooper WA, Kao SC, Dønnem T. The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in development, progression, and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:789-800.
  • 14. Webb JR, Milne K, Watson P, Deleeuw RJ, Nelson BH. Tumorinfiltrating lymphocytes expressing the tissue resident memory marker CD103 are associated with increased survival in highgrade serous ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:434-44.
  • 15. Topalian SL, Taube JM, Anders RA, Pardoll DM. Mechanismdriven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:275-87.
  • 16. Kwon GY, Ro JY. Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma. Adv Urol. 2011;2011:217153.
  • 17. Samaratunga H, Khoo K. Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder; A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology. 2004;45:55-64.
  • 18. Klintrup K, Makinen JM, Kauppila S, Vare PO, Melkko J, Tuominen H, Tuppurainen K, Mäkelä J, Karttunen TJ, Mäkinen MJ. Inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2645-54.
  • 19. Watts KE, Hansel DE. Emerging concepts in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol. 2010;17:182-6.
  • 20. Avramoiu I, Petrescu IO, Ciurea ME, Bold A, Silosi I, tanTu MM, Niculescu M, Savciu REA, Mogoantă SŞ. Peritumoral inflammatory reaction in non-melanoma skin cancers - histological and immunohistochemical study. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2016;57:943-50.
  • 21. Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: Functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:309-22.
  • 22. Nesi G, Nobili S, Cai T, Caini S, Santi R. Chronic inflammation in urothelial bladder cancer. Virchows Arch. 2015;467:623-33.
  • 23. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883-99.
  • 24. Cai T, Nesi G, Boddi V, Mazzoli S, Dal Canto M, Bartoletti R. Prognostic role of the tumor-associated tissue inflammatory reaction in transitional bladder cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2006;16:329-34.
  • 25. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436-44.
  • 26. Liu K, Zhao K, Wang L, Sun E. The prognostic values of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils, lymphocytes and neutrophil/ lymphocyte rates in bladder urothelial cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214:1074-80.
  • 27. Loi S, Sirtaine N, Piette F, Salgado R, Viale G, Van Eenoo F, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in nodepositive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:860-7.
APA Hacihasanoglu E, Yucetas U, OKÇU O, BEHZATOĞLU K (2021). Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. , 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
Chicago Hacihasanoglu Ezgi,Yucetas Ugur,OKÇU Oğuzhan,BEHZATOĞLU Kemal Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. (2021): 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
MLA Hacihasanoglu Ezgi,Yucetas Ugur,OKÇU Oğuzhan,BEHZATOĞLU Kemal Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. , 2021, ss.26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
AMA Hacihasanoglu E,Yucetas U,OKÇU O,BEHZATOĞLU K Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. . 2021; 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
Vancouver Hacihasanoglu E,Yucetas U,OKÇU O,BEHZATOĞLU K Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. . 2021; 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
IEEE Hacihasanoglu E,Yucetas U,OKÇU O,BEHZATOĞLU K "Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas." , ss.26 - 31, 2021. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
ISNAD Hacihasanoglu, Ezgi vd. "Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas". (2021), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
APA Hacihasanoglu E, Yucetas U, OKÇU O, BEHZATOĞLU K (2021). Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, 37(1), 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
Chicago Hacihasanoglu Ezgi,Yucetas Ugur,OKÇU Oğuzhan,BEHZATOĞLU Kemal Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. Türk Patoloji Dergisi 37, no.1 (2021): 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
MLA Hacihasanoglu Ezgi,Yucetas Ugur,OKÇU Oğuzhan,BEHZATOĞLU Kemal Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, vol.37, no.1, 2021, ss.26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
AMA Hacihasanoglu E,Yucetas U,OKÇU O,BEHZATOĞLU K Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. Türk Patoloji Dergisi. 2021; 37(1): 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
Vancouver Hacihasanoglu E,Yucetas U,OKÇU O,BEHZATOĞLU K Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas. Türk Patoloji Dergisi. 2021; 37(1): 26 - 31. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
IEEE Hacihasanoglu E,Yucetas U,OKÇU O,BEHZATOĞLU K "Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas." Türk Patoloji Dergisi, 37, ss.26 - 31, 2021. 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497
ISNAD Hacihasanoglu, Ezgi vd. "Stromal Lymphoid Response Status in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinomas Diagnosed in Bladder Transurethral Resections and its Comparison with Conventional Urothelial Carcinomas". Türk Patoloji Dergisi 37/1 (2021), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2020.01497