Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 390 - 395 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 İndeks Tarihi: 15-06-2022
Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study
Öz: The aim was to compare the shaping ability
and the canal straightening of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold reciprocal file systems with glide path files in resin J-shaped root canals.
Material and Methods: Two groups (n=17) were established. TEM
tg (13/.04) + TEM M25 (25/.06) and WOG Glider (15/.02) + WOG
Primary (25/.07) were used to prepare the resin simulated canals. A series of preoperative and postoperative images were taken by a digital
camera and they were superimposed. The curvature angles and the
amount of resin removed from both the inner and the outer wall of the
canal into the level of 7 mm from the apical point, with a 1 mm increment were measured. The data were evaluated with independent samples Student’s t-test with 5% significance interval. Results: There was
no statistically difference between TEM and WOG reciprocal files
(p>0.05). No instrument fracture or canal aberrations were inspected
during canal preparation. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this present study, TEM and WOG files maintained the original canal curvature in curved canals. They produced conservative shapes with lower
foramen transportation.
Anahtar Kelime: T-Endo MUST ve WaveOne Gold’un Rehber Yol Eğeleri ile Şekillendirme Yeteneklerinin Karşılaştırılması: İn Vitro Çalışma
Öz: T-Endo MUST ve WaveOne Gold resiprokal eğe sistemlerinin rehber yol eğeleri ile birlikte rezin J-şekilli kanallardaki
şekillendirme kabiliyetini ve kanal düzleştirmesini karşılaştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: İki grup (n=17) oluşturuldu. Rezin kanalları
genişletmek için TEM tg (13/.04) + TEM M25 (25/.06) ve WOG Glider (15/.02) + WOG Primary (25/.07) kullanıldı. İşlem öncesi ve sonrası görüntüler dijital kamera ile çekildi ve üst üste bindirildi. Eğrilik
açıları ve kanalın hem iç hem de dış duvarından apikal noktadan 7
mm seviyesine kadar, uzaklaştırılan rezin miktarı 1 mm’lik aralıklarla ölçüldü. Bağımsız örneklem grubuna %5 anlamlılık seviyesine
göre Student t-testi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: TEM ve WOG resiprokal eğe sistemleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Kanal genişletilmesi sırasında alet kırığı
görülmemiştir. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sınırlamaları dâhilinde TEM
ve WOG, eğimli kanallarda orijinal kanal eğriliğini korumuştur. Daha
düşük apikal transportasyon ile konservatif bir kanal genişletmesi gerçekleştirdiler.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30(8):559-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 2. Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):30-76. [Crossref]
- 3. al-Omari MA, Dummer PM, Newcombe RG. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. 1. Int Endod J. 1992;25(2):57-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 4. Park SY, Cheung GS, Yum J, Hur B, Park JK, Kim HC. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2010;36(7):1200-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 5. Lopes HP, Gambarra-Soares T, Elias CN, Siqueira JF Jr, Inojosa IF, Lopes WS, et al. Comparison of the mechanical properties of rotary instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, or nickeltitanium alloy in R-phase. J Endod. 2013;39(4):516-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 6. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. J Endod. 2014;40(12):2053-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 7. Peters OA. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. In: Hargreaves KM CS, ed. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp Expert Consult. 10th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2010. p.283-348. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 8. Nakagawa RK, Alves JL, Buono VT, Bahia MG. Flexibility and torsional behaviour of rotary nickel-titanium PathFile, RaCe ISO 10, Scout RaCe and stainless steel K-File hand instruments. Int Endod J. 2014;47(3):290- 7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 9. Walsch H. The hybrid concept of nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(1):183-202. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 10. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Chiandussi G, Pera F, Migliaretti G, et al. Use of nickel-titanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod. 2009;35(3): 408-12. Erratum in: J Endod. 2009;35(11): 1606. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 11. Lim KC, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J. 1985;18(4):240-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 12. Özyürek T, Uslu G, Gündoğar M, Yılmaz K, Grande NM, Plotino G. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of two reciprocating nickel-titanium glide path files. Int Endod J. 2018;51(9):1047-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 13. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 14. Bürklein S, Flüch S, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue. Odontology. 2019;107(1):96-102. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 15. T-endo Must Brochure [Internet]. [Erişim tarihi: 31 May 2021]. Available at: [Link]
- 16. Pacheco-Yanes J, Gazzaneo I, Pérez AR, Armada L, Neves MAS. Transportation assessment in artificial curved canals after instrumentation with Reciproc, Reciproc Blue, and XP-endo Shaper Systems. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(3):e12417. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 17. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 18. Giuliani V, Di Nasso L, Pace R, Pagavino G. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. J Endod. 2014;40(9):1468-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 19. Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, Plazas-Garzon A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1718-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 20. Keskin C, Demiral M, Sarıyılmaz E. Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2018;43(2):e15. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 21. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod. 2012;38(1):101-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 22. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod. 2004;30(4):228-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 23. Pati-o PV, Biedma BM, Liébana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod. 2005;31(2):114-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 24. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008;41(4):339-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 25. Lim YJ, Park SJ, Kim HC, Min KS. Comparison of the centering ability of Wave•One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(1):21-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- 26. D'Amario M, Baldi M, Petricca R, De Angelis F, El Abed R, D'Arcangelo C. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals. J Endod. 2013;39(12):1581-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 27. Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod. 2001;27(1):1-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 28. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Msd, Seung-Jong L, et al. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000;26(12):719-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 29. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod. 2000;26(4):210-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- 30. Hage W, Zogheib C, Bukiet F, Sfeir G, Khalil I, Gergi R, et al. Canal Transportation and Centring Ability of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue With or Without Use of Glide Path Instruments: A CBCT Study. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(2):118-22. [PubMed] [PMC]
- 31. Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keleş A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of reciproc blue, reciproc, and waveone gold reciprocating ınstruments. J Endod. 2017;43(8):1360-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
| APA | Falakaloğlu S, İriboz E (2022). Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. , 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| Chicago | Falakaloğlu Seda,İriboz Emre Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. (2022): 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| MLA | Falakaloğlu Seda,İriboz Emre Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. , 2022, ss.390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| AMA | Falakaloğlu S,İriboz E Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. . 2022; 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| Vancouver | Falakaloğlu S,İriboz E Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. . 2022; 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| IEEE | Falakaloğlu S,İriboz E "Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study." , ss.390 - 395, 2022. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| ISNAD | Falakaloğlu, Seda - İriboz, Emre. "Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study". (2022), 390-395. https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| APA | Falakaloğlu S, İriboz E (2022). Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(2), 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| Chicago | Falakaloğlu Seda,İriboz Emre Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 28, no.2 (2022): 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| MLA | Falakaloğlu Seda,İriboz Emre Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.28, no.2, 2022, ss.390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| AMA | Falakaloğlu S,İriboz E Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022; 28(2): 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| Vancouver | Falakaloğlu S,İriboz E Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022; 28(2): 390 - 395. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| IEEE | Falakaloğlu S,İriboz E "Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study." Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 28, ss.390 - 395, 2022. 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
| ISNAD | Falakaloğlu, Seda - İriboz, Emre. "Comparison of Shaping Ability of T-Endo MUST and WaveOne Gold with Glide Path Instruments: An In Vitro Study". Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 28/2 (2022), 390-395. https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85047 |
