Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir)

Sevim Pelin Öztürk, (Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi, İzmir, Türkiye)
Fatma Şenol (Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Mimarlık Fakültesi, İzmir, Türkiye)
PLANLAMA
8 4
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 132 - 142 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772 İndeks Tarihi: 16-06-2022

Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir)

Öz:
Public parks' location is one of the major factors shaping their accessibility. Many natural and physical features (e.g., topography, stream ways, street network, traffic density, road junctions, and land uses) affect walking distances from dwellings to these loca- tions. Also, the cost of access (measured in time and meter) to these locations vary among age groups with different walk- ing capacities. Spatial plans in Turkey are the documents for de- termining and implementing the allocation of parks. However, plan-making practices have limitations in considering the park accessibility by walking among different groups of dwellers. This study considers the accessibility of public parks as an issue of spatial equity. It evaluates the park accessibility at a recent spatial plan about a residential area in Karabağlar and Buca Districts of İzmir. It aims to assess the allocations of planned parks and propose potential locations for new park areas. With a point- based approach to park accessibility, the study analysis performs the Location-Allocation (LA) Analysis with multiple criteria at Geographic Information Systems. The results show that at the plan, the specified residential area has spatial inequities with park accessibility. Among the other planned public service areas, some locations can be re-planned as new park areas, which partially im- proves spatial inequities at the plan. Also, the study is an example of how to prepare and run the data for the spatial analysis of allocations of public service areas with the help of GIS in Turkey
Anahtar Kelime:

İmar Planlarında Park Erişiminin Mekânsal Hakçalığı: Karabağlar ve Buca'da bir konut alanı örneği (İzmir)

Öz:
Kamusal parkların konumu, erişilebilirliklerini şekillendiren en önemli faktörlerden biridir. Birçok doğal ve fiziksel özellik (ör. To- pografya, akarsu yolları, sokak ağı, trafik yoğunluğu, yol kavşakları ve arazi kullanımı) konutlardan bu konumlara yürüme mesafeleri- ni etkiler. Ayrıca, bu konumlara erişim maliyeti (zaman ve metre cinsinden ölçülür), farklı yürüme kapasitesine sahip yaş grupları arasında farklılık gösterir. Türkiye'deki mekansal planlar, parkların tahsisinin belirlenmesi ve uygulanmasına yönelik belgelerdir. Bunun- la birlikte, plan yapma uygulamalarının, farklı mahalle sakini grupları için yürüyerek park erişilebilirliğini göz önünde bulundurmada sınırlı kalmaktadır. Bu çalışma, kamusal parkların erişilebilirliğini mekansal hakçalık sorunu olarak ele almaktadır. İzmir'in Karabağlar ve Buca ilçelerinde bir konut yerleşim alanı ile ilgili yakın tarihli bir mekansal planda park erişilebilirliğini değerlendirmektedir. Planlanan parkla- rın tahsisini değerlendirmeyi ve yeni park alanları için potansiyel yerler önermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, park erişilebilirliğine yönelik noktaya dayalı bir yaklaşımla, analizi Coğrafi Bilgi Sistem- lerinde çok kriterle Konum Tahsisi (LA) Analizi ile gerçekleştirir. Sonuçlar, planda, belirtilen konut yerleşim alanının park erişilebilir- liğinde mekansal hakkaniyetsizliğe sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Planlanan diğer kamu hizmeti alanları arasında, bazı yerler yeni park alanları olarak yeniden planlanabilir ve bu da plandaki mekansal eşitsizlikleri kısmen iyileştirir. Ayrıca bu çalışma, Türkiye'de kamu hizmet alanlarının tahsisinin mekansal analizi için verilerin CBS yar- dımıyla nasıl hazırlanıp çalıştırılacağına bir örnek teşkil etmektedir
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aksoy, Y. (2001). İstanbul Kenti Yeşil Alan Durumunun İrdelenmesi. İ.T.Ü Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
  • Apparicio, P., Abdelmajid, M., Riva, M., & Shearmur, R. (2008). Compar- ing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibil- ity of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error is- sues. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(1), 7. https://doi. org/10.1186/1476-072X-7-7
  • Barton, Hugh; Grant, M. (2010). Shaping neighbourhoods : For local health and global sustainability. London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Fran- cis Group,,.
  • Beler, E. F. (1997). The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities, 14(6), 353–361. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00026-7
  • Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and Peo- ple: An Environmental Justice Inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–787. https://doi. org/10.1080/00045600903102949
  • Cook, S. K., & Hegtvedt, A. K. (1983). Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 217–241.
  • Cooper, L. (2005). Heuristic Methods for Location-Allocation Problems. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/1006005
  • Ekkel, E. D., & de Vries, S. (2017). Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008
  • El Karim, A. A., & Awawdeh, M. M. (2020). Integrating GIS accessibility and location-allocation models with multicriteria decision analysis for evalu- ating quality of life in Buraidah city, KSA. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041412
  • Fan, P., Xu, L., Yue, W., & Chen, J. (2017). Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.007
  • Gold, C. M. (2006). What is GIS and what is not? Transactions in GIS. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01009.x
  • Guzman, L. A., Oviedo, D., & Rivera, C. (2017). Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016
  • Harvey, D. (1975). Social Justice and the City. Geographical Review. https:// doi.org/10.2307/213551
  • Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference / David Harvey. Justice, nature & the geography of difference.
  • Kara, B., Tuncay, H. E., & Deniz, B. (2011). Investigating recreational quali- ties of the parks in Aydın. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 158–164.
  • Kwan. (2010). Space-Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-based Framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(3), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998. tb00396.x
  • Kwan, M. P. (1999). Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space–time measures. Professional Geographer. https://doi. org/10.1111/0033-0124.00158
  • Lineberry, R. L., & Welch, R. E. J. (1989). Who gets what: measuring the dis- tribution of Urban Public Services. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • Macintyre, S., Macdonald, L., & Ellaway, A. (2008). Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 67(6), 900–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socs- cimed.2008.05.029
  • Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508
  • Marsh, M. T., & Schilling, D. A. (1994). Equity measurement in facility loca- tion analysis: A review and framework. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90200-3
  • Moise, I. K., Kalipeni, E., & Zulu, L. C. (2011). Analyzing Geographical Access to HIV Sentinel Clinics in Relation to Other Health Clinics in Zambia. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 7(3), 254–281. https:// doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2011.599756
  • Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., Witlox, F., & De Maeyer, P. (2010). Equity of Ur- ban Service Delivery: A Comparison of Different Accessibility Measures. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(7), 1613–1635. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4230
  • Omer, I. (2006). Evaluating accessibility using house-level data: A spatial eq- uity perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.06.004
  • Özkan, S. P., & Şenol, F. (2020). Cbs Tabanlı Mekânsal Hakçalık Haritalanması ve Mahalle Ölçeğinde Park Tahsisi: İzmir Örneği. In Mimarlık, Planlama ve Tasarım Alanında Akademik Çalışmalar (pp. 119–134). Gece Kitaplığı / Gece Publishing.
  • Rigolon, A. (2016). A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017
  • Rushton, G. (1979). Optimal Location of Facilities. Wentworth, NH: COM- Press.
  • Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080 /09644016.2013.755387
  • Sister, C., Wolch, J., & Wilson, J. (2010). Got green? addressing environmental justice in park provision. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708- 009-9303-8
  • Stafford, L., & Baldwin, C. (2018). Planning Walkable Neighborhoods: Are We Overlooking Diversity in Abilities and Ages? Journal of Planning Lit- erature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217704649
  • Stafford, L., & Volz, K. (2016). Diverse bodies-space politics: Towards a cri- tique of social (in) justice of built environment. Text, 34(Special issues).
  • Swyngedouw, E., & Heynen, N. C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8330.2003.00364.x
  • Talen, & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of mea- sures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A. https://doi.org/10.1068/a300595
  • Talen, E. (1998a). Visualizing fairness : Equity maps for planners.
  • Talen, E. (1998b). Visualizing Fairness: Equity Maps for Planners. Jour- nal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 22–38. https://doi. org/10.1080/01944369808975954
  • Tan, P. Y., & Samsudin, R. (2017). Effects of spatial scale on assessment of spatial equity of urban park provision. Landscape and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.001
  • Teitz, M. B. (1968). Toward a theory of urban public facility location. Pa- pers of the Regional Science Association. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01952720
  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Po- litical Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
  • Tsou, K.-W., Hung, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-L. (2005). An accessibility-based inte- grated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.004
  • Turkish Statistical Institute. (2020). Turkish Statistical Institute. Informatics. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do
  • Williams, A. (2002). The Optimal Provision of Public Goods in a Sys- tem of Local Government. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi. org/10.1086/259106
  • Xia, Z., Li, H., & Chen, Y. (2018). Assessing neighborhood walkability based on usage characteristics of Amenities under Chinese metropolises con- text. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113879
  • Yeh, A. G.-O., & Chow, M. H. (1996). An integrated GIS and location-allo- cation approach to public facilities planning: An example of open space planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 20(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(97)00010-0
APA ÖZTÜRK S, ŞENOL F (2022). Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). , 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
Chicago ÖZTÜRK Sevim Pelin,ŞENOL FATMA Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). (2022): 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
MLA ÖZTÜRK Sevim Pelin,ŞENOL FATMA Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). , 2022, ss.132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
AMA ÖZTÜRK S,ŞENOL F Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). . 2022; 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
Vancouver ÖZTÜRK S,ŞENOL F Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). . 2022; 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
IEEE ÖZTÜRK S,ŞENOL F "Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir)." , ss.132 - 142, 2022. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
ISNAD ÖZTÜRK, Sevim Pelin - ŞENOL, FATMA. "Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir)". (2022), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
APA ÖZTÜRK S, ŞENOL F (2022). Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). PLANLAMA, 32(1), 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
Chicago ÖZTÜRK Sevim Pelin,ŞENOL FATMA Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). PLANLAMA 32, no.1 (2022): 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
MLA ÖZTÜRK Sevim Pelin,ŞENOL FATMA Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). PLANLAMA, vol.32, no.1, 2022, ss.132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
AMA ÖZTÜRK S,ŞENOL F Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). PLANLAMA. 2022; 32(1): 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
Vancouver ÖZTÜRK S,ŞENOL F Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir). PLANLAMA. 2022; 32(1): 132 - 142. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
IEEE ÖZTÜRK S,ŞENOL F "Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir)." PLANLAMA, 32, ss.132 - 142, 2022. 10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
ISNAD ÖZTÜRK, Sevim Pelin - ŞENOL, FATMA. "Do Spatial Development Plans Provide Spatial Equity in Access to Public Parks: A Case with a Residential Area in Karabağlar and Buca (İzmir)". PLANLAMA 32/1 (2022), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2021.69772
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 23:16

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları