Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 85 - 108 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/yer-2106-18 İndeks Tarihi: 20-06-2022
Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters
Öz: The tectonic and structural properties of Erzurum and its surroundings have been investigated by evaluating the seismotectonic b - value, magnetic anomaly, edge detection analysis (total horizontal derivative (THDR) and tilt angle (TA)), Curie Point
Depth (CPD), P-wave velocity (Vp), and Vp / Vs (S - wave velocity) ratio and by imaging the regional distributions of these parameters.
For this purpose, all parameters have been combined to be able to reveal the new useful results on the study region and are presented for
different locations and depths. The Vp values have been accompanied by high Vp / Vs ratios and shallow CPD values in the areas with
geothermal regions such as Tekman, Söylemez, and the northern part of Karlıova. In the tectonically active regions such as Ilıca, Dumlu,
Pasinler, Çat, Karlıova and Karaçoban, high reduction - to – the - pole (RTP) total magnetic anomaly was accompanied by low Vp values
in harmony. Besides, the low Vp values between 0 and 10 km and high b - values can be related to the weakness zones and the areas in
which earthquake hazards are high in the study area. The low Vp values in the 0 km horizontal slice are in accordance with the high RTP
total magnetic anomaly values in the triangle area between Aşkale, Ilıca - Dumlu - Pasinler, Narman, and Karaçoban. Uniformly, high
Vp and low RTP total magnetic anomaly inclusions overlap in Çat and Tekman. In some regions such as Dumlu, Narman, Horasan,
Karaçoban and south of Karlıova, the tilt angle values are positive (positive values in the tilt angle map correspond to the center of the
structure causing the magnetic anomaly) and the Vp values are low, but there is not a complete harmony between these parameters.
These results show that variations on these parameters are related to each other, and these types of geophysical data are required for
tectonic and structural features at different locations and depth levels.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Abdelfattah AK, Jallouli C, Qaysi S, Al-Qadasi B (2020). Crustal Stress in the Northern Red Sea Region as Inferred from Seismic b-values, Seismic Moment Release, Focal Mechanisms, Gravity, Magnetic, and Heat Flow Data. Surveys in Geophysics 41: 963-986.
- Aki K (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula and its confidence limits. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute Tokyo University 43: 237-239.
- Akin U, Ulugergerli E, Kutlu S (2014). The assessment of geothermal potential of Turkey by means of heat flow estimation. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 149: 201-210.
- Alacali (2018). Hydrogeochemical investigation of geothermal springs in Erzurum, East Anatolia (Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences 77: 802.
- Ambraseys NN, Jackson JA (2000). Seismicity of the Sea of Marmara (Turkey) since 1500. Geophysical Journal International 141 (3): 1-6.
- Ansari S (2016). Co-seismic stress transfer and magnitude-frequency distribution due to the 2012 Varzaqan-Ahar twin earthquakes (Mw 6.5 and 6.4), NW Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 132: 129-137.
- Arkani-Hamed L (1988). Differential reduction to the pole or regional magnetic anomalies. Geophysics 53 (12): 1529-1600.
- Arkani-Hamed L (2007). Differential reduction to the pole: Revisited. Geophysics 72 (1): 13-20.
- Aydin I, Karat HI, Kocak A (2005). Curie-point depth map of Turkey. Geophysical Journal International 162 (2): 633-640.
- Aydin I, Oksum E (2010). Exponential approach to estimate the Curie temperature depth. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 7: 113-125.
- Bayrak Y, Öztürk S, Çinar H, Kalafat D, Tsapanos TM et al. (2009). Estimating earthquake hazard parameters from instrumental data for different regions in and around Turkey. Engineering Geology 105: 200-210.
- Bektas O, Ravat D, Buyuksarac A, Bilim F, Ates A (2007). Regional geothermal characterisation of East Anatolia from aeromagnetic, heat flow and gravity data. Pure and Applied Geophysics 164 (5): 975-998.
- Bozkurt E (2001). Neotectonics of Turkey-a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta 14: 3-30.
- Bulut F, Bohnhoff M, Eken T, Janssen C, Kılıç T et al. (2012). The East Anatolian Fault Zone: Seismotectonic setting and spatiotemporal characteristics of seismicity based on precise earthquake locations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 117 (B7).
- Cao A, Gao SS (2002). Temporal variation of seismic b - value beneath north Eastern Japan island arc. Geophysical Research Letters 29 (48): 1-3.
- Cordell L, Grauch VJS (1985). Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. In The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps. Society of Exploration Geophysicists 181-197.
- De´verche`re J, Petit C, Gileva N, Radziminovitch N, Melnikova V et al. (2001). Depth distribution of earthquakes in the Baikal rift system and its implications for the rheology of the lithosphere. Geophysical Journal International 146: 714-730.
- Dewey JF, Hempton MR, Kidd WSF, Saroglu F, Sengor AMC (1986). Shortening of continental lithosphere: The neo-tectonics of eastern Anatolia- a young collision zone. In MP Coward, AC Reis (Eds.), Collision tectonics 3-36. London: Geological Society.
- Dilek Y, Sandvol E (2009). Seismic structure, crustal architecture and tectonic evolution of the Anatolian-African plate boundary and the Cenozoic orogenic belts in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 327 (1): 127-160.
- Duman TY, Emre Ö (2013) The East Anatolian Fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics. In: Geological Society, London, Special Publications. pp 495–529
- El-Bohoty M, Brimich L, Saleh A, Saleh S (2012). Comparative study between the structural and tectonic situation of the Southern Sinai and the Red Sea, Egypt, as deduced from magnetic, gravity and seismic data. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 42 (4): 357-388.
- Emre O, Duman TY, Ozalp S, Elmaci H, Olgun S et al. (2013). 1/1.125.000 scale Active Fault Map of Turkey. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Explorations Special Publications Series, Ankara-Turkey. http://www.mta.gov.tr/ v3.0/. Accessed 17 January 2021.
- Emre O, Duman TY, Ozalp S, Saroglu F, Olgun S et al. (2018). Active fault database of Turkey. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16: 3229-3275.
- Fagereng A (2001). Frequency-size distribution of competent lenses in a block-in-matrix me´lange: imposed length scales of brittle deformation? Journal of Geophysical Research 116: B05302.
- Frohlich C, Davis S (1993). Teleseismic b - values: Or, much ado about 1.0. Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (B1): 631-644.
- Gok R, Pasyanos ME, Zor E (2007). Lithospheric structure of the continent-continent collision zone: Eastern Turkey. Geophysical Journal International 169: 1079-1088.
- Gutenberg R, Richter CF (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 34: 185-188.
- Habermann RE (1983). Teleseismic detection in the Aleutian Island arc. Journal of Geophysical Research 88 (B6): 5056-5064.
- Hauksson E (2000). Crustal structure and seismicity distribution adjacent to the Pacific and North America plate boundary in southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research 105: 13875.
- Havskov J, Ottemoller L (1999). SeisAn Earthquake analysis software. Seismological Research Letters 70 (55): 532-534.
- Italiano F, Sasmaz A, Yuce G, Okan OO (2013). Thermal fluids along the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ): Geochemical features and relationships with the tectonic setting. Chemical Geology 339: 103-114.
- Kalyoncuoglu UY, Elitok Ö, Dolmaz MN (2013). Tectonic implications of spatial variation of b - values and heat flow in the Aegean region. Marine Geophysical Research 34 (1): 59-78.
- Kaygusuz A, Aslan Z, Aydıncakır E, Yucel C, Gucer MA et al. (2018). Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb isotope characteristics of the Miocene to Pliocene volcanic rocks from the Kandilli (Erzurum) area, Eastern Anatolia (Turkey): Implications for magma evolution in extension-related origin. Lithos 296: 332- 351.
- Kaypak B (2008). Three-dimensional VP and VP / VS structure of the upper crust in the Erzincan basin (eastern Turkey). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 113 (7): 20.
- Kaypak B, Gokkaya G (2012). 3 - D imaging of the upper crust beneath the Denizli geothermal region by local earthquake tomography, western Turkey. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 211-212: 47-60.
- Keskin M, Pearce JA, Kempton PD, Greenwood P (2006). Magmacrust interactions and magma plumbing in a post-collisional setting: Geochemical evidence from the Erzurum- Kars volcanic plateau, eastern Turkey. Geological Society of America Special Paper 409: 475-505.
- Ketin İ (1976). San Andreas ve Kuzey Anadolu Fayları arasında bir karşılaştırma. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni 19: 149-154.
- Khan PK, Chakraborty PP (2007). The seismic b - value and its correlation with Bouguer gravity anomaly over the Shillong Plateau area: Tectonic implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 29: 136-147.
- Khojamli A, Ardejani FD, Moradzadeh A, Kalate AN, Kahoo AR et al. (2016). Estimation of Curie point depths and heat flow from Ardebil province, Iran, using aeromagnetic data. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 9 (5): 383.
- Kocyigit A, Canoglu MC (2017). Neotectonics and seismicity of Erzurum pull-apart basin, East Turkey. Russian Geology and Geophysics 58: 99-122.
- Koulakov I (2009). LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion: Benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99 (1): 194- 214.
- Idárraga-García J, Vargas CA (2018). Depth to the bottom of magnetic layer in South America and its relationship to Curie isotherm, Moho depth and seismicity behavior. Geodesy and Geodynamics 9 (1): 93-107.
- Le Pichon X, Chamot-Rooke N, Lallemant S (1995). Geodetic determination of the kinematics of central Greece with respect to Europe: Implications for eastern Mediterranean tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research 100: 12.675-12.690.
- Le Pichon X, Kreemer C (2010) The miocene-to-present kinematic evolution of the eastern mediterranean and middle east and its implications for dynamics. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 (1): 323-351.
- Lee WHK, Lahr JC (1975). HYPO71 (Revised): A Computer Program for Determining Hypocenter, Magnitude, and First Motion Pattern of Local Earthquakes. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 75-311, 113.
- Li CF, Lu Y, Wang J (2017). A global reference model of Curie-point depths based on EMAG2. Scientific reports 7 (1): 1-9.
- Maden N (2012). One-dimensional thermal modelling of the eastern pontides orogenic belt (NE Turkey). Pure and Applied Geophysics 169: 235-248.
- Maden N, Aydin A, Kadirov F (2015). Determination of the crustal and thermal structure of the Erzurum-Horasan-Pasinler Basins (Eastern Turkiye) using gravity and magnetic data. Pure and Applied Geophysics 172: 1599-1614.
- Maden N, Öztürk S (2015). Seismic b - values, Bouguer gravity and heat flow data beneath Eastern Anatolia, Turkey: Tectonic implications. Survey in Geophysics 36: 549-570.
- Maus S, Barckhausen U, Berkenbosch H, Bournas N, Brozena J et al. (2009). EMAG2: A 2-arc min resolution Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid compiled from satellite, airborne, and marine magnetic measurements. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 10 (8).
- McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka A, Demir C, Ergintav S et al. (2000). Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. Journal of Geophysical Research 105: 5695-5719.
- McKenzie D (1976). The east Anatolian fault: A major structure in eastern Turkey. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 29: 189- 193.
- Medved I, Polat G, Koulakov I (2021). Crustal Structure of the Eastern Anatolia Region (Turkey) Based on Seismic Tomography. Geosciences 11 (2): 91.
- Mignan A, Woessner J (2012). Estimating the magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalogs. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis. doi: 10.5078/ corssa-00180805. Available at http://www.corssa.org.
- Miller HG, Singh V (1994). Potential field tilt - a new concept for location of potential field sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics 32: 213-217.
- Mogi K (1962). Magnitude-frequency relation for elastic shocks accompanying fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University 40: 831-853.
- MTA (2021). General Directorate of Mineral Research and Explorations. www.mta.gov.tr. Accessed 17 January 2021.
- Njeudjang K, Kana JD, Tom A, Essi JMA, Djongyang N et al (2020). Curie point depth and heat flow deduced from spectral analysis of magnetic data over Adamawa volcanic region (Northern Cameroon): geothermal implications. SN Applied Sciences 2 (8): 1-16.
- NGDC (2006). Two-minute gridded global relief data (ETOPO2) v2. National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC), NOAA, doi: 10.7289/V5J1012Q.
- Ogata Y, Imoto M, Katsura K (1991). 3 - D spatial variation of b - values of magnitude-frequency distribution beneath the Kanto District, Japan. Geophysical Journal International 104: 135-146.
- Oruç B, Sertcelik I, Kafadar O, Selim HH (2013). Structural interpretation of the Erzurum Basin, eastern Turkey, using curvature gravity gradient tensor and gravity inversion of basement relief. Journal of Applied Geophysics 88: 105-113.
- Oruç B, Selim HH (2011). Interpretation of magnetic data in the Sinop area of Mid Black Sea, Turkey, using tilt derivative, Euler deconvolution, and discrete wavelet transform. Journal of Applied Geophysics 74 (4): 194-204.
- Okubo Y, Graf RJ, Hansen RO, Ogawa K, Tsu H (1985). Curie-point depths of the Island of Kyushu and surrounding areas, Japan. Geophysics 50 (3): 481-494.
- Ozer C, Polat O (2017). 3 - D crustal velocity structure of Izmir and surroundings. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 32(3): 733-747.
- Ozer C (2019). Determination of 3 - D crustal seismic velocity structure beneath Hatay and surroundings. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 34(4): 2215-2227.
- Ozer C, Ozyazicioglu M (2019). The Local Earthquake Tomography of Erzurum (Turkey) Geothermal Area. Earth Sciences Research Journal 23(3): 209-223.
- Ozer C, Ozyazicioglu M, Gok E, Polat O (2019). Imaging the Crustal Structure Throughout the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey, by Local Earthquake Tomography. Pure and Applied Geophysics 176 (6): 2235- 2261.
- Öztürk S (2009). An application of the earthquake hazard and aftershock probability evaluation methods to Turkey earthquakes. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish with English abstract).
- Öztürk S (2017). Space-time assessing of the earthquake potential in recent years in the eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Earth Sciences Research Journal 21 (2): 67-75.
- Öztürk S (2018). Earthquake hazard potential in the Eastern Anatolian region of Turkey: seismotectonic b and Dc-values and precursory quiescence Z-value. Frontiers in Earth Science 12 (1): 215-236.
- Öztürk S, Sahin S (2019). A statistical space-time-magnitude analysis on the aftershocks occurrence of the July 21th, 2017 MW = 6.5 Bodrum-Kos, Turkey, earthquake. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 172: 443-457.
- Pamuk E (2019). Investigating edge detection, Curie point depth, and heat flow using EMAG2 magnetic and EGM08 gravity data in the northern part of Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 28 (6): 805-821.
- Pamukcu O, Akcig Z, Hisarli M, Tosun S (2014). Curie Point depths and heat flow of eastern Anatolia (Turkey). Energy Sources. Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 36 (24): 2699-2706.
- Reilinger RE, McClusky SC, Oral MB, King RW, Toksöz MN et al. (1997). Global Positioning System measurements of presentday crustal movements in the Arabia-Africa-Eurasia plate collision zone. Journal of Geophysical Research 102 (B5): 9983-9999.
- Salem A, Williams S, Fairhead JD, Ravat D, Smith R (2007). Tiltdepth method: A simple depth estimation method using firstorder magnetic derivatives. The leading Edge 26 (12): 1502- 1505.
- Sanchez JJ, McNutt SR, Power JA, Wyss M (2004). Spatial variations in the frequency-magnitude distribution of earthquakes at Mount Pinatubo volcano. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94: 430-438.
- Scholz CH (1968). The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58: 399-415.
- Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S, Wyss M (2005). Variations in earthquakesize distribution across different stress regimes. Nature 437.
- Simao NM, Nalbant SS, Sunbul F, Mutlu AK (2016). Central and eastern Anatolian crustal deformation rate and velocity fields derived from GPS and earthquake data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 433: 89-98.
- Spector A, Grant FS (1970). Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics 35 (2): 293-302.
- Sengor AMC, Ozeren S, Genc T, Zor E (2003). East Anatolian high plateau as a mantle-supported, north-south shortened domal structure. Geophysical Research Letters 30 (24): 8045.
- Şengör AMC, Tüysüz O, İmren C, Sakınç M, Eyidoğan H et al. (2004). The North Anatolian Fault: A New Look. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33: 37-112.
- USGS (1997). Earth Resources Observation and Science Center/U.S. Geological Survey/U.S. Department of the Interior. USGS 30 ARC-second Global Elevation Data, GTOPO30. Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory.
- Utsu T (1971). Aftershock and earthquake statistic (III): Analyses of the distribution of earthquakes in magnitude, time and space with special consideration to clustering characteristics of earthquake occurrence. Journal of Faculty of Science Hokkaido University Series VII (Geophysics) 3: 379-441.
- Zor E, Sandvol E, Gurbuz C, Turkelli N, Seber D et al. (2003). The crustal structure of the East Anatolian plateau (Turkey) from receiver functions. Geophysical Research Letters 30 (24): 8044.
- Zor E (2008). Tomographic evidence of slab detachment beneath eastern Turkey and the Caucasus. Geophysical Journal International 175: 1273-1282.
- Wang JH (1988). b - values of shallow earthquakes in Taiwan. Seismological Society of America Bulletin 66: 1243-1254.
- Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis JF, Wobbe F (2013). Generic Mapping Tools: Improved version released. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union 94: 409-410.
- Westeway R (1994). Present-day kinematics of the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Geophysical Research 99: 12071-12090.
- Wiemer S (2001). A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research Letters 72 (3): 373–382.
- Wiemer S, McNutt SR, Wyss M (1998). Temporal and threedimensional spatial analyses of the frequency–magnitude distribution near Long Valley Caldera, California. Geophysical Journal International 134: 409-421.
- Wiemer S, Katsumata K (1999). Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (B6): 13135-13151.
- Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000). Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90 (3): 859-869.
- Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005). Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95 (2): 684-698.
- Wong HK, Degens ET, Finckh P (1978). Structures in modern Lake Van sediments as revealed by 3.5 KHz high resolution profiling. In: E.T. Degens and F. Kurtman (eds.), Geology of Lake Van, Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 169: 11-19.
- Yuce G, Taskiran L (2013). Isotope and chemical compositions of thermal fluids at Tekman Geothermal Area (Eastern Turkey). Geochemical Journal 47: 423-435.
- Xu Y, Hao T, Zeyen H, Nan F (2017). Curie point depths in North China Craton based on spectral analysis of magnetic anomalies. Pure and Applied Geophysics 174 (1): 339-347.
| APA | OZER C, öztürk s, Pamuk E (2022). Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. , 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| Chicago | OZER Caglar,öztürk serkan,Pamuk Eren Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. (2022): 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| MLA | OZER Caglar,öztürk serkan,Pamuk Eren Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. , 2022, ss.85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| AMA | OZER C,öztürk s,Pamuk E Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. . 2022; 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| Vancouver | OZER C,öztürk s,Pamuk E Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. . 2022; 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| IEEE | OZER C,öztürk s,Pamuk E "Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters." , ss.85 - 108, 2022. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| ISNAD | OZER, Caglar vd. "Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters". (2022), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| APA | OZER C, öztürk s, Pamuk E (2022). Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 31(1), 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| Chicago | OZER Caglar,öztürk serkan,Pamuk Eren Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 31, no.1 (2022): 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| MLA | OZER Caglar,öztürk serkan,Pamuk Eren Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, vol.31, no.1, 2022, ss.85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| AMA | OZER C,öztürk s,Pamuk E Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 2022; 31(1): 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| Vancouver | OZER C,öztürk s,Pamuk E Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 2022; 31(1): 85 - 108. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| IEEE | OZER C,öztürk s,Pamuk E "Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters." Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 31, ss.85 - 108, 2022. 10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
| ISNAD | OZER, Caglar vd. "Tectonic and structural characteristics of Erzurum and its surroundings (Eastern Turkey): a detailed comparison between different geophysical parameters". Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 31/1 (2022), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2106-18 |
