Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 172 - 181 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4 İndeks Tarihi: 21-06-2022

Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges

Öz:
Objective: We aimed to investigate mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of papillary breast carcinoma subtypes and to compare the diagnostic features and performance of the imaging method in distinguishing subtypes. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients presenting with pathological diagnosis of 45 papillary carcinoma lesions, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Cases were assigned to five subgroups according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The clinical characteristics (n = 45) and imaging features of each pathological subgroup were retrospectively related to imaging findings from US (n = 45), MG (n = 37), and breast MRI (n = 23), and further compared. Results: The finding of a palpable mass in all subgroups was more common than nipple discharge on clinical breast evaluation, and no significant difference was found between the subgroups. Irregular shape on MG (10/12, 83.3%, p = 0.039) and US (11/12, 91.7%, p = 0.039) was found more frequently in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) compared to other subgroups. Circumscribed margins (4/5, 80%, p = 0.002) occurred more frequently in papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (pDCIS) and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) than in other subgroups (6/8, 75%, p = 0.002). Lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were found in solid papillary cancer (SPC) than in other subgroups (ADC = 0.35 x 10-3, p = 0.017). Conclusion: Radiological findings of papillary carcinomas overlap with each other. US and MRI are complementary when revealing specific morphological characteristics.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. O’Malley FP, Visscher D, MacGrogan G, Tan PH, Ichihara S. Intraductal papilloma. In: Lakhani S, Ellis I, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2012. p. 100-2. [Crossref ]
  • 2. Tan PH, Schnitt SJ, van de Vijver MJ, Ellis IO, Lakhani SR. Papillary and neuroendocrine breast lesions: the WHO stance. Histopathology 2015; 66: 761-770. (PMID: 24845113) [Crossref ]
  • 3. Mulligan AM, O’Malley FP. Papillary lesions of the breast: a review. Adv Anat Pathol 2007; 14: 108-119. (PMID: 17471117) [Crossref ]
  • 4. Liberman L, Feng TL, Susnik B. Case 35: Intracystic papillary carcinoma with invasion. Radiology 2001; 219: 781-784. (PMID:11376269) [Crossref ]
  • 5. Brogi E, Horii R, Mac Grogan G, et al. Papillary Neoplasms. Breast Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition, Volume 2 . WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon; 2019. p. 49-67. [Crossref ]
  • 6. Tan PH, Ellis I, Allison K, Brogi E, Fox SB, Lakhani S, et al. The 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast. Histopathology 2020; 77: 181-185. (PMID: 32056259) [Crossref ]
  • 7. Marchio C, Horlings HM, Vincent-Salomon A. Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Breast Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition, Volume 2 . WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon; 2019. p. 128-130. [Crossref ]
  • 8. Jagmohan P, Pool FJ, Putti TC, Wong J. Papillary lesions of the breast: imaging findings and diagnostic challenges. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013; 19: 471-478. (PMID: 23996839) [Crossref ]
  • 9. Eiada R, Chong J, Kulkarini S, Goldberg F, Muradali D. Papillary lesions of the breast: MRI, ultrasound, and mamographic apperances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 264-271. (PMID: 22268167) [Crossref ]
  • 10. You C, Peng W, Shen X, Zhi W, Yang W, Gu Y. Solid papillary carcinoma of breast: Magnetic resonance mamography, digital mammography, and ultrasound findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018; 42: 771-775. (PMID: 29613993) [Crossref ]
  • 11. Nassar H, Qureshi H, Adsay NV, Visscher D. Clinicopathologic analysis of solid papillary carcinoma of the breast and associated invasive carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30: 501-507. (PMID: 16625097) [Crossref ]
  • 12. Zhong E, Cheng E, Goldfischer M, Hoda SA. Papillary lesions of the male breast: A study of 117 cases and brief review of the literature demonstrate a broad clinicopathologic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 44: 68-76. (PMID: 31403965) [Crossref ]
  • 13. Karakas C, Resetkova E, Sahin AA. Papillary lesions of the breast. In: Palazzo JP, editor. Difficult Diagnoses in Breast pathology. Demos Medical Publishing; 2011. p. 56-87. [Crossref ]
  • 14. Rinaldi P, Ierardi C, Costantini M, Magno S, Giuliani M, Belli P, et al. Cyctic breast lesions. sonographic findings and clinical management. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 1617-1626. (PMID: 20966473) [Crossref ]
  • 15. Günhan-Bilgen I, Zekioglu O, Ustün EE, Memis A, Erhan Y. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and sonographic findings with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 927-931. (PMID: 12239039) [Crossref ]
  • 16. Zekioglu O, Erhan Y, Ciris M, Bayramoglu H, Ozdemir N. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: high incidence of lymph node metastasis with extranodal extension and its immunohistochemical profile compared with invasive ductal carcinoma. Histopathology 2004; 44: 18-23. (PMID: 14717664) [Crossref ]
  • 17. Kim MJ, Gong G, Joo HJ, Ahn SH, Ro JY. Immunohistochemical and clinicopathologic characteristics of invasive ductal carcinoma of breast with micropapillary carcinoma component. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129: 1277-1282. (PMID: 16196516) [Crossref ]
  • 18. Ciurea A, Calin A, Ciortea C, Dudea SM. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions. Med Ultrasound 2015; 17: 392-397. (PMID: 26343090) [Crossref ]
  • 19. Speer ME, Adrada BE, Arribas EM, Hess KR, Middleton LP, Whitman GJ. Imaging of intracystic papillary carcinoma. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2019; 48: 348-352. (PMID: 30072190) [Crossref ]
  • 20. Maluf HM, Koerner FC. Solid papillary carcinoma of the breast. A form of intraductal carcinoma with endocrine differentiation frequently associated with mucinous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19: 1237- 1244. (PMID:7573685) [Crossref ]
  • 21. Tsang WY, Chan JK. Endocrin ductal carcinoma in situ (E-DCIS) of the breast: a form of low-grade DCIS with clinichopathologic and biologic characteristics. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20: 921-943. (PMID: 8712293) [Crossref ]
  • 22. Adrada B, Arribas E, Gilcrease M, Yang WT. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the Breast: Mamographic, sonographic and MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 58-63. (PMID: 19542384) [Crossref ]
  • 23. Yun SU, Choi BB, Shu KS, Kim SM, Seo YD, Lee JS, et al. Imaging findings of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. J Breast Cancer 2012; 15: 57-64. (PMID: 22493629) [Crossref ]
  • 24. Dogan BE, Whitman GJ, Middleton LP, Phelps M. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 186. (PMID: 12818855) [Crossref ]
  • 25. Yılmaz R, Cömert RG, Aliyev S, Toktaş Y, Önder S, Emirikçi S, et al. Encapsulated papillary carcinoma in a man with gynecomastia: ultrasonography, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging features with pathologic correlation. Eur J Breast Health 2018; 14: 127- 131. (PMID: 29774323) [Crossref ]
  • 26. Muttarak M, Lerttumnongtum P, Chaiwun B, Peh WCG. Spectrum of papillary lesions of breast:clinical, imaging and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 700-707. (PMID: 18716096) [Crossref ]
  • 27. Lam WW, Chu WC, Tang AP, Tse G, Ma TK. Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1322-1327. (PMID: 16632726) [Crossref ]
  • 28. Bazzocchi M, Berra I, Francescutti GE, Del Frate C, Zuiani C, Puglisi F, et al. Papillary lesione of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle. Radiol Med 2001; 101: 424-431. (PMID: 11479438) [Crossref ]
  • 29. Linda A, Zuiani C, Girometti R, Londero V, Machin P, Brondani G, et al. Unusual malignant tumors of the breast: MRI features and pathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 178-184. (PMID: 19446418) [Crossref ]
  • 30. Rodríguez MC, Secades AL, Angulo JM. Best cases from the AFIP: intracyctic papillary carcinoma of the breast. Radiographics 2010; 30: 2021-2027. (PMID: 21057133) [Crossref ]
APA Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T, öznur m (2022). Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. , 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
Chicago Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan Tuğba İlkem,öznur meltem Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. (2022): 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
MLA Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan Tuğba İlkem,öznur meltem Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. , 2022, ss.172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
AMA Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T,öznur m Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. . 2022; 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
Vancouver Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T,öznur m Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. . 2022; 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
IEEE Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T,öznur m "Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges." , ss.172 - 181, 2022. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
ISNAD Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan, Tuğba İlkem - öznur, meltem. "Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges". (2022), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
APA Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T, öznur m (2022). Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. European Journal of Breast Health, 18(2), 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
Chicago Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan Tuğba İlkem,öznur meltem Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. European Journal of Breast Health 18, no.2 (2022): 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
MLA Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan Tuğba İlkem,öznur meltem Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. European Journal of Breast Health, vol.18, no.2, 2022, ss.172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
AMA Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T,öznur m Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. European Journal of Breast Health. 2022; 18(2): 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
Vancouver Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T,öznur m Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. European Journal of Breast Health. 2022; 18(2): 172 - 181. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
IEEE Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan T,öznur m "Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges." European Journal of Breast Health, 18, ss.172 - 181, 2022. 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4
ISNAD Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan, Tuğba İlkem - öznur, meltem. "Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges". European Journal of Breast Health 18/2 (2022), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4