Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 142 - 148 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499 İndeks Tarihi: 21-06-2022

Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders

Öz:
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the relationship between proximal biceps tendon disorders and the degree of subacromial impingement in patients who underwent arthroscopic subacromial debridement. Patients and methods: Between January 2015 and June 2021, a total of 110 patients (44 males, 66 females; mean age: 52.5±11.43 years; range, 15 to 78 years) who underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression were retrospectively analyzed. The degree of the subacromial impingement observed during arthroscopy was classified into four stages according to the Neer classification. We classified proximal biceps tendon disorders as five grades according to the Nirschl classification. The proportional relationship between subacromial impingement and biceps tendinopathy severity was analyzed. Results: While biceps tendon degeneration was found to be significantly lower in patients with mild or no subacromial impingement, high rates of severe biceps tendon degeneration were observed in patients with high degree of subacromial impingement. A total of 75% of the patients who had no subacromial impingement had no biceps tendon disorder. Approximately 50% of the patients with Stage 1 subacromial impingement did not have biceps disorder, 31.3% had inflammation, and 12.5% had minor degeneration. In Stage 2 subacromial impingement group, the ratio of inflammation (42.9%) and minor degeneration (42.9%) of biceps tendon greatly increased, and the highest rate of biceps tendon degeneration was observed in the most advanced stage (Stage 3) subacromial impingement group (39.3%) (p=0.001). Conclusion: The stage of subacromial impingement is correlated with the degree of biceps degeneration. Therefore, one should keep in mind that the presence of advanced subacromial impingement may indicate advanced biceps tendon pathologies.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Akbari N, Ozen S, Şenlikçi HB, Haberal M, Çetin N. Ultrasound-guided versus blind subacromial corticosteroid and local anesthetic injection in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized study of efficacy. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:115-22.
  • 2. Krupp RJ, Kevern MA, Gaines MD, Kotara S, Singleton SB. Long head of the biceps tendon pain: Differential diagnosis and treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39:55-70.
  • 3. Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K. Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:644-54.
  • 4. Hsu SH, Miller SL, Curtis AS. Long head of biceps tendon pathology: Management alternatives. Clin Sports Med 2008;27:747-62.
  • 5. Bennett WF. Visualization of the anatomy of the rotator interval and bicipital sheath. Arthroscopy 2001;17:107- 11.
  • 6. Arai R, Mochizuki T, Yamaguchi K, Sugaya H, Kobayashi M, Nakamura T, et al. Functional anatomy of the superior glenohumeral and coracohumeral ligaments and the subscapularis tendon in view of stabilization of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:58-64.
  • 7. Khan R, Satyapal KS, Naidoo N, Lazarus L. Long head of biceps brachii tendon and transverse humeral ligament morphometry and their associated pathology. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2020;79:359-65.
  • 8. Varacallo M, Mair SD. Proximal Biceps Tendinitis and Tendinopathy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available at: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK533002/
  • 9. Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89:1001-9.
  • 10. Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ. The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000;9:382-5.
  • 11. Curtis AS, Snyder SJ. Evaluation and treatment of biceps tendon pathology. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:33-43.
  • 12. Neer CS 2nd. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;(173):70-7.
  • 13. Nirschl RP, Ashman ES. Elbow tendinopathy: Tennis elbow. Clin Sports Med 2003;22:813-36.
  • 14. Goldberg SS, Bigliani LU. Shoulder impingement revisited: Advanced concepts of pathomechanics and treatment. Instr Course Lect 2006;55:17-27.
  • 15. Neviaser TJ, Neviaser RJ, Neviaser JS, Neviaser JS. The four-in-one arthroplasty for the painful arc syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;(163):107-12.
  • 16. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: Incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:959-64.
  • 17. Vecchio P, Kavanagh R, Hazleman BL, King RH. Shoulder pain in a community-based rheumatology clinic. Br J Rheumatol 1995;34:440-2.
  • 18. Harrison AK, Flatow EL. Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:701-8.
  • 19. Szyluk K, Jasiński A, Koczy B, Widuchowski W, Widuchowski J. Subacromial impingement syndrome-- most frequent reason of the painful shoulder syndrome. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2008;25:179-83.
  • 20. Luopajärvi T, Kuorinka I, Virolainen M, Holmberg M. Prevalence of tenosynovitis and other injuries of the upper extremities in repetitive work. Scand J Work Environ Health 1979;5 suppl 3:48-55.
  • 21. Nordander C, Ohlsson K, Balogh I, Rylander L, Pålsson B, Skerfving S. Fish processing work: The impact of two sex dependent exposure profiles on musculoskeletal health. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:256-64.
  • 22. Atik OŞ. Overuse and abuse of cortisone. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2017;28:1.
  • 23. van Rijn RM, Huisstede BM, Koes BW, Burdorf A. Associations between work-related factors and specific disorders of the shoulder--a systematic review of the literature. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010;36:189-201.
  • 24. Dines D, Warren RF, Inglis AE. Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;(164):165-71.
  • 25. Scapinelli R, Candiotto S, Ferrari GP, Iacobellis C. Subcutaneous rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii in subacromial impingement syndrome. Chir Organi Mov 1999;84:229-37.
APA CAN F, Gultac E, ŞAHİN İ, KILINÇ C, Aydogan N (2022). Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. , 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
Chicago CAN Fatih İlker,Gultac Emre,ŞAHİN İsmail Gökhan,KILINÇ Cem Yalın,Aydogan Nevres Hurriyet Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. (2022): 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
MLA CAN Fatih İlker,Gultac Emre,ŞAHİN İsmail Gökhan,KILINÇ Cem Yalın,Aydogan Nevres Hurriyet Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. , 2022, ss.142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
AMA CAN F,Gultac E,ŞAHİN İ,KILINÇ C,Aydogan N Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. . 2022; 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
Vancouver CAN F,Gultac E,ŞAHİN İ,KILINÇ C,Aydogan N Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. . 2022; 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
IEEE CAN F,Gultac E,ŞAHİN İ,KILINÇ C,Aydogan N "Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders." , ss.142 - 148, 2022. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
ISNAD CAN, Fatih İlker vd. "Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders". (2022), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
APA CAN F, Gultac E, ŞAHİN İ, KILINÇ C, Aydogan N (2022). Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. Joint diseases and related surgery, 33(1), 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
Chicago CAN Fatih İlker,Gultac Emre,ŞAHİN İsmail Gökhan,KILINÇ Cem Yalın,Aydogan Nevres Hurriyet Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. Joint diseases and related surgery 33, no.1 (2022): 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
MLA CAN Fatih İlker,Gultac Emre,ŞAHİN İsmail Gökhan,KILINÇ Cem Yalın,Aydogan Nevres Hurriyet Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. Joint diseases and related surgery, vol.33, no.1, 2022, ss.142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
AMA CAN F,Gultac E,ŞAHİN İ,KILINÇ C,Aydogan N Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2022; 33(1): 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
Vancouver CAN F,Gultac E,ŞAHİN İ,KILINÇ C,Aydogan N Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2022; 33(1): 142 - 148. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
IEEE CAN F,Gultac E,ŞAHİN İ,KILINÇ C,Aydogan N "Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders." Joint diseases and related surgery, 33, ss.142 - 148, 2022. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.499
ISNAD CAN, Fatih İlker vd. "Subacromial impingement as a predictor of proximal biceps tendon disorders". Joint diseases and related surgery 33/1 (2022), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.499