Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 180 - 186 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 İndeks Tarihi: 21-06-2022
Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment
Öz: Objectives: This study aims to assess, through a questionnaire,
the functionality, and efficacy of using three-dimensional (3D)
printed medical casts.
Patients and methods: Between February 2017 and March 2019,
a total of 24 patients (14 males, 10 females; mean age: 33.1±9.4
years, range, 12 to 62 years) with upper extremity fracture who
were applied 3D printed medical cast were included. Patient
satisfaction was evaluated using the Quebec User Evaluation of
Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0). Each
item is scored on a five-point scale.
Results: The mean follow-up was 14 (range, 6 to 18) months.
All fractures healed within four to six weeks without any
complications. In all cases, there was no loss of reduction. The
total mean QUEST 2.0 satisfaction score for the participants was
4.7. The ratings on each scale ranged from 4.5 to 4.9.
Conclusion: Almost all patients with upper extremity fractures
were satisfied with the 3D printed medical cast. The patients
found the 3D printed medical cast to be comfortable, safe,
easy-to-apply, lightweight, and effective.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Christopher L, Colton MD. The history of fracture treatment. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, Krettek C, Green NE, editors. Skeletal Trauma. 2nd ed. Philedelphia: Saunders; 2008. p. 1-32.
- 2. Szostakowski B, Smitham P, Khan WS. Plaster of Paris-short history of casting and injured limb immobilzation. Open Orthop J 2017;11:291-6.
- 3. Faustini MC, Neptune RR, Crawford RH, Stanhope SJ. Manufacture of passive dynamic ankle-foot orthoses using selective laser sintering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008;55:784-90.
- 4. Adkins LM. Cast changes: Synthetic versus plaster. Pediatr Nurs 1997;23:422, 425-7.
- 5. Graham J, Wang M, Frizzell K, Watkins C, Beredjiklian P, Rivlin M. Conventional vs 3-dimensional printed cast wear comfort. Hand (N Y) 2020;15:388-92.
- 6. Ertürk C, Ayyıldız S, Erdöl C. Orthopedics and 3D technology in Turkey: A preliminary report. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2021;32:279-89.
- 7. Lin H, Shi L, Wang D. A rapid and intelligent designing technique for patient-specific and 3D-printed orthopedic cast. 3D Print Med 2015;2:4.
- 8. Demers L, Weiss-lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability 2002;14:101-5.
- 9. Sikka MP, Midha VK. The role of biopolymers and biodegradable polymeric dressings in managing chronic wounds. In: Advanced Textiles for Wound Care. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 463-88.
- 10. Seitz H, Marlovits S, Schwendenwein I, Vécsei V, Losert U. Biocompatibility of polyethylene terephthalate--PET- -(Trevira strong)--an in vivo study of the sheep knee. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1996;41:178-82.
- 11. Fess EE. Orthoses for mobilization of joints: principles and methods. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, editor. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2011. p. 1588-98.
- 12. Gravlee JR, Van Durme DJ. Braces and splints for musculoskeletal conditions. Am Fam Physician 2007;75:342-8.
- 13. Chen YJ, Lin H, Zhang X, Huang W, Shi L, Wang D. Application of 3D-printed and patient-specific cast for the treatment of distal radius fractures: Initial experience. 3D Print Med 2017;3:11.
- 14. Wong DA, Watson AB. Allergic contact dermatitis due to benzalkonium chloride in plaster of Paris. Australas J Dermatol 2001;42:33-5.
- 15. Sharma H, Prabu D. Plaster of Paris: Past, present and future. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2013;4:107-9.
- 16. Akoglu G, Emre S, Metin A, Bozkurt M. High frequency of hypertrichosis after cast application. Dermatology 2012;225:70-4.
- 17. Davis DI, Baratz M. Soft tissue complications of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2010;26:229-35.
- 18. Atik OŞ. Is there something new and interesting in my article? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019;30:69.
| APA | SURUCU S, AYDIN M, BATMAZ A, KARAŞAHİN D, MAHİROĞULLARI M (2022). Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. , 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| Chicago | SURUCU Serkan,AYDIN Mahmud,BATMAZ Ahmet Güray,KARAŞAHİN Deniz,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. (2022): 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| MLA | SURUCU Serkan,AYDIN Mahmud,BATMAZ Ahmet Güray,KARAŞAHİN Deniz,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. , 2022, ss.180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| AMA | SURUCU S,AYDIN M,BATMAZ A,KARAŞAHİN D,MAHİROĞULLARI M Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. . 2022; 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| Vancouver | SURUCU S,AYDIN M,BATMAZ A,KARAŞAHİN D,MAHİROĞULLARI M Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. . 2022; 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| IEEE | SURUCU S,AYDIN M,BATMAZ A,KARAŞAHİN D,MAHİROĞULLARI M "Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment." , ss.180 - 186, 2022. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| ISNAD | SURUCU, Serkan vd. "Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment". (2022), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| APA | SURUCU S, AYDIN M, BATMAZ A, KARAŞAHİN D, MAHİROĞULLARI M (2022). Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. Joint diseases and related surgery, 33(1), 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| Chicago | SURUCU Serkan,AYDIN Mahmud,BATMAZ Ahmet Güray,KARAŞAHİN Deniz,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. Joint diseases and related surgery 33, no.1 (2022): 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| MLA | SURUCU Serkan,AYDIN Mahmud,BATMAZ Ahmet Güray,KARAŞAHİN Deniz,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. Joint diseases and related surgery, vol.33, no.1, 2022, ss.180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| AMA | SURUCU S,AYDIN M,BATMAZ A,KARAŞAHİN D,MAHİROĞULLARI M Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2022; 33(1): 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| Vancouver | SURUCU S,AYDIN M,BATMAZ A,KARAŞAHİN D,MAHİROĞULLARI M Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2022; 33(1): 180 - 186. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| IEEE | SURUCU S,AYDIN M,BATMAZ A,KARAŞAHİN D,MAHİROĞULLARI M "Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment." Joint diseases and related surgery, 33, ss.180 - 186, 2022. 10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
| ISNAD | SURUCU, Serkan vd. "Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment". Joint diseases and related surgery 33/1 (2022), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.372 |
