Due to the fault and damages caused by public health care providers exercising their powers, only a full judicial case may be filed against the administration in the administrative judiciary. The administration, which has been awarded compensation against it in the full judicial case, will recourse the compensation it has paid to the relevant public health employee at the rate of their fault. The recourse litigations that the administration will file against the public health care providers are being heard in the judicial court and ought to be filed in the competent court of first instance. The court, which is looking into the recourse litigation, must first determine the fault rates of the parties. It is accepted in supreme court practices that fairness should be reduced from the amount of compensation determined according to fault rates. It is stated that organizational fault created in the presentation of health services should be evaluated, while reducing fairness in Supreme Court decisions. Organizational fault arise in a variety of ways, such as poor health care, late functioning of health care, and no health care at all. In this study, which was discussed by document review method, in line withthe relevant Legal regulations and Supreme Court decisions, it was tried to be discussed in detail in the recourse cases against public health care providers, the application of fairness reduction due to organizational fault.