Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 657 - 667 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/vet-2012-86 İndeks Tarihi: 22-06-2022

Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to identify the shares of the intermediaries in the Eastern Mediterranean region milk supply chain (I) and to estimate the factors influencing the raw milk marketing preferences of milk producers (II). The research was conducted in 2017 with 102 dairy farms and 36 dairy industry enterprises in Hatay, Kahramanmaraş, and Osmaniye provinces. As a result of the research, it was found that 85% of the milk produced by dairy farms was offered to the market, 65% of the milk entering the supply chain was transferred to the dairy industry and the average capacity utilization rate of the industry was 37%. It was found that the most rational chain for the milk producers and dairies among the 4 main marketing channels in the region is the third channel, which has two stages. Binary logistic regression was found to be significant (p < 0.01) as a whole. It was found that “scale” and “price” variables explained the variation in marketing preference by 70%. The cattle unit in the livestock enterprise has a positive effect on the transfer of milk to the industry, and the possibility of selling the milk directly at a higher price has a negative effect. For a more sustainable market organization and supply chain, business scales need to be increased and raw milk prices should be linked with production costs.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Gateway to dairy production and products. Milk production. Technical Report. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2020.
  • 2. Akbay C, Tiryaki Yıldız G. Tüketicilerin ambalajlı ve açık süt tüketim alışkanlıklarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi: Kahramanmaraş örneği. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 2007; 10 (1): 89-96 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 3. Akın AC. Türkiye’de süt sektörünün değerlendirilmesi: İnek sütü arzında mevsimsellik. Hayvancılık Sektörüne Ekonomik Bakış. 1st ed. Ankara, Turkey: Iksad Publishing House; 2020. pp. 5-28 (in Turkish).
  • 4. DOĞAKA. TC Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı, Doğu Akdeniz Kalkınma Ajansı, Doğu Akdeniz. Hatay, Turkey: 2020; DOĞAKA (in Turkish).
  • 5. Cevger Y, Aral Y, Sakarya E. Hayvancılık Ekonomisi. 1st ed. TC. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayın No 2361. Eskişehir, Turkey:Anadolu Üniversitesi; 2011 (in Turkish).
  • 6. Can MF. Türkiye hayvancılık politikalarının AB ile etkileşimi ve olası sonuçları. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 2018; 13 (2): 242-250 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.17094/ataunivbd.321172
  • 7. Günlü A. Çiğ süt pazarlanmasında süt sanayi işletmelerinde firma yoğunlaşma oranlarının araştırılması: Burdur ili örneği. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 17 (1): 101-106 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi:10.9775/ kvfd.2010.2520
  • 8. Can MF. A socioeconomic analysis of small ruminant breeders’ membership relations and organizational effectiveness. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2014; 61 (2): 119-124. doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002615
  • 9. Can MF, Yalçın C. Investigation of organizational responsibility and satisfaction level of the cattle producers in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2015; 21 (5): 711-717. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2015.13229
  • 10. Collins M. Sampling. Worcester RM, Downham J (editors). Consumer Marketing Research Handbook. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Sci. Pub. Company Inc.; 1986.
  • 11. Armstrong G, Adam S, Denize S, Kotler P. Principles of Marketing. 6th edition. Melbourne, VIC, Australia : Pearson Australia; 2015.
  • 12. Vural H, Fidan H. Türkiye’de hayvansal üretim ve hayvancılık işletmelerinin özellikleri. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 2007; 13 (2): 49-59 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 13. Koç G, Uzmay A. Süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde üreticilerin kooperatif kanalıyla süt pazarlama olasılığını etkileyen faktörler: Trakya Bölgesi örneği. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 2018; 24 (2): 203-214 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.24181/ tarekoder.477188 (
  • 14. Shokoohi Z, Chizari AH, Asgari M. Investigating bargaining power of farmers and processors in Iran’s dairy market. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2019; 51 (1): 126-141. doi:10.1017/aae.2018.26
  • 15. Artukoğlu MM, Olgun A. Cooperation tendencies and alternative milk marketing channels dairy producers in Turkey: a case of Menemen. Agricultural Economics 2008; 54 (1): 32-37. doi:10.17221/252-AGRICECON
  • 16. Çetin B. Tarım Ekonomisi. 1st ed. Bursa, Turkey: Dora Yayınları; 2010 (in Turkish).
  • 17. Sayın C, Karaman S, Mencet MS, Taşcıoğlu Y. Antalya ilinde süt arz zincirinde pazarlama marjları. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 24 (2): 95-99 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 18. Vargova L, Rajcaniova M. Development of marketing margins of dairy industry in Slovakia. International Scientific Days 2018; 2492-2501. doi: 10.15414/isd2018.aeu.06
  • 19. TMAF (Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry). Süt ve süt ürünleri üreten ve işleyen tescil edilmiş işletme kayıtları. Institutional Reports for Hatay, Osmaniye and Kahramanmaraş provinces. Ankara, Turkey: TMAF; 2019 (in Turkish).
  • 20. Israel GD. Determining Sample Size: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS. Gainesville, FL, USA: University of Florida; 1992.
  • 21. Can MF, Altuğ N, Kaygısız F. Biosecurity levels of livestock enterprises in Turkey and factors affecting these levels. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2020; 44: 632-640. doi:10.3906/vet-1911-70
  • 22. Kaygısız F. İstanbul’da kasaplık koyun ve koyun eti pazarlamasında aracı marjları. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2002; 28 (1): 143-153 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 23. Hosmer DV, Hosmer T, Cessie L, Lmeshow S. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16 (9): 965-980. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097- 0258(19970515)16:9<965::aid-sim509>3.0.co;2-o
  • 24. Demir MÖ. Çıkarım ve ilişki analizi. In: Sosyal Bilimlerde İstatistiksel Analiz. SPSS 20 Kullanım Kılavuzu. 2nd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Detay Yayıncılık; 2012 (in Turkish).
  • 25. Cankurt M, Miran B, Şahin A. Sığır eti tercihlerini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma: İzmir ili örneği. Hayvansal Üretim 2010; 51(2): 16-22 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 26. Can MF. Türkiye’de veteriner hekimlerin girişimcilik düzeyi ve niyetine etkili faktörler. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2015; 21 (6): 855-862 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2015.13772
  • 27. Demir P, Aral S. Kars ili süt sanayi işletmelerinde üretim ve sanayi entegrasyonunun ekonomik ve sosyo-ekonomik analizi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2010; 16 (4): 585-592 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.9775/ kvfd.2009.1179
  • 28. Can MF. Hayvancılık yatırım projeleri, fizibilite çalışmaları ve ekonomik önemi. Hayvancılık Sektörüne Ekonomik Bakış. 1st ed. Ankara, Turkey: Iksad Publishing House; 2020. pp. 139-176 (in Turkish).
  • 29. Bars T, Akbay C. Kahramanmaraş ilinde süt ve süt ürünleri işleyen mandıra işletmelerinin yapısal analizi. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 2013; 16 (2): 9-20 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 30. Aydın E, Can MF, Aral Y. Cevger Y, Sakarya E. Türkiye’de canlı hayvan ve kırmızı et ithalatı kararlarının sığır besicileri üzerine etkileri. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi 2010; 81 (2): 51- 57 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 31. USK. Ulusal Süt Konseyi (National Milk Council). Yemlerin ortalama fiyatları. Ankara, Turkey: Ulusal Süt Konseyi; 2020 (in Turkish).
  • 32. TVMA. Turkish Veterinary Medical Association. Düşük fiyat paritesi süt sektörünü olumsuz etkiler. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Veterinary Medical Association; 2020 (in Turkish).
  • 33. European Comission. Milk market observatory. Agriculture and Rural Development Report. Brussels, Belgium: EC Publishing; 2020.
  • 34. Borawski P, Guth M, Truszkowski W, Zuzek D, BeldyckaBorawska A et al. Milk price changes in Poland in the context of the Common Agricultural Policy. Agricultural Economics– Czech 2020; 66: 19-26. doi: 10.17221/178/2019-AGRICECON
  • 35. Scalco PR, Braga MJ. Measuring the degree of oligopsony power in the Brazilian raw milk market. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2014; 17 (2): 1-20. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.167902
  • 36. Resmi Gazete. 2017/20 sayılı Çiğ sütün arzına dair tebliğ. 27 Nisan 2017 tarih ve 30050 sayılı Resmi Gazete. Ankara, Turkey: Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey; 2017 (in Turkish).
  • 37. Bölük G, Karaman S. Süt arz zincirinde aksak rekabet koşullarinin asimetrik hata düzeltme modeli ile analizi. Rekabet Dergisi 2015; 16 (1): 3-40 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 38. Graubner M, Koller I, Salhofer K, Balmann A. Cooperative versus non-cooperative spatial competition for milk. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2011; 38 (1): 99-118. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbq054
  • 39. Terin M. Dünya süt ve süt ürünleri üretim, tüketim, fiyat ve ticaretindeki gelişmeler. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2014; 3 (4): 53-63 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • 40. OECD/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Dairy and dairy products, in OECD FAO Agricultural Outlook 2018-2027. Paris/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2018.
APA Can M, GÜNLÜ A, ARAL Y, Sarıhan Şahin T, ARIKAN M (2021). Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. , 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
Chicago Can Mehmet Ferit,GÜNLÜ Aytekin,ARAL YILMAZ,Sarıhan Şahin Tuğba,ARIKAN Mehmet Saltuk Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. (2021): 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
MLA Can Mehmet Ferit,GÜNLÜ Aytekin,ARAL YILMAZ,Sarıhan Şahin Tuğba,ARIKAN Mehmet Saltuk Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. , 2021, ss.657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
AMA Can M,GÜNLÜ A,ARAL Y,Sarıhan Şahin T,ARIKAN M Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. . 2021; 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
Vancouver Can M,GÜNLÜ A,ARAL Y,Sarıhan Şahin T,ARIKAN M Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. . 2021; 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
IEEE Can M,GÜNLÜ A,ARAL Y,Sarıhan Şahin T,ARIKAN M "Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey." , ss.657 - 667, 2021. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
ISNAD Can, Mehmet Ferit vd. "Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey". (2021), 657-667. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2012-86
APA Can M, GÜNLÜ A, ARAL Y, Sarıhan Şahin T, ARIKAN M (2021). Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 45(4), 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
Chicago Can Mehmet Ferit,GÜNLÜ Aytekin,ARAL YILMAZ,Sarıhan Şahin Tuğba,ARIKAN Mehmet Saltuk Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 45, no.4 (2021): 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
MLA Can Mehmet Ferit,GÜNLÜ Aytekin,ARAL YILMAZ,Sarıhan Şahin Tuğba,ARIKAN Mehmet Saltuk Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol.45, no.4, 2021, ss.657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
AMA Can M,GÜNLÜ A,ARAL Y,Sarıhan Şahin T,ARIKAN M Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2021; 45(4): 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
Vancouver Can M,GÜNLÜ A,ARAL Y,Sarıhan Şahin T,ARIKAN M Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2021; 45(4): 657 - 667. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
IEEE Can M,GÜNLÜ A,ARAL Y,Sarıhan Şahin T,ARIKAN M "Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey." Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 45, ss.657 - 667, 2021. 10.3906/vet-2012-86
ISNAD Can, Mehmet Ferit vd. "Mediator margins in the dairy supply chain and factors influencing marketing preferences in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey". Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 45/4 (2021), 657-667. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2012-86