Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 1539 - 1553 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/elk-2005-208 İndeks Tarihi: 22-06-2022

Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems

Öz:
Robot motion planning & control is one of the most critical and prevalent problems in the robotics community. Even though original motion planning algorithms had relied on “open-loop” strategies and policies, researchers and engineers have been focusing on feedback motion planning and control algorithms due to the uncertainties, such as process and sensor noise of autonomous robotic applications. Recently, several studies proposed some robust feedback motion planning strategies based on sparsely connected safe zones. In this class of planning and control policies, local control policy inside a single zone computes and feeds the control actions that can drive the robot to a different connected region while guaranteeing that the robot never exceeds the boundaries of the active area until convergence. While most of these studies apply only to holonomic robotic models, a recent motion planning method (RCT) can solve the motion planning and navigation problems for unicycle like robotic systems based on a randomly connected circular region tree. In this paper, we propose a new/updated feedback motion planning algorithm that substantially enhances the sparsity, computational feasibility, and input effort compared to their methodology. The new algorithm generates a sparse neighborhood tree as a set of connected obround zones. Obround regions cover larger areas inside the environment, thus leads to a more sparse tree structure. During navigation, we modify the nonlinear control policy adopted in RCT method to handle the obround shaped zones. The feedback control policy navigates the robot model from one obround zone to the adjacent area in the tree structure, ensuring it stays inside the active region’s boundaries and asymptotically reaches the connected obround. We demonstrate the effectiveness and validity of the algorithm on simulation studies. Our Monte Carlo simulations show that our enhancement to the original algorithm probabilistically improves the sparsity, and produces smoother trajectories compared to two motion planning algorithms that rely on sampling based neighborhood structures.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Li THS, Yeh YC, Wu JD, Hsiao MY, Chen CY. Multifunctional intelligent autonomous parking controllers for carlike mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2009; 57 (5): 1687–1700.
  • [2] Ogbemhe J, Mpofu K. Towards achieving a fully intelligent robotic arc welding: a review. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 2015; 42 (5): 475–484.
  • [3] Li B, Moridian B, Kamal A, Patankar S, Mahmoudian N. Multi-robot mission planning with static energy replenishment. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 2019; 95 (2): 745–759.
  • [4] Kavraki LE, Svestka P, Latombe JC, Overmars MH. Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 1996; 12 (4): 566–580.
  • [5] Piazzi A, Visioli A. Global minimum-jerk trajectory planning of robot manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2000; 47 (1): 140–149.
  • [6] Mitsi S, Bouzakis KD, Mansour G, Sagris D, Maliaris G. Off-line programming of an industrial robot for manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2005; 26 (3): 262–267.
  • [7] LaValle SM, Kuffner Jr JJ. Randomized kinodynamic planning. The International Journal of rRobotics Research 2001; 20 (5): 378–400.
  • [8] Tedrake R, Manchester IR, Tobenkin M, Roberts JW. LQR-trees: Feedback motion planning via sums-of-squares verification. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2010; 29 (8): 1038–1052.
  • [9] Karaman S, Frazzoli E. Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2011; 30 (7): 846–894.
  • [10] La Valle SM. Motion planning. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 2011; 18 (2): 108–118.
  • [11] Agha-Mohammadi AA, Chakravorty S, Amato NM. FIRM: Sampling-based feedback motion-planning under motion uncertainty and imperfect measurements. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2014; 33 (2): 268–304.
  • [12] Caldwell CV, Dunlap DD, Collins EG. Motion planning for an autonomous underwater vehicle via sampling based model predictive control. In: OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE; Seattle, WA, USA; 2010. pp. 1–6.
  • [13] Moore J, Cory R, Tedrake R. Robust post-stall perching with a simple fixed-wing glider using LQR-Trees. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 2014; 9 (2): 025013.
  • [14] Reist P, Preiswerk P, Tedrake R. Feedback-motion-planning with simulation-based LQR-trees. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2016; 35 (11): 1393–1416.
  • [15] Yang L, LaValle SM. A framework for planning feedback motion strategies based on a random neighborhood graph. In: Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2000. pp. 544–549.
  • [16] Yang L, Lavalle SM. The sampling-based neighborhood graph: An approach to computing and executing feedback motion strategies. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 2004; 20 (3): 419–432.
  • [17] Lindemann SR, LaValle SM. Simple and efficient algorithms for computing smooth, collision-free feedback laws over given cell decompositions. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2009; 28 (5): 600–621.
  • [18] Golbol F, Ankarali MM, Saranli A. RG-Trees: Trajectory-Free Feedback Motion Planning Using Sparse Random Reference Governor Trees. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); Madrid, Spain; 2018. pp. 6506–6511.
  • [19] Ege E, Ankarali MM. Feedback motion planning of unmanned surface vehicles via random sequential composition. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 2019; 41 (12): 3321–3330.
  • [20] Ozcan M, Ankarali MM. Feedback Motion Planning For a Dynamic Car Model via Random Sequential Composition. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC); Bari, Italy; 2019. pp. 4239–4244.
  • [21] LaValle SM, Kuffner JJ, Donald B, et al. Rapidly-exploring random trees: progress and prospects. Algorithmic and Computational Robotics: New Directions 2001; (5): 293–308.
  • [22] Kolmanovsky I, Garone E, Di Cairano S. Reference and command governors: A tutorial on their theory and automotive applications. In: 2014 American Control Conference; Portland, OR, USA; 2014. pp. 226–241.
  • [23] Garone E, Di Cairano S, Kolmanovsky I. Reference and command governors for systems with constraints: A survey on theory and applications. Automatica 2017; 75 : 306–328.
  • [24] Zeng W, Church RL. Finding shortest paths on real road networks: the case for A. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2009; 23 (4): 531–543.
  • [25] LaValle SM. Planning Algorithms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • [26] Burridge RR, Rizzi AA, Koditschek DE. Sequential composition of dynamically dexterous robot behaviors. The International Journal of Robotics Research 1999; 18 (6): 534–555.
APA ANKARALI M (2021). Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. , 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
Chicago ANKARALI M. Mert Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. (2021): 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
MLA ANKARALI M. Mert Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. , 2021, ss.1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
AMA ANKARALI M Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. . 2021; 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
Vancouver ANKARALI M Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. . 2021; 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
IEEE ANKARALI M "Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems." , ss.1539 - 1553, 2021. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
ISNAD ANKARALI, M. Mert. "Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems". (2021), 1539-1553. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-2005-208
APA ANKARALI M (2021). Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 29(3), 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
Chicago ANKARALI M. Mert Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 29, no.3 (2021): 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
MLA ANKARALI M. Mert Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, vol.29, no.3, 2021, ss.1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
AMA ANKARALI M Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2021; 29(3): 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
Vancouver ANKARALI M Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2021; 29(3): 1539 - 1553. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
IEEE ANKARALI M "Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems." Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 29, ss.1539 - 1553, 2021. 10.3906/elk-2005-208
ISNAD ANKARALI, M. Mert. "Obround trees: sparsity enhanced feedback motion planning of differential drive robotic systems". Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 29/3 (2021), 1539-1553. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-2005-208