Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 62 - 67 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297 İndeks Tarihi: 23-06-2022

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study

Öz:
Aim: Colorectal resection is a procedure that might cause severe pain in the postoperative period. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a interfascial plane block technique used frequently in recent years to provide postoperative analgesia. The study aimed to compare the ESPB and trocar site infiltration on pain scores and postoperative fentanyl consumption in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection (LCRR). Materials and Methods: ASA I-III, 48 patients scheduled for LCRR were randomly assigned into two groups. Bilateral ultrasoundguided ESPB with 0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml was administered to Group ESPB (n=24) at T7 level on each side. Trocar Site Group (n=24) was injected with peri-incisional 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine subcutaneously in trocar sites after surgery. Intravenous (iv) dexketoprofen and iv 0.1mg/kg morphine were injected into both groups half an hour before the surgery ended. At the postoperative 12th hour, 50 mg iv dexketoprofen was repeated, and analgesia was achieved with Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl. Postoperative pain scores, fentanyl consumption, opioid-related side effects, and need for rescue analgesia were noted. Results: The twenty-four hour fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the ESPB group than the trocar site group (438.96 ± 297.99 mcg vs. 738.33 ± 247.35 mcg, respectively p=0.001). Compared with the trocar site, the pain scores were statistically higher in the trocar site group during all time period (P < 0.05). Rescue analgesia requirement was statistically higher in the trocar site group than the ESPB group (20/24 vs. 8/24 respectively, p=0.001). Conclusions: ESPB reduced postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores by providing effective analgesia in LCRR.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Delaney CP, Marcello PW, Sonoda T, et al. Gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic colectomy: results of a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2010;24:653-61.
  • 2. Delaney C, Kehlet H, Senagore A, B et al. Postoperative ileus: profiles, risk factors, and definitions—a framework for optimizing surgical outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal and colorectal surgery. Clinical consensus update in general surgery 2006;1:1-26.
  • 3. Mujukian A, Truong A, Tran H, et al. A Standardized Multimodal Analgesia Protocol Reduces Perioperative Opioid Use in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2286-94.
  • 4. Manion SC, Brennan TJ. Thoracic epidural analgesia and acute pain management. Anesthesiology 2011;115:181-8.
  • 5. Wildsmith JA. Continuous thoracic epidural block for surgery: gold standard or debased currency? Br J Anaesth 2012;109:9-12.
  • 6. Cesur S, Yayik AM, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A. Ultrasoundguided Low Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Effective Postoperative Analgesia after Lumbar Surgery: Report of Five Cases. Cureus 2018;10:e3603.
  • 7. Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, et al. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2018;21:323-7.
  • 8. Patel NV, Glover C, Adler AC. Erector Spinae Plane Catheter for Postoperative Analgesia After Thoracotomy in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report. A A Pract 2019;12:299-301.
  • 9. ElHawary H, Abdelhamid K, Meng F, Janis JE. Erector Spinae Plane Block Decreases Pain and Opioid Consumption in Breast Surgery: Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7:e2525.
  • 10. Yamak Altinpulluk E, García Simón D, Fajardo-Pérez M. Erector spinae plane block for analgesia after lower segment caesarean section: Case report. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2018;65:284-6.
  • 11. Pedrazzani C, Menestrina N, Moro M, et al. Local wound infiltration plus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program. Surg Endosc 2016;30:5117-25.
  • 12. Yeh CC, Jao SW, Huh BK, et al. Preincisional dextromethorphan combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia improves postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1384-9
  • 13. Zielińska A, Włodarczyk M, Makaro A, et al. Management of pain in colorectal cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021;157:103122.
  • 14. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. Bmj 2000;321:1493.
  • 15. Higgs S, Henry R, Glackin M. Acute pain services following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Nurs 2014;23:4, 6, 8-11.
  • 16. Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, et al. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:1276- 82.
  • 17. Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1474-506.
  • 18. Tikuišis R, Miliauskas P, Samalavičius NE, et al. Intravenous lidocaine for post-operative pain relief after hand-assisted laparoscopic colon surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18:373-80.
  • 19. Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schönherr ME, et al. Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2007;246:192-200.
  • 20. Atangana R, Ngowe Ngowe M, Binam F, Sosso MA. Morphine versus morphine-ketamine association in the management of post operative pain in thoracic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2007;58:125-7.
  • 21. Kim SH, Kim SI, Ok SY, et al. Opioid sparing effect of low dose ketamine in patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia using fentanyl after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013;64:524-8.
  • 22. Huang D, Song L, Li Y, et al. Posteromedial quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2020;62:109716.
  • 23. Coppens S, Rex S, Fieuws S, et al. Transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a double-blind, prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials 2020;21:581.
  • 24. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, et al. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016;41:621-7.
  • 25. Vidal E, Giménez H, Forero M, Fajardo M. Erector spinae plane block: A cadaver study to determine its mechanism of action. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2018;65:514-9.
  • 26. Hamilton DL. Pneumothorax following erector spinae plane block. J Clin Anesth 2019;52:17.
  • 27. Selvi O, Tulgar S. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block as a cause of unintended motor block. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2018;65:589-92.
  • 28. Ueshima H, Otake H. Erector spinae plane block provides effective pain management during pneumothorax surgery. J Clin Anesth 2017;40:74.
  • 29. Bonvicini D, Giacomazzi A, Pizzirani E. Use of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in breast surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2017;83:1111-2.
  • 30. Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary SD, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block for the management of chronic shoulder pain: a case report. Can J Anaesth 2018;65:288-93.
  • 31. Aydin ME, Ahiskalioglu A, Tekin E, et al. Relief of refractory renal colic in emergency department: A novel indication for ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block. Am J Emerg Med 2019;37:794.e1-.e3.
  • 32. Elkoundi A, Eloukkal Z, Bensghir M,et al. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Hyperalgesic Acute Pancreatitis. Pain Med 2019;20:1055-6.
  • 33. Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia 2017;72:452-60.
  • 34. Chin KJ, Malhas L, Perlas A. The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Report of 3 Cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017;42:372-6.
  • 35. Marques EM, Jones HE, Elvers KT, et al. Local anaesthetic infiltration for peri-operative pain control in total hip and knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analyses of short- and long-term effectiveness. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:220.
  • 36. Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, Wu CL. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:914-32.
  • 37. Tulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, De Cassai A, Gurkan Y. Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in the management of pain: current insights. J Pain Res 2019;12:2597-613.
APA ATEŞ İ, Disci E, YAYIK A (2022). Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. , 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
Chicago ATEŞ İREM,Disci Esra,YAYIK Ahmet Murat Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. (2022): 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
MLA ATEŞ İREM,Disci Esra,YAYIK Ahmet Murat Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. , 2022, ss.62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
AMA ATEŞ İ,Disci E,YAYIK A Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. . 2022; 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
Vancouver ATEŞ İ,Disci E,YAYIK A Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. . 2022; 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
IEEE ATEŞ İ,Disci E,YAYIK A "Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study." , ss.62 - 67, 2022. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
ISNAD ATEŞ, İREM vd. "Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study". (2022), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
APA ATEŞ İ, Disci E, YAYIK A (2022). Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. Annals of Medical Research, 29(1), 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
Chicago ATEŞ İREM,Disci Esra,YAYIK Ahmet Murat Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. Annals of Medical Research 29, no.1 (2022): 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
MLA ATEŞ İREM,Disci Esra,YAYIK Ahmet Murat Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. Annals of Medical Research, vol.29, no.1, 2022, ss.62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
AMA ATEŞ İ,Disci E,YAYIK A Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. Annals of Medical Research. 2022; 29(1): 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
Vancouver ATEŞ İ,Disci E,YAYIK A Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. Annals of Medical Research. 2022; 29(1): 62 - 67. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
IEEE ATEŞ İ,Disci E,YAYIK A "Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study." Annals of Medical Research, 29, ss.62 - 67, 2022. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
ISNAD ATEŞ, İREM vd. "Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study". Annals of Medical Research 29/1 (2022), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297