Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine
Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port

MERT, AYDIN

doi:10.4274/jems.2021.26576

Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port

Aydın Mert (Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü, Deprem Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Journal of Eta Maritime Science

9 3

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 74 - 84 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/jems.2021.26576 İndeks Tarihi: 24-06-2022

Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port

Öz:

The size and importance of maritime transportation in world trade are well known. The number of ports, which is one of the most important elements of maritime transportation, is increasing day by day not only in our country but also throughout the world. Many active fault systems in our country are located at sea. In the Marmara Region in particular, most active branches of the North Anatolian Fault system pass through the Sea of Marmara. When offshore structures such as ports are constructed in high-seismicity zones such as the Sea of Marmara, conducting site-specific seismic hazard studies is necessary to reduce the seismic risk of offshore structures. In 2007, the first Turkish Seismic Design Code for Port Structures was published, which introduced new design concepts in the seismic design of offshore structures. According to this code, the design can be finalized in three basic steps: assessment of regional seismicity, estimation of geotechnical hazards, and soil-structure interaction analysis of offshore structures. Nowadays, the first Turkish Seismic Design Code for Port Structures is on the verge of a major update, which was published as a draft report in May 2019. In this manuscript, site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard analysis is needed to determine the seismic hazard associated with typical port sites. Considering this new draft code as a guideline document, we developed consistent seismic hazard studies for offshore structures within the Haydarpaşa Port sites. Unlike the old one, this new document identifies four different levels of ground motion: minimum damage level earthquake (TR=72), limited damage level earthquake (TR=144), controlling damage level earthquake (TR=475), and maximum considered earthquake (TR=2.475)

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] H. Tsuchida, “History of earthquake-induced damage on port facilities in Japan.” J Foundation Engineering & Equipment, vol. 315, 2-4 in Japanese, 2003.
[2] Port and Harbour Research Institute, Handbook on liquefaction remediation of reclaimed land, Ports and Harbours Bureau, Tokyo: Coastal Development Institute of Technology, 1997.
[3] R. Boulanger, et al. “Performance of waterfront structures,” Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake Reconnaissance Rep. in Chap. 13, Supplement A to Earthquake Spectra, T. L. Youd, J.-P. Bardet, and J. D. Bray Eds., İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, 2000, pp. 295-310.
[4] A.R. Gunbak, O. Muyesser, and Y. Yuksel, “Damages recorded at the coastal and port structures around Izmit Bay under the August 17, 1999 Earthquake.” Presented at PIANC Buenos Aires Conf., 2000. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2000.
[5] Y. Yüksel, B. Alpar, A. Yalciner, E. Cevik, O. Ozguven and Y. Celikoglu, “Effects of the Eastern Marmara Earthquake on the marine structures and coastal areas.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Water and Maritime Engineering, vol. 156, pp. 147-163, Jun 2003.
[6] B.M. Sumer, A. Kaya, and N.E.O. Hansen, “Impact of liquefaction on coastal structures in the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey Earthquake.” in 12th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., KitaKyushu: Japan, vol. 2, 2002, pp. 504-511.
[7] Kıyı ve Liman Yapıları, Demiryolları ve Hava Meydanları İnşaatlarına İlişkin Deprem Teknik Yönetmeliği, Ulaştırma Bakanlığı, Ankara, Ağustos 2007.
[8] M. Cubrinovski, et al. “Liquefaction-induced damage and CPT characterization of the reclamation at centreport Wellington.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol 108, March 2018.
[9] Ulasim ve Dagitim Tesisleri İçin Deprem Yönetmelikleri Hazirlanmasi ve Musavirlik Hizmetleri Danismanlik Hizmet Alimi İsi, Yüksel Proje, Nihai Rapora Esas Taslak Rapor (ARA RAPOR-3), Kıyı ve Liman Yapıları (Sektör: Ulaşım Tesisleri – A3) Mayis 2019.
[10] The Turkish Statistical Institute, [Online] Available from: https://www.tuik.gov.tr
[11] Boğaziçi University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI), Regional Earthquake and Tsunami Monitoring Center, [Online] Available from:www.koeri.boun. edu.tr.
[12] R. Armijo, B. Meyer, A. Hubert and A. Barka, “Westward propagation of the North Anatolian fault into the northern Aegean: timing and kinematics,” Geology, vol. 27, pp. 267-270, April 2016.
[13] A.C. Yalciner, et al. “Evaluation of tsunami scenario for western Peloponnese, Greece”. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata. vol. 55, pp. 485-500. DOI 10.4430/bgta0126.
[14] T. Hori, A. Pinar, O. Necmioglu, M. Hori and A. Nishizawa, “Special issue the next Marmara earthquake: disaster mitigation, recovery, and early warning, Earth, Planets and Space, vol. 69, May 2017.
[15] C.A. Cornell, “Engineering seismic risk analysis”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 58, pp. 1583-1606, Oct 1968.
[16] R.K. McGuire, “FORTRAN program for seismic risk analysis,” Virginia, USA, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Rep. 76-67, 1976.
[17] R. Gutenberg, and C.F. Richter, “Frequency of earthquakes in California.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 34, pp. 185-188, Oct 1944.
[18] A.A. Barka and K. Kadinsky-Cade, “Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity,” Tectonics, vol. 7, pp. 663-684, Jun 1988.
[19] J.F. Dewey and A.M.C. Şengör, “Aegean and surrounding regions: Complex multi plate and continuum tectonics in convergent zone:” Geological Society America Bullletin, vol. 90, pp. 84-92, Jan 1979.
[20] A.M.C. Şengör, N. Görür and F. Şaroğlu, “Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study,” in strike-slip Faulting and Basin Formation, K.T. Biddle, and N. Christie-Blick, Eds. İstanbul: The Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Publications, vol. 37, 1985, pp. 227-265.
[21] G. Orgulu, “Seismicity and source parameters for small-scale earthquakes along the splays of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) in the Marmara Sea,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 184, pp. 385-404, Jan 2011.
[22] N. Pınar, Marmara Denizi Havzasının Sismik Jeoloji ve Meteorolojisi/Géologie et Météorologie Sismique du Bassin de Mer Marmara, İstanbul: Kenan Matbaası, 1943.
[23] M.N. Toksöz, A.F. Shakal and A.J. Micheal, “Space-time migration of earthquakes along the North Anatolian Fault Zone and seismic gaps,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 117, pp. 1258-1270, Nov 1979.
[24] N. Pondard, R. Armijo, G.C.P. King, B. Meyer and F. Flerit, “Fault interactions in the Sea of Marmara pullapart (North Anatolian Fault): earthquake clustering and propagating earthquake sequences,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 171, pp. 1185-1197, Aug 2007.
[25] A.M.C. Şengör, et al. “The geometry of the North Anatolian transform fault in the Sea of Marmara and its temporal evolution: implications for the development of intracontinental transform faults.” Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 51, pp. 222-242, Feb 2014.
[26] N.N. Ambraseys, “The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea Region over the last 2000 years,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of Amerika, vol. 92, pp. 1-18, Feb 2002.
[27] M. Erdik, M. Demircioglu, K. Sesetyan, E. Durukal and B. Siyahi, “Assessment of probabilistic earthquake hazard in The Marmara region, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 605-631.
[28] H. Hébert, F. Schindelé, Y. Altinok, B. Alpar and C. Gazioglu, “Tsunami hazard in the Marmara Sea (Turkey): a numerical approach to discuss active faulting and impact on the Istanbul coastal areas,” Marine Geology, vol. 215, pp. 23-43, Feb 2005.
[29] N.N. Ambraseys, and C.F. Finkel, “Long-term seismicity of İstanbul and of the Marmara Sea region,” Terra Nova, vol. 3, pp. 527-539, Sep 1991.
[30] E. Kalkan, P. Gülkan, N. Yilmaz and M. Çelebi, “Reassessment of probabilistic seismic hazard in the Marmara region,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 99, pp. 2127-2146, Au
[31] J.K. Gardner and L. Knopoff, “Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern california, with aftershocks removed, poissonian?” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 64-5, pp. 1363-1367, Oct 1974.
[32] T.C. Hanks and W.H. Bakun, “M-log A observations of recent large earthquakes,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 98, 490-494, Feb 2008.
[33] J.G. Anderson, S.G. Wesnousky, and M. Stirling, “Earthquake size as a function of fault slip rate,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America vol. 86, pp. 683-690, Jun 1996.
[34] S. Wiemer, and M. Wys, “Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the western United States and Japan,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 90, pp. 859-869, Aug 2000.
[35] N.A. Abrahamson and W.J. Silva, “Summary of the abrahamson & silva NGA ground motion relations,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, pp. 67-97, Dec 2019.
[36] D.M. Boore and G.M. Atkinson, “Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of pga, pgv, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, pp: 99-138, Dec 2019.
[37] K.W. Campbell and Y. Bozorgnia, “NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of pga, pgv, pgd and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s”, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, pp. 139-171, Dec 2019.
[38] B. Chiou, R.R and Youngs, “An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, pp. 173-215. Dec 2019.
[39] J. Woessner, L. Danciu D. Giardini and the SHARE consortium, “The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, pp. 3553-3596, Jul 2015.
[40] L. Danciu, O. Kale and S. Akkar, “The 2014 Earthquake model of the Middle East: Ground motion model and uncertainties,” Bulletin Earthquake Engineering, pp. 3497-3533, Aug 2016.
[41] L. Danciu, K. Şeşetyan, M. Demircioglu, M. Erdik, D. Giardini, “The 2014 Earthquake Model of the Middle East: seismogenic sources.” Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 3465-3496 (2018). https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0096-8.
[42] S. Akkar, et al. “Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE),” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 311-339, Sept 2013.
[43] N.N. Ambraseys, “The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea Region over the last 2000 years,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of Amerika, vol. 92, pp. 1-18. Feb 2002.
[44] K. Sesetyan, et al. “A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Turkish territory—part I: the area source model,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 16, 3367-3397, Sept 2018.
[45] M.B. Demircioğlu, et al. “A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Turkish territory: part II-fault source and background seismicity model.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol.16, pp. 3399-3438, Sept 2018.
[46] Ez-Frisk Manual, “Software for Earth quake Ground Motion Estimation,” Risk Engineering INC, [Online]. Available: http:// www.ez-frisk.com/. [Accessed: 2015].
[47] Y.N. Huang, A.S. Whittaker and N. Luco, “Maximum spectral demands in the near-fault region. earthquake Spectra,” vol. 24 pp. 319-341. Dec 2008.
[48] Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program NEHRP (2009). 2009 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450), Washington: Building Seismic Safety Council National Institute of Building Sciences, 2004.
[49] Z. Gülerce and N.A. Abrahamson, “Site-specific design spectra for vertical ground motion.” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 27 pp. 1023-1047, Nov 2011.
[50] Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Ankara, 2018.

APA	MERT A (2021). Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. , 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
Chicago	MERT AYDIN Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. (2021): 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
MLA	MERT AYDIN Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. , 2021, ss.74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
AMA	MERT A Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. . 2021; 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
Vancouver	MERT A Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. . 2021; 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
IEEE	MERT A "Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port." , ss.74 - 84, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
ISNAD	MERT, AYDIN. "Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port". (2021), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.26576

APA	MERT A (2021). Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9(2), 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
Chicago	MERT AYDIN Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9, no.2 (2021): 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
MLA	MERT AYDIN Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.9, no.2, 2021, ss.74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
AMA	MERT A Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(2): 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
Vancouver	MERT A Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(2): 74 - 84. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
IEEE	MERT A "Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9, ss.74 - 84, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.26576
ISNAD	MERT, AYDIN. "Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9/2 (2021), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.26576