Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 110 - 119 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/jems.2021.59480 İndeks Tarihi: 24-06-2022

Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards

Öz:
Today, occupational health and safety is a prominent issue in all branches of the industry. In Turkey, shipyards are highly prone to accidents related to occupational safety. Clearly defining hazard risks and taking precautions against identified priority risks are essential in preventing these risks. This study proposes a two-stage risk-assessment method based on spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs), which is a new fuzzy set theory. A systematic risk-assessment tool with the SFSs was developed combining two of the most reliable decision-making methods: “Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)” and “VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR).” The proposed method was applied in a real case study considering the shipyards in Turkey. Results showed that the developed two-stage risk-assessment approach provides reasonable results in identifying high-risk hazards to ensure occupational safety in a shipyard. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the reliability and validity of the results.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1] M. Ozkok, “Risk assesment in ship hull structure production using FMEA,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology (Taiwan), vol. 22, pp. 173-185, 2014.
  • [2] A. Pinto, I.L. Nunes, and R.A. Ribeiro, “Occupational risk assessment in construction industry – overview and reflection,” Safety Science, vol. 49, pp. 616-624, Jun 2011.
  • [3] B.O. Alli, Fundamental principles of occupational health and safety. 2nd ed. International Labour Office, 2008.
  • [4] E. Ilbahar, A. Karaşan, S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman, “A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system,” Safety Science, vol. 103, pp. 124-136, March 2018.
  • [5] J.R.C. Nurse, S. Creese and D. De Roure, “Security risk assessment in internet of things systems. arXiv, Oct 2018.
  • [6] M. Rausand and S. Haugen. Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications, 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John & Wiley Sons, 2020
  • [7] M. Zanko and P. Dawson, “Occupational health and safety management in organizations: a review,” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 14, pp. 328-344, Aug 2011.
  • [8] S. Verma and S. Chaudhari, “Highlights from the literature on risk assessment techniques adopted in the mining industry: a review of past contributions, recent developments and future scope,” International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 691-702, Jul 2016.
  • [9] M. Gul, “Application of pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: the case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit,” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, pp. 715-718, Jul 2018.
  • [10] J. Joy, “Occupational safety risk management in Australian mining.” Occupational Medicine, vol. 54 pp. 311-315, Aug 2004.
  • [11] J. Tang, X. Liu and W. Wang, “A hybrid risk prioritization method based on generalized TODIM and BWM for Fine-Kinney under interval type-2 fuzzy environment,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, pp. 954-979, Jul 2020.
  • [12] G.F. Kinney, and A. D. Wiruth, “Practical risk analysis for safety management,” Naval Weapons Center, vol. 20, pp. 1-25, Jun 1976.
  • [13] M. Oturakçı, C. Dağsuyu, and Ali Kokangül, “A new approach to fine kinney method and an implementation study,” Alphanumeric Journal, vol. 3, pp. 83-92, Dec 2015.
  • [14] A. Kokangül, U. Polat and C. Dağsuyu, “A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies.” Safety Science, vol 91, pp. 24-32, Jan 2017.
  • [15] W. Wang, X. Liu and Y. Qin, Y. “A fuzzy Fine-Kinney-based risk evaluation approach with extended MULTIMOORA method based on Choquet integral,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 125, pp. 111-123, Nov 2018.
  • [16] M. Gul and E. Celik, E. “Fuzzy rule-based Fine–Kinney risk assessment approach for rail transportation systems,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 24, pp. 1786-1812, Dec 2017.
  • [17] M. Gul, B. Guven and A.F. Guneri, “A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation,“ Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 53, pp. 3-16, May 2018.
  • [18] F. Yılmaz and M. Ozcan, “A risk analysis and ranking application for lifting vehicles used in construction sites with integrated AHP and fine-kinney approach,” Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 13, pp. 152-161, Sept 2019.
  • [19] A. Karasan, E. Ilbahar, S. Cebi and C. Kahraman, “A new risk assessment approach: Safety and Critical Effect Analysis (SCEA) and its extension with Pythagorean fuzzy sets,” Safety Science, vol. 108, pp. 173-187, May 2018.
  • [20] M. Gul, A.F. Guneri and M. Baskan, M. “An occupational risk assessment approach for construction and operation period of wind turbines,” Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, vol. 4, pp. 281-298, Summer 2018.
  • [21] M. Gul, S. Mete, F. Serin and E. Celik, Fine–kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-criteria Occupational Risk Assessment, Approaches, Case Studies and Python Applications, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
  • [22] M. Gul, S. Mete, F. Serin and E. Celik, Fine–kinney-based occupational risk assessment using fuzzy best and worst method (F-BWM) and Fuzzy MAIRCA, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 13-30, Sept 2020.
  • [23] M. Gul, S. Mete, F. Serin and E. Celik, Fine–kinney-based occupational risk assessment using ınterval type-2 fuzzy QUALIFLEX, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 135-149, Sept 2020.
  • [24] A.I. Yilmaz, F. Yilmaz, and U. Celebi, “Analysis of shipyard accidents in Turkey”. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, vol. 5, pp. 472-481, Nov 2014.
  • [25] Ö.U. Senturk, “The shipbuilding industry in Viet Nam” OECD Journal: General Papers, 2010, 71-103.
  • [26] S. Seker, F. Recal and H. Basligil, “A combined DEMATEL and grey system theory approach for analyzing occupational risks: a case study in Turkish shipbuilding industry,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 23, pp. 1340-1372, Jul 2017.
  • [27] B. Barlas, Occupational fatalities in shipyards: an analysis in Turkey. Brodogradnja, vol. 63, pp. 35-41.
  • [28] E. Lee, Y. Park, J.G. Shin, “Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, pp. 5880-5887, April 2009.
  • [29] T. Buksa, D. Pavletic, and M. Sokovic, M. “Shipbuilding pipeline production quality improvement.” Journal of Achivements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 40, pp. 160-166, June 2010.
  • [30] B. Barlas, Shipyard fatalities in Turkey. Safety Science, vol. 50, pp. 1247-1252, Jun 2012
  • 31] R. R. Iwańkowicz and W. Rosochacki, “Clustering risk assessment method for shipbuilding industry,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, vol. 114, pp. 1499-1518, Oct 2014.
  • [32] M. Basuki, D. Manfaat, S. Nugroho and A.A.B. Dinariyana, “Probabilistic risk assessment of the shipyard industry using the bayesian method,” International Journal of Technology, vol. 5, pp. 88-97, Dec 2013.
  • [33] S. Gatti, A. Rigamonti, F. Saita and M. Senati, “Measuring value- at-risk in project finance transactions,” European Financial Management, vol. 13, pp. 135-158, Jan 2007.
  • [34] M. Basuki and S. Widjaja. Studi pengembangan model manajemen rısıko usaha bangunan baru pada ıındustrı galangan kapal. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Produksi, Jurusan Teknik Perkapalan, 2008.
  • [35] E, Farrokhizadeh, S. A. Seyfi-Shishavan, Y. Donyatalab and S.H. Seifi, “Interval valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy EDAS method and ıts application to supplier selection,” International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, pp. 457-465, Jul 2020.
  • [36] Y. Donyatalab, E. Farrokhizadeh, S.A. Seyfi-Shishavan, and S.H. Seifi, “Hamacher aggregation operators based on interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their applications to decision making problems,” International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, pp. 466-474, July 2020.
  • [37] F.K. Gündoğdu and C. Kahraman, “Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 36, pp. 337-352, Feb 2019.
  • [38] E. Farrokhizadeh, S.A. Seyfi-Shishavan, F. Kutlu Gündoğdu, Y. Donyatalab, C. Kahraman and S.H. Seifi, “A spherical fuzzy methodology integrating maximizing deviation and TOPSIS methods,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 101, pp. 104212, May 2021.
APA Kutlu Gündoğdu F, Seyfi S (2021). Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. , 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
Chicago Kutlu Gündoğdu Fatma,Seyfi Seyed Amin Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. (2021): 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
MLA Kutlu Gündoğdu Fatma,Seyfi Seyed Amin Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. , 2021, ss.110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
AMA Kutlu Gündoğdu F,Seyfi S Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. . 2021; 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
Vancouver Kutlu Gündoğdu F,Seyfi S Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. . 2021; 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
IEEE Kutlu Gündoğdu F,Seyfi S "Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards." , ss.110 - 119, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
ISNAD Kutlu Gündoğdu, Fatma - Seyfi, Seyed Amin. "Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards". (2021), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.59480
APA Kutlu Gündoğdu F, Seyfi S (2021). Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9(2), 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
Chicago Kutlu Gündoğdu Fatma,Seyfi Seyed Amin Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9, no.2 (2021): 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
MLA Kutlu Gündoğdu Fatma,Seyfi Seyed Amin Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.9, no.2, 2021, ss.110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
AMA Kutlu Gündoğdu F,Seyfi S Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(2): 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
Vancouver Kutlu Gündoğdu F,Seyfi S Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(2): 110 - 119. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
IEEE Kutlu Gündoğdu F,Seyfi S "Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9, ss.110 - 119, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.59480
ISNAD Kutlu Gündoğdu, Fatma - Seyfi, Seyed Amin. "Occupational Risk Assessment Using Spherical Fuzzy Safety and Critical Effect Analysis for Shipyards". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9/2 (2021), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.59480