Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 72 - 76 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237 İndeks Tarihi: 24-06-2022

Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes

Öz:
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting successful vaginal delivery in induction with slow-release dinoprostone at term pregnancy with premature rupture of membranes. Materials and Methods: Pregnancies between 370/7 and 416/7 gestation weeks with premature rupture of membranes in which slow-release dinoprostone was used for cervical ripening were sought for inclusion in the study. Pregnancies with previous uterine surgery, multiple fetal gestations, chorioamnionitis, non-cephalic presentation, fetal distress at the time of admission, HIV positivity, and estimated fetal weight >4500 on ultrasonographic evaluation were excluded. The primary outcome of measures were factors affecting the success of vaginal delivery including maternal age, gestational weeks at delivery, initial Bishop score, parity, induction time, and induction–delivery time interval. To reduce the risk of overfitting in the study, penalized maximum likelihood estimation was performed instead of traditional logistic regression in the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 1266 participants who met the study criteria were included in the study. Among the parameters evaluated for the prediction of successful vaginal delivery in cases with premature rupture of membranes, maternal age (P < .001), Bishop score (P < .001), parity (P=.01), induction time (P < .001), and induction–delivery time interval (P < .001) had an impact on success. The mean gestational week of the participants who had cesarean deliveries was lower than in those who had vaginal deliveries (P=.03); however, this was not a predictor factor of penalized maximum likelihood estimation (P=.70). Conclusion: Basic parameters such as maternal age, induction time, parity, and Bishop score can be used to predict successful vaginal birth following dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert administration.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1(1):CD005302. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Gafni A, Goeree R, Myhr TL, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: an economic evaluation. TERMPROM Study Group. Term prelabour Rupture of the membranes. CMAJ. 1997;157(11):1519-1525.
  • 3. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, et al. Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and prelabor rupture of membranes at term: the role of induction of labor. TermPROM Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(4):780- 785. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Saccone G, Berghella V. Antibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes: metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):627.e1-627.e9. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(16):1005-1010. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10(10):CD000941. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Crane JMG, Young DC. Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17(5):795-809. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Keirse MJ. Prostaglandins in preinduction cervical ripening. Meta-analysis of worldwide clinical experience. J Reprod Med. 1993;38(1):89-100.
  • 9. Lyrenäs S, Clason I, Ulmsten U. In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour. BJOG. 2001;108(2):169-178. [CrossRef]
  • 10. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour; 2011. Available at: http://who.int. Accessed 31 July 2018.
  • 11. Leduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, Dy J, Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee, Special Contributors. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(9):840-857. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Hou L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Li J, Zhang W. Clinical parameters for prediction of successful labor induction after application of intravaginal dinoprostone in nulliparous Chinese women. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(8):CR518-CR522. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA, Flenady VJ, Varatharaju B. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;1(1):CD005302. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Larrañaga-Azcárate C, Campo-Molina G, PérezRodríguez AF, Ezcurdia-Gurpegui M. Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(2):195-200. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1(1):CD005302. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Tran SH, Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Caughey AB. Length of rupture of membranes in the setting of premature rupture of membranes at term and infectious maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(6):700.e1-700.e5. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Basirat Z, Barat SH, Ghanbarpour A, Golsorkhtabar-Amiri M. Does vaginal pH affect the efficacy of dinoprostone in cervical ripening/labor duration? Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(4):522-525.
  • 18. Döderlein A. Das Scheidensekret und seine Bedeutung f€ur dasPuerperalfieber. Zentbl Bakteriol Microbiol Hyg Abt. 1892;11:699.
  • 19. Yayla Abide Ç, Kurek Eken M, Ozkaya E, et al. Effect of vaginal washing before intravaginal dinoprostone insertion for labor induction: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(12):2149-2155. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(4):304-310. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Riboni F, Garofalo G, Pascoli I, et al. Labour induction at term: clinical, biophysical and molecular predictive factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(5):1123-1129. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(3):357-362. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Levast F, Legendre G, Hachem HE, et al. A mathematical model to predict mean time to delivery following cervical ripening with dinoprostone vaginal insert. Sci Rep. 2019:9(1):9910.
  • 24. Park KH, Hong JS, Ko JK, et al. Comparative study of induction of labor in nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes at term compared to those with intact membranes: duration of labor and mode of delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006;32(5):482-488. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Kolkman DG, Verhoeven CJ, Brinkhorst SJ, et al. The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(8):625-630. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Batinelli L, Serafini A, Nante N, Petraglia F, Severi FM, Messina G. Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(3):352-358. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2013;13:108. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Daykan Y, Biron-Shental T, Navve D, Miller N, Bustan M, Sukenik-Halevy R. Prediction of the efficacy of dinoprostone slow release vaginal insert (Propess) for cervical ripening: a prospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(9):1739-1746. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Zhang J, Bricker L, Wray S, Quenby S. Poor uterine contractility in obese women. BJOG. 2007;114(3):343-348. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Garabedian MJ, Hansen WF, McCord LA, Manning MA, O'Brien JM, Curry TE Jr. Up-regulation of oxytocin receptor expression at term is related to maternal body mass index. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(6):491-497. [CrossRef]
  • 31. Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(3):573-584. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Veglia M, Cavallaro A, Papageorghiou A, Black R, Impey L. Small-for-gestational-age babies after 37weeks: impact study of risk-stratification protocol. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):66- 71. [CrossRef]
  • 33. Torricelli M, Voltolini C, Vellucci FL, et al. Fetal gender effects on induction of labor in postdate pregnancies. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(6):670-674. [CrossRef]
  • 34. Ashwal E, Hadar E, Chen R, Aviram A, Hiersch L, Gabbay-Benziv R. Effect of fetal gender on induction of labor failure rates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(24):3009-3013. [CrossRef]
  • 35. Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Pérez-Medina T, Barbancho C, Troyano J, Bajo J. The labor induction: integrated clinical and sonographic variables that predict the outcome. J Perinatol. 2007;27(1):4-8. [CrossRef]
APA obut m, AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G, bademkıran m, Oglak S, YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö, Olmez F (2022). Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. , 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
Chicago obut mehmet,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ GULSAH,bademkıran muhammed hanifi,Oglak Süleyman Cemil,YÜCEL ÇELİK ÖZGE,Olmez Fatma Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. (2022): 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
MLA obut mehmet,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ GULSAH,bademkıran muhammed hanifi,Oglak Süleyman Cemil,YÜCEL ÇELİK ÖZGE,Olmez Fatma Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. , 2022, ss.72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
AMA obut m,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G,bademkıran m,Oglak S,YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö,Olmez F Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. . 2022; 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
Vancouver obut m,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G,bademkıran m,Oglak S,YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö,Olmez F Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. . 2022; 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
IEEE obut m,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G,bademkıran m,Oglak S,YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö,Olmez F "Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes." , ss.72 - 76, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
ISNAD obut, mehmet vd. "Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes". (2022), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
APA obut m, AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G, bademkıran m, Oglak S, YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö, Olmez F (2022). Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54(1), 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
Chicago obut mehmet,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ GULSAH,bademkıran muhammed hanifi,Oglak Süleyman Cemil,YÜCEL ÇELİK ÖZGE,Olmez Fatma Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54, no.1 (2022): 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
MLA obut mehmet,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ GULSAH,bademkıran muhammed hanifi,Oglak Süleyman Cemil,YÜCEL ÇELİK ÖZGE,Olmez Fatma Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.54, no.1, 2022, ss.72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
AMA obut m,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G,bademkıran m,Oglak S,YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö,Olmez F Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(1): 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
Vancouver obut m,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G,bademkıran m,Oglak S,YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö,Olmez F Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(1): 72 - 76. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
IEEE obut m,AYNAOGLU YILDIZ G,bademkıran m,Oglak S,YÜCEL ÇELİK Ö,Olmez F "Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54, ss.72 - 76, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237
ISNAD obut, mehmet vd. "Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54/1 (2022), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21237