Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 119 - 126 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 İndeks Tarihi: 24-06-2022
Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Öz: Background: Surgeons continue to be concerned about complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula. Among the factors that cause postoperative pancreatic fistula, the pancreaticojejunostomy technique has stood out in
recent studies. In this study, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes, especially POPF, of the modified Blumgart and the traditional
anastomosis techniques in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Methods: A total of 144 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were divided into 2 groups according to the performed
pancreaticojejunostomy technique (modified Blumgart anastomosis, n = 91 and traditional anastomosis, n = 53). Preoperative clinicodemographic data, perioperative findings, and postoperative results were compared between the groups. Additionally, factors associated with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula were analyzed.
Results: The modified Blumgart anastomosis group had lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate than traditional
anastomosis group (n = 8 (8.8%) versus n = 14 (26.4%), P = .005). On the contrary, the biochemical leakage rate was higher in the modified Blumgart anastomosis group (n = 30 (33%) versus n = 9 (17%), P = .037). While postoperative pancreatic fistula-related reoperation rate was lower (n = 2 (2.2%) versus n = 7 (13.2%), P = .013), the length of hospital stay was also shorter (11 days (5-47 days) versus
21 days (6-46 days),
P < .001) in the modified Blumgart anastomosis group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that modified Blumgart anastomosis was an independent and negative predictive factor for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio = 0.274, 95%
confidence interval = 0.103-0.728, P = .009).
Conclusion: Compared to the traditional anastomosis, modified Blumgart anastomosis decreases the rate of transition from biochemical leakage to clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and postoperative pancreatic fistula-related reoperation and also
shortens the length of hospital stay. In addition, modified Blumgart anastomosis is an independent and negative predictive factor for
the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Kalev G, Marquardt C, Matzke H, Matovu P, Schiedeck T. The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study [Epub ahead of print]. Innov Surg Sci. 2020;5(3-4):20200021. [CrossRef]
- 2. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 1935;102(4):763-779. [CrossRef]
- 3. Oguro S, Yoshimoto J, Imamura H, Ishizaki Y, Kawasaki S. Three hundred and sixty-eight consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with zero mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(4):226- 234. [CrossRef]
- 4. Machado MC, Machado MA. Systematic use of isolated pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: five years of experience with zero mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(10):1584-1590. [CrossRef]
- 5. Gupta V, Kumar S, Gupta V, et al. Blumgart’s technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: analysis of safety and outcomes. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019;18(2):181-187. [CrossRef]
- 6. Mishra PK, Saluja SS, Gupta M, Rajalingam R, Pattnaik P. Blumgart’s technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: an appraisal. Dig Surg. 2011;28(4):281-287. [CrossRef]
- 7. Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S, et al. A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(1):89-102; discussion 102. [CrossRef]
- 8. Li YT, Zhang HY, Xing C, et al. Effect of Blumgart anastomosis in reducing the incidence rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(20):2514-2523. [CrossRef]
- 9. Hogg ME, Zenati M, Novak S, et al. Grading of surgeon technical performance predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula for pancreaticoduodenectomy independent of patient-related variables. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):482-491. [CrossRef]
- 10. Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN. Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):54-59. [CrossRef]
- 11. Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, Albertsmeier M, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2009;96(7):741-750. [CrossRef]
- 12. Lee YN, Kim WY. Comparison of Blumgart versus conventional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018;22(3):253-260. [CrossRef]
- 13. Kim SG, Paik KY, Oh JS. The vulnerable point of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy regarding pancreatic fistula learned from 50 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(22):630. [CrossRef]
- 14. Hirono S, Kawai M, Okada KI, et al. Modified Blumgart mattress suture versus conventional interrupted suture in pancreaticojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):243-251. [CrossRef]
- 15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-213. [CrossRef]
- 16. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584- 591. [CrossRef]
- 17. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142(5):761-768. [CrossRef]
- 18. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142(1):20-25. [CrossRef]
- 19. Bag YM, Topel C, Ozdemir E, Saglam K, Sumer F, Kayaalp C. A novel radiological predictor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after stapled distal pancreatectomy. Am Surg. 2021;87(5):725-731. [CrossRef]
- 20. Cao F, Tong X, Li A, Li J, Li F. Meta-analysis of modified Blumgart anastomosis and interrupted transpancreatic suture in pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(11):1056-1061. [CrossRef]
- 21. Yu L, Huang Q, Xie F, Lin X, Liu C. Risk factors of postoperative complications of pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61(135):2091-2095.
- 22. House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ, et al. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(2):270-278. [CrossRef]
- 23. Li R, Zhang W, Li Q. Modified pancreatojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of periampullary tumor: 8 years of surgical experience. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:3788-3795. [CrossRef]
| APA | ozsay o, AYDIN M (2022). Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| Chicago | ozsay oguzhan,AYDIN MEHMET CAN Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. (2022): 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| MLA | ozsay oguzhan,AYDIN MEHMET CAN Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2022, ss.119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| AMA | ozsay o,AYDIN M Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. . 2022; 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| Vancouver | ozsay o,AYDIN M Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. . 2022; 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| IEEE | ozsay o,AYDIN M "Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy." , ss.119 - 126, 2022. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| ISNAD | ozsay, oguzhan - AYDIN, MEHMET CAN. "Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy". (2022), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| APA | ozsay o, AYDIN M (2022). Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 33(2), 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| Chicago | ozsay oguzhan,AYDIN MEHMET CAN Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 33, no.2 (2022): 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| MLA | ozsay oguzhan,AYDIN MEHMET CAN Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, vol.33, no.2, 2022, ss.119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| AMA | ozsay o,AYDIN M Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 33(2): 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| Vancouver | ozsay o,AYDIN M Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 33(2): 119 - 126. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| IEEE | ozsay o,AYDIN M "Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy." Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 33, ss.119 - 126, 2022. 10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
| ISNAD | ozsay, oguzhan - AYDIN, MEHMET CAN. "Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy". Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 33/2 (2022), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2021.21701 |
