Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü

Gaye SOLMAZER, (İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, İzmir, Türkiye)
Türker ÖZKAN (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Nesne Dergisi
20 8
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 23 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 16 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01 İndeks Tarihi: 27-06-2022

Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı (KSK) çerçevesinde, öz-şefkatin sosyal olarak uzak veya yakın olayları kurgulama üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Öz-şefkat puanları arttıkça, kendileri için seçim yapan kişilerin düşük seviye özelliklere, bir başkası için öneride bulunan kişilerin ise yüksek seviye özelliklere verdiği önemin azalacağı hipotezi öne sürülmektedir. Bu çalışmada Öz-Şefkat Ölçeği, Davranış Tanımlama Formu, ödev partneri seçme görevi kullanılmıştır. Seçkisiz olarak iki koşuldan birine atanan katılımcılardan ya kendileri için bir ödev partneri seçmeleri ya da diğer bir kişi için bir ödev partneri önermeleri istenmiştir. Ayrıca olası iki partnerin bazı özelliklerinin öneminin değerlendirilmesi de istenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini toplam 187 öğrenci (107 kadın, 80 erkek; Ortyaş =22.37, Syaş= 3.10) oluşturmaktadır. Karma varyans analizi sosyal uzaklığın kurgu seviyesi üzerindeki etkisinin beklenmeyen yönde olduğunu göstermektedir. Daha açık bir şekilde, bireylerin kendileri için ödev partneri seçtiği koşulda, yüksek seviye özelliğin öneminin, düşük seviye özelliğin önemine kıyasla, anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Ancak, bir başkası için öneride bulunma koşulunda anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Dolayısıyla, bu çalışma genel olarak KSK'nin önermelerine destek sağlayamamıştır. Bootstrap analizi, öz-şefkat ve sosyal uzaklığın düşük seviye özelliğin önemi üzerindeki etkileşim etkisinin anlamlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, regresyon analizi, öz-şefkat ile kişilik özelliği kurgu seviyesi arasındaki ilişkiyi göstermektedir. Bu çalışmanın öz-şefkat ile kurgu seviyesi arasındaki ilişkiye ilişkin ön bulgu sunduğu tartışılabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

The Effect of Social Distance from a Construal Level Theory Perspective: The Role of Self-Compassion

Öz:
The aim of this study is to examine the role of self-compassion in construing socially distant or near events within the framework of Construal Level Theory (CLT). It is hypothesized that as self-compassion scores increase, people who make decisions for themselves will give less importance to low-level features, and those who make suggestions for another person will give less importance to high-level features. In this study, the Self-Compassion Scale, the Behavior Identification Form and the task of choosing an assignment partner was used. Participants who were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions, were asked to either choose an assignment partner themselves or suggest an assignment partner for another person. In addition, they were asked to evaluate the importance of some characteristics of the two possible partners. The participants were 187 students (107 females, 80 males; Mage= 22.37, SDage = 3.10). The mixed ANOVA indicated that the effect of social distance on construal level was in an unexpected direction. Specifically, when individuals chose an assignment partner for themselves, the importance of the high-level feature was significantly greater as compared to the importance of the low-level feature. However, there was no significant difference between attribute importance when individuals made suggestions for another person. Hence, this study did not provide support for the premises of the CLT in general. Bootstrap analyses revealed that the interaction effect of social distance and self-compassion on the importance of the low-level feature was significant. In addition, regression analysis showed the relationship between self-compassion and trait construal level. It can be argued that this study presents a preliminary finding regarding the relationship between self-compassion and construal level.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Amani, R. ve Khosroshahi, A. S. (2020). The structural model of marital quality based on secure attachment style through the mediating role of self-compassion, resilience, and perspective-taking. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1813653
  • Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609
  • Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. ve Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610
  • Biber, D. D. ve Ellis, R. (2019). The effect of self-compassion on the self-regulation of health behaviors: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(14), 2060–2071. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317713361
  • Breines, J. G. ve Chen, S. (2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9) 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212445599
  • Bruk, A., Scholl, S. G. ve Bless, H. (2018). Beautiful mess effect: Self–other differences in evaluation of showing vulnerability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000120
  • Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D. ve Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497964
  • Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D. ve Wakslak, C. J. (2013). How do we want others to decide? Geographical distance influences evaluations of decision makers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 826–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213481247.
  • Calderon, S., Mac Giolla, E., Ask, K. ve Granhag, P. A. (2020). Subjective likelihood and the construal level of future events: A replication study of Wakslak, Trope, Liberman, and Alony (2006). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 119(5), e27–e37. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000214
  • Chan, E. Y. ve Wang, Y. (2019). Mindfulness changes construal level: An experimental investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 48(9), 1656–1664. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000654
  • Chung, M. S. (2016). Relation between lack of forgiveness and depression: The moderating effect of self-compassion. Psychological Reports, 119(3), 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116663520
  • Danziger, S., Montal, R. ve Barkan, R. (2012). Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice: A psychological distance account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027013.
  • Darwent, K. M. (2012). Individual differences in travel across psychological distances [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. The Ohio State University
  • Eyal, T., Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012
  • Ferreira, C., Matos, M., Duarte, C. ve Pinto‐Gouveia, J. (2014). Shame memories and eating psychopathology: The buffering effect of self‐compassion. European Eating Disorders Review, 22(6), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2322
  • Freitas, A., Salovey, P. ve Liberman, N. (2001). Abstract and concrete self- evaluative goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.80.3.410
  • Fresnics, A. ve Borders, A. (2017). Angry rumination mediates the unique associations between self-compassion and anger and aggression. Mindfulness, 8(3), 554-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0629-2
  • Fuochi, G., Veneziani, C. A. ve Voci, A. (2018). Exploring the social side of self-compassion: Relations with empathy and outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2378
  • Gong, H. ve Medin, D. L. (2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(5), 628–638.
  • Grossmann, I. ve Kross, E. (2010). The impact of culture on adaptive versus maladaptive self- reflection. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1150-1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376655
  • Grossmann, I. ve Kross, E. (2014). Exploring Solomon’s Paradox: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relationships in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (2. baskı). Guilford Press.
  • Henderson, M. D. ve Trope, Y. (2009). The effects of abstraction on integrative agreements: When seeing the forest helps avoid getting tangled in the trees. Social Cognition, 27(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.3.402
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values (2. baskı). Sage Publication Inc.
  • Kantaş, Ö. (2013). Impact of relational and individuational self orientations on the well-being of academicians: The roles of ego- or eco-system motivations, self-transcendence, self- compassion and burnout [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Kivetz, Y. ve Tyler, T. R. (2007). Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,102(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.002
  • Kogut, T., Eyal, T. ve Sharon, I. (2017). Seeing into the future: Future time orientation as a moderator of temporal distance effects on educators' decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(4), 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2015
  • Kross, E. (2009). When self becomes other. Towards an integrative understanding of the processes distinguishing adaptive self-reflection from rumination. S. Altran, A. Navarro, K. Ochsner, A. Tobeña ve O.Vilarroya (Ed.), Values, empathy, and fairness across social barriers (s. 35–40) içinde. New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04545.x
  • Kross, E. ve Ayduk, O. (2017). Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, s. 81–136) içinde. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.002
  • Kross, E., Ayduk, O. ve Mischel, W. (2005). When asking "why" does not hurt: distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01600.x
  • Lathren, C. R., Rao, S. S., Park, J. ve Bluth, K. (2021). Self-compassion and current close interpersonal relationships: A scoping literature review. Mindfulness, 12(5), 1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01566-5
  • Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
  • Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958
  • Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2014). Traversing psychological distance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001
  • Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D. ve Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8
  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y. ve Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. A. W. Kruglanski ve E. T. Higgins (Ed.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (s. 353- 383) içinde. The Guilford Press.
  • Liviatan, I., Trope, Y. ve Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007
  • Lu, J. ve Xie, X. (2019). Self–other differences in change predictions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/0.1002/cb.1770
  • Lu, J., Xie, X. ve Xu, J. (2013). Desirability or feasibility: Self—Other decision-making differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212470146
  • MacBeth, A. ve Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: A meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003
  • Messervey, D. L. (2008). Time and time again: Cultural differences in construal levels [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Queen’s University.
  • Miyagawa, Y. ve Taniguchi, J. (2020). Self-compassion and time perception of past negative events. Mindfulness, 11, 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01293-6 Neff, K. D (b.t.). Self-compassion. https://self-compassion.org/
  • Neff, K. D. (2003a). The development and validation of a scale to measure self- compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
  • Neff, K. D. (2003b). Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032
  • Neff, K. D. (2016). The self-compassion scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7(1), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0479-3
  • Neff, K. D. ve Dahm, K. A. (2015). Self-compassion: What it is, what it does, and how it relates to mindfulness. M. Robinson, B. Meier ve B. Ostafin (Ed.), Mindfulness and self-regulation (s. 121-137) içinde. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939- 2263-5_10
  • Neff, K. D. ve Pommier, E. (2013). The relationship between self-compassion and other- focused concern among college undergraduates, community adults, and practicing meditators. Self and Identity, 12(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.649546
  • Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L. ve Rude, S. S. (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004
  • Neff, K. D., Pisitsungkagarn, K. ve Hsieh, Y. (2008). Self-compassion and self- construal in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108314544
  • Polman, E. (2012). Self–other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.005
  • Polman, E. ve Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398362
  • Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D. ve Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self‐ compassion scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702
  • Rim, S. Y. ve Summervile, A. (2014). How far to the road not taken? The effect of psychological distance on counterfactual direction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213513304
  • Smith, P. K. ve Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
  • Soderberg, C. K., Callahan, S. P., Kochersberger, A. O., Amit, E. ve Ledgerwood, A. (2015). The effect of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta- analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000005
  • Trope, Y. ve Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.
  • Trope, Y. ve Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
  • Updegraff, J. A. ve Suh, E. M. (2007). Happiness is a warm abstract thought: Self-construal abstractness and subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(1), 18–28. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/17439760601069150
  • Vallacher, R. R. ve Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671.
  • Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N. ve Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 641–653.
  • Wenzel, M. ve Coughlin, A. M. (2020). Toward the bigger picture: Concrete and abstract thinking about a transgression, and the role of time in interpersonal forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2676
  • Wong, V. C. ve Wyer, R. S. (2016). Mental traveling along psychological distances: The effects of cultural syndromes, perspective flexibility, and construal level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000048
  • Yarnell, L. M. ve Neff, K. D. (2013). Self-compassion, interpersonal conflict resolutions, and well-being. Self and Identity, 12(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.649545
  • Yetişer, B. (2014). Do all roads lead to rome? The moderating role of culture and age in predicting construal level on machiavellianism. Journal of Yasar University, 9(36) 6261–6380.
  • Zeng, T. (2019). Construal level and well-being: The role of psychological needs satisfaction [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Zessin, U., Dickhäuser, O. ve Garbade, S. (2015). The relationship between self- compassion and well‐ being: A meta‐ analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 7(3), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12051
  • Žeželj, I. L. ve Jokić, B. R. (2014). Replication of experiments evaluating impact of psychological distance on moral judgment. Social Psychology. 45, 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000188
  • Zhang, J. W. ve Chen, S. (2016). Self-compassion promotes personal improvement from regret experiences via acceptance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215623271
APA solmazer g, Özkan T (2022). Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. , 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
Chicago solmazer gaye,Özkan Türker Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. (2022): 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
MLA solmazer gaye,Özkan Türker Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. , 2022, ss.1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
AMA solmazer g,Özkan T Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. . 2022; 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
Vancouver solmazer g,Özkan T Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. . 2022; 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
IEEE solmazer g,Özkan T "Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü." , ss.1 - 16, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
ISNAD solmazer, gaye - Özkan, Türker. "Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü". (2022), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
APA solmazer g, Özkan T (2022). Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. Nesne Dergisi, 10(23), 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
Chicago solmazer gaye,Özkan Türker Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. Nesne Dergisi 10, no.23 (2022): 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
MLA solmazer gaye,Özkan Türker Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. Nesne Dergisi, vol.10, no.23, 2022, ss.1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
AMA solmazer g,Özkan T Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(23): 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
Vancouver solmazer g,Özkan T Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(23): 1 - 16. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
IEEE solmazer g,Özkan T "Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü." Nesne Dergisi, 10, ss.1 - 16, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
ISNAD solmazer, gaye - Özkan, Türker. "Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı Perspektifinden Sosyal Uzaklığın Etkisi: Öz-Şefkatin Rolü". Nesne Dergisi 10/23 (2022), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-23-01
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 23:36

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları