Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?
Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 131 - 133 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; kliniğimizde yatırılarak fizik tedavi modaliteleri (FTM) uygulanan hastalarda, uygulama sırasında veya sonrasında FTM’nin komplikasyonlarını ve hastaların memnuniyetlerini saptamaktı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya kliniğimizde yatırılarak tedaviye alınan 100 hasta (64 kadın, 36 erkek) dahil edildi. Bütün hastalara demografik verileri, FTM’nin komplikasyonlarını ve hastaların memnuniyetlerini ölçen bir form uygulandı. Hastalara uygulanan FTM’leri sırasıyla; 86 hot pack, 69 ultrason, 56 interferansiyel akım, 37 diadinamik akım, 26 kısa dalga diatermi, 5 whirlpool (girdaplı banyo) ve 2 soğuk uygulama idi. Tanılar; 44 servikal veya lomber spondiloz, 16 gonartroz, 14 omuz periartriti, 11 yumuşak doku lezyonu, 9 serebrovasküler hastalık ve 6 eklem kontraktürü idi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 51,14±13,42 yıl idi. Dört hastada ağrı, ikisinde taşikardi, birer hastada da hipertansiyon, uygulama yerinde kanama, alerjik reaksiyon ve bül oluşumu kaydedildi. Hastaların memnuniyetleri ile komplikasyonlar arasında ilişki saptanmadı (p>0,05). Ayrıca primer hastalık-komplikasyonlar ve FTM-komplikasyonlar arasında da bir ilişki bulamadık (p>0,05). Sonuç: FTM güvenli bulundu ve ciddi komplikasyonlara yol açmadılar. Fizik tedavi uygulanan hastalar da tedaviden memnun olduklarını belirttiler.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Fizik tedavi modaliteleri gerçekten güvenli mi?
Öz: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications of physical therapeutic modalities (PTMs) and patient satisfaction during and after physical therapy (PT) in our institution. Materials and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients (64 female, 36 male), who underwent PT were enrolled in this study. A questionnaire involving demographic data, complications of PTMs and complaints of patients was applied to all patients. PTMs and patient numbers were as follows; hot pack for 86 patients, ultrasound for 69, interferential current for 56, diadynamic electrotherapy for 37, short wave diathermy for 26, whirlpool for 5 and cold pack for 2 patients. The patients’ disorders were as follows respectively; 44 patients had lumbar or cervical spondylosis, 18 knee osteoarthritis, 15 soft tissue disease, 14 shoulder periarthritis, 9 cerebrovascular disease and 6 joint contractures.Results: The mean age was 51.14±13.42 years. Pain (n=4), tachycardia (n=2), bleeding (n=1), allergic reaction (n=1), hypertension (n=1) and bulla (n=1) were documented as PTMs complications. There was no statistically significant relationship between the occurrence of complications and patients’ satisfaction (p>0.05). We did not find any significant relationship between the primary disorders and the complications, and PTMs and the complications (p>0.05). Conclusion: The PTMs are safe and did not raise serious complications when used by experienced physiotherapists. Patients were satisfied with their therapy as well.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Weber DC, Brown A. Physical agents modalities, In: Braddom RL, editor. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2000. p. 440-5.
- 2. Basford JR. Physical agents, In: DeLisa J, Gans BM, editors. Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practices. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 483-99.
- 3. Bissell JH. Therapeutic modalities in hand surgery. J Hand Surg 1999;24:435-48.
- 4. Sandanam J. Burns caused by heating pads (letter). Med J Aust 1982;1(9):369. 5. Stevenson TR, Hammond DC, Keip D, Argenta LC. Heating pad burns in anesthetic skin. Ann Plast Surg 1985;15:73-5.
- 6. Khabbaz RF, McKinley TW, Goodman RA, Hightower AV, Highsmith AK, Tait KA, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype 0:9 new case of whirlpool associated dermatitis. Am J Med 1983;74:73-7.
- 7. Bassett FH, Kirkpatrick JS, Engelhardt DL, Malone TR. Cryotherapy induced nerve injury. Am J Sports Med 1992;20:516-8.
- 8. Batavia MB. Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound: Do sources agree? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1006-12.
- 9. Nadler SF, Prybicien M, Malanga GA, Sicher D. Complications from therapeutic modalities: Results of a national survey of athletic trainers, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:849-63.
- 10. Collins K, Storey M, Peterson K. Peroneal nerve palsy after cryotherapy. Phys Sport Med 1986;14:105-8.
- 11. Drez D, Faust DC, Evans JP. Cryotherapy and nerve palsy. Am J Sports and Med 1981;9(4):256-7.
- 12. Moeller JL, Monroe J, McKeag DB. Cryotherapy-induced common peroneal nerve palsy. Clin J Sport Med 1997;7(3):212-6.
- 13. Eguino P, Sanchez A, Agesta N, Lasa O, Raton JA, Diaz-Perez JL. Allergic contact dermatitis due to propylene glycol and parabens in an ultrasonic gel. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48(5):290.
- 14. Erdmann SM, Sachs B, Merk HF. Allergic contact dermatitis due to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in Euxyl K 400 in an ultrasonic gel. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44(1):39-40.
- 15. Villa A, Venegoni M, Tiso B. Cases of contact dermatitis caused by ultrasonographic gel. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17(8):530.
- 16. Castelain PY, Chabeau G. Contact dermatitis after transcutaneous electric analgesia. Contact Dermatitis 1986;15:32-5.
| APA | tander b, CANTÜRK F, CENGİZ K, DURMUŞ D, AKYOL Y (2005). Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. , 131 - 133. |
| Chicago | tander berna,CANTÜRK Ferhan,CENGİZ Kıvanç,DURMUŞ Dilek,AKYOL Yeşim Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. (2005): 131 - 133. |
| MLA | tander berna,CANTÜRK Ferhan,CENGİZ Kıvanç,DURMUŞ Dilek,AKYOL Yeşim Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. , 2005, ss.131 - 133. |
| AMA | tander b,CANTÜRK F,CENGİZ K,DURMUŞ D,AKYOL Y Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. . 2005; 131 - 133. |
| Vancouver | tander b,CANTÜRK F,CENGİZ K,DURMUŞ D,AKYOL Y Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. . 2005; 131 - 133. |
| IEEE | tander b,CANTÜRK F,CENGİZ K,DURMUŞ D,AKYOL Y "Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?." , ss.131 - 133, 2005. |
| ISNAD | tander, berna vd. "Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?". (2005), 131-133. |
| APA | tander b, CANTÜRK F, CENGİZ K, DURMUŞ D, AKYOL Y (2005). Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 51(4), 131 - 133. |
| Chicago | tander berna,CANTÜRK Ferhan,CENGİZ Kıvanç,DURMUŞ Dilek,AKYOL Yeşim Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 51, no.4 (2005): 131 - 133. |
| MLA | tander berna,CANTÜRK Ferhan,CENGİZ Kıvanç,DURMUŞ Dilek,AKYOL Yeşim Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol.51, no.4, 2005, ss.131 - 133. |
| AMA | tander b,CANTÜRK F,CENGİZ K,DURMUŞ D,AKYOL Y Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2005; 51(4): 131 - 133. |
| Vancouver | tander b,CANTÜRK F,CENGİZ K,DURMUŞ D,AKYOL Y Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2005; 51(4): 131 - 133. |
| IEEE | tander b,CANTÜRK F,CENGİZ K,DURMUŞ D,AKYOL Y "Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?." Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 51, ss.131 - 133, 2005. |
| ISNAD | tander, berna vd. "Are the physical therapeutic modalities really safe?". Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 51/4 (2005), 131-133. |
