A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses

Tayfur GÖKÇEK, (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Elektrik Elektronik Fakültesi, Elektrik Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Mehmet Tan TURAN, (ENKA İnşaat ve Sanayi A.Ş., Mühendislik Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Yavuz ATEŞ, (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Elektrik Elektronik Fakültesi, Elektrik Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Ahmet Yiğit ARABUL (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Elektrik Elektronik Fakültesi, Elektrik Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
3 0
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 943 - 960 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/elk-2106-73 İndeks Tarihi: 04-07-2022

A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses

Öz:
This article presents an optimized heavy duty electric truck charging station (ETCS) design based on bi-level mixed integer linear programming. Electric truck parameters are integrated with the grid model and charging sequences are firstly formulated to optimize charging stages. As the second level of the optimization stage, line losses are aimed to be minimized for the charging station. ETCS model is obtained from actual parameters of the Istanbul Muratbey Customs zone which is one of the busiest customs zone in Europe and an ideal location for ETCS application in the future. The ETCS is equipped with roof type photovoltaic (PV) modules and the capacity of the PV generation is determined in accordance with the actual data of the customs zone buildings. The PV generated power is integrated with electric truck demand which varies in daytime based on hourly intervals along with the seasonal impact. Ultimately, an optimized ETCS model is presented including PV generated power to reduce line losses and CO2 emission along with optimized charging sequences for ETCS with huge power consumption. The proposed model represents the reduction of line losses along with the obtained environmental and economic benefits.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Islam JBF, Rahman MT, Mokhlis H, Othman M, Tengku Mohmed Noor TF et al. Combined analytic hierarchy process and binary particle swarm optimization for multiobjective plug-in electric vehicles charging coordination with time-of-use. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2020; 28: 1314-1330. doi: 10.3906/elk1907-189
  • [2] Ustun O, Tuncay RN, Mokukcu MS, Kıvanc OC, Tosun G et al. An integrated approach for the development of an electric vehicle powertrain: design, analysis, and implementation. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2018; 26: 1541-1554
  • [3] Rezaee S, Farjah E, Khorramdel B. Probabilistic Analysis of Plug-In Electric Vehicles Impact on Electrical Grid Through Homes and Parking Lots. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2013; 4(4): 1024-1033. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2013.2264498
  • [4] Ates Y, Gokcek T, Arabul AY. Impact of hybrid power generation on voltage, losses, and electricity cost in distribution networks. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2021; 29(3): 1720-1735. doi: 10.3906/elk-2006-149
  • [5] Pham TH, Kessels JTBA, van den Bosch PPJ, Huisman RGM. Analytical Solution to Energy Management Guaranteeing Battery Life for Hybrid Trucks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2016; 65(10): 7956- 7971. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2015.2480745
  • [6] Voronov S, Frisk E, Krysander M. Data-Driven Battery Lifetime Prediction and Confidence Estimation for HeavyDuty Trucks. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2018; 67(2): 623-639. doi: 10.1109/TR.2018.2803798
  • [7] Pi D, Cheng Q, Xie B, Wang H, Wang X. A Novel Pneumatic Brake Pressure Control Algorithm for Regenerative Braking System of Electric Commercial Trucks. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 83372-83383. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924739
  • [8] Deng L, Hajiesmaili MH, Chen M, Zeng H. Energy-Efficient Timely Transportation of Long-Haul HeavyDuty Trucks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2018; 19(7): 2099-2113. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2749262
  • [9] Samsun R.C., Krupp C, Baltzer S, Gnörich B, Peters R. et al. A battery-fuel cell hybrid auxiliary power unit for trucks: Analysis of direct and indirect hybrid configurations. Energy Conversion and Management 2016; 127: 312-323. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.025
  • [10] Turan M.T., Ates Y., Gokalp E. Integration of Solar Power Plant to Existing Network with Adaptive Relay Protection in the Concept of Smart Grid. In: Nižetić S., Papadopoulos A. (eds) The Role of Exergy in Energy and the Environment. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-89845-2_25
  • [11] ITF transport Outlook 2017. OECD Publishing 2017. doi: 10.1787/9789282108000-en
  • [12] Mulholland E, Teter J, Cazzola P, McDonald Z, Gallachoir B. The long haul towards decarbonising road freight – a global assessment to 2050. Appl Energy 2018; 216: 678–693. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.058
  • [13] Kast J, Morrison G, Gangloff JJ, Vijayagopal R, Marcinkoski J. Designing hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks in a diverse medium and heavy duty market. Research in Transportation Economics 2018; 70: 139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2017.07.006
  • [14] Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Rui W,Thompson RG. Analyzing truck fleets’ acceptance of alternative fuel freight vehicles in China. Renewable Energy 2019; 134: 1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.016
  • [15] Kast J, Vijayagopal R, Gangloff JJ, Marcinkoski J. Clean commercial transportatiorn: medium and heavy duty fuel cell electric trucks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2017; 42 (7): 4508–4517. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.129
  • [16] Cabukoglu E, Georges G, Kung L, Pareschi G, Boulouchos K. Fuel cell electric vehicles: an option to decarbonize heavy-duty transport? Results from a swiss case- study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2019; 70: 35–48. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.03.004
  • [17] Sim K, Vijayagopal R, Kim N, Rousseau A. Optimization of component sizing for a fuel cell-powered truck to minimize ownership cost. Energies 2019; 12 (6): 1–13. doi: doi.org/10.3390/en12061125
  • [18] Liu Y, Liu J, Qin D, Li G, Chen Z et al. Online energy management strategy of fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles based on rule learning. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 260: 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121017
  • [19] Liu F, Zhao F, Liu Z, Hao H. The impact of fuel cell vehicle deployment on road transport greenhouse gas emissions: The China case. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2018; 43 (50): 22604–22621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.088
  • [20] Davis BA, Figliozzi MA. A methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric delivery trucks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2013; 49(1): 8-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.07.003
  • [21] Xie S, Lang K, Qi S. Aerodynamic-aware coordinated control of following speed and power distribution for hybrid electric trucks. Energy 2020; 15: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118496
  • [22] Wu X, Hu X, Yin X, Peng Y, Pickert V. Convex programming improved online power management in a range extended fuel cell electric truck. Journal of Power Sources 2020; 476: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228642
  • [23] van Keulen T, van Mullem D, de Jager B, Kessels JTBA, Steinbuch M. Design, implementation, and experimental validation of optimal power split control for hybrid electric trucks. Control Engineering Practice 2012; 20(5): 547- 558. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2012.01.010
  • [24] Sen B, Ercan T, Tatari O. Does a battery-electric truck make a difference? Life cycle emissions, costs, and externality analysis of alternative fuel-powered Class 8 heavy-duty trucks in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 141: 110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.046
  • [25] Plötz P, Gnann T, Jochem P, Yilmaz HU, Kaschub T. Impact of electric trucks powered by overhead lines on the European electricity system and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 2019; 130: 32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.042
  • [26] Zhou T, Roorda MJ, MacLean HL, Luk J. Life cycle GHG emissions and lifetime costs of medium-duty diesel and battery electric trucks in Toronto, Canada. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2017; 55: 91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.019
  • [27] Lee DY, Elgowainy A, Kotz A, Vijayagopal R, Marcinkoski J. Life-cycle implications of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle technology for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Journal of Power Sources 2018; 393: 217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.012
  • [28] Liimatainen H, van Vliet O, Aplyn D. The potential of electric trucks – An international commodity-level analysis. Applied Energy 2019; 236: 804-814. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.017
  • [29] Khayyer P, Izadian A. Power management strategies for hybrid electric trucks in smart-grids. 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT); doi: 10.1109/ISGT.2012.6175767
  • [30] Zhu X, Mather B, Mishra P. Grid Impact Analysis of Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT); doi: 10.1109/ISGT45199.2020.9087651
  • [31] Turker H, Radu A, Bacha S, Frey D, Richer J et al. Optimal charge control of electric vehicles in parking stations for cost minimization in V2G concept. 2014 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA); doi: 10.1109/ISGT.2012.6175767
  • [32] Abousleiman R, Scholer R. Smart Charging: System Design and Implementation for Interaction Between Plug-in Electric Vehicles and the Power Grid. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 2015; 1(1): 18-25. doi: 10.1109/TTE.2015.2426571
  • [33] Nguyen DT, Nguyen HT, Le LB. Dynamic Pricing Design for Demand Response Integration in Power Distribution Networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2016; 31 (5): 3457-3472. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2510612.
  • [34] Gu H, Li Y, Yu J, Wu C, Song T, Xu J. Bi-level optimal low-carbon economic dispatch for an industrial park with consideration of multi-energy price incentives. Applied Energy 2020; 262; 114276. doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114276.
  • [35] Jin X, Wu Q, Jia H, Hatziargyriou ND. Optimal integration of building heating loads in integrated heating/electricity community energy systems: A bi-level mpc approach. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2021; 12 (3): 1741- 1754. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2021.3064325.
  • [36] Talari S, Shafie-Khah M, Wang F, Aghaei J, Catalao JP. Optimal scheduling of demand response in pre-emptive markets based on stochastic bi-level programming method. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2017; 66 (2): 1453–1464. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2786288.
  • [37] Li Y, Han M, Yang Z, Li G. Coordinating Flexible Demand Response and Renewable Uncertainties for Scheduling of Community Integrated Energy Systems With an Electric Vehicle Charging Station: A Bi-Level Approach. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2021; 12 (4): 2321-2331. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2021.3090463.
  • [38] Turan MT, Ates Y, Erdinc O, Gokalp E, Catalão JPS. Effect of electric vehicle parking lots equipped with roof mounted photovoltaic panels on the distribution network. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2019; 109: 283-289. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.02.014
APA Gökçek T, Turan M, ates y, Arabul A (2022). A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. , 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
Chicago Gökçek Tayfur,Turan Mehmet Tan,ates yavuz,Arabul Ahmet Yigit A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. (2022): 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
MLA Gökçek Tayfur,Turan Mehmet Tan,ates yavuz,Arabul Ahmet Yigit A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. , 2022, ss.943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
AMA Gökçek T,Turan M,ates y,Arabul A A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. . 2022; 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
Vancouver Gökçek T,Turan M,ates y,Arabul A A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. . 2022; 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
IEEE Gökçek T,Turan M,ates y,Arabul A "A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses." , ss.943 - 960, 2022. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
ISNAD Gökçek, Tayfur vd. "A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses". (2022), 943-960. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-2106-73
APA Gökçek T, Turan M, ates y, Arabul A (2022). A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 30(3), 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
Chicago Gökçek Tayfur,Turan Mehmet Tan,ates yavuz,Arabul Ahmet Yigit A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 30, no.3 (2022): 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
MLA Gökçek Tayfur,Turan Mehmet Tan,ates yavuz,Arabul Ahmet Yigit A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, vol.30, no.3, 2022, ss.943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
AMA Gökçek T,Turan M,ates y,Arabul A A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2022; 30(3): 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
Vancouver Gökçek T,Turan M,ates y,Arabul A A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2022; 30(3): 943 - 960. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
IEEE Gökçek T,Turan M,ates y,Arabul A "A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses." Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 30, ss.943 - 960, 2022. 10.3906/elk-2106-73
ISNAD Gökçek, Tayfur vd. "A bi-level charging management approach for electric truck charging station considering power losses". Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 30/3 (2022), 943-960. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-2106-73
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 23:45

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları