Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 103 - 107 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2 İndeks Tarihi: 05-07-2022

Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population

Öz:
Objective: Calf circumference (CC) is used as a simple and practical anthropometric measure for evaluating skeletal muscle mass (SMM). CC cutoffs to indicate the presence of low SMM were determined through calculation of CC values that predicted low SMM with receiver operating characteristic analyses. Also, to date CC cut-off points were obtained from older adults. Very recently, the determination of CC cut-off values derived from normative values of young reference population with normal body mass index [using one and two standard deviations (SDs) below the mean] has been suggested as an alternative CC cut-off designation method. Here, we aimed to determine the sex-specific Turkish CC cut-offs by this new CC cut-off designation method. Materials and Methods: We included healthy young participants aged between 18 and 39, with body mass index between 18.5 kg/m2-24.9 kg/ m2 who were free from any chronic disease or drug use. CC was measured at the widest circumference of the calf with a non-elastic tape on the non-dominant leg while the subjects were standing and CC cut-off points were calculated as one and two SDs below the mean for moderately low or severely low CC values, respectively in each sex. Results: There were 164 participants (mean age, 25.7±4.4 years; 50% male, 50% female). Mean CC was 35.5±2.1 cm and 34.2±2.1 cm in males and females, respectively. The rounded cut-off values for moderately and severely low CC were calculated as 33 cm in males and 32 cm in females and 31 cm in males 30 cm in females, respectively. Conclusion: This study reported CC cut-offs derived from normative values of the Turkish young reference population which can be used as a marker for the muscle mass assessment. The success of these cut-offs in prediction of SMM adequacy should be assessed in further studies.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ ageing/afy169. Erratum in: Age Ageing 2019;48:601.
  • 2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Schneider SM, Zúñiga C, Arai H, Boirie Y, Chen LK, Fielding RA, Martin FC, Michel JP, Sieber C, Stout JR, Studenski SA, Vellas B, Woo J, Zamboni M, Cederholm T. Prevalence of and interventions for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the International Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). Age Ageing 2014;43:748-759.
  • 3. Landi F, Onder G, Russo A, Liperoti R, Tosato M, Martone AM, Capoluongo E, Bernabei R. Calf circumference, frailty and physical performance among older adults living in the community. Clin Nutr 2014;33:539-544.
  • 4. Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S, Kojima T, Kuzuya M, Lee JSW, Lee SY, Lee WJ, Lee Y, Liang CK, Lim JY, Lim WS, Peng LN, Sugimoto K, Tanaka T, Won CW, Yamada M, Zhang T, Akishita M, Arai H. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020;21:300-307.e2.
  • 5. Ishii S, Tanaka T, Shibasaki K, Ouchi Y, Kikutani T, Higashiguchi T, Obuchi SP, Ishikawa-Takata K, Hirano H, Kawai H, Tsuji T, Iijima K. Development of a simple screening test for sarcopenia in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2014;14(Suppl 1):93-101.
  • 6. Barbosa-Silva TG, Menezes AM, Bielemann RM, Malmstrom TK, Gonzalez MC; Grupo de Estudos em Composição Corporal e Nutrição (COCONUT). Enhancing SARC-F: Improving Sarcopenia Screening in the Clinical Practice. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;17:1136-1141.
  • 7. Singh P, Somers VK, Romero-Corral A, Sert-Kuniyoshi FH, Pusalavidyasagar S, Davison DE, Jensen MD. Effects of weight gain and weight loss on regional fat distribution. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:229-233.
  • 8. Gould H, Brennan SL, Kotowicz MA, Nicholson GC, Pasco JA. Total and appendicular lean mass reference ranges for Australian men and women: the Geelong osteoporosis study. Calcif Tissue Int 2014;94:363-372.
  • 9. Kawakami R, Murakami H, Sanada K, Tanaka N, Sawada SS, Tabata I, Higuchi M, Miyachi M. Calf circumference as a surrogate marker of muscle mass for diagnosing sarcopenia in Japanese men and women. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15:969-976.
  • 10. Rolland Y, Lauwers-Cances V, Cournot M, Nourhashémi F, Reynish W, Rivière D, Vellas B, Grandjean H. Sarcopenia, calf circumference, and physical function of elderly women: a cross-sectional study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1120-1124.
  • 11. Kim S, Kim M, Lee Y, Kim B, Yoon TY, Won CW. Calf Circumference as a Simple Screening Marker for Diagnosing Sarcopenia in Older Korean Adults: the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS). J Korean Med Sci 2018;33:e151.
  • 12. Bahat G, Tufan A, Tufan F, Kilic C, Akpinar TS, Kose M, Erten N, Karan MA, Cruz-Jentoft AJ. Cut-off points to identify sarcopenia according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition. Clin Nutr 2016;35:1557-1563.
  • 13. Hwang AC, Liu LK, Lee WJ, Peng LN, Chen LK. Calf Circumference as a Screening Instrument for Appendicular Muscle Mass Measurement. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018;19:182-184.
  • 14. Barbosa-Silva TG, Bielemann RM, Gonzalez MC, Menezes AM. Prevalence of sarcopenia among community-dwelling elderly of a medium-sized South American city: results of the COMO VAI? study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016;7:136-143.
  • 15. Gonzalez MC, Mehrnezhad A, Razaviarab N, Barbosa-Silva TG, Heymsfield SB. Calf circumference: cutoff values from the NHANES 1999-2006. Am J Clin Nutr 2021;113:1679-1687.
  • 16. Rush EC, Freitas I, Plank LD. Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults. Br J Nutr 2009;102:632-641.
  • 17. Kawakami R, Miyachi M, Sawada SS, Torii S, Midorikawa T, Tanisawa K, Ito T, Usui C, Ishii K, Suzuki K, Sakamoto S, Higuchi M, Muraoka I, Oka K. Cut-offs for calf circumference as a screening tool for low muscle mass: WASEDA’S Health Study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020;20:943-950.
  • 18. Ukegbu PO, Kruger HS, Meyer JD, Nienaber-Rousseau C, Botha- Ravyse C, Moss SJ, Kruger MI. The association between calf circumference and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index of black urban women in Tlokwe City. J Endocrinol Metab Diabetes S Afr 2018;23:86-90.
  • 19. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, Baptista G, Barazzoni R, Blaauw R, Coats A, Crivelli A, Evans DC, Gramlich L, Fuchs-Tarlovsky V, Keller H, Llido L, Malone A, Mogensen KM, Morley JE, Muscaritoli M, Nyulasi I, Pirlich M, Pisprasert V, de van der Schueren MAE, Siltharm S, Singer P, Tappenden K, Velasco N, Waitzberg D, Yamwong P, Yu J, Van Gossum A, Compher C; GLIM Core Leadership Committee; GLIM Working Group. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr 2019;38:1-9.
  • 20. Bahat G, Cederholm T. Grading the Reduced Muscle Mass in the Context of GLIM Criteria. Eur J Geriatr Gerontol 2020;2:1-2.
  • 21. Bahat G, Erdogan T, Cederholm T. Paving the way for applying GLIM criteria in clinical practice and research: how to define mild to moderate and severe reduced muscle mass. Eur Geriatr Med 2022. doi: 10.1007/s41999-022- 00609-5.
  • 22. Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argilés J, Aversa Z, Bauer JM, Biolo G, Boirie Y, Bosaeus I, Cederholm T, Costelli P, Fearon KC, Laviano A, Maggio M, Rossi Fanelli F, Schneider SM, Schols A, Sieber CC. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) “cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases” and “nutrition in geriatrics”. Clin Nutr 2010;29:154-159.
  • 23. Morley JE, Abbatecola AM, Argiles JM, Baracos V, Bauer J, Bhasin S, Cederholm T, Coats AJ, Cummings SR, Evans WJ, Fearon K, Ferrucci L, Fielding RA, Guralnik JM, Harris TB, Inui A, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kirwan BA, Mantovani G, Muscaritoli M, Newman AB, Rossi-Fanelli F, Rosano GM, Roubenoff R, Schambelan M, Sokol GH, Storer TW, Vellas B, von Haehling S, Yeh SS, Anker SD; Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders Trialist Workshop. Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011;12:403-409.
  • 24. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinková E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010;39:412-423.
  • 25. Roubenoff R. Sarcopenic obesity: does muscle loss cause fat gain? Lessons from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;904:553-557.
  • 26. Akın S, Mucuk S, Öztürk A, Mazıcıoğlu M, Göçer Ş, Arguvanlı S, Şafak ED. Muscle function-dependent sarcopenia and cut-off values of possible predictors in community-dwelling Turkish elderly: calf circumference, midarm muscle circumference and walking speed. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015;69:1087-1090.
  • 27. Halil M, Ulger Z, Varlı M, Döventaş A, Oztürk GB, Kuyumcu ME, Yavuz BB, Yesil Y, Tufan F, Cankurtaran M, Saka B, Sahin S, Curgunlu A, Tekin N, Akçiçek F, Karan MA, Atlı T, Beger T, Erdinçler DS, Arıoğul S. Sarcopenia assessment project in the nursing homes in Turkey. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:690-694.
  • 28. Tresignie J, Scafoglieri A, Pieter Clarys J, Cattrysse E. Reliability of standard circumferences in domain-related constitutional applications. Am J Hum Biol 2013;25:637-642.
  • 29. Santos LP, Gonzalez MC, Orlandi SP, Bielemann RM, Barbosa- Silva TG, Heymsfield SB, Group CS. New prediction equations to estimate appendicular skeletal muscle mass using calf circumference: results from NHANES 1999-2006. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2019;43:998-1007.
APA Erdogan T, Catikkas N, Kılıç C, KARAN M, Bahat G (2022). Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. , 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
Chicago Erdogan Tugba,Catikkas Nezahat Muge,Kılıç Cihan,KARAN MEHMET,Bahat Gulistan Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. (2022): 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
MLA Erdogan Tugba,Catikkas Nezahat Muge,Kılıç Cihan,KARAN MEHMET,Bahat Gulistan Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. , 2022, ss.103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
AMA Erdogan T,Catikkas N,Kılıç C,KARAN M,Bahat G Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. . 2022; 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
Vancouver Erdogan T,Catikkas N,Kılıç C,KARAN M,Bahat G Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. . 2022; 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
IEEE Erdogan T,Catikkas N,Kılıç C,KARAN M,Bahat G "Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population." , ss.103 - 107, 2022. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
ISNAD Erdogan, Tugba vd. "Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population". (2022), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
APA Erdogan T, Catikkas N, Kılıç C, KARAN M, Bahat G (2022). Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online), 4(2), 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
Chicago Erdogan Tugba,Catikkas Nezahat Muge,Kılıç Cihan,KARAN MEHMET,Bahat Gulistan Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online) 4, no.2 (2022): 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
MLA Erdogan Tugba,Catikkas Nezahat Muge,Kılıç Cihan,KARAN MEHMET,Bahat Gulistan Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online), vol.4, no.2, 2022, ss.103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
AMA Erdogan T,Catikkas N,Kılıç C,KARAN M,Bahat G Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online). 2022; 4(2): 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
Vancouver Erdogan T,Catikkas N,Kılıç C,KARAN M,Bahat G Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online). 2022; 4(2): 103 - 107. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
IEEE Erdogan T,Catikkas N,Kılıç C,KARAN M,Bahat G "Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population." European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online), 4, ss.103 - 107, 2022. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2
ISNAD Erdogan, Tugba vd. "Turkish Calf Circumference Cut-offs Derived from Normative Values of Young Reference Population". European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online) 4/2 (2022), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2022.2022-2-2