The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia
Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior
Region

Sertgöz, Atilla; KOCAK BUYUKDERE, AYSE

doi:10.52037/eads.2021.0015

The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region

Ayşe KOCAK-BÜYÜKDERE, (Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protez Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Atilla SERTGÖZ (Özel Klinik, İstanbul, Türkiye)

European annals of dental sciences (Online)

1 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 52 - 56 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52037/eads.2021.0015 İndeks Tarihi: 07-07-2022

The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region

Öz:

Purpose: Long-term clinical success is closely related to the internal and marginal adaptation of the restorations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the internal adaptation of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses in the posterior region. Materials & Methods: Four-unit porcelain-fused to zirconia fixed dental prostheses were fabricated with CAD-CAM system in 20 patients. For the evaluation of the restorations’ internal fit, conventional silicone replicas were used with the optical microscope. The obtained silicone impression was cut to obtain two cross-sections from buccolingual and 3 from mesiodistal. Fifty different measurements were taken from every tooth by taking 10 from each cross- section; 2 from the margin, 6 from the axial surfaces and 2 from the occlusal by the optical microscope. Results: There were statistically significant differences in internal discrepancy in terms of area and tooth type. The average internal discrepancy on the axial surfaces of the molars was 142.39±47.42µm. In premolars, the mean was 139.53±46.80µm. The average of the internal discrepancy values obtained from occlusal surfaces of the molar teeth was 164.39±53.61µm, whereas the same average for the premolar teeth was 161.92±60.54µm. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM and internal and marginal discrepancies were at clinically acceptable intervals.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Tabata LF, de Lima Silva TA, de Paula Silveira AC, Ribeiro APD. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(3):500–505. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.010.
2. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(4):419–24. doi:10.1067/mpr.2000.109125.
3. Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):545–551. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001.
4. de Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):386–392. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.017.
5. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):394–404. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70002- 2.
6. Oz FD, Bolay S. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Strength of Different Ceramic Inlays Produced by CEREC Omnicam and Heat-Pressed Technique. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:5152703. doi:10.1155/2018/5152703.
7. Padrós R, Giner L, Herrero-Climent M, Falcao-Costa C, Ríos-Santos JV, Gil FJ. Influence of the CAD-CAM Systems on the Marginal Accuracy and Mechanical Properties of Dental Restorations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12). doi:10.3390/ijerph17124276.
8. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(1):18–24. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5.
9. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent. 2001;26(4):367–74.
10. Nissan J, Rosner O, Rosen G, Naishlos S, Zenziper E, Zelikman H, et al. Influence of Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Techniques on Marginal Fit of Metal Frameworks for Fixed Partial Dentures. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(20). doi:10.3390/ma13204684.
11. Al Mortadi N, Bataineh K, Al Janaideh M. Fatigue Failure Load of Molars with Thin-Walled Prosthetic Crowns Made of Various Materials: A 3D-FEA Theoretical Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:581–593. doi:10.2147/ccide.S286826.
12. Malone W, Koth D. Tylman’s Theory and Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics. 8 [sup] th ed. Missouri: Ishiyaku Euro America. 1989:237–54.
13. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
14. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. vol. 194. Quintessence Publishing Company; 1997.
15. McCabe JF, Walls AW. Applied dental materials. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
16. Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;117(6):715–20. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0096.
17. Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(11):866– 76. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02113.x.
18. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):555–60. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002.
19. Peng CC, Chung KH, Yau HT, Ramos J V. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(3):514–522. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.024.
20. Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage. Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):3–11. doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00052-6.
21. Lindquist TJ, Connolly J. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(3):292–8. doi:10.1067/mpr.2001.113705.
22. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(2):174–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x.
23. Aktepe E. CAD-CAM Cerec 3 Sistemiyle Hazırlanan İnleylerin Marjinal Adaptasyonlarının İn Vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi Marmara Üniversitesi [Thesis]; 2005.
24. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(6):441–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2842.2005.01446.x.
25. Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushima S, Vult von Steyern P. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(10):753–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2842.2005.01506.x.
26. Nakamura T, Nonaka M, Maruyama T. In vitro fitting accuracy of copy-milled alumina cores and all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(3):189–93.

APA	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A, Sertgöz A (2021). The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. , 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
Chicago	KOCAK BUYUKDERE AYSE,Sertgöz Atilla The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. (2021): 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
MLA	KOCAK BUYUKDERE AYSE,Sertgöz Atilla The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. , 2021, ss.52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
AMA	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A,Sertgöz A The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. . 2021; 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
Vancouver	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A,Sertgöz A The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. . 2021; 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
IEEE	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A,Sertgöz A "The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region." , ss.52 - 56, 2021. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
ISNAD	KOCAK BUYUKDERE, AYSE - Sertgöz, Atilla. "The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region". (2021), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0015

APA	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A, Sertgöz A (2021). The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. European annals of dental sciences (Online), 48(2), 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
Chicago	KOCAK BUYUKDERE AYSE,Sertgöz Atilla The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. European annals of dental sciences (Online) 48, no.2 (2021): 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
MLA	KOCAK BUYUKDERE AYSE,Sertgöz Atilla The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. European annals of dental sciences (Online), vol.48, no.2, 2021, ss.52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
AMA	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A,Sertgöz A The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2021; 48(2): 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
Vancouver	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A,Sertgöz A The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2021; 48(2): 52 - 56. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
IEEE	KOCAK BUYUKDERE A,Sertgöz A "The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region." European annals of dental sciences (Online), 48, ss.52 - 56, 2021. 10.52037/eads.2021.0015
ISNAD	KOCAK BUYUKDERE, AYSE - Sertgöz, Atilla. "The Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region". European annals of dental sciences (Online) 48/2 (2021), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0015