Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 59 - 83 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.12711/tjbe/m2783 İndeks Tarihi: 09-07-2022

Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey

Öz:
This study offers a conceptual framework to investigate the role of financial and cultural factors on the understanding of corporate (social) responsibility (CR), and by applying this framework, aims to understand how cultural factors are affecting CR perception of Turkey. Since the impact of cultural factors is especially apparent on the smaller enterprises, the research focuses on SMEs in the manufacturing sector. In total, 15 semi-structured interviews with company representatives were conducted. The acquired data was analyzed with a descriptive analysis method. Results show that although participants were not aware of the extent of CR concept, a majority of them do have philanthropic activities, which are motivated predominantly by moral values. However, they show weak performances in terms of their environmental responsibility and stakeholder dialogue. These findings confirm that the CR perception of participant SMEs is compatible with Turkey’s cultural characteristics. Therefore, cultural factors could play a key role for SMEs to embrace the essence of CR as somehow traditional and already existing, rather than considering this notion as ‘imported’ or ‘new’. This research differs from existing literature in its qualitative methodology and conceptual framework, which scrutinizes financial and non-financial factors separately to reveal the CR perception of SMEs.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akbank, Deloitte, Sabancı Üniversitesi & TAİDER. (2019). Aile Şirketlerinde Sürdürülebilir Başarının Anahtarı. Deloitte Türkiye. Retrieved from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ tr/Documents/risk/aile-sirketlerinde-surdurulebilir-basarinin-anahtarlari.pdf
  • Al-Ali, N. M. (2006). Islamic Culture Key to Regional CSR Model. Retrieved from: www.albawaba.com
  • Alakavuklar, O. N., Kılıçaslan, S. & Öztürk, E. B. (2009). Türkiye’de hayırseverlikten kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğa geçiş: Bir kurumsal değişim öyküsü. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 103-143.
  • Altintas, N. N., Adiloglu, B. & Altintas, A. T. (2007). Evolution of reporting on corporate social responsibility by the companies in ISE national-30 index in Turkey. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 19-25.
  • Argandoña, A., & von Weltzien Hoivik, H. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: One size does not fit all. Collecting evidence from Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 221-234. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0394-4
  • Aydemir, M. & Ateş, M. (2011). Küçük sanayi sitelerinde kurumsal sorumluluk olgusu: Bilecik küçük sanayi sitesi örneği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 30, 169-180.
  • Barth, R. & Wolff, F. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability impact: Opening up the arena. In R. Barth and F. Wolff (eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe, rhetoric and realities, (pp. 3-25). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Basah, M. Y. A. & Yusuf, M. M. (2013). Islamic bank and corporate social responsibility (CSR), EJBM-Special Issue: Islamic Management and Business. 5, 194-209. DOI: 10.18502/kss. v3i14.4329
  • Bayram, M. (1991). Ahi evren ve ahi teşkilatının kuruluşu. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
  • Bikmen, F. (2008). Philanthropy in Europe: A rich past, a promising future. In Norine MacDonald and Luc Tayart de Borms (eds.) The Rich History of Philanthropy in Turkey: A Paradox of Tradition and Modernity, (pp. 223-234), London: Alliance Publishing Trust.
  • Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 81(3), 499–513. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3569630
  • Brammer, S., Williams, G. & Zinkin, J., (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 229-243. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9136-z
  • Celal, M. (2002). Ankara’da ahiler yönetimi meselesi. Retrieved from: http://www.ait.hacettepe. edu.tr/akademik/arsiv/ank.htm
  • Chavarria, Mariela P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Mexico. An Approximation from the Point of View of Communication. In S. K. May, G. Cheney and J. Roper (eds.), The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility, (pp. 135-144). Oxford University Press.
  • Cheney, G., Roper, J. & May, S. (2007). Overview. In S. K. May, G. Cheney and J. Roper (eds.), The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility, (pp. 3-14). Oxford University Press.
  • Coane, A., Matten D. & Spence, L. J. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility, Readings and cases in a global context. In Coane, A., Matten D. and Spence, L. J. (eds.). Corporate Social Responsibility: In Global Context, (pp. 3-20). Routledge.
  • Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J., (2012). Managing Corporate Social Responsibility: A Communicaton Approach. Wiley-Blackwell Publication.
  • Crano, W.D., Brewer, M.B. & Lac, A. (2014). Principles and methods of social research. Third Edition New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Çagatay, N. (1981). Bir türk kurumu olan ahilik. 2. Baskı. Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • Çam, M. (2014). Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü Vakıf Kayıtları Arşivi. Ahilik Ansiklopedisi (Cilt II) Ankara: T. C. Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığı.
  • Darrag, M. & E‐Bassiouny, N. (2013). An introspect into the Islamic roots of CSR in the Middle East: the case of Savola Group in Egypt. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(3), 362-378. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-10-2011-0096
  • Dincer, C. & Dincer B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Future prospects in the Turkish context. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 44-49. DOI: 10.1108/17471110710835572
  • Dinçer, C., & Dinçer, B. (2010). An investigation of Turkish small and medium-sized enterprises online CSR communication. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2): 197-207. DOI: 10.1108/17471111011051711
  • Dusuki, A. W. & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari`ah, Maslahah, and corporate social responsibility. American Journal of Islam and Society, 24(1), 25–45. DOI: 10.35632/ajis.v24i1.415
  • Epstein, E. M. (2002). Religion and business – The critical role of relgious traditions in management education. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 91-96. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015712827640
  • Ertuna, B. & Tükel, A. (2009). Türkiye’de KSS uygulamaları: Geleneksel ve Küresel Arasında. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 9(2), 145-172.
  • Faroqhi, S. (2011). Osmanlı zanaatkârları (Translator: Zülal Kılıç) İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi.
  • Garriga, E. & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123282
  • Güllülü, S. (1977). Sosyoloji açısından ahi birlikleri. İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınevi.
  • Hofstede Insights (2020). What about Turkey? Retrieved from: https://www.hofstede-insights. com/country-comparison/turkey/
  • Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill Publications.
  • İstatistiklerle Ankara (2017). Ankara Kalkınma Ajansı. Retrieved from: https://www.ankaraka. org.tr/tr/istatistiklerle-ankara-2017_4028.html
  • İnalcık, H. (2009). Devlet-i ‘Aliyye Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Üzerine Araştırmalar – 1, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Kafesoğlu, İ. (1977). Türk millî kültürü. Ankara: Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları.
  • Katsoulakos, T. & Katsoulacos, Y. (2007). Strategic management, corporate responsibility and stakeholder management Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: A stakeholder-oriented and integrative strategic management framework. Corporate Governance, 7, 355-369. DOI: 10.1108/14720700710820443
  • Katz, J. P., Swanson, D. L. & Nelson, L. K. (1999). Culture based expetations of corporate citizenship: A propositional framework and corporate analysis of four countries. (Working Paper) Kansas University. Retrieved from: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/eb028931
  • Looser, S. & Wehrmeyer, W. (2015). Stakeholder mapping of CSR in Switzerland. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 780-830. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-06-2014-0071
  • Macleod, M. (2011). Religion and the rise of global corporate social responsibility. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 9(3), 29-36. DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2011.597215
  • Mitra, R. (2012). My country’s future: A cultre-centered interrogation of corporate social responsibility in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(2), 131-147. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0985-8
  • Morsing, M., Schultz, M. & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The catch 22 of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2): 97-111. DOI: 10.1080/13527260701856608
  • Özdemir, M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1) , 323-343. Retrieved from
  • https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ogusbd/issue/10997/131612 Paçacı, İ. (2006). Dini kavramlar sözlüğü. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları
  • Palvölgyi, T., Szlavik, J., Nagypal, N. C., Füle, M. & Csete, M. (2009). Driving on CSR: SMEs in the automotive supply chain. In Barth, R. and Wolff, F. (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, Rhetoric and Realities, (pp. 109-123). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
  • Perrini, F. (2006). SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 305-316. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9186-2
  • Rishi, P. & Moghe, S. (2013). Integrating corporate social responsibility and culture as a strategy for holistic corporate success in India. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 51, 17-37.
  • Ronnegard, D. (2013). CSR in Saudi Arabia: Far behind or another path? INSEAD Knowledge, Retrieved from: https://knowledge. insead.edu/csr/csr-in-saudi-arabia-far-behind-or-another-path-2479
  • Saraç, M. & Kavakçı, S. (2016). İslami perspektiften kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk (Corporate Social Responsibility in Islamic Perspective). International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 30(69), 1-40. DOI: 10.12816/0036626
  • Sennett, R. (2000). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Spence, L. J., Schmidpeter, R. & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing social capital: Small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 17–29. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026284727037
  • Spence, L.J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163-174. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8608.00144
  • Spence, L. & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 1-5. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026205109290
  • Stabile, S. J. (2004). Using religion to promote corporate responsibility. Wake Forest Law Review, (39), 839-901.
  • Tek, A. (2014). Ahilik ansiklopedisi (Cilt I). Ankara: T. C. Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığı. The Financial Express. (2011). Islam based CSR can ensure human welfare and justice. Retrieved from: http:www. asiancsr.com/?page_id=66
  • Tilley, F. (2000). Small firm environmental ethics: How deep they go? Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(1), 31-41. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8608.00167
  • Ülger, B. & Ülger, G. (2005). Akhism as a non-governmental association model in the history of Turkish nation and an assassment of today’s business ethics: A relationship or a contradiction? Journal of Human Values, 11(1), 49-61. DOI: 10.1177/097168580401100105
  • VERBI Software (2018). MAXQDA analytics. Berlin: VERBI. Wang, L. & Juslin, H. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 433-451. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0306-7
  • Waqf. (2020). In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/ dictionary/waqf
  • Whelan, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A Confucian context. In G. Cheney, J. Roper and S. May (eds.) The debate over corporate social responsibility, (pp. 105-118). Oxford University Press.
  • Williams, G. & Zinkin, J. (2008). The effect of culture on consumers’ willingness to punish irresponsible corporate behaviour: applying Hofstede’s typology to the punishment aspect of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 210-226. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00532.x
  • Williams, G. & Zinkin, J. (2010). Islam and CSR: a Study of the compatability between the Tenets of Islam and the UN global compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 519-533. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0097-x
APA Orhaner B (2022). Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. , 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
Chicago Orhaner Berkay Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. (2022): 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
MLA Orhaner Berkay Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. , 2022, ss.59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
AMA Orhaner B Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. . 2022; 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
Vancouver Orhaner B Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. . 2022; 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
IEEE Orhaner B "Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey." , ss.59 - 83, 2022. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
ISNAD Orhaner, Berkay. "Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey". (2022), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.12711/tjbe/m2783
APA Orhaner B (2022). Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 15(1), 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
Chicago Orhaner Berkay Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi 15, no.1 (2022): 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
MLA Orhaner Berkay Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, vol.15, no.1, 2022, ss.59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
AMA Orhaner B Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi. 2022; 15(1): 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
Vancouver Orhaner B Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi. 2022; 15(1): 59 - 83. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
IEEE Orhaner B "Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey." İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 15, ss.59 - 83, 2022. 10.12711/tjbe/m2783
ISNAD Orhaner, Berkay. "Understanding the Impact of Cultural Factors on Corporate Responsibility: Conceptual Framework and a Study of 15 SMEs in Turkey". İş Ahlakı Dergisi 15/1 (2022), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.12711/tjbe/m2783