Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 485 - 490 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189 İndeks Tarihi: 10-07-2022

TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population

Öz:
Background: We aimed to evaluate the association between the TP53 Arg72Pro gene polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer in an Azerbaijani population. Methods: A total of 141 patients with colorectal cancer and 150 gender- and age-matched controls were involved in the study. The genotypes of the TP53 gene Arg72Pro polymorphism were detected by polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Results: We found that the heterozygous genotypes Arg/Pro (odds ratio, 1.128; 95% CI, 0.657-1.937) and mutant Pro/Pro (odds ratio, 1.274; 95% CI, 0.648-2.504) were more frequent in colorectal cancer patients compared to healthy controls. The frequency of the mutant Pro allele (odds ratio, 1.122; 95% CI, 0.809-1.554) was revealed in 47.5% of colorectal cancer patients and in 44.7% of healthy controls. There was no association observed between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer in an Azerbaijani population (P > .05). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a lack of relationship between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, we have found no statistical differences in the frequency of genotype and allele by sex, age, histological grade, tumor stage, smoking status, and alcohol consumption in this study.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Fan H, Demirci U, Chen P. Emerging organoid models: leaping forward in cancer research. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):142. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Naccarati A, Polakova V, Pardini B, et al. Mutations and polymorphisms in TP53 gene--an overview on the role in colorectal cancer. Mutagenesis. 2012;27(2):211-218. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Gomez-Lazaro M, Fernandez-Gomez FJ, Jordán J. p53: twenty five years understanding the mechanism of genome protection. J Physiol Biochem. 2004;60(4):287-307. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Baugh EH, Ke H, Levine AJ, Bonneau RA, Chan CS. Why are there hotspot mutations in the TP53 gene in human cancers? Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(1):154-160. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Fischer M. Census and evaluation of p53 target genes. Oncogene. 2017;36(28):3943-3956. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Barnoud T, Parris JLD, Murphy ME. Common genetic variants in the TP53 pathway and their impact on cancer. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019;11(7):578-585. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Elsaleh H, Powell B, McCaul K, et al. P53 alteration and microsatellite instability have predictive value for survival benefit from chemotherapy in stage III colorectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(5):1343-1349.
  • 8. Dumont P, Leu JI, Della Pietra AC, 3rd, George DL, Murphy M. The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet. 2003;33(3):357-365. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Dong Z, Zheng L, Liu W, Wang C. Association of mRNA expression of TP53 and the TP53 codon 72 Arg/Pro gene polymorphism with colorectal cancer risk in Asian population: a bioinformatics analysis and meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:1341-1349. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Katkoori VR, Manne U, Chaturvedi LS, et al. Functional consequence of the p53 codon 72 polymorphism in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(44):76574-76586. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Irarrázabal CE, Rojas C, Aracena R, Márquez C, Gil L. Chilean pilot study on the risk of lung cancer associated with codon 72 polymorphism in the gene of protein p53. Toxicol Lett. 2003;144(1):69-76. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Lee JM, Lee YC, Yang SY, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of p53 and GSTP1, but not NAT2, are associated with susceptibility to squamous- cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Cancer. 2000;89(5):458- 464. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Song HR, Kweon SS, Kim HN, et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphism in patients with gastric and colorectal cancer in a Korean population. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(3):242-248. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Singamsetty GK, Malempati S, Bhogadhi S, et al. TP53 alterations and colorectal cancer predisposition in south Indian population: a case-control study. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(3):2303-2311. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Gemignani F, Moreno V, Landi S, et al. A TP53 polymorphism is associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer and with reduced levels of TP53 mRNA. Oncogene. 2004;23(10):1954-1956. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Goodman JE, Mechanic LE, Luke BT, Ambs S, Chanock S, Harris CC. Exploring SNP-SNP interactions and colon cancer risk using polymorphism interaction analysis. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(7):1790- 1797. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Zhu ZZ, Wang AZ, Jia HR, et al. Association of the TP53 codon 72 polymorphism with colorectal cancer in a Chinese population. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37(5):385-390. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Dakouras A, Nikiteas N, Papadakis E, et al. P53Arg72 homozygosity and its increased incidence in left-sided sporadic colorectal adenocarcinomas, in a Greek-Caucasian population. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(2A):1039-1043.
  • 19. Pérez LO, Abba MC, Dulout FN, Golijow CD. Evaluation of p53 codon 72 polymorphism in adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum in la Plata, Argentina. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(9):1426- 1429. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Koushik A, Tranah GJ, Ma J, et al. p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(8):1863-1868. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Polakova V, Pardini B, Naccarati A, et al. Genotype and haplotype analysis of cell cycle genes in sporadic colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(4):661-668. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Joshi AM, Budhathoki S, Ohnaka K, et al. TP53 R72P and MDM2 SNP309 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: the Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(2):232-238. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Beckman G, Birgander R, Själander A, et al. Is p53 polymorphism maintained by natural selection? Hum Hered. 1994;44(5):266-270. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Liu L, Wang K, Zhu ZM, Shao JH. Associations between P53 Arg- 72Pro and development of digestive tract cancers: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Res. 2011;42(1):60-69. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Rivu SF, Apu MNH, Shabnaz S, et al. Association of TP53 codon 72 and CDH1 genetic polymorphisms with colorectal cancer risk in Bangladeshi population. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;49:46-52. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Mojtahedi Z, Hashemi SB, Khademi B, et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphism association with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(3):316-320. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Shen CC, Cheng WY, Lee CH, et al. Both p53 codon 72 Arg/Arg and pro/Arg genotypes in glioblastoma multiforme are associated with a better prognosis in bevacizumab treatment. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):709. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Lin HY, Huang CH, Wu WJ, Chang LC, Lung FW. TP53 codon 72 gene polymorphism paradox in associated with various carcinoma incidences, invasiveness and chemotherapy responses. Int J Biomed Sci. 2008;4(4):248-254.
  • 29. Storey A, Thomas M, Kalita A, et al. Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of human papillomavirus-associated cancer. Nature. 1998;393(6682):229-234. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Frank AK, Leu JI, Zhou Y, et al. The codon 72 polymorphism of p53 regulates interaction with NF−{kappa}B and transactivation of genes involved in immunity and inflammation. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31(6):1201-1213. [CrossRef]
APA Yagublu V, Bayramov B, YÜCE M, Aslanov H (2022). TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. , 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
Chicago Yagublu Vugar,Bayramov Bayram,YÜCE MELEK,Aslanov Hazi TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. (2022): 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
MLA Yagublu Vugar,Bayramov Bayram,YÜCE MELEK,Aslanov Hazi TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. , 2022, ss.485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
AMA Yagublu V,Bayramov B,YÜCE M,Aslanov H TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. . 2022; 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
Vancouver Yagublu V,Bayramov B,YÜCE M,Aslanov H TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. . 2022; 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
IEEE Yagublu V,Bayramov B,YÜCE M,Aslanov H "TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population." , ss.485 - 490, 2022. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
ISNAD Yagublu, Vugar vd. "TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population". (2022), 485-490. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
APA Yagublu V, Bayramov B, YÜCE M, Aslanov H (2022). TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 33(6), 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
Chicago Yagublu Vugar,Bayramov Bayram,YÜCE MELEK,Aslanov Hazi TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 33, no.6 (2022): 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
MLA Yagublu Vugar,Bayramov Bayram,YÜCE MELEK,Aslanov Hazi TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, vol.33, no.6, 2022, ss.485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
AMA Yagublu V,Bayramov B,YÜCE M,Aslanov H TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 33(6): 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
Vancouver Yagublu V,Bayramov B,YÜCE M,Aslanov H TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 33(6): 485 - 490. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
IEEE Yagublu V,Bayramov B,YÜCE M,Aslanov H "TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population." Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 33, ss.485 - 490, 2022. 10.5152/tjg.2022.21189
ISNAD Yagublu, Vugar vd. "TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Azerbaijani Population". Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 33/6 (2022), 485-490. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2022.21189