Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 77 - 94 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094 İndeks Tarihi: 13-07-2022

Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey

Öz:
Advances in technology give rise to buildings with complicated systems and components. Many building systems fail to perform as intended owing to lack of a systematic approach adopted during construction. Commissioning is known to enhance the building's operational efficiency through bringing a holistic perspective to design, construction, and operation. This study aims to investigate the building commissioning practices in Turkey with the intention of promoting energy efficient building communities in developing countries. Within this context, a questionnaire survey was designed and administered to the commissioning practitioners to explore their perceptions and experiences regarding a number of critical commissioning issues. The findings reveal that (i) most frequently encountered challenges are non-technical rather than technical; (ii) benefits realized in the post-occupancy period overweigh the pre-occupancy benefits; and (iii) experiential features of the commissioning agents are more important for the commissioning agent selection process than the technical and managerial features. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by presenting the main observations on building commissioning practices in a developing country and providing recommendations to enhance the commissioning performance. It is expected to provide a better understanding of the critical issues in building commissioning process and promote its implementation in developing countries.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] EIA. International Energy Outlook. Energy Information Administration, Washington, United States, 2017.
  • [2] Turkoglu H, Polat G, Damci A (2020). Assessment of materials and resources credit achievements of LEED certified buildings in Turkey based on certification levels. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 3(1): 17-28.
  • [3] Rana MJ, Hasan MR (2020). The effects of thermal insulation on energy consumption in small office buildings in the context of subtropical monsoon climate. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 3(4): 275-292.
  • [4] Kirant HT, Sozer H (2020). Assessing the indoor comfort conditions through energy performance and CFD analyses for a traditional masonry chimney. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 3(4): 264-274.
  • [5] Tözer KD, Gürcanlı GE, Yarkıner Z (2022). Analysis of workday losses due to falls from scaffoldings in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 5(1): 15-27.
  • [6] Djuric N, Novakovic V (2009). Review of possibilities and necessities for building lifetime commissioning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(2): 486-492.
  • [7] Wang L, Greenberg S, Fiegel J, Rubalcava A, Earni S, Pang X, Yin R, Woodworth S, Hernandez-Maldonado J (2013). Monitoring-based HVAC commissioning of an existing office building for energy efficiency. Applied Energy 102: 1382-1390.
  • [8] Yigit S, Ozorhon B (2021). Effectiveness of standalone simulation-based optimization software in optimizing the life cycle cost of residential buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation 4(4): 210-228.
  • [9] Burnett J (2008). Costs and benefits of building commissioning. HKIE Transactions 15(2): 9-15.
  • [10] Ma JJ, Du G, Zhang ZK, Wang PX, Xie BC (2017). Life cycle analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emissions from a typical large office building in Tianjin, China. Building and Environment 117: 36-48.
  • [11] Miraj P, Berawi MA, Utami SR (2021). Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost–benefit evaluation. Building Research & Information 49(6): 1-15.
  • [12] Maby C, Gwilliam J (2021). Integrating energy efficiency into private home repair, maintenance and improvement practice in England and Wales. Building Research & Information 1-14.
  • [13] Hu M (2020). Life-cycle environmental assessment of energy-retrofit strategies on a campus scale. Building Research & Information 48(6): 659-680.
  • [14] Ferretti NM, Miyata M, Baumann O (2018). A retrospective on the impact of Annex 40 and Annex 47 research on the international state of building commissioning. Energy and Buildings 158: 54-61.
  • [15] Bynum JD, Claridge DE, Curtin JM (2012). Development and testing of an automated building commissioning analysis tool (ABCAT). Energy and Buildings 55: 607-617.
  • [16] Gram-Hanssen K, Georg S, Christiansen E, Heiselberg P (2018). What next for energy-related building regulations?: the occupancy phase. Building Research & Information 46(7): 790-803.
  • [17] Ágústsson RÖ, Jensen PA (2011). Building commissioning: what can Denmark learn from the US experience? Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 26(3): 271-278.
  • [18] Elzarka HM (2009). Best practices for procuring commissioning services. Journal of Management in Engineering 25(3): 155-164.
  • [19] Mills E (2011). Building commissioning: a golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Energy Efficiency 4(2): 145-173.
  • [20] Lord SF, Noye S, Ure J, Tennant MG, Fisk DJ (2016). Comparative review of building commissioning regulation: a quality perspective. Building Research & Information 44(5-6): 630-643.
  • [21] Xiao F, Wang S (2009). Progress and methodologies of lifecycle commissioning of HVAC systems to enhance building sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(5): 1144-1149.
  • [22] Mohamed MA (2019). Saving energy through using green rating system for building commissioning. Energy Procedia, 162: 369-378.
  • [23] Gillis WL, Cudney EA (2015). A methodology for applying quality function deployment to the commissioning process. Engineering Management Journal 27(4): 177-187.
  • [24] ACG. ACG Commissioning Guideline for building owners, design professionals and commissioning service providers. AABC Commissioning Group, Washington, United States, 2005.
  • [25] ASHRAE. Standard 202 - Commissioning process for buildings and systems. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Georgia, United States, 2013.
  • [26] GSA. The building commissioning guide. General Services Administration, Washington, United States, 2005.
  • [27] ASHRAE. Guideline 0 - The commissioning process. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Georgia, United States, 2013.
  • [28] ASHRAE. Guideline 1.1 - HVAC&R technical requirements for the commissioning process. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Georgia, United States, 2007.
  • [29] ASHRAE. Guideline 1.5 - The commissioning process for smoke control systems. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Georgia, United States, 2017.
  • [30] BC Housing. Building commissioning guide. British Columbia Housing, British Columbia, Canada, 2015.
  • [31] Mintrom M, Thomas M (2018). Improving commissioning through design thinking. Policy Design and Practice 1(4): 310-322.
  • [32] Kantola M, Saari A (2014). Commissioning for nearly zero-energy building projects. Construction Innovation 14(3): 370-382.
  • [33] Coyner RC, Kramer SW (2017). Long term benefits of building commissioning: Should owners pay the price? Procedia Engineering 196: 429-435.
  • [34] Crowe E, Mills E, Poeling T, Curtin C, Bjørnskov D, Fischer L, Granderson J (2020). Building commissioning costs and savings across three decades and 1500 North American buildings. Energy and Buildings 227: 110408.
  • [35] Turkaslan-Bulbul MT, Akin O (2006). Computational support for building evaluation: Embedded Commissioning Model. Automation in Construction 15(4): 438-447.
  • [36] Ahmed A, Ploennigs J, Menzel K, Cahill B (2010). Multi-dimensional building performance data management for continuous commissioning. Advanced Engineering Informatics 24(4): 466-475.
  • [37] Ginestet S, Marchio D (2010). Retro and on-going commissioning tool applied to an existing building: Operability and results of IPMVP. Energy 35(4): 1717-1723.
  • [38] Harmer LC, Henze GP (2015). Using calibrated energy models for building commissioning and load prediction. Energy and Buildings 92: 204-215.
  • [39] Jradi M, Liu N, Arendt K, Mattera CG (2020). An automated framework for buildings continuous commissioning and performance testing – A university building case study. Journal of Building Engineering 31: 101464.
  • [40] Kramer H, Lin G, Curtin C, Crowe E, Granderson J (2020). Building analytics and monitoring-based commissioning: industry practice, costs, and savings. Energy Efficiency 13(3): 537-549.
  • [41] Wang S, Wang JB (2002). Automatic sensor evaluation in BMS commissioning of building refrigeration systems. Automation in Construction 11(1): 59-73.
  • [42] Painter B, Brown N, Cook MJ (2012). Practical application of a sensor overlay system for building monitoring and commissioning. Energy and Buildings 48: 29-39.
  • [43] Gunay B, Shen W, Huchuk B, Yang C, Bucking S, O’Brien W (2018). Energy and comfort performance benefits of early detection of building sensor and actuator faults. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 39(6): 652-666.
  • [44] Demkin JA. The architect's handbook of professional practice (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
  • [45] CSE. Building commissioning challenges, solutions. Consulting-Specifying Engineer, Illinois, United States, 2014.
  • [46] O’Connor JT, Choi JO, Winkler M (2016). Critical success factors for commissioning and start-up of capital projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 142(11): 04016060.
  • [47] Bjornskov D (2015). What owners and pro should know about building commissioning. Facilities Manager 32-36.
  • [48] Zhang Y, Barber EM, Ogilvie JR (2001). Commissioning livestock buildings: The needs and challenges. Transactions of the ASAE 44(1): 129-136.
  • [49] Baechler MC. A guide to building commissioning, Pacific Northwest National Lab., Washington, 2011.
  • [50] Della Barba MP (2005). The dollar value of commissioning. Proceedings of the National Conference on Building Commissioning, 4-6.
  • [51] Nelson MJ. Commissioning authority. Whole Building Design Guide, United States, 2019.
  • [52] Potts K, Wall M (2002). Managing the commissioning of building services. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 9(4): 336-344.
APA Caglayan S, Ozorhon B, Ilıcalı E (2022). Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. , 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
Chicago Caglayan Semih,Ozorhon Beliz,Ilıcalı Emre Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. (2022): 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
MLA Caglayan Semih,Ozorhon Beliz,Ilıcalı Emre Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. , 2022, ss.77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
AMA Caglayan S,Ozorhon B,Ilıcalı E Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. . 2022; 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
Vancouver Caglayan S,Ozorhon B,Ilıcalı E Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. . 2022; 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
IEEE Caglayan S,Ozorhon B,Ilıcalı E "Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey." , ss.77 - 94, 2022. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
ISNAD Caglayan, Semih vd. "Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey". (2022), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
APA Caglayan S, Ozorhon B, Ilıcalı E (2022). Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 5(2), 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
Chicago Caglayan Semih,Ozorhon Beliz,Ilıcalı Emre Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 5, no.2 (2022): 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
MLA Caglayan Semih,Ozorhon Beliz,Ilıcalı Emre Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), vol.5, no.2, 2022, ss.77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
AMA Caglayan S,Ozorhon B,Ilıcalı E Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2022; 5(2): 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
Vancouver Caglayan S,Ozorhon B,Ilıcalı E Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2022; 5(2): 77 - 94. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
IEEE Caglayan S,Ozorhon B,Ilıcalı E "Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey." Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 5, ss.77 - 94, 2022. 10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094
ISNAD Caglayan, Semih vd. "Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey". Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 5/2 (2022), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2022.02077094