General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal
Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy:
A Prospective, Randomized Study

UYSAL, HARUN; Koc, Suna

doi:10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337

General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Harun UYSAL, (Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Suna KOÇ (Biruni Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation

1 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 157 - 164 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337 İndeks Tarihi: 18-07-2022

General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Öz:

Objectives: Different anesthetic methods have been used in multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided (mpMRI) transrectal ultrasound guidance (TRUS) fusion-targeted prostate biopsy, but the consensus on the optimal anesthetic approach is not clear. In this study, the anesthesia management, procedural conditions, intraoperative adverse events, complications, discharge criteria, and cancer detection rates of general anesthesia and sedation were compared. Methods: Participants were randomly divided into general anesthesia (GA) and sedation (S) groups. The primary endpoint of the study was the surgical satisfaction score. The incidence of hypoxia, patient satisfaction, cancer detection rate, anesthetic agent consumption, recovery and hospitalization times, and complication rates were all compared as secondary outcomes. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypoxemia in both groups (Group G:0, Group S:2 patients, p=0.494). While there was no significant difference in surgical satisfaction scores (Group GA: 9.48 vs Group S: 9.23, p=0.353). PC detection rates (p=0.809) and complication rates were similar. Conclusion: With similar surgical conditions, complication incidence, and cancer detection rates, neither anesthesia approach did not provide surgical superiority over the other. The sedation approach, combined with careful monitoring of anesthesia depth, prevented hypoxemia, reduced anesthetic agent consumption, and allowed for faster recovery and discharge, allowing for ambulatory anesthesia.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. WHO. Cancer Fact Sheet. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/ data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed Mar 22, 2022.
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7–33.
3. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative ıntent. Eur Urol 2017;71:618–29.
4. Lughezzani G, Saita A, Lazzeri M, Paciotti M, Maffei D, Lista G, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. European Urol Oncol 2019;2:329–32.
5. Lemaître L, Villers A, Mouton D, Puech P. Transrectal ultrasound and biopsy of the prostate. J Radiol 2006;87:201–9.
6. Ward AD, Crukley C, McKenzie CA, Montreuil J, Gibson E, Romagnoli C, et al. Prostate: registration of digital histopathologic images to in vivo MR images acquired by using endorectal receive coil. Radiology 2012;263:856–64.
7. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, Peeling WB. Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol 1993;47:125–6.
8. Anup K, Pawan V, Niraj K, Biswajit N, Nayan MK. A prospective randomized trial comparing three different analgesic techniques for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a single center experience. Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2013;65:77–82.
9. Kucur M, Goktas S, Kaynar M, Apiliogullari S, Kilic O, Akand M, et al. Selective low-dose spinal anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective and randomized study. J Endourol 2015;29:1412–7.
10. Maccagnano C, Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Raber M, Angiolilli D, Montorsi F, et al. Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: which is the most effective technique? Urol Int 2011;87:1–13.
11. Kang SG, Tae BS, Min SH, Ko YH, Kang SH, Lee JG, et al. Efficacy and cost analysis of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy under monitored anesthesia. Asian J Androl 2011;13:724–7.
12. Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet (London, England) 2017;389:815–22.
13. Altok M, Kim B, Patel BB, Shih YT, Ward JF, McRae SE, et al. Cost and efficacy comparison of five prostate biopsy modalities: a platform for integrating cost into novel-platform comparative research. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2018;21:524–32.
14. Bakan M, Umutoglu T, Topuz U, Uysal H, Bayram M, Kadioglu H, et al. Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, dexmedetomidine and lidocaine infusions for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Braz J Anesthesiol 2015;65:191–9.
15. Brain AI, McGhee TD, McAteer EJ, Thomas A, Abu-Saad MA, Bushman JA. The laryngeal mask airway. Development and preliminary trials of a new type of airway. Anaesthesia 1985;40:356–61.
16. Nishikawa K, Yoshida S, Shimodate Y, Igarashi M, Namiki A. A comparison of spinal anesthesia with small-dose lidocaine and general anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol for ambulatory prostate biopsy procedures in elderly patients. J Clin Anesth 2007;19:25–9.
17. Chung F. Are discharge criteria changing? J Clin Anesth 1993;5:64–8.
18. Manfredi M, Costa Moretti TB, Emberton M, Villers A, Valerio M. MRI/TRUS fusion software-based targeted biopsy: the new standard of care? Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2015;67:233–46.
19. Mozer P, Rouprêt M, Le Cossec C, Granger B, Comperat E, de Gorski A, et al. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer. BJU Int 2015;115:50–7.
20. Peyromaure M, Ravery V, Messas A, Toublanc M, Boccon- Gibod L, Boccon-Gibod L. Pain and morbidity of an extensive prostate 10-biopsy protocol: a prospective study in 289 patients. J Urol 2002;167:218–21.
21. Davis P, Paul E, Grummet J. Current practice of prostate biopsy in Australia and New Zealand: A survey. Urol Ann 2015;7:315– 9.
22. Mazdak H, Abtahi AM, Momeni F, Izadpanahi MH. A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound- guided prostate biopsy. J Res Med Sci 2018;23:17.
23. Daşkaya H, Yazıcı H, Doğan S, Can IH. Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:2433–6.
24. Singh H. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring during propofol- induced sedation and anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999;16:31–6.
25. Ng SY, Teoh WH, Lim Y, Cheong VG. Comparison of the AMBU Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Classic in anaesthetised, spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007;35:57–61.
26. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Barry J, Mecklem D, Blinco A, et al. Emergence characteristics and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of high versus low initial cuff volume. Anaesthesia 2000;55:338–43.
27. Satilmis T, Ugurlu F, Garip H, Sener BC, Goker K. Comparison of the effects of sedation and general anesthesia in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion. Saudi Med J 2011;32:593–7.
28. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, et al; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1767–77.
29. Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2013;64:876–92.

APA	UYSAL H, Koc S (2022). General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. , 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
Chicago	UYSAL HARUN,Koc Suna General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. (2022): 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
MLA	UYSAL HARUN,Koc Suna General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. , 2022, ss.157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
AMA	UYSAL H,Koc S General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. . 2022; 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
Vancouver	UYSAL H,Koc S General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. . 2022; 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
IEEE	UYSAL H,Koc S "General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study." , ss.157 - 164, 2022. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
ISNAD	UYSAL, HARUN - Koc, Suna. "General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study". (2022), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337

APA	UYSAL H, Koc S (2022). General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, 6(2), 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
Chicago	UYSAL HARUN,Koc Suna General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation 6, no.2 (2022): 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
MLA	UYSAL HARUN,Koc Suna General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, vol.6, no.2, 2022, ss.157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
AMA	UYSAL H,Koc S General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation. 2022; 6(2): 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
Vancouver	UYSAL H,Koc S General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation. 2022; 6(2): 157 - 164. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
IEEE	UYSAL H,Koc S "General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study." Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, 6, ss.157 - 164, 2022. 10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337
ISNAD	UYSAL, HARUN - Koc, Suna. "General Anesthesia versus Sedation in Multi Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Transrectal Ultrasound Guided (TRUS) Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study". Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation 6/2 (2022), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2022.34337