Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 188 - 193 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 İndeks Tarihi: 18-07-2022
Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?
Öz: Objective: This study assessed the educational quality and reliability of YouTube
videos about regenerative endodontics.
Materials and Methods: The YouTube videos were viewed using the searching
terms ‘regenerative endodontic treatment’, ‘endodontic regeneration’, ‘pulp
regeneration’, ‘pulp revascularization’, and ‘pulp revitalization’. The first 60 videos
(300 videos, in total) were searched for each term and after initial screening, 70
videos were selected for analysis by three reviewers according to the inclusion
criteria. The global score for educational value and modified DISCERN score was
used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Kruskal-Wallis test and
chi-square test were used to analyze data. Correlations analyzed using Pearson-
Spearman test.
Results: The mean of Modified DISCERN score of the YouTube videos about
regenerative endodontics was 3.02±1.07 which was categorized as moderate
reliability. The mean of global score for educational value of the videos was
2.05±1.13 and 37.1% (n=26) of them were in a poor quality while 14.3% (n=10)
were in a good quality due to the scoring of this value. No excellent quality video
was found.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that the amount of educational and reliable
information on YouTube videos about regenerative endodontics is limited.
Anahtar Kelime: Youtube Rejeneratif Endodonti için Nitelikli Bir Bilgi Kaynağı mı?
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışma, rejeneratif endodonti ile ilgili YouTube videolarının eğitim
kalitesini ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada ‘rejeneratif endodontik tedavi’, ‘endodontik
rejenerasyon’, ‘pulpa rejenerasyonu’, ‘pulpa revaskülarizasyonu’ ve ‘pulpa
revitalizasyonu’ arama terimleri kullanılarak ilgili YouTube videoları görüntülendi.
Her bir terim için ilk 60 video (toplam 300 video) tarandı ve ilk taramada dahil
edilme kriterlerine göre seçilen 70 video üç gözlemci tarafından analiz edildi.
Videoların kalitesi ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla ‘eğitim değeri global
skoru’ ve ‘modifiye DISCERN skoru’ kullanıldı. Verilerin analizi için Kruskal Wallis ve
ki-kare testleri kullanıldı. Veriler arasındaki korelasyonlar Pearson-Spearman testi
kullanılarak analiz edildi.
Bulgular: Rejeneratif endodonti ile ilgili YouTube videolarının Modifiye DISCERN
puanlama ortalaması 3,02±1,07 olup, ortalama güvenilirlik olarak kategorize edildi.
Videoların global eğitim değeri puanlama ortalaması 2,05±1,13 olarak bulunmuş
olup, bu puanlamaya göre %37,1’inin (n=26) kötü kalitede, %14,3’ünün (n=10) iyi
kalitede olduğu görüldü. Videoların hiçbiri mükemmel kalitede bulunmadı.
Sonuç: YouTube videolarında rejeneratif endodonti ile ilgili eğitici ve güvenilir bilgi
miktarının sınırlı olduğu görülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Akyildiz BM, Sönmez I. Rejeneratif Endodontik Tedavi: Bir Literatür Derlemesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr Dent-Special Topics 2016; 2: 1-12.
- 2. Rossi-Fedele G, Kahler B, Venkateshbabu N. Limited Evidence Suggests Benefits of Single Visit Revascularization Endodontic Procedures-A Systematic Review. Braz Dent J 2019; 30: 527-35.
- 3. Nagata JY, Soares AJ, Souza-Filho FJ, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Almeida JF, et al. Microbial evaluation of traumatized teeth treated with triple antibiotic paste or calcium hydroxide with 2% chlorhexidine gel in pulp revascularization. J Endod 2014; 40: 778-83.
- 4. Kahler B, Rossi-Fedele G, Chugal N, Lin LM. An Evidence-based Review of the Efficacy of Treatment Approaches for Immature Permanent Teeth with Pulp Necrosis. J Endod 2017; 43: 1052-7.
- 5. Jung C, Kim S, Sun T, Cho YB, Song M. Pulp-dentin regeneration: current approaches and challenges. J Tissue Eng 2019; 10: 1-13.
- 6. Nakashima M, Akamine A. The application of tissue engineering to regeneration of pulp and dentin in endodontics. J Endod 2005; 31: 711-8.
- 7. Kim SG, Malek M, Sigurdsson A, Lin LM, Kahler B. Regenerative endodontics: a comprehensive review. Int Endod J 2018; 51: 1367-88.
- 8. Boyer C, Provost, M, Baujard, V. Highlights of the 8th HON survey of health and medical Internet users. Geneva: Health on the Net Foundation [updated 2002]. Available from: https://www.hon.ch/ Survey/Spring2002/res.html .
- 9. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully, C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016; 22: 202-8.
- 10. Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP, Gaş S. Potential Patient Education of YouTube Videos Related to Wisdom Tooth Surgical Removal. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30: 481-4.
- 11. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 180-5.
- 12. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2016; 49: 1194-200.
- 13. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77: 1776-83.
- 14. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1-6.
- 15. Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V, Hügle, T. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19: 373-6. 16. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 105-11.
- 17. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012; 39: 899-903.
- 18. Pons-Fuster E, Roca JR, Tvarijonaviciute A, López-Jornet, P. YouTube information about diabetes and oral healthcare. Odontology 2020; 108: 84-90.
- 19. Radonjic A, Hing NNF, Harlock J, Naji F. YouTube as a source of patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71: 637-44.
- 20. Kılınç DD, Sayar G. Assessment of reliability of youtube videos on orthodontics. Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 145-50.
- 21. Fortuna G, Schiavo JH, Aria M, Mignogna MD, Klasser GD. The usefulness of YouTube™ videos as a source of information on burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Rehabil 2019; 46: 657-65.
| APA | DURMAZPINAR P, KANMAZ B, Adalı E (2022). Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. , 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| Chicago | DURMAZPINAR Parla Meva,KANMAZ Burcu,Adalı Emine Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. (2022): 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| MLA | DURMAZPINAR Parla Meva,KANMAZ Burcu,Adalı Emine Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. , 2022, ss.188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| AMA | DURMAZPINAR P,KANMAZ B,Adalı E Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. . 2022; 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| Vancouver | DURMAZPINAR P,KANMAZ B,Adalı E Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. . 2022; 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| IEEE | DURMAZPINAR P,KANMAZ B,Adalı E "Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?." , ss.188 - 193, 2022. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| ISNAD | DURMAZPINAR, Parla Meva vd. "Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?". (2022), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| APA | DURMAZPINAR P, KANMAZ B, Adalı E (2022). Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, 23(2), 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| Chicago | DURMAZPINAR Parla Meva,KANMAZ Burcu,Adalı Emine Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 23, no.2 (2022): 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| MLA | DURMAZPINAR Parla Meva,KANMAZ Burcu,Adalı Emine Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, vol.23, no.2, 2022, ss.188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| AMA | DURMAZPINAR P,KANMAZ B,Adalı E Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal. 2022; 23(2): 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| Vancouver | DURMAZPINAR P,KANMAZ B,Adalı E Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal. 2022; 23(2): 188 - 193. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| IEEE | DURMAZPINAR P,KANMAZ B,Adalı E "Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?." Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, 23, ss.188 - 193, 2022. 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
| ISNAD | DURMAZPINAR, Parla Meva vd. "Is Youtube Qualified as an Information Source for Regenerative Endodontics?". Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 23/2 (2022), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.02693 |
