Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 130 - 137 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 İndeks Tarihi: 20-07-2022
Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers
Öz: Child assessment studies are essential for the child, the teacher, and the program. Daily evaluations help educators reveal the holistic picture of the child, determine
the program’s effectiveness, and determine the appropriateness of the methods used by the teacher. The COVID-19 pandemic affected the field of education and all
other fields, and it required updating the evaluation methods. This is aimed to compare the evaluation processes of preschool teachers in face-to-face and distance
education. The study was designed using basic qualitative research. The participants consist of 20 teachers determined by criterion sampling, one of the purposeful
sampling methods. In the research, in which standardized interview and demographic information forms were used, data were collected online and content analysis
was used in the analysis. As a result of the research, teachers use different assessment techniques and the same assessment techniques in face-to-face and distance
education processes. Assessment techniques are divided into two categories as authentic and traditional assessment; the assessment methods they use are mostly
observation interviews and portfolios. As a result of the research, it was determined that the evaluation studies were used at different time intervals. In the light of
the findings, it can be said that it is a desirable situation in the literature that teachers use other techniques; however, the frequency of evaluation is not as expected
in the literatüre.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Akman, B. (2010). Fen eğitiminde değerlendirme [Assessment in science education]. Berrin Akman (Ed). İçinde Okul öncesi dönemde fen eğitimi, ss. 151–162. Ankara: Pegem.
- Akman, B., & Yazıcı, D. (2016). Standardize Testler [Standard tests] [Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları]. In Ç. Dinçer (Ed.), Gelişimsel Tanı ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri Içinde [in Developmental diagnosis and assessment methods (ss. 100–120). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
- Aksoy, V., & Şahin, Ş. (2017). Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu (OSB): Tarama, Tanılama ve Değerlendirme [Autism spectrum disorder (ASD): Screening, diagnosis and evaluation]. In Bakkaloğlu (Ed.), İbrahim Diken ve Hatice, Zihin Yetersizliği ve Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Içinde [In intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder] (ss. 230–259). Ankara: PEGEM.
- APA (American Psychiatric Association). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publishing.
- Asri, D. N., Cahyono, B. E. H., & Trisnani, R. P. (2021). Early reading learning for special needs students: Challenges on inclusive primary school during COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1062–1074. [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, R., & Luckner, J. L. (2013). Assessment practices and training needs of early childhood professionals. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34(3), 231–248. [CrossRef]
- Bernes, J. K., Guin, A., & Allen, K. (2018). Training needs and online learning preferences of early childhood professionals. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 39(2), 114–130. [CrossRef]
- Bayhan, P. (2016). Erken Müdahalede Herşeyin Başlangıcı: Çocuk Gelişimi, Tarama, Değerlendirme ve Tanılama [The beginning of everything in early intervention: Child development, screening, assessment and diagnosis]. In E. N. Metin & B. G. Doğan (Eds.), Erken Müdahalede Ilk Aşama: Tanılama Içinde [The first stage in early intervention: in diagnosis] (ss. 69–94). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
- Bayhan, P. (2019). Erken Çocuklukta Değerlendirme [Assessment in early childhood]. Vize.
- Beaty, J. J. (2014). Observing development of the young child. New York: Merrill.
- Brown, J., & Rolfe, S. A. (2005). Use of child development assessment in early childhood education: Early childhood practitioner and student attitudes toward formal and informal testing. Early Child Development and Care, 175(3), 193–202. [CrossRef]
- Buldu, M. (2010). Okul öncesi matematik eğitiminde değerlendirme [Assessment in preschool mathematics education]. Berrin Akman (Ed). İçinde Okul öncesi matematik eğitimi, ss. 190–209. Ankara: Pegem.
- Camara, W. J. (2007). Standards for educational and psychological testing: ınfluence in assessment development and use. [Unpublished Article]. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/237435554_Standards_for_ Educational_and_Psychological_Testing_Influence_in_Assessment_Development_and_Use
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2016). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Eken, Ö., Tosun, N., & Tuzcu Eken, D. (2020). Covid-19 Salgını ile Acil ve Zorunlu Uzaktan Eğitime Geçiş: Genel bir Değerlendirme [Transition to emergency and compulsory distance education with the Covid-19 outbreak: A general assessment]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 113–128. [CrossRef]
- Ekinci, B. (2012). Standart Testler: Erken Çocukluk Dönemi Öğretmenleri Neleri Bilmeli? Erken Çocukluk Döneminde Gelişim Ve Öğrenmenin Değerlendirilmesi Ve Desteklenmesi, Birsen Ekinci Palut ( Ed.). Ankara: Nobel.
- ETS. (2014). ETS Standarts for Quality and Fairness. www.ets.org/s/about/pdf/ standards.pdf.
- Garbe, A., Ogurlu, U., Logan, N., & Cook, P. (2020). Parents’ experiences with remote education during COVID-19 school closures. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 45–65. [CrossRef]
- Giovannella, C., Passarelli, M., Persico, D. (2020). Measuring the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on Italian Learning Ecosystems at the steady state: the school teachers’ perspective, Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal (IxD&A), 45, 264–286.
- Haberleri, K. (2020). Coronavirus forces 1 in 13 students in Japan to consider quitting: Survey. Kyodo News. Retrieved from https://english.kyodonews .net/news/2020/04/3e4502b6c22f-virus-forces-1-in-13-students-in-japanto-consider-quitting-survey.html
- Howard, V., Williams, B., & Lepper, C. (2010). very young children with special needs: A foundation for educators, families and service providers (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
- Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). COVID-19 and schooling: Evaluation, assessment and accountability in times of crises—Reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy, practice and research with the school barometer. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(2), 237–270. [CrossRef]
- Hunter Myers, C. M. (2021). Standard 3: Observing, documenting, and assessing to support young children and families. Retrieved from https://chunter myers.weebly.com/naeyc-standard-3-observing-documenting-and-asses sing-to-support-young-children-and-families.html
- Işıkoğlu Erdoğan, N., Aydoğan, S., Efe Kendüzler, S., Dülger, E., Aydın, A., & Dinler, H. (2021). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Çocukları Değerlendirmedeki Yeterlilik Düzeyleri ve Kullandıkları Araçlar [Preschool teachers’ levels of competence in evaluating children and the tools they use]. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 35(1), 1–19. [CrossRef]
- Kan, Ü. D. (2007). Okul Öncesi Eğitimde Değerlendirme Aracı Olarak Portfolyo [Portfolio as an assessment tool in preschool education]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 27(1), 169–178.
- Karaca, Ş., & Kelam, D. (2020). Covid-19 Gölgesinde Uzaktan Eğitim Hizmet Kalitesinin Incelenmesi [Investigation of distance education service quality in the shadow of Covid-19]. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 7–18. Retrieved from http://sita.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/en/pub/issue/57 733/791442
- Kuru, N., & Akman, B. (2019). Çocuğu Tanıma ve Değerlendirme Aracı Olarak Pedagojik Dokümantasyon [Pedagogical documentation as a tool for recognizing and evaluating the child]. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science/Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 12(3), 935–949.
- Lapada, A. A., Miguel, F. F., Robledo, D. A. R., & Alam, Z. F. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 awareness, distance learning education experiences and perceptions towards institutional readiness and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127–144. [CrossRef]
- Losardo, A., & Notari-Syverson, A. (2001). An alternative approach to assessing young children. Baltimore: Brookes.
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- MEB. (2013). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı. www.meb.gov.tr.
- Mercan Uzun, E., Yazıcı, D., & Akman, B. (2017). Okul Öncesi Öğretmen Adaylarının Çocuğu Tanıma ve Değerlendirme Hakkındaki Görüşlerinin Incelenmesi [Examination of pre-school teacher candidates’ views on recognizing and evaluating children]. Nisan, Antalya, Türkiye: Uluslararası eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi.
- Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis, 1(1), 1–17.
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2004). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/ globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/positionstatements/PSDAP.pdf
- Ntuli, E., Nyarambi, A., & Traore, M. (2014). Assessment in early childhood education: threats and challenges to effective assessment of immigrant children. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 14(4), 221–228.
- Nuere, S., & de Miguel, L. (2021). The digital/technological connection with COVID-19: An unprecedented challenge in University Teaching. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 931–943. [CrossRef]
- Ok, B., Torun, N., & Yazıcı, D. N. (2021). Yeni Normalin Erken Çocukluk Dönemi Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Ebeveyn Görüşleri Alınarak Incelenmesi [Examining the effects of the new normal on early childhood by taking parental views]. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 35(2), 640–654. [CrossRef]
- Okatan, Ö., & Tagay, Ö. (2021). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Çocuğu Tanıma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemi Olarak Oyuna Ilişkin Görüşleri [Preschool teachers’ opinions on play as a child recognition and evaluation method]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(3), 2140–2164. [CrossRef]
- Parczewska, T. (2020). Difficult situations and ways of coping with them in the experiences of parents homeschooling their children during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Education 3-13, 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Rasmitadila, R., Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109. [CrossRef]
- Sancho, N., Idoiaga Mondragon, N., Dosil Santamaria, M., & Picaza Gorrotxategi, M. (2021). The well-being of children with special needs during the COVID-19 lockdown: Academic, emotional, social and physical aspects. European Journal of Special Needs Education. [CrossRef]
- Sapsağlam, Ö. (2013). Değerlendirme Boyutuyla Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programları (1952–2013) [Preschool education programs with the dimension of evaluation (1952–2013)]. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1, 63–73. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/goputeb/issue /7323/95839
- Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. [CrossRef]
- Singh, A., Yeh, C. J., & Blanchard, S. B. (2017). Ages and stages questionnaire: A global screening scale. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México (English ed), 74(1), 5–12.
- Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and’teacherpresence: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 146.
- Topuz, G. Y., & Kaya, Ö. M. E. (2016). The opinions of the pre-school teachers about the works conducted for ıdentification and assessment of children. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 6(1), 27–62. [CrossRef]
- Türkoğlu, B. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmenleri ile öğretmen adaylarının çocuğu tanıma ve değerlendirme sürecine ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Ankara: Eyuder.
- Ulusoy, N. (2019). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Çocuğu Tanıma ve Değerlendirme Tekniklerine Yönelik Tutumlarının Incelenmesi [Examination of pre-school teachers’ attitudes towards child recognition and assessment techniques] [Master’s thesis]. Ankara, Türkiye: Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gazi Üniversitesi.
- UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring (GEM) report. Paris: UNESCO.
- Vu, C. T., Hoang, A. D., Than, V. Q., Nguyen, M. T., Dinh, V. H., Le, Q. T., Le, T. T., Pham,H. H., & Nguyen, Y. C. (2020). Dataset of Vietnamese teachers’ perspectives and perceived support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data in Brief, 31, 105788. [CrossRef]
- Yazcayir, G., & Gurgur, H. (2021). Students with special needs in digital classrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Pedagogical Research, 6(1), 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Yazıcı, D. N., Akman, B., & Usta, M. B. (2020). Otizmli Çocukları Tarama, Tanılama, Değerlendirmede Kullanılan Psikometrik Araçlar [Psychometric tools used in screening, diagnosing and evaluating children with autism]. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi, 29(4), 267–275.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimsek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
| APA | Akman B, AKGÜL E, yazıcı d (2022). Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. , 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| Chicago | Akman Berrin,AKGÜL ESRA,yazıcı dila Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. (2022): 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| MLA | Akman Berrin,AKGÜL ESRA,yazıcı dila Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. , 2022, ss.130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| AMA | Akman B,AKGÜL E,yazıcı d Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. . 2022; 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| Vancouver | Akman B,AKGÜL E,yazıcı d Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. . 2022; 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| IEEE | Akman B,AKGÜL E,yazıcı d "Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers." , ss.130 - 137, 2022. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| ISNAD | Akman, Berrin vd. "Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers". (2022), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| APA | Akman B, AKGÜL E, yazıcı d (2022). Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. Hayef:journal of education (Online), 19(2), 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| Chicago | Akman Berrin,AKGÜL ESRA,yazıcı dila Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. Hayef:journal of education (Online) 19, no.2 (2022): 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| MLA | Akman Berrin,AKGÜL ESRA,yazıcı dila Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. Hayef:journal of education (Online), vol.19, no.2, 2022, ss.130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| AMA | Akman B,AKGÜL E,yazıcı d Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2022; 19(2): 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| Vancouver | Akman B,AKGÜL E,yazıcı d Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2022; 19(2): 130 - 137. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| IEEE | Akman B,AKGÜL E,yazıcı d "Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers." Hayef:journal of education (Online), 19, ss.130 - 137, 2022. 10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
| ISNAD | Akman, Berrin vd. "Determining the Practice Differences in Preschool Teachers’ Practices for Evaluating Children in the Face-to-Face and Distance Education Process, with the Views of the Teachers". Hayef:journal of education (Online) 19/2 (2022), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.54614/hayef.2022.22004 |
