Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 119 - 123 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 İndeks Tarihi: 24-07-2022
Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow
Öz: Zirconia has become a popular restorative material regarding the mechanical and biocompatibility advantages.
Monolithic and translucent forms of zirconia advanced the aesthetics of this material, making it the material of choice
for both tooth- and implant- supported restorations. Also, digital fabrication of zirconia not only enables accurate
restorations but also provides time efficiency. The present case report demonstrates the rehabilitation of a patient who
has generalized tooth wear with implant- and tooth-supported monolithic zirconia restorations with buccal veneers in a
newly established occlusal vertical dimension. The treatment process was completed in a digital workflow as the
impressions were taken with a powder-free intraoral scanner and the digital data were send to the dental laboratory to
fabricate the restorations. Monolithic zirconia restorations with buccal feldspathic veneers were completed without any
adjustments in only two appointments. The patient was satisfied and the restorations have been in service for two years.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Olgu Sunumu Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Papaspyridakos P, Chochlidakis K, Kang K, Chen YW, Al- ghfeli A, Kudara Y, et al. Digital Workflow for Im- plant Rehabilitation with Double Full-Arch Monolithic Zir- conia Prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):460–465. doi:10.1111/jopr.13166.
- 2. Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM Ce- ramic Restorative Materials for Natural Teeth. J Dent Res. 2018;97(10):1082–1091. doi:10.1177/0022034518779759.
- 3. Stawarczyk B, Frevert K, Ender A, Roos M, Sener B, Wimmer T. Comparison of four monolithic zirco- nia materials with conventional ones: Contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;59:128–138. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.040.
- 4. Marchack BW, Sato S, Marchack CB, White SN. Com- plete and partial contour zirconia designs for crowns and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(3):145–152. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60112-1.
- 5. Diéguez-Pereira M, Chávarri-Prado D, Estrada-Martínez A, Pérez-Pevida E, Brizuela-Velasco A. Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant- Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8821068. doi:10.1155/2020/8821068.
- 6. Worni A, Katsoulis J, Kolgeci L, Worni M, Mericske- Stern R. Monolithic zirconia reconstructions sup- ported by teeth and implants: 1- to 3-year results of a case series. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(6):459–467. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a38138.
- 7. Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Närhi TO, Cooper LF. Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zir- conia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic re- view. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):672–677.e1. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.025.
- 8. Sadowsky SJ. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review. Dent Mater. 2020;36(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.100.
- 9. Sudhir N, Chittaranjan B, Kumar BA, Taruna M, Kumar MP, Reddy MR. Digital Cephalometric Tracings by PRO- CEPH V3 Software for Comparative Analyses of Vertical Dimension in Edentulous Patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(5):Zc01–5. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2015/12034.5862.
- 10. Guichet DL. Digital Workflows in the Management of the Esthetically Discriminating Patient. Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(2):331–344. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.011.
- 11. Juntavee N, Sirisathit I. Marginal accuracy of computer- aided design- and computer-aided manufacturing- fabricated full-arch zirconia restoration. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:9–17. doi:10.2147/ccide.s154156.
- 12. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Häm- merle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):383–388.
- 13. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clin- ical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial den- tures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(2):174–179. doi:10.1111/j.1600- 0722.2004.00197.x.
- 14. Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restora- tive material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):545–551. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001.
- 15. Caglar I, Ates SM, Yesil Duymus Z. The effect of var- ious polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(2):132–137. doi:10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132.
- 16. Cakir-Omur T, Gozneli R, Ozkan Y. Effects of Silica Coat- ing by Physical Vapor Deposition and Repeated Firing on the Low-Temperature Degradation and Flexural Strength of a Zirconia Ceramic. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e186–e194. doi:10.1111/jopr.12618.
- 17. Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treat- ments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91(2):930–937. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31477.
- 18. Mohammadi-Bassir M, Babasafari M, Rezvani MB, Jamshidian M. Effect of coarse grinding, overglazing, and 2 polishing systems on the flexural strength, surface rough- ness, and phase transformation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(5):658–665. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.019.
- 19. Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Evaluation of various pol- ishing systems and the phase transformation of mono- lithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):440–449. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.021.
- 20. Dérand P, Dérand T. Bond strength of luting ce- ments to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(2):131–135.
- 21. Griffin J J D. Combining monolithic zirconia crowns, digital impressioning, and regenerative cement for a predictable restorative alternative to PFM. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(3):212–222.
- 22. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhe- sion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceram- ics: where are we now? Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):71–82. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022.
- 23. Abduo J, Lyons K. Clinical considerations for increas- ing occlusal vertical dimension: a review. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(1):2–10. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01640.x.
- 24. Oudkerk J, Eldafrawy M, Bekaert S, Grenade C, Van- heusden A, Mainjot A. The one-step no-prep ap- proach for full-mouth rehabilitation of worn dentition using PICN CAD-CAM restorations: 2-yr results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent. 2020;92:103245. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103245.
- 25. Vailati F, Carciofo S. CAD/CAM monolithic restorations and full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation to restore a patient with a past history of bulimia: the modified three-step technique. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11(1):36–56
| APA | Oguz E, Kılıçarslan M (2021). Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. , 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| Chicago | Oguz Ece Irem,Kılıçarslan Mehmet Ali Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. (2021): 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| MLA | Oguz Ece Irem,Kılıçarslan Mehmet Ali Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. , 2021, ss.119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| AMA | Oguz E,Kılıçarslan M Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. . 2021; 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| Vancouver | Oguz E,Kılıçarslan M Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. . 2021; 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| IEEE | Oguz E,Kılıçarslan M "Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow." , ss.119 - 123, 2021. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| ISNAD | Oguz, Ece Irem - Kılıçarslan, Mehmet Ali. "Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow". (2021), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| APA | Oguz E, Kılıçarslan M (2021). Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. European annals of dental sciences (Online), 48(3), 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| Chicago | Oguz Ece Irem,Kılıçarslan Mehmet Ali Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. European annals of dental sciences (Online) 48, no.3 (2021): 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| MLA | Oguz Ece Irem,Kılıçarslan Mehmet Ali Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. European annals of dental sciences (Online), vol.48, no.3, 2021, ss.119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| AMA | Oguz E,Kılıçarslan M Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2021; 48(3): 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| Vancouver | Oguz E,Kılıçarslan M Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2021; 48(3): 119 - 123. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| IEEE | Oguz E,Kılıçarslan M "Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow." European annals of dental sciences (Online), 48, ss.119 - 123, 2021. 10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
| ISNAD | Oguz, Ece Irem - Kılıçarslan, Mehmet Ali. "Full-mouth reconstruction with Implant and Tooth-supported Zirconia Restorations in a Digital Workflow". European annals of dental sciences (Online) 48/3 (2021), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0017 |
