Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 28 - 34 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958 İndeks Tarihi: 28-07-2022

Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation

Öz:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare the muscle strength and thickness of individuals who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft for at least 12 months with uninvolved limbs and healthy controls. MATERIALS and METHODS: This study included 25 individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction [age: 29.56±8.25 years; Body Mass Index (BMI): 27.27±3.89 kg/cm2] and 25 healthy participants (age: 27.12±5.94 years; BMI: 24.70±3.03 kg/cm2). Muscle thicknesses of the vastus medialis oblique (VMO), rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus-semimembranosus (SS) muscles were evaluated by ultrasonographic measurement. Muscle strength measurements using an isokinetic system were performed. RESULTS: VMO (p<0.001) and RF (p<0.001) muscle thickness were higher in the uninvolved limb than in the surgical limb. The concentric quadriceps muscle (p=0.029), eccentric quadriceps muscle (p=0.012), and eccentric hamstring muscle strengths (p=0.001) were significantly higher in uninvolved limb, which was similar concentric hamstring muscle strength (p>0.05). Muscle thickness and muscle strength of the control group and the surgical limbs were similar (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: An average of 3 years has passed since the operation; however, VMO and RF muscle atrophy and decreased hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength continued. These results revealed that the use of the limb, which has not fully achieved its functionality, is limited, and individuals try to compensate for this situation by the uninvolved limb.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Gasibat Q, Jahan AM. Pre and post-operative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young athletes. Int J Orthop. 2017;3:819- 828.
  • 2. Butler RJ, Dai B, Garrett WE, Queen RM. Changes in landing mechanics in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction when wearing an extension constraint knee brace. Sports Health. 2014;6:203-209.
  • 3. Wurtzel CN, Gumucio JP, Grekin JA, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of myostatin protects against skeletal muscle atrophy and weakness after anterior cruciate ligament tear. J Orthop Res. 2017;35:2499-2505.
  • 4. Ageberg E, Roos HP, Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Roos EM. Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:162-169.
  • 5. Tourville TW, Jarrell KM, Naud S, Slauterbeck JR, Johnson RJ, Beynnon BD. Relationship between isokinetic strength and tibiofemoral joint space width changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:302-311.
  • 6. Palmieri-Smith RM, Lepley LK. Quadriceps strength asymmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alters knee joint biomechanics and functional performance at time of return to activity. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1662-1669.
  • 7. Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou B, Letson D, Chuinard R, D’ambrosia R. Muscular coactivation the role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am J Sports Med. 1988;16:113-22.
  • 8. Opar DA, Serpell BG. Is there a potential relationship between prior hamstring strain injury and increased risk for future anterior cruciate ligament injury? Arch Physic Med Rehab. 2014;95:401-405.
  • 9. Tashiro T, Kurosawa H, Kawakami A, Hikita A, Fukui N. Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a detailed evaluation with comparison of singleand double-tendon harvest. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:522-529.
  • 10. Tsifountoudis I, Bisbinas I, Kalaitzoglou I, et al. The natural history of donor hamstrings unit after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MRI scan assessment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1583-1590.
  • 11. Friedmann-Bette B, Profit F, Gwechenberger T, et al. Strength training effects on muscular egeneration after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:1152-61.
  • 12. Konishi Y, Kinugasa R, Oda T, Tsukazaki S, Fukubayashi T. Relationship between muscle volume and muscle torque of the hamstrings after anterior cruciate ligament lesion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:2270- 2274.
  • 13. Williams GN, Snyder-Mackler L, Barrance PJ, Axe MJ, Buchanan TS. Muscle and tendon morphology after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with autologous semitendinosus-gracilis graft. JBJS. 2004;86:1936- 1946.
  • 14. Burks RT, Crim J, Fink BP, Boylan DN, Greis PE. The effects of semitendinosus and gracilis harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2005;21:1177-1185.
  • 15. Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ. Contralateral limb strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:543-550.
  • 16. Urbach D, Awiszus F. Impaired ability of voluntary quadriceps activation bilaterally interferes with function testing after knee injuries. A twitch interpolation study. Int J Sports Med. 2002;23:231-236.
  • 17. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111:278-284.
  • 18. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-1395.
  • 19. Zwolski C, Schmitt LC, Quatman-Yates C, Thomas S, Hewett TE, Paterno MV. The influence of quadriceps strength asymmetry on patient-reported function at time of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2242-2249.
  • 20. Tengman E, Brax Olofsson L, Stensdotter A-K, Nilsson KG, Häger C. Anterior cruciate ligament injury after more than 20 years. II. Concentric and eccentric knee muscle strength. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:501-509.
  • 21. Choi YL, Kim BK, Hwang YP, Moon OK, Choi WS. Effects of isometric exercise using biofeedback on maximum voluntary isometric contraction, pain, and muscle thickness in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:149-153.
  • 22. Ikezoe T, Mori N, Nakamura M, Ichihashi N. Age-related muscle atrophy in the lower extremities and daily physical activity in elderly women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;53:153-157.
  • 23. Giles LS, Webster KE, McClelland JA, Cook J. Atrophy of the quadriceps is not isolated to the vastus medialis oblique in individuals with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45:613-619.
  • 24. Ross MD, Irrgang JJ, Denegar CR, McCloy CM, Unangst ET. The relationship between participation restrictions and selected clinical measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002;10:10-19.
  • 25. Oliveira AK, Borges DT, Lins CA, Cavalcanti RL, Macedo LB, Brasileiro JS. Immediate effects of Kinesio Taping® on neuromuscular performance of quadriceps and balance in individuals submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:2-6.
  • 26. Kellis E, Karagiannidis E, Patsika G. Patellar tendon and hamstring momentarms and cross-sectional area in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18:1083-1089.
  • 27. Žargi TG, Drobnič M, Vauhnik R, Koder J, Kacin A. Factors predicting quadriceps femoris muscle atrophy during the first 12 weeks following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2017;24:319-328.
  • 28. Snow BJ, Wilcox JJ, Burks RT, Greis PE. Evaluation of muscle size and fatty infiltration with MRI nine to eleven years following hamstring harvest for ACL reconstruction. JBJS. 2012;94:1274-1282.
  • 29. Thomas AC, Wojtys EM, Brandon C, Palmieri-Smith RM. Muscle atrophy contributes to quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:7-11.
  • 30. Bodkin S, Goetschius J, Hertel J, Hart J. Relationships of muscle function and subjective knee function in patients after ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967117719041.
  • 31. Hart JM, Pietrosimone B, Hertel J, Ingersoll CD. Quadriceps activation following knee injuries: a systematic review. J Athl Train. 2010;45:87-97. 32. Cavanaugh JT, Powers M. ACL Rehabilitation progression: where are we now? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10:289-296.
  • 33. Fischer F, Fink C, Herbst E, et al. Higher hamstring-to-quadriceps isokinetic strength ratio during the first post-operative months in patients with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft following ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:418-425.
  • 34. Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ. Hamstring and quadriceps strength balance in normal and hamstring anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed subjects. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14:274-280.
  • 35. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Keays AC, Newcombe PA, Bullock MI. A 6-year follow-up of the effect of graft site on strength, stability, range of motion, function, and joint degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:729-739.
APA Suner-Keklik S, atalay güzel n, COBANOGLU G, günendi z, Kafa N, Ataoğlu B (2021). Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. , 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
Chicago Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,günendi zafer,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. (2021): 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
MLA Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,günendi zafer,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. , 2021, ss.28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
AMA Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,günendi z,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. . 2021; 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
Vancouver Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,günendi z,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. . 2021; 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
IEEE Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,günendi z,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B "Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation." , ss.28 - 34, 2021. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
ISNAD Suner-Keklik, Sinem vd. "Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation". (2021), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
APA Suner-Keklik S, atalay güzel n, COBANOGLU G, günendi z, Kafa N, Ataoğlu B (2021). Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(1), 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
Chicago Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,günendi zafer,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences 6, no.1 (2021): 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
MLA Suner-Keklik Sinem,atalay güzel nevin,COBANOGLU GAMZE,günendi zafer,Kafa Nihan,Ataoğlu Baybars Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.6, no.1, 2021, ss.28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
AMA Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,günendi z,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 6(1): 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
Vancouver Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,günendi z,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 6(1): 28 - 34. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
IEEE Suner-Keklik S,atalay güzel n,COBANOGLU G,günendi z,Kafa N,Ataoğlu B "Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation." Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, 6, ss.28 - 34, 2021. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958
ISNAD Suner-Keklik, Sinem vd. "Results Muscle Strength and Thickness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: An Ultrasonographic and Isokinetic Evaluation". Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences 6/1 (2021), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2021.2021.2958