Yıl: 2006 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 29 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach

Öz:
Bu çalışmada, Ankara’nın güney kesminde yer alan Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü İkizce Araştırma Çiftliği topraklarının parametrik yaklaşım sistemine göre damla ve yüzey sulama metotlarına uygunluğunun karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. İlk olarak, 1/5000 ölçekli detaylı toprak haritasından yaralanarak çalışma alanı topraklarının bünye, derinlik, kireç, elektriksel iletkenlik, drenaj ve eğim özellikleri belirlenmiş ve coğrafi bilgi sistemi yardımıyla çalışma alanının yüzey ve damla sulama yöntemlerinin uygunluk haritaları oluşturulmuştur. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, çalışma alanının %13.1’i yüzey sulama metodu için çok uygun iken, bu oran damla sulamada %51.2 olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca 3, 16, 18 ve 19 nolu haritalama üniteleri ise her iki sulama sistemine uygun bulunamamıştır. Sonuç olarak toprak ve topografik koşullardan dolayı, damla sulama yarıdan fazla çalışma alanı toprakları için en uygun sulama şekli olduğu önerilmektedir. Bu çalışma alanı topraklarının yüzey ve damla sulama yöntemlerine uygunluklarının belirlenmesinde Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi (CBS) tekniği kullanılmasının önemli bir rolü olduğunu da göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: coğrafi bilgi sistemleri Ankara toprak özellikleri sulama değerlendirme

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği

Farklı sulama yöntemlerinin parametrik değerlendirme yaklaşımına göre karşılaştırılması

Öz:
The main objective of this research is to compare two different irrigation methods according to parametric evaluation system in the Field Plants Central Research Institute-Ikizce Research Farm’s soils located in southern Ankara. Soil properties of the study area including texture, depth, EC, drainage, carbonate content and slope were derived from a detailed soil map scaled 1/5000. After analyzing and evaluating soil properties using geographic information system techniques, gravity and drop irrigation suitability maps were generated. Results showed that 13.1% of the study area was highly suitable for surface and gravity irrigation methods, whereas 51.2% of the study area was highly suitable for drop irrigation method. On the other hand, it was found that some land mapping units coded 3, 16, 18 and 19 are not suitable for both irrigation systems. As a result, drop type was suggested the best irrigation system for more than half of the study area soils due to soil and topographic conditions. This study indicates that the geographic information system (GIS) technique has an important role to determine suitability of the study area soils for both gravity and drop irrigation systems.
Anahtar Kelime: soil properties irrigation evaluation geographical information systems Ankara

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Bond, W.J. 2002. Assessing site suitability for an effluent plantation. In McKenzie, N.J., Coughlan, Kand Cresswell, H. (Eds). Soil Physical Measurement and Interpretation for Land Evaluation. CS1R0 Publishing. Pp 351-359.
  • Dengiz, O. and M, Yüksel. 1998. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü İkizce Araştırma Çiftliği Topraklarının detaylı etüd ve haritalanması. M.Şefik Yeşilsoy International Symposium on Arid Region Soil. Menemen-İzmir.
  • DM1. 2003. Devlet Meteroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  • FAO. 1976. A Framework for Land Evaluation, Rome.
  • Griffiths, E.I975. Classification of land for irrigation in New Zealand. NZ Soil Bureau Scientific Report 22. DSIR New Zealand.
  • Hargreaves, H.G and G.P. Mekley. 1998. Irrigation fundamentals. Water Resource Publication, LLC. 200 pp.
  • Hired, C, Thomson, A. and I. Beer. 1996. Selection and monitoring of sites intended for irrigation with reclaimed water. In Proceedings Water TECH, Sydney, May 1996. Australian Water and Wastewater Association, Sydney.
  • I0A.1997. (http://www.iao.florence.it/training/geomatics/BenSlimane).
  • Rees, S. and Laffan, M.2004. Site suitability for spray irrigation of stormwater and log sprinkler wastewater in Stage 1 and 2 at the Soutwood Processing Complex, Southern Tasmania. Technical Report. Division of Forest Research and Development, Forestry Tasmania.
  • Seelig, B. and D. Franzen. 1996. Soil, water and plant characteristics important to irrigation. EB-66, February 1996, Nort Dakota, USDA.
  • Sys, C, E. van Ranst and J. Debaveye. 1991. Land evaluation. Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. International training centre for post-graduate soil scientists, University Ghent.
  • Tesfai, M. 2002. A land suitability system for spate irrigation schemes in Eritrea. Soil Use Manag. 18: 77-78.
APA dengiz o (2006). Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. , 21 - 29.
Chicago dengiz orhan Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. (2006): 21 - 29.
MLA dengiz orhan Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. , 2006, ss.21 - 29.
AMA dengiz o Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. . 2006; 21 - 29.
Vancouver dengiz o Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. . 2006; 21 - 29.
IEEE dengiz o "Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach." , ss.21 - 29, 2006.
ISNAD dengiz, orhan. "Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach". (2006), 21-29.
APA dengiz o (2006). Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30(1), 21 - 29.
Chicago dengiz orhan Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 30, no.1 (2006): 21 - 29.
MLA dengiz orhan Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol.30, no.1, 2006, ss.21 - 29.
AMA dengiz o Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2006; 30(1): 21 - 29.
Vancouver dengiz o Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2006; 30(1): 21 - 29.
IEEE dengiz o "Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach." Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30, ss.21 - 29, 2006.
ISNAD dengiz, orhan. "Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 30/1 (2006), 21-29.