Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü
Yıl: 2006 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 19 - 39 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü
Öz: -
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Modern and Scholastic: An Un-Researched Preface by Ruskin
Öz: In the brief Preface to the second edition of The Seven Lamps of Architecture published in 1855, John Ruskin identified four kinds of admiration viewers might feel regarding an architectural work: Sentimental Admiration, Proud Admiration, Workmanly Admiration, Artistical or Rational Admiration. Unexplored by Ruskin critics, the Preface poses significant interpretive problems: neither the Preface nor the elaboration of the fourfold typology contained in it bears reference to the content of The Seven Lamps which had first appeared in 1849. The key lies in the Preface's explicit and implicit references to The Stones of Venice which Ruskin had published in 1853 and to the latter work's all-important middle chapter entitled "The Nature of Gothic." Read in conjunction with "The Nature of Gothic," the 1855 Preface emerges as a belated gloss to The Stones, witnessed above all in the coalescence of the complementary notions of production and reading of the Gothic in both articles. "The Nature of Gothic" further offers the clue to the source of the fourfold typology and to Ruskin's employment of the term admiration by identifying the reading of architectural works with textual reading, viz. the reading of Gothic cathedrals with the reading of epic poetry. The representation of Gothic cathedrals and the reference to Dante offer certain proof that Ruskin found the prototype of the fourfold typology and admiration in the Scholastic elaboration on the four levels of Biblical exegesis and on admiratio as, again, a mode of reading the Bible and viewing religious painting. In fact, Ruskin's treatment of the fourfold typology and admiration follows as it were in verbatim fashion the description of Dante's adaptation of the Biblical modes to the reading of his Divine Comedy in the "Epistle to Can Grande" as well as Dante's sources in Aristotle, Aquinas, and Bonaventure. Ruskin's radical reduction, found much puzzling by critics today, of the value of architecture to the value of the painting and sculpture contained in an edifice underscores the medieval conception of admiratio that had particularly flourished in the era of Gothic architecture. Not only will these findings compel us further to revise our notion of Ruskin's stance toward the Evangelical Protestantism of his day as well as add to the demonstration of the author's commitment to Gothic architecture, but they equally call for re-investigating Ruskin as a major force in the assimilation of architecture into the then-burgeoning discipline of art history.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- AQUINOLU TOMASSO (1969) Saint Thomas Aquinas. Summa theologica. Quaestiones disputatae 1-26, ed. by T. Gilby, Doubleday Image Books, New York.
- ARİSTOTELES (1961) De anima (On the Soul), çev. H. Lawson-Tancred (1986) Penguin Books, London, New York.
- ARİSTOTELES (1941) Nicomachea ethica, The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. R. McKeon, tr. by W. D. Ross, Random House, New York.
- ARİSTOTELES (1831) On the Soul. Parva Naturalia. On Breath, tr. by W. S. Hett (1936; 1995) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., London.
- AZİZ AUGUSTİNUS (1836) Civitate Dei, The City of God, tr. M. Dods (1950) The Modern Library, New York.
- BACON, F. (1623) De dignitate et augmentius scientiarum, Works, ed. by J. M. Robertson 1970, Books for Libraries, Freeport, NY.
- BAXANDALL, M. (1974) Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-Century Italy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
- BLOCK, I. (1961) Truth and Error in Aristotle's Theory of Sense Perception, Philosophical Quarterly (11:2) 1-9.
- BONAVENTURİUS (1970) Itinerarium mentis in deum, ed. by W. Hover, Wilhelm Fink, München.
- BRETT, G. S. (1912) A History of Psychology, v:l, G. Allen, London.
- BRIGGS, A. (1979) Iron Bridge to Crystal Palace: Impact and Images of the Industrial Revolution, Thames and Hudson, London.
- CONDILLAC, E. B. DE (1788) Traite de sensations, Barrois, Didot [Paris].
- DANTE ALIGHIERI (1924) TheLiterary Criticism of Dante Alighieri, der., çev. R. S. Haller (1973) University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
- EISLER, R. (1899) Worterbuch der philosophischen Begriffe und Ausdrücke quellenma'Big bearbeitet, E. S. Mittler u. Sohn, Berlin.
- FELLOWS, J. (1975) The Failing Distance: The Autobiographical Impulse in John Ruskin, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
- FELLOWS, J. (1981) Ruskin's Maze: Mastery and Madness in His Art, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- GARRIGAN, K. O. (1973) Ruskin on Architecture: His Thought and Influence, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
- GARRIGAN, K. O. (1991) 'The Splendidest May Number of the Graphic': John Ruskin and the Royal Academy Exhibition of 1875, Victorian Periodical Review (24:1) 22-31.
- GILBERT, C. (1959) The Archbishop on the Painters of Florence, 1450, Art Bulletin (41) 75-87.
- GILLET, J. E. (1918) A Note on the Tragic 'Admiratio', Modern Language Review (13) 233-38.
- GOETHE, J. W. (1876) Italienische Reise, İtalya Seyahati, çev. S. B. Göknil (1992) Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, İstanbul.
- GRANT, R. M., TRACY, D. (1984) Short History of the Interpretation of the Bible, Fortress Press, Philadelphia.
- HACKFORD, T. R. (1981) Lord Leighton's Arab Hall, yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Brown Üniversitesi, Providence, RI.
- HARDISON, Jr., O. B. (1962) The Enduring Monument, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
- HELSINGER, E. (1982) Ruskin and the Art of the Beholder, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- HERRICK, M. T. (1947) Some Neglected Sources of Admiratio, Modern Language Notes (62) 222-26.
- HOLLANDER, R. (1993) Dante's Epistle to Can Grande, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
- JONES, O. The Grammar of Ornament: Illustrated by Examples from various Styles of Ornament, Day, [Londra].
- Kitabı Mukaddes (1991) Kitabı Mukaddes Şirketi, İstanbul.
- KOLLWITZ, J. (1957) Bild und Bildertheologie im Mittelalter, Das Gottesbild im Abendland, Eckart-Verlag, Witten; 91-126.
- KOMMERELL, M. (1970) Lessing und Aristoteles: Untersuchung über die Theorie der Tragödie, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. Main.
- KRISTELLER, P. O. (1965; 1980) The Modern System of the Arts, Renaissance Thought and the Arts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; 163-227.
- LADNER, G. B. (1983) Die Bilderstreit und die Kunst-Lehren der byzantinischen und abendlandischen Theologie, Images and Ideas in the Middle Ages: Selected Studies in History and Art, 1. cilt, Storia e letteratura, Roma; 24-46.
- LANDOW, G. P. (1985a) The Aesthetic and Critical Theories of John Ruskin, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
- LANDOW, G. P. (1985b) Ruskin, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- LE BRUN, Ch. (1889) Charles Le Brun et les arts sous Louis XIV, ed. by H. Jouin, yayımcı yok, Paris.
- LEVINE, C. (2000) Visual Labor: Ruskin's Radical Realism, Victorian Literature and Culture (28:1) 73-86.
- MATTESON, J. (2002) Constructing Ethics and the Ethics of Construction: John Ruskin and the Humanity of the Builder, Cross Currents (52: 3)294-304.
- MIGNE, J.-P. ed. (1849) Patrologia latina 75, v:77. cilt, Gamier, Paris.
- MURRAY, P. (1964) Introduction, Heinrich WoMin, Renaissance and Baroque, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY; 1-12.
- PALMER WANDEL, L. (1995) Voracious Idols and Violent Hands, Cambridge University Press, Cambrdige, New York.
- PANOFSKY, E. (1971) Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism, Meridian Books, New York, Cleveland.
- PLATON (895) Theaetetus. Sophist, ed. & tr. by H. N. Fowler (1921; 1987) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., William Heinemann, London.
- PODRO, M. (1982) The Critical Historians of Art, Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
- ROSENBERG, J. D. (1963) The Darkening Glass: A Portrait ofRuskin's Genius, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
- RUSKIN, J. (1969) The Seven Lamps of Architecture, Dent, Londra; Dutton, New York.
- RUSKIN, J. (1903-1912) The Complete Works of John Ruskin, vols. 10 & 16, ed. by E. T. Cook, A Wedderburn, George Allen, London.
- SAWYER, P. L. (1985) Ruskin's Poetic Argument: The Design of the Major Works, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
- SCHMARSOW, A. (1896) Beitrage zur Aesthetik der bildenden Künste I: Zur Frage nach dem malerischen, S. Hirzel, Leipzig.
- SCHMARSOW, A. (1897) Beitrâge zur Aesthetik der bildenden Künste II: Barock und Rokoko, S. Hirzel, Leipzig.
- SCHMARSOW, A. (1906) Kunstwissenschaft und Kulturphilosophie mit gemeinsamen Grundbegriffen, Zeitschrift für Aesthetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft (1:13).
- SIEGEL, J. (1999) Black Arts, Ruined Cathedrals, and the Grave in Engraving: Ruskin and the Fatal Excess of Art, Victorian Literature and Culture (27: 2) 395-417.
- SORABJİ, R. Aristotle on the Role of the Intellect in Virtue, Essays on Aristotle's Ethics,, der. A. Oksenberg Rorty. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London; 201-19.
- STAHL, K.-H. (1975) Das Wunderbare als Problem und Gegenstand der deutschen Poetik des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts, Athenaion, Frankfurt a. Main.
- STEIN, R. L. (1975) The Ritual of Interpretation, Harvard University Press, Cambrdige, Mass.
- ŞAMLI YUHANNA (Johannes Damascus) (St John of Damascus) (1866) Apologia, On the Divine Images: Three Apologies Against Those Who Attack Divine Images, çev. M. H. Allies (1898) Thomas Baker, London. .
- TÜMER, G. (2004) Ve Mimarlık, Literatür, Istanbul.
- VITRUVIUS (1983) De architectura (On Architecture), v:l, tr. by F. Granger, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.; William Heinemann, London.
- WAINRIGHT, C. (1981) Architect-Designers from Pugin to Mackintosh, The Fine Art Society; Haslam & Whiteway, London.
- WIHL, G. (1985) Ruskin and the Rhetoric of Infallibility, Yale University Press, New Haven.
- WILTON-ELY, J. (1986) The Rise of Professional Architect in England, The Architect: Chapters in the History of a Profession, ed. by S. Kostof. Oxford University Press, New York.
- WOLFFLIN, H. (1915) Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe, Sanat Tarihinin Temel Kavramları, çev. H. Örs (1995). Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul.
| APA | ŞENGEL D (2006). Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. , 19 - 39. |
| Chicago | ŞENGEL Deniz Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. (2006): 19 - 39. |
| MLA | ŞENGEL Deniz Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. , 2006, ss.19 - 39. |
| AMA | ŞENGEL D Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. . 2006; 19 - 39. |
| Vancouver | ŞENGEL D Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. . 2006; 19 - 39. |
| IEEE | ŞENGEL D "Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü." , ss.19 - 39, 2006. |
| ISNAD | ŞENGEL, Deniz. "Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü". (2006), 19-39. |
| APA | ŞENGEL D (2006). Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 19 - 39. |
| Chicago | ŞENGEL Deniz Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 23, no.1 (2006): 19 - 39. |
| MLA | ŞENGEL Deniz Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.23, no.1, 2006, ss.19 - 39. |
| AMA | ŞENGEL D Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006; 23(1): 19 - 39. |
| Vancouver | ŞENGEL D Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006; 23(1): 19 - 39. |
| IEEE | ŞENGEL D "Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü." Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, ss.19 - 39, 2006. |
| ISNAD | ŞENGEL, Deniz. "Modern ve Skolastik: Ruskın'in İncelenmemiş Bir Önsözü". Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 23/1 (2006), 19-39. |
