Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale
Yıl: 2006 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 57 - 62 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale
Öz: Bu çalışmanın amacı Genelleştirilmiş Algılanan Öz-yeterlilik Ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenirliğini test ederek Türk toplumuna uyarlamaktır. Metodolojik olarak yapılan araştırmanın evrenini 1 Mayıs - 1 Ağustos 2004 tarihleri arasında Evren Paşa Sağlık ocağına herhangi bir hizmet için başvuran yetişkinler oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın örneklem gurubunu olasılıksız rastlantısal örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen ve araştırmaya katılmayı kabul eden 130 kişi oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri Algılanan Genelleş¬tirilmişÖz-yeterlilik ölçeği ve demografik özellikleri içeren soru formu kullanılarak toplanmıştır. 10 maddeden oluşan ölçeğin maddeleri 1-4 arasında puan almaktadır. Ölçek pozitif maddelerden oluşmakta ve değerlendirilmesi toplam puan üzerinden yapılmaktadır. Verilerin istatistiksel değerlendirilmesinde faktör analizi, Cronbach alfa güvenirlik katsayısı ve korelasyon analizleri, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin örneklem yeterlilik ve Bartletfs Test of Sphericity kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda rnadd-toplarn puan korelasyonun 0.64 — 0.78 arasında değiştiği, ölçeğin alfa katsayısının da 0.89 olduğu bulunmuştur. Ölçek maddelerinin faktör yüklerinin 0.64-0.79 arasında değiştiği ve tek faktörden oluştuğu saptanmıştır. Ölçek toplam varyansın % 52 'sini açıkladığı vetest-retest korelasyonu da 0.83 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, Genelleştirilmiş Algılanan Öz-yeterlilik Ölçeği 'nin Türk toplumuna uygulanması açısından geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu söylenebilir.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Genelleştirilmiş algılanan öz-yeterlilik ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonu
Öz: The purpose of this study was to adapt for the Turkish population the tested valid and reliable Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. The population for the research was adults who applied to Evren Paşa Primary Health Care Centre between 1 May and 30 August 2004 for services. A convenience sample of 130 persons who accepted participation to study was selected. The data was collected by the researcher using Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale and an inquiry form including demographic characteristics. The scale consists of W items, is easy understandable, and is self-reported. The items on the scale are scored as 1-4 points, and the scale forms positive items. Evaluation of the scale score is made by sum point. In statistical analysis of the data, factor analysis, Cronbach alpha, correlation analyses, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity for the simple size were used. Pearson's product-moment correlation changed with then this mean from 0.64 to 0.78, alpha was 0.89. Factor loading of the scale's items changed from 0.64 to 0.79, and the scale resulted in one factor structure. Overall explained variance for this factor model was 53%, and test-retest correlation was 0.83. According to the finding, the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale was found to be valid and reliable for Turkish population.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Bandura A (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press. New York
- Bandura A (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Erefe İ (2002). Veri toplama araçlarının niteliği. Hemşirelikte Araştırma. Editör: İnci Erefe, Odak Ofset, İstanbul, 169-188.
- Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R (1992). Self-effıcacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In Self-efficacy:Thought control of action. Editor: Ralf Schwarzer, Washington, DC: Hemisphere 195-213.
- Jerusalem M. (1993). Personal resources, environmental constraints, and adaptation processes: The predictive power of a theoretical stress model. Personality and Individual Differences 14: 15-24.
- Maddux J (1995). Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. New York: Plenum.
- Özgüven ÎE (1999) Psikolojik testler. III. Baskı PDREM Yayınlan. Ankara, 35-48.
- Polit DF, Hungler BP (İ995). Nursing research-principles and methods. Fifth ed. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott Company. Rimm H, Jerusalem M (1999). Adaptation and validation of an Estonian version of the general self-efficacy scale (ESES). Anxiety, Stres and Coping 12: 329-345.
- Sanders MR, Woolley ML (2005). The relationship between maternal self-efficacy and parenting practices: implications for parent training. Child: Care, Health & Development 31(1): 65-73.
- Schwarzer R (1992). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. R (1994). Optimism, vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview. Psychology and Health: An International Journal 9: 161-180.
- Schwarzer R, BaBler J, Kwiatek P et al. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the General Self-Efficacy scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review 46(1): 69-88.
- Schwarzer R, Born A (1997). Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in 13 cultures. Worm Psychology 3: 177-190.
- Schwarzer R Jerusalem M (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs Windsor. Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, Nfer-nelson UK, 35-37.
- Schwarzer R, Schroder KEE (1997). Effects of self-efficacy and social support on postsurgical recovery of heart patients. Irish Journal of Psychology 18:-88 103.
- Zhaag JX, Schwarzer R (1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Psychologia 38(3): 174-181.
| APA | ERCİ B (2006). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. , 57 - 62. |
| Chicago | ERCİ Behice Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. (2006): 57 - 62. |
| MLA | ERCİ Behice Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. , 2006, ss.57 - 62. |
| AMA | ERCİ B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. . 2006; 57 - 62. |
| Vancouver | ERCİ B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. . 2006; 57 - 62. |
| IEEE | ERCİ B "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale." , ss.57 - 62, 2006. |
| ISNAD | ERCİ, Behice. "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale". (2006), 57-62. |
| APA | ERCİ B (2006). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 9(2), 57 - 62. |
| Chicago | ERCİ Behice Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 9, no.2 (2006): 57 - 62. |
| MLA | ERCİ Behice Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, vol.9, no.2, 2006, ss.57 - 62. |
| AMA | ERCİ B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2006; 9(2): 57 - 62. |
| Vancouver | ERCİ B Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2006; 9(2): 57 - 62. |
| IEEE | ERCİ B "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale." Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 9, ss.57 - 62, 2006. |
| ISNAD | ERCİ, Behice. "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of perceived stress scale". Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 9/2 (2006), 57-62. |
