Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler
Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 211 - 230 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler
Öz: Özet: Günümüzün değişken ve belirsiz çevre koşullarında örgütsel başarının temel kaynağı yenilik yönelimli olmaktır; çünkü örgütler ancak yenilikyoluyla sürdürülebilir rekabetavantajıyakalayabilmekte, performanslarını iyileştirmekte ve dinamizmi yakalayabilmektedirler. Bir örgütün yenilik yönelimini ise büyük ölçüde örgütsel faktörler belirler. Bu nedenle çalışmamızın amacı, örneğimizde yer alan örgütlerin yenilik yönelimlerini belirlemek ve örgütsel faktörlerin, örgütlerin yenilik yönelimi üzerine etkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaca ulaşabilmek için büyük ölçekli örgütlerde anket çalışmasına dayalı bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar; örneğimizde yer olan örgütlerden 46’sının oldukça düşük düzeyde yenilik yönelimli olduğunu ve risk alma, ödül ve teşvik sistemi, örgütsel yapı, kaynak varlığı ve yönetsel destek gibi örgütsel faktörlerin örgütlerin yenilik yönelimi üzerinde önemli ölçüde etkili olduğu ortaya koymuştur.
Anahtar Kelime: -
Öz: In today’s variable and uncertain environmental conditions, the main source of organizational success is being innovation oriented because organizations can get sustainable competitive advantage, improve their performance and reach dynamism only by innovation. Organizational factors mostly determine an organization’s innovation orientation. So, the aim of our study is to determine the innovation orientation of companies in our sample and explain the effects of organizational factors on innovation orientation of organizations. In order to achieve this goal, a questionnaire based survey was conducted on large organizations. The findings showed that46 of the organizations in our sample was lowly innovation oriented, and organizational factors such as risk taking, reward and incentive system, organizational structure, resource possession and managerial support are significantly effective on innovation orientation of organizations.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- Afuay,Allan. (2003), Innovation Management, Oxford University Pres,U:S.A. Ahmed, Pervaiz K. (1998), Culture and Climate for Innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol:1, No:1, ss.30–43.
- Antoncic, Bostjan; Hisrich, Robert D. (2001), Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation; Journal of Business Venturing, No.16, ss.497-527.
- Azulay, Israel; Lerner, Miri; Tishler, Asher. (2002), Converting Military Technology Through Corporate Entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 31, 2002, ss.419-435
- Barney, Jay, B. (2002), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage; Pearson Education, New Jersey.
- Bird, Barbara J.(1989) Entrepreneurial Behavior, Foresman and Company, Illinois.
- Bagozzi, Richard P. (1981), Evaluating Structural Equation model With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment , Journal Of Marketing Research,18, August , ss.375-381
- Christensen, Karina. (2005), Enabling Intrapreneurship: The Case of a Knowledge Intensive Industrial Company, European Journal of Innovation Management, 8: 3, 305-322.
- Dobbins, Richard;. Pettman, Barria O. (1997) Implement a Winning a Business Strategy The Journal of Management Development, Vol.16, No 8, 1997, ss.565 -584.
- Damanpour, Fariborz, Wischnevsky, J. Daniel.(2006), Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations, Journal of Eng. Technology Management, 23, 269–291.
- Dutz, Mark A.; Ordover, Janusz A.; Willig, Robert D. (2000), Entrepreneurship Access Policy and Economic Development, European Economic Review, 44, ss.739-747.
- Echols, Ann E.; Neck, Christopher P. (1998), The Impact of Behaviors and Structure on Corporate Entrepreneurial Success, journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.13, No.1/2, ss.38-46.
- Eren, Erol.(2001),Yönetim ve Organizasyon, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2001.
- Galanakis, Kostas.(2006), Innovation Process. Make Sense Using Systems Thinking, Technovation, 26, ss.1222–1232.
- Gitman, Lawrence J.; McDaniel, Carl. (2002), The Future of Business, South Western College Pub.
- Greenberg, Jerald;.Baron, Robert A. (2000), Behaviour in Organizations, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
- Hitt, Michael A; Ireland; R. Duane; Camp, S. Michael; Sexton, Donald L.(2002), Strategic Entrepreneurship, Creating a New Mindset, Blackwell Pub., U.K.
- Heinonen, J.ve Korvela, K. 12.01.2006. How About Measuring Intrapreneurship,http://www.tukkk.fi/pki/, 1-18.
- Hornsby, Jeffrey S.; Kuratko, Donald F.; Zahra, Shaker A.(2002), Middle Managers’ Perception of the Internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing a Measurement Scale, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, ss.253–273.
- Humphrey, Watts S. (1997), Managing Technical People: Innovation, Teamwork and Software Process, Addison Wesley Longman Inc., California.
- İdil, Orhan.(1980), Örnekleme Teorisi ve İşletme Yönetiminde Uygulanması, İstanbulÜniversitesi Yayını, No.2708, İstanbul.
- Koh, Hian Chye. (1996), Testing Hypotheses of Entrepreneurial Characteristics, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.11, No.3, ss.12-25.
- Kuratko, Donald F.; Hodgetts, Richard, M.(2001), Entrepreneurship, A Contemporary Approach, Harcourt Inc., U.S.A.
- Kurtuluş, Kemal. (2004), Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Literatür Yayıncılık, No,114, İstanbul.
- Levinson, William. (1998), Hayatta Kalmak, Executive Excellence, Yıl.2, Sayı.14, Mayıs, ss.9-10.
- Lawler, Edward E. Jay R. Galbraith. (1994), Avoiding The Corporate Dinosaurs Syndrome, Organizational Dynamics, Autumn, ss.5-16.
- Lewis, Pamela S.; Goodman, Stephan E.; Fandt, Patricia M. (1998), Management, Challenges in The 21st Century, South-Western College Pub., Ohio.
- Liu, Sandra, S.; Dubinsky, Alan J. (2000), Institutional Entrepreneurship; A Panacea for Universities in Transition European, Journal of Marketing, Vol.34, No.11/12, ss.1315-1337.
- Lynch, Richard.(2000), Corporate Strategy, Pitman Publishing, London, 2000
- McAdam, Rodney; Stevenson, Peter; Armstrong, Gren. (2000), Innovative Change Management in SME’s: Beyond Continuous improvement; Logistic Information Management, Vol.13, No.3, June, ss.138-149.
- Miller, Damian; Garnsey, Elizabeth. (2000), Entrepreneurs and Technology Diffusion, How Diffusion Research Can Benefit from a Greater Understanding of Entrepreneurship, Technology in Society, 22, ss. 445-465.
- Mische, Michael A. (2001) Strategic Renewal, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
- Mueller, Stephen L.; Thomas, Anisya S. (2000), Culture and Entrepreneurial Potential: A Nine Country Study of Locus of Control and Innovativeness, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, ss.51-75.
- Narayanan, V.K. (2001), Managing Technology and Innovation for Competitive Advantage, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
- Naktiyok, Atılhan,. (2004), İç Girişimcilik, Beta, İstanbul.
- Peters, Thomas J., Waterman, Robert H. (1982), In Search of Excellence: Lesson from America’s Best-Run Companies, Harper Row, New York.
- Popadiuk, Silvio; Choo,Chun, W. (2006), Innovation and Knowledge Creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26, 302–312.
- Rebernik, Miroslav; Mulej, Matjaz. (2000), Requisite Holism, Isolating Mechanisms and Entrepreneurship, Kybernetes, Vol.29, No.9/10, ss.1126-1140.
- Robbins, Stephen P.(2002), Managing Today, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey,
- Robbins, Stephan P.; Coulter, Mary. (2002), Management, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
- Schermerhon, John R. (1996), Management Today, John Wiley Sons, Inc., Canada.
- Schermerhon, John, R. (2007), Exploring Management in Modules, John Wiley, USA.
- Smit, D.J. (2007), The politics of innovation: Why innovations need a godfather, Technovation, 27, 95–104.
- Sykes, Hollister B.; Block, Zenas. (1989), Corporate Venturing Obstacles, Journal of Business Venturing, Winter, ss.159-167.
- Thompson, John L. (2001), Strategic Management, Fourth Edition, Thompson Learning, London.
- Thornberry, Neal. (2001), Corporate Entrepreneurship, Antidote or Oxymoron? European Management Journal, Vol.19, No.5, October, ss.526-533
- Tushman, Mihael L.; Anderson, Philiph C. (1997), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Reading, Oxford University Press., New York..
- Warner , Mark J.; Pyle, Lory, K. (1998), Çabuk İyileşmek İçin, Executive Excellence, Kasım, Yıl.2, Sayı.20, ss.21-22.
- Wickham, Philiph A., (2001), Strategic Entrepreneurship, Prentice Hall Inc.,
- Woodruff, Robert B. (1997), Customer Value, The Next Source of Competitive Advantage, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.25, No.2, ss.139-153.
- Zahra, Shaker A. Pearce, John A. (1994), Corporate Entrepreneurship in Smaller Firms, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change, Vol.3, No.1, ss.35-36.
- Zahra, Shaker A. (1993), Environment, Corporate Entrepreneurship and Financial Performance: A Taxonomic Approach , Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 4, ss.319-340.
- Zahra, Shaker A.;. Covin, Jeffrey G. Contextual Influences on The Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis, Journal of Business Venturing, No.10, 1995, ss.43-58.
- Zahra, Sahaker A.; Neubaum, Donald O.; Huse, Morten. (2000), Entrepreneurship in Medium-Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems, Journal of Management, Vol.26, No.5, ss.947-976.
- http://www.kobinet.org.tr/kobinetuye,php, 20.03.2007.
- http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm, 20.03.2007.
| APA | Naktiyok A (2007). Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. , 211 - 230. |
| Chicago | Naktiyok Atılhan Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. (2007): 211 - 230. |
| MLA | Naktiyok Atılhan Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. , 2007, ss.211 - 230. |
| AMA | Naktiyok A Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. . 2007; 211 - 230. |
| Vancouver | Naktiyok A Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. . 2007; 211 - 230. |
| IEEE | Naktiyok A "Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler." , ss.211 - 230, 2007. |
| ISNAD | Naktiyok, Atılhan. "Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler". (2007), 211-230. |
| APA | Naktiyok A (2007). Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 211 - 230. |
| Chicago | Naktiyok Atılhan Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 21, no.2 (2007): 211 - 230. |
| MLA | Naktiyok Atılhan Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol.21, no.2, 2007, ss.211 - 230. |
| AMA | Naktiyok A Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2007; 21(2): 211 - 230. |
| Vancouver | Naktiyok A Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2007; 21(2): 211 - 230. |
| IEEE | Naktiyok A "Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler." Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21, ss.211 - 230, 2007. |
| ISNAD | Naktiyok, Atılhan. "Yenilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Faktörler". Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 21/2 (2007), 211-230. |
