The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean

Sevgi ÇALIŞKAN, (Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Hatay, Türkiye)
Mehmet ARSLAN, (Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Hatay, Türkiye)
İlhan ÜREMİŞ, (Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Hatay, Türkiye)
Mehmet Emin ÇALIŞKAN (Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Hatay, Türkiye)
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
2 0
Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 147 - 154 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean

Öz:
Özet: Ana ürün soya tarımına göre ikinci ürün soya tarımında verim düşüklüğü önemli bir kaygıdır. Bu çalışma, ana ürün ve ikinci ürün soya tarımında sıra arası mesafelerinin daraltılması ile olası verim artışını tespit etmek amacı ile Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Araştırma Çiftliğinde yürütülmüştür. 2004 ve 2005 yıllarında yürütülen çalışmada, iki soya çeşidi (A3935 ve S4240), 30, 50,-70 cm aralıklı ve çiftli (50 25 50 cm) sıralardan oluşan parsellere ekilmiştir. İkinci ürün soya tarımında tohum verimi ve incelenen diğer bitkisel özellikler ana ürüne göre daha düşük bulunmuştur. Sıra arası mesafesi ana ürün ve ikinci ürün soyalarda bitki boyu, ana dalda boğum sayısı, ana dalda bakla ve tohum sayısı, yan dalda bakla ve boğum sayısı ve tohum verimi üzerine önemli etkide.bulunmuştur. Verim ve diğer tüm incelenen özellikler üzerine çeşit x sıra arası interaksiyonu önemli bulunmamıştır. İki yıllık ortalama verimlere göre ana ürün soyada en yüksek tohum verimi 4142.5 kg ha"1 ile 50 cm sıra arası mesafeden elde edilirken ikinci ürün soyada en yüksek tohum verimi 3241.5 kg ha"1 ile 30 cm sıra arası mesafeden elde edilmiştir. Ana ürün soya üretiminde sıra arası mesafesinin 70 cm den 50 cm ye düşürülmesi ile % 23 oranında verim artışı sağlanırken, sıra arası mesafesinin daha da azaltılması verim artışı sağlamamıştır. İkinci ürün soya üretiminde 70 cm sıra arası mesafesine kıyasla 50, 30 cm ve çift sıra ekimde sırası ile % 24.8 ve 59.5 ve 35.6 oranında verim artışı kaydedilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, Doğu Akdeniz bölgesi koşullarında sıra aralığının daraltılması ile ikinci ürün soya tarımında yaşanan verim düşüklüğünün azaltılabileceğini göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Hatay sıra aralığı verim ögeleri Glycine max verim soya fasulyesi ekim zamanı ikinci ürün

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği

Ana ve ikinci ürün soya tarımında sıra arası mesafelerinin verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkileri

Öz:
Abstract: Compared to full season soybean cropping systems, seed yield reduction is a major concern in double-cropped soybean production systems. This study was conducted at the Research Farm of Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey, to determine if it is possible to enhance the yield of both full season and double-cropped soybean by narrowing row spacing. Two soybean cultivars, A3935 and S4240, were planted using row widths of 30, 50, and 70 cm, and twin row (50 25 50 cm) in 2004 and 2005. Seed yield and the other investigated plant parameters of double-cropped soybean were" lower compared to full season soybean. Row spacing had a significant effect on plant height, number of nodes per plant, main-stem pod and seed number, branch pod and seed number, and seed yield in both cropping systems. The highest seed yield (4142.5 kg ha"1) averaged over years was obtained from a 50-cm row width in full season soybean cropping, whereas a 30-cm row width had the highest seed yield (3241.5 kg ha"1) in double-cropped soybean. In full season soybean production, a 23% yield increase was recorded when row width was shifted from 70 to 50 cm, and no yield increase was recorded by further narrowing the row width. In double-cropped soybean, 24.8%, 59.5%, and 35.6% yield increases were recorded when soybean was planted in 50 and 30 cm, and twin row width, respectively, instead of a 70-cm row width. Our results indicated that yield reductions in double-cropped soybean production could be alleviated by narrowing the row width in the eastern Mediterranean region.
Anahtar Kelime: secondary crop Hatay row spacing yield components Glycine max yields soyabeans sowing date

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Arslan, M., N. İşler and S. Çalışkan. 2006. Effects of cultivar maturity on growth and yield of double cropped soybean. Acta Agric. Scan. Section B-Soil and Plant, 56: 39-46.
  • Beatty, K.D., I.L. Eldridge and A.M. Simpson, Jr. 1982. Soybean response to different planting patterns and dates. Agron. J. 74: 859-862.
  • Board, J E. and W. Hall. 1984. Premature flowering in soybean yield reductions at non-optimal planting dates as influenced by temperature and photoperiod. Agron. J. 76: 700-704.
  • Board, J.E. and J.R. Settimi. 1986. Photoperiod effect before and after flowering on branch development in determinate soybean. Agron. J. 78:995-1102.
  • Board, J.E. and B.G. Harville. 1992. Explanation for greater light interception in narrow- vs. wide- row soybean. Crop Sci. 32: 198-202.
  • Board, J.E. and B.G. Harville. 1994. A criteria for acceptance of narrow-row culture in soybean. Agron. J. 86: 1103-1106.
  • Boerma, H.R. and D.A. Ashley. 1982. Irrigation, row spacing, and genotype effects on late and ultra-late planted soybeans. Agron. J. 78:995-1002.
  • Boquet, D.J., K.L. Koonce and D.M. Walker. 1982. Selected determinate soybean cultivar yield response to row spacings and planting dates. Agron. J. 74: 136-138.
  • Boquet, D.J. 1990. Plant population density and row spacing effects on soybean at post-optimal planting dates. Agron. J. 82: 59-64.
  • Boquet, D.J. 1998. Yield and risk utilizing short-season soybean production in the mid-southern USA. Crop Sci. 38: 1004-1010.
  • Bowers, G.R., J.L. Rabb, L.O. Ashlock and J.B. Santini. 2000. Row spacing in the early soybean. production system. Agron. J. 92: 524-531.
  • Bullock, D., S. Khan and A. Rayburn. 1998. Soybean yield response to narrow rows is largely due to enhanced early growth. Crop Sci. 38: 1011-1016.
  • Cooper, R.L. 1977. Response of soybean cultivars to narrow rows and planting dates under weed-free conditions. Agron. J. 69: 89-92. Cooper, R.L. 1981. Development of short-statured soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 21: 127-131.
  • Devlin, D.L., D.L. Fjell, J.P. Shroyer, W.B. Gordon, B.H. Marsh, L.D. Maddux, V.L. Martin and S.R. Duncan. 1995. Row spacing and seeding rates or soybean in low and high yielding environments. J. Prod. Agric. 8: 215-222.
  • Egli, D.B., R.D. Guffy and JJ. Heitholt. 1987. Factors associated with reduced yields of delayed plantings of soybean. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 159: 176-185.
  • Egli, D.B. and Z. Yu. 1991. Crop growth rate and seeds per unit area in soybean. Crop Sci. 31: 439-442.
  • Egli, D.B. 1994. Mechanisms responsible for soybean yield response to equidistant planting patterns. Agron. J. 86: 1046-1049.
  • Fehr, W.R. and C.E. Caviness. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, Special Reports, 80.
  • Grabau, LJ. and T.W. Pfeiffer. 1989. Stubble losses of Kentucky soybeans. Agronomy Notes Vol. 22, No. 2. University of Kentucky
  • Heatherly, L.G. 1988. Planting date, row spacing, and irrigation effects on soybean grown on clay soil. Agron. J. 80: 227-231.
  • Holmes, M.G. and H. Smith. 1977. The function of phytochrome in the natural environment: II. The influence of vegetation canopies on the spectralenergy distribution of natural daylight. Photochem. Photobiol. 25: 539-545.
  • Johnson, R.R. 1987. Crop management. In: Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, 2nd ed. (Ed. J.R. Wilcox), American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 355-390.
  • Kane, M.V., C.C. Steele and LJ. Grabau. 1997. Early maturing soybean cropping system: I. Yield response to planting date. Agron. J. 89, 454-458.
  • Palmer, J.H. and C. Privette. 1992. Guidelines for drilling soybeans. Soybean leaflet no. 9. Clemson Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv.
  • Parks, W.L., J. Davis, R. Evans, M. Smith, T. McCutchen, L. Safely and W. Sanders. 1982. Soybean yields as affected by row spacing and within row plant density. Univ. Of Tennessee Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 615.
  • Quattara, S. and D.B. Weaver. 1995. Effects of growth habit on yield components of late planted soybean. Crop Sci. 35-411-378.
  • Taylor, H.M. 1980. Soybean growth and yield as affected by row spacing and by seasonal water supply. Agron. J. 72: 543-547.
  • Taylor, H.M., W.K. Mason, A.T.P. Bennie and H.R. Rowse. 1982. Responses of soybeans to two row spacings and two soil water levels. I. An analysis of biomass accumulation, canopy development, solar radiation interception and components of seed yield. Field Crop Res. 5: 1-4.
  • Weber, C.R. and W.R. Fehr. 1966. Seed yield losses form lodging combine harvesting in soybeans. Agron. J. 58: 287-289.
APA ÇALISKAN S, Arslan M, ÜREMİŞ İ, ÇALISKAN M (2007). The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. , 147 - 154.
Chicago ÇALISKAN SEVGI,Arslan Mehmet,ÜREMİŞ İLHAN,ÇALISKAN MEHMET EMIN The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. (2007): 147 - 154.
MLA ÇALISKAN SEVGI,Arslan Mehmet,ÜREMİŞ İLHAN,ÇALISKAN MEHMET EMIN The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. , 2007, ss.147 - 154.
AMA ÇALISKAN S,Arslan M,ÜREMİŞ İ,ÇALISKAN M The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. . 2007; 147 - 154.
Vancouver ÇALISKAN S,Arslan M,ÜREMİŞ İ,ÇALISKAN M The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. . 2007; 147 - 154.
IEEE ÇALISKAN S,Arslan M,ÜREMİŞ İ,ÇALISKAN M "The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean." , ss.147 - 154, 2007.
ISNAD ÇALISKAN, SEVGI vd. "The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean". (2007), 147-154.
APA ÇALISKAN S, Arslan M, ÜREMİŞ İ, ÇALISKAN M (2007). The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31(3), 147 - 154.
Chicago ÇALISKAN SEVGI,Arslan Mehmet,ÜREMİŞ İLHAN,ÇALISKAN MEHMET EMIN The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 31, no.3 (2007): 147 - 154.
MLA ÇALISKAN SEVGI,Arslan Mehmet,ÜREMİŞ İLHAN,ÇALISKAN MEHMET EMIN The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol.31, no.3, 2007, ss.147 - 154.
AMA ÇALISKAN S,Arslan M,ÜREMİŞ İ,ÇALISKAN M The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2007; 31(3): 147 - 154.
Vancouver ÇALISKAN S,Arslan M,ÜREMİŞ İ,ÇALISKAN M The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2007; 31(3): 147 - 154.
IEEE ÇALISKAN S,Arslan M,ÜREMİŞ İ,ÇALISKAN M "The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean." Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31, ss.147 - 154, 2007.
ISNAD ÇALISKAN, SEVGI vd. "The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 31/3 (2007), 147-154.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 12:35

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları