Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar

İdil DİKBAŞ, (Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Temel KÖKSAL (Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi
6 0
Yıl: 2006 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 41 - 51 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar

Öz:
Aşırı madde kaybına uğramış endodontik tedavili dişlerde, restorasyona tutuculuk sağlamak amacıyla post-kor sistemlerinden biri kullanılmaktadır. Bu makalede geniş bir literatür taraması yapılarak, post-kor uygulamalarında karşılaşılan başarısızlık tiplerinden söz edilmiştir. Başarıda rol oynayan en önemli etken doğru endikasyonun konulması ve uygulamada ana prensiplerin takip edilmesidir. Henüz uzun takip sonuçları olmamasına rağmen, başarısızlığın tipi, telafi edilebilirliği ve sıklığı bakımından en uygun olan post tipinin fiber destekli postlar olduğu görülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Post kor tekniği Endodonti Tedavi sonucu Tedavi başarısızlığı

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Failure in post-core restorations

Öz:
To provide retention to the final restoration of endodontically treated teeth with severe tooth tissue loss one of the post-core systems is preferred. In this article, the types of failure in application of post-core are mentioned by performing a comprehensive literature review. The most important factors effecting success are the establishment of the correct indication and following the main principles. Although there are no long time follow-up reports, fiber posts seemed to be the most suitable type when considering the type, compensation and the frequency of the failure.
Anahtar Kelime: Post and Core Technique Endodontics Treatment Outcome Treatment Failure

Konular: Diş Hekimliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Rrosthet Dent 1984; 52: 28-35.
  • Goodacre CJ, Berna I G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 121-32.
  • Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-8.
  • Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber posts: Characteristics and clinical applications. Birinci baskı, Masson S.p.A., Milano, Italy, 2002:121-30.
  • Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 2:153-8.
  • Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. BC Decker Inc., Canada, 2002; 913-50.
  • Ottl P, Lauer HC Success rates for two different types of post-and-cores. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 752-8.
  • Morgano SM, Rodrigues AHC, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48:397-416.
  • Qualtrough AJE, Mannocci F. Tooth colored post systems: A review. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 86-91.
  • Silness J, Gustavsen F, Hunsbeth J. Distribution of corrosion products in teeth restored with metal crowns retained by stainless steel posts. Ada Odontol Scand 1979; 37:317-21.
  • TorbjornerA, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate . and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-44.
  • Turner CH. Post-retained crown failure: a survey. Dent Update 1982; 9:193-202.
  • Pitel ML, Hicks NL Evolving technology in endodontic posts. Compendium 2003; 24:13-29.
  • Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13 (Spec No): 9B-13B.
  • Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garda-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13: (Spec No): 15B-18B.
  • Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:151-7.
  • Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fiber posts- A prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 613-8.
  • Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:39-44.
  • Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431-7.
  • Martinez-Insua A, Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:527-32.
  • Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 657-67.
  • Drummond JL, Bapna MS. Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. Dent Mater 2003; 19:226-31.
  • Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 1996; 29:262-5.
  • Qualtrough AJ, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int 2003; 34; 199-201.
  • Weine FS, Wax H, Wenckus CS. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post systems in place for 10 years or more. J Endod 1991; 17:293-7.
  • Lewis R, Smith BG. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. Br Dent J 1998; 165:95-7.
  • Mentink AGf Meeuwissen Rf Kayser AF, Mulder. J. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 455-461.
  • Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated: classification and evaluation. J Endod 1991; 17: 338-42.
  • Bergman B,_ Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:10-5.
  • Nanayakkara L, McDonald A, Setchell DJ. Retrospective analysis of factors affecting the longevity of post crowns. -IADR Abstract No. 932. J Dent Res (special issue) 1999; 78: 222.
  • Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. J Endodon 2004; 30:289-301.
  • Fokkinga WA., Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:476-82.
  • Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restorations. J Prosthodont 2001; 10:26-36.
  • Isador F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:78-82.
  • Pest B, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002; 18:596-602.
  • Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Pollack NH. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33: 952-60.
  • Felton DA, Webb EL, Kanoy BE, Dugoni J. Threaded endodontic dowels: effect of post design on incidence of root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:179-87.
  • Johnson JK, Sakamura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 645-9.
  • Nergiz I, Schmage P, Ozcan M, Platzer U. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:28-34.
  • Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sh err iff M, Watson TF, Ford TRP. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 297-301.
  • Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:595-601.
  • Maniatopolous C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC. Evaluation of shear strength at the cement endodontic post interface. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 662-9.
  • Richer JB, Lautehschlager EP, Greener EH. Mechanical properties of post and core systems. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 63-6.
  • Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Retentive properties of some simplified dowel core-systems to cast gold dowel and core. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:203-6.
  • Nergiz I, Schmage P, Platzer U, McMullan-Vogel CG. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 451-7.
  • Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth.Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:367-84.
  • Lacy AM. Adhesive restoration of a nonvital anterior tooth using a carbon-fiber post and all-porcelain crown. Pract Periodontics Aesthetic Dent 1995; 7:1-9.
  • Freedman G. The carbon fiber post: metal-free, post-endodontic rehabilitation. Oral Health 1996; 86; 23-6.
  • King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17:599-609.
  • Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 605-11.
  • Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:36-40.
  • Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, Silverstein BA, Lepley J, Ohlen K, Lesser M. Root fracture during insertion of prefabricated posts related to root size. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 52: 786-9.
  • Wise DM. Examination. In: Failure in the restored dentition: Management and treatment. 1. ed., Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd., London, UK, 1996:43-119.
  • Zinman El Endodontic records and legal responsibilities. In: Pathways of the pulp. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. 9. ed., Mosby,St. Louis, 2006: 400-60.
  • Wagnild G, Mueller K. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Pathways of the pulp. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. 9. ed., Mosby, St. Louis, 2006: 786-822.
  • Main C, Mirzayan N, Shabahang S, Torabinejad M. Repair of root perforations using mineral trioxide aggregate: a long term study. J Endodon 2004; 30:80-3.
  • Tanalp J, Dikbas I, Delilbaşı Ç, Bayırlı G, Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Persistent sinus tract formation one year following cast post-core replacement: a case report. Quintessence Int 2006; 37:545-50.
  • Shillinburg HT, Hobo S, Whittsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Preparations; for extensively damaged teeth. In: Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed., Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 1997; 181-209.
  • Smukler H, Chaibi M. Periodontal and dental considerations in clinical crown extension: a rationale basis of treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 464-77.
  • Kocadereli I, Tasman F, Guner SB. Combined endodontic-orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment of fractured teeth: case report. Austr Dent J 1998; 43:28-31.
  • Heydecke G, Budtz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in vitro study. J Dent 2001; 29: 427-33.
  • Freeman MA, Nicholls JI, Kydd WL, Harrington GW. Leakage associated with load fatigue-induced preliminary failure of full crowns placed over three different post and core systems. J Endod 1998; 24:26-32.
  • Heling I,Gorfil C, Slutzky H, Kopolovic K, Zalkind M, Slutzky-Goldberg I. Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedures: Review and treatment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 674-8.
  • Swanson K, Madison S. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part I. Time periods. J Endod 1987; 13:56-59.
  • Alves J, Walton R, Drake D. Coronal leakage: endotoxin penetration from mixed bacterial communities through obturated, post-prepared root canals. J Endod 1998; 24:587-591.
  • Christensen G: Posts and cores: State of art. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 96-7.
  • Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 631-6.
  • Kane JJ, Burgess JO. Modification of the resistance form of amalgam coronal-radiculer restorations. JProsthet Dent 1991; 65: 470-4.
  • Robbins JW, Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 118: 437-42.
  • Baratieri LN, Calderia de Androda MA, Arcar GM, Ritter A V. Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors with direct composite. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:180-4.
  • Robbins JW. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. 3. ed, Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., Chicago, 2006; 571-90.
  • Gluskin AH, Radke RA, Frost SL, Watanabe LG. The mandibular incisor: rethinking guidelines for post and core design. J Endod 1995; 21:33-7.
  • Raiden G, Costa L, Koss S, Hernandez JL, Acenolaza V. Residual thickness of root in first maxillaryprom olars with post space preparation. J Endod 1999; 25:502-5.
  • Yaman P, Zillich R. Effect of root curvature on post length in restoration of endodontically treated premolars. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:135-7.
  • Junge T, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Load fatigue of compromised teeth: a comparison of 3 luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 558-64.
  • Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 401-5.
  • Neagley RL, The effect of dowel preparation on apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969; 28: 739-45.
  • Fuss Z, Lustig J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001; 27: 46-8.
  • Mattison GD. Photoelastic stress analysis of cast gold endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 407-11.
  • Abramovitz L, Lev R, Fuss Z, Metzger Z. The unpredictability of seal after post space preparation: a fluid transport study. J Endod 2001; 27:292-5.
  • Mattison GD, Delivanis PD, Thacker RW Jr, Hassell KJ. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 785-9.
  • Madison S, Zakariasen KL. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leakage in teeth prepared for posts. J Endod 1984; 10: 422-7.
  • Hussey DL, Biagioni PA, McCullagh JJ, Lamey PJ. Thermographic assessment of heat generated on the root surface during post space preparation. Int Endod J1997; 30:187-90.
  • Fox K, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in root canal treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. Int Endod J 1997; 30:361-8.
  • Anusavice KJ. Phillips'science of dental material. 11. ed., WBSaunders, St. Louis, 2003: 451.
  • Matsuya S, Maeda T, Ohta M. IR and NMR analyses of hardening and maturation of glass ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1920-7.
  • Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 643-57.
  • Irie M, Nakai H. Flexural properties and swelling after storage in water of polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer). Dent Mater J 1998; 17:77-82.
  • Nissan J, Dmitri Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 304-8.
  • Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 1998; 24: 703-8.
  • Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a con focal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:284-91.
  • Mayhew JT,Windchy AM, Goldsmith LJ, Gettleman L. Effect of root canal sealers and irrigation agents on retention preformed posts luted with a resin cement. J Endod 2000; 26:341-4.
APA DİKBAŞ İ, KÖKSAL T (2006). Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. , 41 - 51.
Chicago DİKBAŞ İdil,KÖKSAL Temel Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. (2006): 41 - 51.
MLA DİKBAŞ İdil,KÖKSAL Temel Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. , 2006, ss.41 - 51.
AMA DİKBAŞ İ,KÖKSAL T Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. . 2006; 41 - 51.
Vancouver DİKBAŞ İ,KÖKSAL T Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. . 2006; 41 - 51.
IEEE DİKBAŞ İ,KÖKSAL T "Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar." , ss.41 - 51, 2006.
ISNAD DİKBAŞ, İdil - KÖKSAL, Temel. "Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar". (2006), 41-51.
APA DİKBAŞ İ, KÖKSAL T (2006). Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 41 - 51.
Chicago DİKBAŞ İdil,KÖKSAL Temel Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 16, no.2 (2006): 41 - 51.
MLA DİKBAŞ İdil,KÖKSAL Temel Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.16, no.2, 2006, ss.41 - 51.
AMA DİKBAŞ İ,KÖKSAL T Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006; 16(2): 41 - 51.
Vancouver DİKBAŞ İ,KÖKSAL T Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006; 16(2): 41 - 51.
IEEE DİKBAŞ İ,KÖKSAL T "Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar." Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, ss.41 - 51, 2006.
ISNAD DİKBAŞ, İdil - KÖKSAL, Temel. "Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar". Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 16/2 (2006), 41-51.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 12:44

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları