Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 143 - 148 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre

Öz:
Glokom, gözü etkileyen çeşitli hastalıkların yarattığı retina ganglion hücre ölümüne bağlı olarak gelişen optik sinir hasarı ve tipik görme alanı kayıpları ile karakterize ilerleyici bir optik nöropatidir. Glokoma bağlı hasarın saptanmasında ve takibinde kullanılan klinik oftalmoskopik muayene ve optik disk-retina sinir lif tabakası (RSLT) fotografisinin duyarlı testler olduğu gösterilmiş olmakla beraber bu testler uygulayıcının yeteneklerinden etkilenmekte ve uygulayıcılar arası farklılıklar gösterebilmektedir. Glokomun tanı ve takibinde kullanılabilecek, optik disk ve RSLT hasarları konusunda güvenilir ve objektif veriler sağlayacak yöntemler şüphesiz uzmanlara çok yardımcı olacaktır. Son 20 yılda yapılan araştırmalar sayesinde glokom hasarının erken dönemlerde saptanmasını sağlayabilecek görüntüleme teknolojileri geliştirilmiştir. Bunlardan birisi, ~800 nm dalga boyunda ışık kullanılarak retinanın ve optik sinirin non-kontakt, non-invaziv bir şekilde yüksek çözünürlükte tomografik kesit görüntülerinin elde edildiği optik koherens tomografidir (OCT). Optik disk ve retinanın tomografik kesit görüntüleri, kızılötesi ışığın B mod ultrason prensibine benzer bir şekilde doku katmanlarından geri yansıması özelliğinden faydalanılarak elde edilir. Bu şekilde OCT, retina tabakalarının ayırt edilerek RSLT kalınlığının ölçülebilmesini ve optik sinir başı parametrelerinin elde edilmesini sağlamaktadır. Böylece bu teknik, glokom tanı ve takibinde yaygın bir şekilde kullanılan bir görüntüleme yöntemi haline gelmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Tonometri, oküler Göz içi basınç Glokom Oküler hipertansiyon

Konular: Göz Hastalıkları

Pascal dynamic contour tonometre

Öz:
Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by optic nerve damage and typical visual field defects due to retinal ganglion loss caused by a number of deseases affecting the eye. Although clinical examination and photography of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) have been considered as sensitive tests for detecting glaucomatous damage and its progression, they are highly dependent on observer skills, inducing high interobserver and intraobserver variation that affects the utility of these diagnostic modalities. Objective and reliable methods of detecting optic nerve head and RNFL pathologies, and their progression as well, would help the clinician in the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucomatous damage. Researches during the past two decades have resulted in the development of several imaging technologies designed to detect glaucomatous damage at early stages of disease. This review outlines optical coherence tomography (OCT), which is a noncontact noninvasive imaging technology that can create high-resolution, real-time, cross-sectional tomographic images of retina and optic nerve head using light with a wavelength of ~800 nm. Cross-sectional images of the optic disc and retina are obtained using the optical backscattering of near-infrared light in a manner analogous to B-scan ultrasonography. OCT can differentiate the anatomic layers of retina, measure the thickness of RNFL and produce the optic nerve head parameters. Thus, OCT has became a widely used imaging modality that enables clinicians to obtain objective measurements of RNFL thickness and optic nerve head parameters in glaucoma.
Anahtar Kelime: Tonometry, Ocular Intraocular Pressure Glaucoma Ocular Hypertension

Konular: Göz Hastalıkları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • 1. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al.: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714-720.
  • 2. Arıtürk N: Glokomda Santral Korneal Kalınlık Ölçümü ve Önemi. Glo-Kat. 2006;1:1-6.
  • 3. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, et al.: Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1389-1392.
  • 4. Li Q, Li M, Fan Z, et al.: The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature and axial length on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2002;18:176-180.
  • 5. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, et al.: Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1779-1788.
  • 6. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML: Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367-408.
  • 7. SMT Swiss Microtechnology AG.: Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer Operating Manual, version 1.4, Switzerland, 2004.
  • 8. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, et al.: Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1572-1575.
  • 9. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S: Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34-43.
  • 10. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, et al.: Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:767-772.
  • 11. Hoffmann EM, Grus FH, Pfeiffer N: Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol. 2004;23:4:4.
  • 12. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA: Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldman applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3118-3121.
  • 13. Schneider E, Grehn F: Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:2-6.
  • 14. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C: Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:746-751.
  • 15. Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye. 2006;20:191-198.
  • 16. Doyle A, Lachkar Y: Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:288-292.
  • 17. Erdurmuş M, Totan Y, Yağcı R, ve ark.: Primer Açık Açılı Glokom ve Oküler Hipertansiyonda Dinamik Kontur Tonometre ve Non-Kontakt Tonometrenin Karşılaştırılması. T Klin Oftalmol (Baskıda).
  • 18. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, et al.: Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2156-2162.
  • 19. Öztürk F, Küsbeci T, Yavaş G, ve ark.: Pascal Dinamik Kontur Tonometre İle Ölçülen Göz İçi Basınç Değerlerinin Goldmann Applanasyon Tonometresi, Non Kontakt Tonometre Ve Tonopen İle Karşılaştırılması Ve Santral Kornea Kalınlığının Etkisi. Glo-Kat. 2006;1:171-175.
  • 20. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al.: Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:20-26.
  • 21. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL.: Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:359-366.
  • 22. Ozbek Z, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, et al.: Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas. Cornea. 2006;25:890-894.
  • 23. Barreto J Jr, Babic M, Vessani RM, et al.: Dynamic contour tonometry and goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus. Clinics. 2006;61:511-514.
  • 24. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, et al.: Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1104-1108.
  • 25. Langham ME, To’Mey KF.: A clinical procedure for the measurements of the ocular pulse-pressure relationship and ophthalmic arterial pressure. Exp Eye Res. 1978.27.17-25.
  • 26. Silver DM, Farrell RA.: Validity of pulsatile ocular blood flow measurements. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;38:72-80.
  • 27. Silver DM, Geyer O.: Pressure-volume relation for the living human eye. Curr Eye Res. 2000;20:115-120.
  • 28. To’mey KF, Faris BM, Jalkh AE, et al.: Ocular pulse in high myopia: a study of 40 eyes. Ann Ophthalmol. 1981;13:569-571.
  • 29. Shih YF, Horng IH, Yang CH, et al.: Ocular pulse amplitude in myopia. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1991;7:83-87.
  • 30. Perkins ES. The ocular pulse. Curr Eye Res. 1981;1:19-23.
  • 31. James CB, Trew DR, Clark K, et al.: Factors influencing the ocular pulseaxial length. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:341-344.
  • 32. McBrien NA, Gentle A.: Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:307-338.
  • 33. Avetisov ES, Savitskaya NF.: Some features of ocular microcirculation in myopia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1977;9:1261-1264.
  • 34. Akyol N, Kukner AS, Ozdemir T, et al.: Choroidal and retinal blood flow changes in degenerative myopia. Can J Ophthalmol. 1996;31:113-119.
  • 35. Shih YF, Fitzgerald ME, Norton TT, et al.: Reduction in choroidal blood flow occurs in chicks wearing goggles that induce eye growth toward myopia. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12:219-227.
  • 36. Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, et al.: Noninvasive determination of agerelated changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation. 1989;80:1652- 1659.
  • 37. Franklin SS, GustinWIV, Wong ND, et al.: Hemodynamic patterns of agerelated changes in blood pressure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997;96:308-315.
  • 38. Ravalico G, Toffoli G, Pastori G, et al.: Age-related ocular blood flow changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2645-2650.
  • 39. Bynke HG, Schele B.: On the origin of the ocular pressure pulse. Ophthalmologica. 1967;153:29-36.
  • 40. Schilder P.: Ocular blood flow responses to pathology of the carotid and cerebral circulations. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;38:52-58.
  • 41. Centofanti M, Bonini S, Manni G, et al.: Do sex and hormonal status influence choroidal circulation? Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:786-787.
  • 42. Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Viestenz A: [Reproducibility of Dynamic Contour Tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry-A Clinical Study on 323 Normal Eyes.] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2006;223:813-819.
  • 43. Punjabi OS, Ho HK, Kniestedt C, et al.: Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31:851-862.
  • 44. Fuchsjager-Mayrl G, Wally B, Rainer G, et al.: Effect of dorzolamide and timolol on ocular blood flow in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1293-1297.
  • 45. Zeitz O, Matthiessen ET, Reuss J, et al.: Effects of glaucoma drugs on ocular hemodynamics in normal tension glaucoma: a randomized trial comparing bimatoprost and latanoprost with dorzolamide [ISRCTN18873428]. BMC Ophthalmol. 2005;5:5:6.
  • 46. Romppainen T, Kniestedt C, Bachmann LM, et al.: [Ocular pulse amplitude: a new biometrical parameter for the diagnose of glaucoma?] Ophthalmologe. 2007;104:230-235.
  • 47. Erdurmus M, Yagci R: Dynamic contour tonometer versus goldmann applanation tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:471.
  • 48. Kanngiesser HE, Nee M, Kniestedt C, et al.: Simulation of dynamic contour tonometry compared to in-vitro study revealing minimal influence of corneal radius and astigmatism. The theoretical foundations of dynamic contour tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2641.
  • 49. Schwenteck T, Harnisch JP, Galanski M, et al.: [Clinical Evaluation of a New Tonometer on the Basis of International Standard ISO 8612.] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2006;223:808-812.
APA ERDURMUŞ M, HEPŞEN İ (2007). Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. , 143 - 148.
Chicago ERDURMUŞ Mesut,HEPŞEN İbrahim F. Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. (2007): 143 - 148.
MLA ERDURMUŞ Mesut,HEPŞEN İbrahim F. Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. , 2007, ss.143 - 148.
AMA ERDURMUŞ M,HEPŞEN İ Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. . 2007; 143 - 148.
Vancouver ERDURMUŞ M,HEPŞEN İ Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. . 2007; 143 - 148.
IEEE ERDURMUŞ M,HEPŞEN İ "Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre." , ss.143 - 148, 2007.
ISNAD ERDURMUŞ, Mesut - HEPŞEN, İbrahim F.. "Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre". (2007), 143-148.
APA ERDURMUŞ M, HEPŞEN İ (2007). Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. Glokom Katarakt, 2(2), 143 - 148.
Chicago ERDURMUŞ Mesut,HEPŞEN İbrahim F. Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. Glokom Katarakt 2, no.2 (2007): 143 - 148.
MLA ERDURMUŞ Mesut,HEPŞEN İbrahim F. Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. Glokom Katarakt, vol.2, no.2, 2007, ss.143 - 148.
AMA ERDURMUŞ M,HEPŞEN İ Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. Glokom Katarakt. 2007; 2(2): 143 - 148.
Vancouver ERDURMUŞ M,HEPŞEN İ Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre. Glokom Katarakt. 2007; 2(2): 143 - 148.
IEEE ERDURMUŞ M,HEPŞEN İ "Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre." Glokom Katarakt, 2, ss.143 - 148, 2007.
ISNAD ERDURMUŞ, Mesut - HEPŞEN, İbrahim F.. "Paskal dinamik kontur tonometre". Glokom Katarakt 2/2 (2007), 143-148.