An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment

SERAP LEMAN BİLGİN (Anadolu Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstriyel İlişkiler Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)
Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 39 - 51 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment

Öz:
Bu çalışmada sendikaya bağlılığı gösteren tutumların (sendikalılığın önemine inanma, sendikaya karşı sorumluluk, sendikaya sadakat ve sendika için çalışmaya isteklilik) işte denetim odağına göre nasıl değiştiğinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. İncelenen 127 anketin sonuçları, sendikaya karşı sorumluluğun denetim odağı ile doğru orantılı olarak değiştiğini ortaya koymaktadır. İşte denetim odağı ile, sendikaya bağlılığa ilişkin diğer üç tutum (sendikalılığın önemine inanma, sendikaya sadakat ve sendika için çalışmaya isteklilik) arasında ise düşük ancak olumlu ilişkiler olduğu saptanmıştır.(Denetim odağına ilişkin yüksek puanlar içten denetimlilik göstergesidir.)
Anahtar Kelime: sendikalaşma örgütlenme isteklilik sendikalılığa inanma örgütsel davranış sadakat çalışma ekonomisi sorumluluk denetim odağı sendika üyeleri dış denetim odağı örgütsel psikoloji örgütsel bağlılık iç denetim odağı işçi sendikaları

İşte Denetim Odağı ile Sendikaya Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz:
The present study intended to analyze how union commitment attitudes, namely belief in unionism, responsibility to the union, union loyalty and willingness to work for the union change with work locus of control. Analyses of 127 survey responses indicate that changes in responsibility to the union are directly proportional with work locus of control. There found to be low but positive relationships between work locus of control (higher scores indicated internality) and the other three union commitment attitudes (belief in unionism, union loyalty and willingness to work for the union). (Higher scores in locus of control indicated internality.)
Anahtar Kelime: organizational behavior loyalty labor economics responsibility locus of control union members external locus of control organizational psychology organizational commitment internal locus of control labor unions unionization organization willingness belief in unionism

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Allen, N. J. and J. P. Meyer (1990). “Organizational Socialization Tactics: A Longitudinal Analysis of Links to Newcomers’ Commitment and Role Orientation.” Academy of Management Journal, 33, 847-858.
  • Altan, Z.,D. Kağnıcıoğlu, Y. Şişman and Z. Sungur. (2005). İşçi Profili Araştırması: Eskişehir Örneği. Eskişehir: Anadulu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Angle, H.V. and J. L. Perry (1986). “Dual Commitment and Labor - Management Relationship Climates.” Academy of Management Journal, 29, 31-50.
  • Bamberger, P. A., A. N. Kluger and R. Suchard (1999). “The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta Analysis.” Academy of Management Journal, 42, 304-318.
  • Bilgin, S. L. (2003). “Sendikaya Bağlılık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması.” D.E.U. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5, 12-31.
  • Bilgin, S. L. and G. K. İftar (1998). “İşde Kendilik Kontrolu Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması” Anadolu Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 14 , 541-548.
  • Büyükuslu, A. R. (1998-1999). “ The Changing Nature of Turkish Trade Unions Since 1980.” IBAR, 19-20, 65-76.
  • Coleman, D. F., G. P. Irwing, and C. L. Cooper (1999). “Another Look at Locus of Control-Organizational Commitment Relationship: It Depends on the Form of Commitment.” Journal of Organizational Behavior , 20, 995-1001.
  • Friedman, L. and R.J. Harvey (1986). “ Factors of Union Commitment: The Case for A Lower Dimensionality .” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 371-376.
  • Fullagar, C. and J. Barling (1989). “A Longitudinal Test of A Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Union Loyalty.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 , 213-227.
  • Fuller, J.B. and K. Hester (1998). “The Effect of Labor Relations Climate on the Union Participation Process.” Journal of Labor Research, 19, 171-187.
  • Gordon, M.E., J. W. Philpot, R. E. Burt, C.A. Thompson, and W. E. Spiller (1980). “Commitment to the Union: Development of A Measure and Examination of its Correlates.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 479-499.
  • Hoell, R. C. (2004). “ How Employee Involvement Affects Union Commitment.” Journal of Labor Research, 25, 267-277.
  • Iverson, R. D., and S. Kuruvilla (1995). “Antecedents of Union Loyalty: The Influence of Individual Dispositions and Organizational Context.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 557-582.
  • Kelloway, E.K., V. M.Catano, and R. R. Southwell (1992). “ The Construct Validity of Union Commitment: Development and Dimensionality of A Shorter Scale.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 197-211.
  • Ladd, R.T., M. E. Gordon, L. L. Beauvais, and R.L. Morgan (1982). “Union Commitment: Replication and Extension. ” Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 640-644.
  • Magenau, J. M., J.E. Martin, and M. M. Peterson. (1988). “Dual and Unilateral Commitment Among Stewards and Rank-and-File Members.” Academy of Management Journal, 31, 359-376.
  • Martin, R., G.Thomas, K.Charles, O.Epitropaki, and R.McNamara (2005). “The Role of Leader- Member Exchanges in Mediating the Relationship Between Locus of Control and Work Reactions.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 141-147.
  • Özkaplan, N. (2000).”Trade Union Responses to Globalization: A Case Study of the Turkish Labour Market” Management Research News, 3, 34-36.
  • Raja, U., G. Johns, F. Ntalianis (2004). “The impact of Personality on Psychological Contracts.” Academy of Management Journal, 47, 350-367.
  • Reed, C.S., W. R.Young, and P.P. McHugh. (1994).“ A Comparative Look at Dual Commitment: An International Study.” Human Relations, 47, 1269-1293.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). “ Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Locus of Control of Reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1998). “The ‘Problem’ of the Psychological Contract Considered.”Journal of Organizational Behavior., 19, 665-671.
  • Snape, Ed, and A.W. Chan (2000). “ Commitment to Company and Union: Evidence from Hong Kong.” Industrial Relations, 39, 445-459.
  • Spector, P.E. (1988). “ Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale.” Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335-340.
  • Thacker, J.W., M.W.Fields and L.E.Tetrick (1989). “The Factor Structure of Union Commitment: An Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 228-232.
  • Tetrick, L.E., J.W.Thacker M.W.Fields (1989). “Evidence for a Stability of the Four Dimensions of the Commitment to the Union Scale”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 819-822.
  • Tetrick, L.E. (1995). “Developing and Maintaining Union Commitment: A Theoretical Framework”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 583-595.
  • Turnley, W. H., M.C.Bolino, S.W.Lester and J. M.Bloodgood (2004). “ The Effects of Psychological Contract Breach on Union Commitment.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 421-428.
APA BİLGİN S (2007). An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. , 39 - 51.
Chicago BİLGİN SERAP LEMAN An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. (2007): 39 - 51.
MLA BİLGİN SERAP LEMAN An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. , 2007, ss.39 - 51.
AMA BİLGİN S An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. . 2007; 39 - 51.
Vancouver BİLGİN S An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. . 2007; 39 - 51.
IEEE BİLGİN S "An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment." , ss.39 - 51, 2007.
ISNAD BİLGİN, SERAP LEMAN. "An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment". (2007), 39-51.
APA BİLGİN S (2007). An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 39 - 51.
Chicago BİLGİN SERAP LEMAN An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7, no.1 (2007): 39 - 51.
MLA BİLGİN SERAP LEMAN An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.7, no.1, 2007, ss.39 - 51.
AMA BİLGİN S An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2007; 7(1): 39 - 51.
Vancouver BİLGİN S An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2007; 7(1): 39 - 51.
IEEE BİLGİN S "An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment." Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7, ss.39 - 51, 2007.
ISNAD BİLGİN, SERAP LEMAN. "An Investigation on the Relationship Between Work Locus of Control and Union Commitment". Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7/1 (2007), 39-51.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 12:53

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları