Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography

Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 397 - 403 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography

Öz:
Amaç: Bu longitüdinal çalışmada, mitral kapak replasmanı yapılan hastalarda prostetik kapak çaplarının kardiyak strese cevabı ve cerrahiyi takiben kapak çapının iyileşme-yeniden yapılanma üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması planlanmıştır.Yöntemler: Mitral kapak replasmanı yapılan 39 hasta, mekanik kapak çapının postoperatif kardiyak yeniden yapılanma üzerine etkisinin araştırılması amacı ile ventrikül çapları, sistolik fonksiyonları ve kardiyak kitle indeksleri açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Hastalar protez kapak çapına göre 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Grup 1- kapak çapı 29 numaranın altı hastaları (n=11), Grup 2- 29 numara olan hastaları (n=11) ve Grup 3- kapak çapı 29 numaranın üstünde olan hastaları içermektedir (n=17). İstatistiksel analiz için Ki-kare ve ANOVA testleri kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: Sadece Grup 1’deki hastalarda sol ventrikül kitle indeksi ve diyastol sonu çapında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı azalma tespit edilmiştir (138.3±29.7 gm/2 ile 86.6±15.6 g/m2 ve 5.1±0.5 cm ile 4.4±0.4 cm, p<0.05). Grup 3’deki hastalar da sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonu cerrahiyi takiben gerilemiştir (64.0±5.6% ile 55.9±6.5%, p<0.05). Dobutamin stres ekokardiyografi sırasında, mitral protez kapak maksimum ve ortalama gradiyentleri ve pulmoner arter basınçları önemli miktarda artmıştır. Maksimum gradiyent Grup 1’de 14.2±4.6’dan 20.7±7.5 mmHg’ya (p<0.05), Grup 2’de 11.6±4.7’dan 16.2±6.8 mmHg’ya (p<0.05) ve Grup 3’de 10.6±3.1’dan 20.8±12.7 mmHg’ya (p<0.05) yükselmiştir. İzovolümik relaksasyon zamanı dobutamin infüzyonunu takiben tüm gruplarda azalmıştır, ancak bu azalma 3. grupta anlamlı değildir. Sonuç: Büyük çaplı kalp kapak protezi taşıyan grupta mitral kapak replasmanını takiben sol ventrikül sistolik fonksiyonlarında bozulma görülmektedir. Sadece küçük çaplı protez ile replasman yapılan grupta kardiyak kitle indeksinde azalma saptanmış ve sistolik fonksiyonlar korunmuştur. Cerrahiden sonra yapılan ekokardiyografi ile tespit edilen kitle indeks ve sistolik-diyastolik fonksiyon değişiklikleri, kullanılan kapak çaplarının kardiyak yeniden yapılanma üzerine etkilerinin olabileceği yönde olmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime: Kardiyotonik ajanlar Kalp kapağı protezleri Mitral kapak yetmezliği Ventriküler yeniden yapılandırma Mitral kapak Kalp kapağı protezi implantasyonu Dobutamin Ekokardiyografi, stres Strok volümü Ventriküler fonksiyon, sol

Konular: Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi

Mitral kapak replasmanı yapılan hastalarda dobutamin stres ekokardiyografi ile hemodinamik değişikliklerin değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the response of heart to stress according to the size of the prosthetic valve in patients who had undergone mitral valve replacement by using dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and to evaluate the relationship between the size of the prosthetic valve and cardiac recovery-remodeling process. Methods: Thirty-nine patients, who had undergone mitral valve replacement were compared in terms of left ventricular diameters, systolic functions and cardiac mass indexes in order to investigate the effect of the mechanical valve size on postoperative cardiac remodeling in this longitudinal study. They were divided into three groups according to their valve size: Group 1 (valve size<29 mm, n=11), Group 2 (valve size=29 mm, n=11) and Group 3 (valve size>29 mm, n=17). Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and one-way ANOVA tests to determine the statistical differences between the groups. The repeated measurements of two-way ANOVA test was used to analyze effects during long-term follow-up. Results: Only Group 1 patients achieved a significant decrease in terms of left ventricular mass index and end-diastolic diameter (138.3±29.7 g/m2 vs 86.6±15.6 g/m2 and 5.1±0.5 cm vs. 4.4±0.4 cm, p<0.05). Group 3 patients&#8217; left ventricular ejection fraction become worse after theoperation (64.0±5.6% vs. 55.9±6.5%, p<0.05). Maximum and mean pressure gradients across the mitral prosthesis as well as pulmonary artery pressure were significantly increased in all groups during DSE. Maximum gradients increased from 14.2±4.6 to 20.7±7.5 mmHg in Group 1 (p<0.05), 11.6±4.7 to 16.2±6.8 mmHg in Group 2 (p<0.05), and 10.6±3.1 to 20.8±12.7 mmHg in Group 3 (p<0.05). Isovolumic relaxation time decreased in all groups following the dobutamine infusion, as expected, but this decline was not significant in Group 3.Conclusion: A worsening in left ventricular systolic function was observed in large- sized valve prosthesis group. Only the patients who had undergone MVR with small-sized valve prosthesis achieved a decrease in cardiac mass index and preservation of the systolic function. The echocardiographically determined differences and mass index that appeared after the operation may point out that, the effect of theoperation on cardiac remodeling can be related with the ventricular size.
Anahtar Kelime: Echocardiography, Stress Stroke Volume Ventricular Function, Left Cardiotonic Agents Heart Valve Prosthesis Mitral Valve Insufficiency Ventricular Remodeling Mitral Valve Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation Dobutamine

Konular: Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Horstkotte D, Niehues R, Schulte HD, Strauer BE. Exercise capacity after heart valve replacement. Z Kardiol 1994; 83: 111-20.
  • 2. Munt BI, Legget ME, Healy NL, Fujioka M, Schwaegler R, Otto C. Effect of aortic valve replacement on exercise duration and functional status in adults with valvular aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 1997; 13: 346-50.
  • 3. Fan CM. Hemodynamic evaluation of GK and Medtronic-Hall prosthetic mitral valves by exercise Doppler echocardiography. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 1992; 20: 335-7.
  • 4. Izzat MB, Birdi I, Wilde P, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Comparison of hemodynamic performances of St. Jude Medical and Carbomedics 21mm aortic prostheses by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 408-15.
  • 5. Hecker SL, Zabalgoitia M, Ashline P, Oneschuk L, O’Rourke RA, Herrera CS. Comparison of exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography in assessing mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1374-77.
  • 6. Kadir I, Walsh C, Wilde P, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Comparison of exercise and dobutamine echocardiography in the haemodynamic assessment of small size mechanical aortic valve prostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 692-7.
  • 7. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendation regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography. Result of a survey of echocardiographic measurement. Circulation 1978; 58: 1072-83.
  • 8. Erdil N, Cetin L, Nisaoğlu V, Demirkilic U, Sener E, Tatar H. Clinical experience with Sorin Bicarbon valve in patients with tight mitral valve stenosis and elevated pulmonary hypertension (early and mid-term results). J Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 43: 423-7.
  • 9. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1-148
  • 10. Rahimtoola SH. Early valve replacement for preservation of ventricular function? Am J Cardiol 1977; 40: 472-5.
  • 11. Rahimtoola SH. Lessons learned about the determinants of the results of valve surgery. Circulation 1988; 78: 1503-7.
  • 12. Tischler MD, Cooper KA, Rowen M, LeWinter MM. Mitral valve replacement versus mitral valve repair. A Doppler and quantitative stress echocardiographic study. Circulation 1994; 89: 132-7.
  • 13. Kennedy JW, Doces JG, Stewart DK. Left ventricular function before and following surgical treatment of mitral valve disease. Am Heart J 1979;97:585-94.
  • 14. David TE, Uden DE, Strauss HD. The importance of the mitral valve apparatus in left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1983; 68 (suppl 2): 76-82.
  • 15. Zile MR, Gaasch WH, Carroll JD, Levine HJ. Chronic mitral regurgitation: predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular function and wall stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 235-42.
  • 16. Crawford MH, Souchek J, Oprian CA, Miller DC, Rahimtoola S, Giacomini JC, et al. Determinants of survival and left ventricular performance after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 1990; 8: 1173-81.
  • 17. Iguchi A, Tabayashi K, Ninomiya M. Left ventricular function following conventional mitral valve replacement in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation. Tohoku J Exp Med 1996; 179: 157-66.
  • 18. Ren JF, Aksut S, Lighty GW Jr, Vigilante GJ, Sink JD, Segal BL, et al. Mitral valve repair is superior to valve replacement for the early preservation of cardiac function: relation of ventricular geometry to function. Am Heart J 1996; 131: 974-81.
  • 19. Rozich J, Carabello B, Usher B, Kratz J, Bell A, Zile M. Mitral valve replacement with and without chordal preservation in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1992; 86: 1718-26.
  • 20. Hansen D, Cahill P, DeCampli W, Harrison D, Derby G, Mitchell R, et al. Valvular-ventricular interaction: importance of the mitral apparatus in canine left ventricular systolic performance. Circulation 1986; 73: 1310-20.
  • 21. Harris GE, Cahill P, Hansen D, Derby G, Miller DG. Restoration of left ventricular systolic performance after reattachment of the mitral chordae tendineae. J Cardiothorac Surg 1988; 95: 969-79.
  • 22. Hansen DE, Sarris GE, Niczyporuk MA, Derby GC, Cahill PD, Miller DC. Physiologic role of the mitral apparatus in left ventricular regional mechanics, contraction synergy, and global systolic performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 97: 521-33.
  • 23. Tatineni S, Barner HB, Pearson AC, Halbe D, Woodruff R, Labovitz AJ. Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function. Circulation 1989; 80: 16-23.
  • 24. Skudicky D, Essop MR, Sareli P. Time-related changes in left ventricular function after double valve replacement for combined aortic and mitral regurgitation in a young rheumatic population. Predictors of postoperative left ventricular performance and role of chordal preservation. Circulation 1997; 95: 899-904.
  • 25. Rezaian GR, Aghasadeghi K, Kojuri J. Evaluation of the hemodynamic performance of St. Jude mitral prostheses: a pilot study by dobutamine-stress Doppler echocardiography. Angiology 2005; 56: 81-6.
  • 26. Leavitt JI, Coats MH, Falk RH. Effects of exercise on transmitral gradient and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with mitral stenosis or a prosthetic mitral valve: a Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 199; 17: 1520-6.
  • 27. Reisner SA, Lichtenberg GS, Shapiro JR, Schwartz KQ, Meltzer RS. Exercise Doppler echocardiography in patients with mitral prosthetic valves. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 755-9.
  • 28. Izzat MB, Birdi I, Wilde P, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. evaluation of hemodynamic performance of small CarboMedics aortic prostheses using dobutamine stress Doppler echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1048-52.
  • 29. Çam N, Gerçekoğlu H, Çelik S, Gürsürer M, Tayyareci G, Karabulut H, et al. Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 1998; 6: 166-73.
  • 30. Hwang MH, Pacold I, Piao ZE, Engelmeier R, Scanion PJ, Loeb HS. The usefulness of dobutamine in the assessment of the severity of mitral stenosis. Am Heart J 1986; 111: 312-6.
  • 31. Alonso AM, Bello MC. Effects of prosthetic type and size on the hemodynamic response of mitral valve prostheses to exertion. Rev Med Univ Navarra 1996; 40: 19-26.
APA ULUS A, tutun u, BUDAK B, ERBAŞ S, ARAT N, BOZBOĞA S, KÖSE S, SEREN M, PARLAR A, Aksöyek A, KATIRCIOĞLU S (2007). Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 397 - 403.
Chicago ULUS A. Tulga,tutun ufuk,BUDAK Baran,ERBAŞ Sakine,ARAT Nurcan,BOZBOĞA Seher,KÖSE Serdal Kenan,SEREN Mustafa,PARLAR A. İhsan,Aksöyek Ayşen,KATIRCIOĞLU S. Fehmi Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. (2007): 397 - 403.
MLA ULUS A. Tulga,tutun ufuk,BUDAK Baran,ERBAŞ Sakine,ARAT Nurcan,BOZBOĞA Seher,KÖSE Serdal Kenan,SEREN Mustafa,PARLAR A. İhsan,Aksöyek Ayşen,KATIRCIOĞLU S. Fehmi Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2007, ss.397 - 403.
AMA ULUS A,tutun u,BUDAK B,ERBAŞ S,ARAT N,BOZBOĞA S,KÖSE S,SEREN M,PARLAR A,Aksöyek A,KATIRCIOĞLU S Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. . 2007; 397 - 403.
Vancouver ULUS A,tutun u,BUDAK B,ERBAŞ S,ARAT N,BOZBOĞA S,KÖSE S,SEREN M,PARLAR A,Aksöyek A,KATIRCIOĞLU S Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. . 2007; 397 - 403.
IEEE ULUS A,tutun u,BUDAK B,ERBAŞ S,ARAT N,BOZBOĞA S,KÖSE S,SEREN M,PARLAR A,Aksöyek A,KATIRCIOĞLU S "Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography." , ss.397 - 403, 2007.
ISNAD ULUS, A. Tulga vd. "Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography". (2007), 397-403.
APA ULUS A, tutun u, BUDAK B, ERBAŞ S, ARAT N, BOZBOĞA S, KÖSE S, SEREN M, PARLAR A, Aksöyek A, KATIRCIOĞLU S (2007). Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, 7(4), 397 - 403.
Chicago ULUS A. Tulga,tutun ufuk,BUDAK Baran,ERBAŞ Sakine,ARAT Nurcan,BOZBOĞA Seher,KÖSE Serdal Kenan,SEREN Mustafa,PARLAR A. İhsan,Aksöyek Ayşen,KATIRCIOĞLU S. Fehmi Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi 7, no.4 (2007): 397 - 403.
MLA ULUS A. Tulga,tutun ufuk,BUDAK Baran,ERBAŞ Sakine,ARAT Nurcan,BOZBOĞA Seher,KÖSE Serdal Kenan,SEREN Mustafa,PARLAR A. İhsan,Aksöyek Ayşen,KATIRCIOĞLU S. Fehmi Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, vol.7, no.4, 2007, ss.397 - 403.
AMA ULUS A,tutun u,BUDAK B,ERBAŞ S,ARAT N,BOZBOĞA S,KÖSE S,SEREN M,PARLAR A,Aksöyek A,KATIRCIOĞLU S Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi. 2007; 7(4): 397 - 403.
Vancouver ULUS A,tutun u,BUDAK B,ERBAŞ S,ARAT N,BOZBOĞA S,KÖSE S,SEREN M,PARLAR A,Aksöyek A,KATIRCIOĞLU S Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi. 2007; 7(4): 397 - 403.
IEEE ULUS A,tutun u,BUDAK B,ERBAŞ S,ARAT N,BOZBOĞA S,KÖSE S,SEREN M,PARLAR A,Aksöyek A,KATIRCIOĞLU S "Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography." Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, 7, ss.397 - 403, 2007.
ISNAD ULUS, A. Tulga vd. "Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in patients with mitral valve replacement using dobutamine stress echocardiography". Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi 7/4 (2007), 397-403.