Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 137 Sayfa Aralığı: 74 - 81 Metin Dili: İngilizce

The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Tschannen-Moran ve Woolfolk Hoy tarafından geliştirilen öğretmenlerin özyeterlik inançlarına yönelik ölçeğin Türkçeye adapte edilmesidir. Ayrıca, bu ölçek için güvenirlik ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile Rasch yöntemi kullanılarak geçerlilik çalışmalarının yapılması hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmaya, Türkiye'nin dört büyük şehrindeki altı farklı üniversiteden 628 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Bulgular bize Türk öğretmen adayı örneklemi için geliştirilen Türkçe "öğretmen özyeterlik ölçeği"nin güvenirlik ve geçerliği hakkında deliller sunmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: turkish adaptation confirmatory factor analysis reliability validity rasch method teachers efficacy beliefs efficacy scale

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86-95.
  • Anderson, R. N., Greene, M. L. & Loewen, P. S. (1988). Relationships among teachers' and students' thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XXXIV (2), 148-165.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.
  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cakiroglu, J. & Cakiroglu, E. (Nisan, 2002). Pre-service teacher efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching: A comparison of USA and Turkey. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.
  • Enochs, L. G. & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90,695- 706.
  • Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (4), 569-582.
  • Ginns, I. S. & Tulip, D.F. (1995). Changes in preservice elementary teachers' sense of efficacy in teaching science. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 395-401.
  • Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K. & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479-507.
  • Gorrell, J. & Hwang, Y. S. (1995). A study of self-efficacy beliefs among pre-service teachers in Korea. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28, 101-105.
  • Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.
  • Guskey, T. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 41-47.
  • Lin, H. & Gorrell, J. (2001). Expiatory analysis of pre-service teacher efficacy in Taiwan. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 623-635.
  • Lin, H., Gorrell, J. & Taylor, J. (2002). Influence of culture and education on U.S. and Taiwan pre-service teachers' efficacy beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 37-46.
  • Linacre, J. M. (1999a). Facets, Version 3.22 [Computer program]. Chicago: MESA Press.
  • Linacre, J. M. (1999b). A user's guide to Facets: Rasch measurement computer program. Chicago: MESA Press.
  • Midgley, C, Feldlaufer, H. & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task- related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (2), 247-258.
  • Riggs, I. M., Diaz, E., Riggs, M., Jusenthada, J., Brasch, K., Torner, J., Shamansky, L., Crowell, S. & Pelletier, A. (1994). Impacting elementary science teachers' beliefs and performance through teacher enhancement for science instruction in diverse settings. Paper presented at the annual conference National association for research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.
  • Roberts, J. K. & Henson, R. K. (2000). Self-efficacy teaching and knowledge instrument for science teachers (SETAKIST): A proposal for a new efficacy instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY.
  • Rose, J.S. & Medway, F.J. (1981). Measure of teachers' beliefs in their own control over student outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 185-199.
  • Tekkaya, C, Cakiroglu, J. & Özkan, O. (2004). Turkish pre-service science teachers' understanding of science, and their confidence in teaching science. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30, 57-66.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. & Woolfolk-Hoy, A.(2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17 (7), 783-805.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A. & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its Meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research. 68 (2), 202-248.
  • Walters. J. J. & Ginns, I. S. (1995). Origins of and changes in preservice teachers science teaching efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National association for research in Science teaching, San Francisco, CA.
  • Wright, B. D. & Linacre, J.*M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83.htm
  • Wright, B. D. & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA.
APA ÇAPA Y, ÇAKIROĞLU J, SARIKAYA H (2005). The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale. Eğitim ve Bilim, 30(137), 74 - 81.
Chicago ÇAPA Yeşim,ÇAKIROĞLU Jale,SARIKAYA Hilal The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale. Eğitim ve Bilim 30, no.137 (2005): 74 - 81.
MLA ÇAPA Yeşim,ÇAKIROĞLU Jale,SARIKAYA Hilal The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.30, no.137, 2005, ss.74 - 81.
AMA ÇAPA Y,ÇAKIROĞLU J,SARIKAYA H The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2005; 30(137): 74 - 81.
Vancouver ÇAPA Y,ÇAKIROĞLU J,SARIKAYA H The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2005; 30(137): 74 - 81.
IEEE ÇAPA Y,ÇAKIROĞLU J,SARIKAYA H "The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale." Eğitim ve Bilim, 30, ss.74 - 81, 2005.
ISNAD ÇAPA, Yeşim vd. "The Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale". Eğitim ve Bilim 30/137 (2005), 74-81.