Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 145 Sayfa Aralığı: 16 - 22 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms

Öz:
Çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim ikinci kademedeki matematik derslerini matematiksel içerik, öğretim metodu ve ders saati süresi açısından incelemektir. Ankara'daki çeşitli ilköğretim okullarının ikinci kademesinde 15 matematik öğretmenine ait 241 matematik dersi gözlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar şunlardır: (a) Gözlemciler verilen matematik konularının öğretilmeye değer ve seviyeye uygun olduğunu, içeriğin doğru olarak verildiğini düşünmektedirler. Diğer taraftan işlenen derslerde dersin konusu ile matematiğin diğer konuları ya da günlük hayat arasında yeteri kadar bağlantı kurulmadığına inanmaktadırlar, (b) Yaygın olarak düz anlatım yöntemi ve soru-cevap tekniği kullanılmaktadır. Gözlenen derslerin hepsinde öğrenciler bireysel olarak çalışmaktadırlar öğrencilerin birbiriyle etkileşimini gerektiren hiçbir etkinlik gerçekleştirilmemiştir. Gözlenen derslerin yarısından çoğunda, ders kitabı dışında bir materyal kullanılmamıştır, (c) Ders süresi etkili bir şekilde kullanılamamaktadır. 40 dakikalık dersin ortalama 24,72 dakikasında derse yönelik bir çalışma yapılmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: matematik dersleri öğretim programı matematik öğretmenleri matematik eğitimi Ankara öğretmen algılamaları öğretmen bakış açısı ilk öğretim ders planlama

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

İlköğretim Matematik Sınıflarında Gözlem Çalışması

Öz:
The purpose of this paper is to investigate elementary mathematics classrooms in terms of mathematics content, teaching method, and the duration of mathematics lesson. Data for this research study comprised of 241 elementary mathematics lessons taught by 15 teachers working in different schools in Ankara. The results suggested, (a) in these lessons the topic was worthwhile to teach, the level of teaching was appropriate to the grade level, the topic was presented correctly but the connection between the topic of the lesson and other topics of math or daily life was not built, (b) Commonly used teaching method was lecturing and technique was question-answer; and the students studied individually. More than half of the lessons teachers did not use any material other than textbooks; (c) teachers were not successful at using the time efficiently.
Anahtar Kelime: teacher perspectives primary education course planning mathematics lessons education program mathematics teachers mathematics education Ankara teacher perceptions

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Burnett, P. C. (2003). The impact of teacher feedback on student self-talk and self-concept in reading and mathematics. Journal of Classroom Interaction. 38(1). 11-18.
  • Bong, M. (2000). Perceptions of school and classroom environments on students motivation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, April 24-28, New Orleans, LA. ERIC Publication (ED446135).
  • Civil, M. (1998). Linking students' own cultural mathematics and academic mathematics. In A. Olivier and K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol: 1 (pp. 152- 159). South Africa. University of Stellenbosch.
  • Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research 4: 243-257.
  • Hill, H. C. (2004). Professional Development Standards and Practices in Elementary School Mathematics. Elementary School Journal. Retrieved from [www-personal.umich.edu] on August, 19. 2005
  • Larkin, H. J. (1991). Robust performance in algebra: the role of the problem representation. In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (pp. 120-135). Virginia: NCTM Publications.
  • Leitzel, R. J. (1991). Critical considerations for the future of algebra instruction. In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (pp. 25-33). Virginia: NCTM Publications.
  • MEB (2004). İlköğretim Matematik Dersi (1- 5. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Ankara Devlet Kitapları Basımevi.
  • Moseley, B. & Brenner, M. E. (1997). Using multiple representations for conceptual change in pre-algebra: A comparison of variable usage with graphic and text based problems (pp.29-30). Washington DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  • Page, M. S. (2002). Technology-Enriched Classrooms: Effects on Students of Low Socioeconomic Status. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 34(4). pp 389-411
  • Panasuk, R. M. and Sullivan, M. M. (1998). Need For Lesson Analysis in Effective Lesson Planning. Education. 118(3). pp: 330-44.
  • Pape, S. J. & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding, Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118-128.
  • Proulx, S. (2002). The development, implementation and assessment of a structured classroom observation instrument for primary level mathematics instruction. Unpublished dissertation. University of Worcester, MA.
  • Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent Methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic Relations. Review of Educational Research, 50 (2), 241-271.
  • Smith, S. P. (2004). Representation in school mathematics: Children's* representations of problems. In J. Kilpatrick (Ed.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 263-274), Reston, VA: NCTM, Inc.
  • Taylor, B. A. & Fraser, B. J. (2003). The influence of classroom environment on high school students' mathematics anxiety. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, April 21, Chicago, IL. ERIC Publication (ED476644).
  • Van Zoest, L. R. (1994). The impact of small-group discussion on preservice secondary mathematics teachers' classroom observations and reflections, Unpublished dissertation. Illinois State University, Illinois.
  • Waxman, H. C, & Huang, S. L. (1996). Classroom instruction differences by level of technology use in middle school mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 157-169.
APA DUATEPE PAKSU A, AKKUŞ O (2007). An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. , 16 - 22.
Chicago DUATEPE PAKSU ASUMAN,AKKUŞ Oylum An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. (2007): 16 - 22.
MLA DUATEPE PAKSU ASUMAN,AKKUŞ Oylum An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. , 2007, ss.16 - 22.
AMA DUATEPE PAKSU A,AKKUŞ O An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. . 2007; 16 - 22.
Vancouver DUATEPE PAKSU A,AKKUŞ O An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. . 2007; 16 - 22.
IEEE DUATEPE PAKSU A,AKKUŞ O "An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms." , ss.16 - 22, 2007.
ISNAD DUATEPE PAKSU, ASUMAN - AKKUŞ, Oylum. "An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms". (2007), 16-22.
APA DUATEPE PAKSU A, AKKUŞ O (2007). An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. Eğitim ve Bilim, 32(145), 16 - 22.
Chicago DUATEPE PAKSU ASUMAN,AKKUŞ Oylum An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. Eğitim ve Bilim 32, no.145 (2007): 16 - 22.
MLA DUATEPE PAKSU ASUMAN,AKKUŞ Oylum An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.32, no.145, 2007, ss.16 - 22.
AMA DUATEPE PAKSU A,AKKUŞ O An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2007; 32(145): 16 - 22.
Vancouver DUATEPE PAKSU A,AKKUŞ O An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2007; 32(145): 16 - 22.
IEEE DUATEPE PAKSU A,AKKUŞ O "An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms." Eğitim ve Bilim, 32, ss.16 - 22, 2007.
ISNAD DUATEPE PAKSU, ASUMAN - AKKUŞ, Oylum. "An Observational Study in Elemantary Mathematisc Classrooms". Eğitim ve Bilim 32/145 (2007), 16-22.