Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 81 - 94 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği

Öz:
İstanbul’un son 20 yıl içinde hızlı bir dönüşüm yaşamış olması, bu süreç içinde İstanbul’un gayri-menkul ve rant odaklı büyüme içerisinde olması, yapı stoğunun yaklaşık %60’ının depreme karşı mukavemet gösterecek sağlamlıkta olmaması gibi nedenler ile İstanbul için, kentsel dönüşüm kavramının yoğun olarak tartışılması kaçınılmaz olmuştur. Bununla birlikte İstanbul’da halen kentsel dönüşüm ve depreme hazırlık politikalarının üretilmesinde önemli eksiklikler bulunmaktadır. Bu tespitleri dikkate alarak, yeni dönemin gündemini doğru belirlememiz gerekmektedir. Özellikle deprem beklentisi ve yapı stoğunun yeterli sağlamlıkta olmadığı gerçeği, afet odaklı kentsel dönüşüm planlamasındaki ön koşulların neler olması gerektiğini sorgulamayı zorunlu kılmaktadır. İstanbul’da son yıllarda gerçekleştirilen kentsel dönüşüm çalışmaları, yerel yönetimlerin bireysel çaba-ları ile uygulanan tekil projelerden ibaret iken, depreme hazırlık çalışmalarının kentsel planlama ile ilişkilendirilme çabaları sınırlı kalmıştır. Bu süreç içinde ‘Kentsel dönüşüm ne olmalıdır? Neleri kapsamalıdır? İstanbul’a özgü koşullar ve stratejiler nelerdir?’ gibi sorulara cevap aranmış ve birtakım kavramsal kargaşa da yaşanmıştır. Bu karmaşa, ancak süreç içinde uygulamalı örneklerle ortadan kalkacaktır. Bu yönde atılan tüm adımlar değerlidir ve ülkesel politikalara ışık tutmalı, öncü olmalıdır. Bu makalenin amacı, deprem odaklı kentsel dönüşüm etki projelerinin araçlarının ve uygulanabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi ve ileriye dönük kanıta dayalı kentsel dönüşüm politikaları-nın oluşturulmasıdır. Makalede, deprem odaklı kentsel dönüşüm etki projelerinin anahtar bileşenleri incelenmektedir. Deprem odaklı kentsel dönüşüm etki projesinin uygulanabilirliği örnek alan üzerinde SWOT analizi yöntemi ile sınanmaktadır. Makale, depreme odaklı çözüm ve etki yaratacak kentsel dönüşüm politikalarının önemini vurgulamakta ve kentsel dönüşüm tartışmalarına pilot alan sınaması ile kanıt sunmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mimarlık Kentsel Çalışmalar

Analysis for main toolkits of urban regeneration focused on earthquake: Case of IETT blocks

Öz:
It has been inevitable to discuss the concept of urban transformation intensively for Istanbul due to some reasons like having experienced the rapid transformation for the last 20 years, being in real estate and annuity based growth in this process, approximately % 60 of building stock not being strong and sound enough to resist earthquake. 1999 Marmara earthquake experience has introduced the necessity to plan earthquake preparation studies in Turkey within an integrated system. Designation of a provisional settlement area, associate the reserved places with the urban plans, provision of equipment in neighborhood unit at provisional housing areas and interassociation of the design of prefabricated housing units that form the neighborhood unit and the performance of earthquake preparation studies within this process must be adopted as a new approach. The results of 1999 Marmara earthquake has entailed the formation of “planning, design and management” systematic of earthquake preparation studies in Turkey. While the sensitivity of Turkey and Marmara to earthquake preparation studies increases, another issue of cooperation is reinforcement and the determination of areas that will start “urban regeneration acceleration” rapidly in areas where reinforcement is not sufficient, and the use of urban transformation as a tool in damage reduction studies However, there are still important deficiencies for the urban regeneration and the production of preparation policies for earthquake. It is necessary to establish sustainable and well qualified urban living spaces for the public prepared for disaster. In other words, on one hand, disaster preparation activities have to be performed quickly and integrated with urban planning on the other hand, approaches on urban regeneration models have to be developed and application / implementation areas for these models have to be determined. By considering these findings, we have to determine the agenda of the new period in a right way. Especially, the earthquake expectation and the fact that building stock is not sound and strong enough necessitate the questioning of what prerequisites have to be in disaster focused urban regeneration planning. While urban regeneration activities, which have been realized in Istanbul recently is made up of singular projects implemented by the efforts of the local authorities, the efforts to associate preparation activities for the earthquake with urban planning has been limited. In this process, the efforts were made to find answers for the questions like what should urban regeneration be? What should it cover? What are the conditions and strategies special for Istanbul? and several conceptual confusions were experienced. This confusion or chaos will be removed with practical examples in the process. The steps taken to this effect is valuable and should light the way for national policies, they should be pioneer in this way. The aim of this article is to evaluate the toolkits for flagship regeneration projects based on earthquake and their applicability and to build up evidence based urban regeneration policies for future. In the article, after literature investigation on flagship urban regeneration projects, toolkits for flagship urban regeneration projects based on earthquake are examined. By testing the applicability of the toolkits for flagship urban transformation projects based on earthquake on case area with SWOT analysis method, important urban regeneration policies are developed for Istanbul. The article emphasizes the importance of urban regeneration policies which will create flagship development based on earthquake and submits the proof for urban regeneration by pilot area test. In the 2nd section following the introduction section of the article, it is emphasized the main components of an earthquake based urban regeneration project. In the third section, selection of case / sample area and its importance is stated in the context of methodology of the study. In the fourth section of the article, in the framework of key components of an earthquake based regeneration project, the applicability of earthquake based regeneration model is questioned / interrogated on the area taken as a case / sample in Istanbul and the components of regeneration project are evaluated. In Conclusion section, pilot project proofs based strategies and policies are developed in earthquake based regeneration model.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mimarlık Kentsel Çalışmalar
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akıncı, F., (2004). Viewpoint the aftermath of disas­ter in urban areas: An evaluation of the 1999 earthquake in Turkey, Cities, 21, 6, 527-536
  • Atkinson, R., (2002). Does gentrification help or harm urban neighbourhoods? An assessment of the evidence-base in the context of the new urban agenda, http://www.neighbourhoodcentre. org.uk/research/cnrpapersword/gent_refs.doc
  • Birkland, T., (1996). Natural disasters as focusing events: Policy communities and political re­sponse, Mass Emergeinces and Disasters, 14 2, 221-244.
  • Bolin, S., (1998). The Northridge Earthquake: Vul­nerability and Disaster, Routledge.
  • Bursa, M., (2004). Hazard Risk Management in Turkey- Achievements and challenges ahead, Hazard Hazard Risk Management in Europe and Central Asia Workshop.
  • Carrıeere, J., Demaziere, C, (2002). Urban planning and flagship development projects: Lessons from EXPO 98, Lisbon, Planning Practice & Research, 17, 1.
  • Cigler, B., (1987). Emergency management and public administration. In Crisis Management: A Casebook, eds T Charles and J Choon. Charles C Thomas, Illinois.
  • Cuny, F., (1983). Disasters and Development. Ox­ford: Oxford University Press.
  • Elander, I., (1995). Policy Networks and Housing Regeneration in England and Sweden, Urban Studies 32, 6, 913-934.
  • Erdik M., Durukal, E., Alpay, Y., Birgören, G., (2001). İstanbul'da binalar için deprem riski ve risk azaltımına yönelik somut bir öneri, İstanbul Bülten, 12,52,3-16.
  • Erdik, M., (1999). İstanbul İçin kapsamlı bir deprem afet master planı geliştirilmesi, Deprem Güvenli Konut Sempozyumu, 1-49, Ankara.
  • FEMA, Project Impact: Building Disaster-Resistant Communities," call 1-800-227-4731, FEMA web site : www.fema.gov.
  • Fischer, H. W., (1998). Response to Disaster, Uni­versity Press of America.
  • Göksu, F., (2004). Urban regeneration from the viewpoint of the private sector, International Ur­ban Regeneration Implementations Symposium, 263-265, Istanbul.
  • Hall, S., Hickman, P., (2002). Neighbourhood re­newal and urban policy: a comparison of new ap­proaches in England and France, Regional Stud­ies, 36, 6,691-707.
  • Hibbitt, K., Jones, P., Meegan, R., (2001). Tackling social exclusion: the role of social capital in ur­ban regeneration on Merseyside - from mistrust to trust?, European Planning Studies, 9, 2, 141-61.
  • Hodgkinson, P., Stewart, M., (1991). Coping with Catastrophe. Routledge, London.
  • Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Greater Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (GIMM), (2002). The study on a disaster preven­tion/earthquake mitigation master plan in Istan­bul, Istanbul: GIMM.
  • Kleinman, M., (1998). Include me out? The new politics of place and poverty, CASE Paper 11, London: LS E.
  • Kloppenborg, T. J., Opfer, W. A., (2000). Forty years of project management research: Trends, interpretations and predictions. In Project Man­agement at the Turn of the Millennium: Proceed­ings of PMI Research Conference, Project Man­agement Institute,
  • Kocabaş, A., (2006). Urban conservation in Istanbul: evaluation and re-conceptualisation, Habitat In­ternational, 30, 1, 107-126 Meeting, Mimar Sinan University, Istanbul, Turkey, May
  • Nozick, M., (1992). No Place Like Home: Building Sustainable Communities. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development.
  • Özçevik, O., Şener, S., Taş, E., Yaman, H., Türk, Ş., Bey'go, C., (2004). ZeyREG-IIPM Zeytinburnu Regeneration Program Integrated Impact Project Management A Project Management Methodol­ogy Towards Sustainable Urban Regeneration in the Context of Disaster Mitigation, World Bank Project Report.
  • Özden, P., Kubat, S., (2003). Türkiye'de şehir yenilemenin uygulanabilirliği üzerine düşünceler, itü dergisi/a mimarlık, planlama, tasarım, 2, 1, 77-88.
  • Project Management Institute (PMI)(1996). A guide to the project management body of knowledge Automated Graphic Systems, USA
  • Quarantelli, E., (1995). Disasters are different, there­fore planning for and managing them requires in­novative as well as traditional behaviour. In Pro­ceedings of the Third Emergency Planning and Disaster Management Conference, Lancaster University.
  • Şener, S. Özçevik, Ö., Altun, C.,Şener, E.(2003) Post disaster temporary shelter settlement pattern and unit development project for Istanbul, European Comission/ Operations in canditated counrites, Directorate of Urban Transformation and New Settlements, The Metropolitan Municipality of Istanbul and Istanbul Technical University, Ur­ban and Environmental Planning Research Cen­ter, Project Report.
  • The World Bank, (2004). Involuntary Resettlement Sourcebook, Planning and Implementation in Development Projects.
  • Voyadzıs, S., Erdoğdu, M., (2001). Sustaniable So­lutions for Project Finance, EFCA, F1DIC,
  • Williams, B., (2000). Responding to urban crisis, Cities, 17,4,293-304.
  • Witt, J. L., (1999). Creating Disaster Resistant Communities, Disaster Recovery Journal, 12.
APA Özçevik Ö, TÜRK Ş, BEYGO C, Tas E, Yaman H (2007). İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. , 81 - 94.
Chicago Özçevik Özlem,TÜRK Şence,BEYGO CEM,Tas Elcin,Yaman Hakan İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. (2007): 81 - 94.
MLA Özçevik Özlem,TÜRK Şence,BEYGO CEM,Tas Elcin,Yaman Hakan İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. , 2007, ss.81 - 94.
AMA Özçevik Ö,TÜRK Ş,BEYGO C,Tas E,Yaman H İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. . 2007; 81 - 94.
Vancouver Özçevik Ö,TÜRK Ş,BEYGO C,Tas E,Yaman H İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. . 2007; 81 - 94.
IEEE Özçevik Ö,TÜRK Ş,BEYGO C,Tas E,Yaman H "İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği." , ss.81 - 94, 2007.
ISNAD Özçevik, Özlem vd. "İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği". (2007), 81-94.
APA Özçevik Ö, TÜRK Ş, BEYGO C, Tas E, Yaman H (2007). İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. İTÜ Dergisi Seri A: Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, 6(1), 81 - 94.
Chicago Özçevik Özlem,TÜRK Şence,BEYGO CEM,Tas Elcin,Yaman Hakan İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. İTÜ Dergisi Seri A: Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım 6, no.1 (2007): 81 - 94.
MLA Özçevik Özlem,TÜRK Şence,BEYGO CEM,Tas Elcin,Yaman Hakan İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. İTÜ Dergisi Seri A: Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, vol.6, no.1, 2007, ss.81 - 94.
AMA Özçevik Ö,TÜRK Ş,BEYGO C,Tas E,Yaman H İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. İTÜ Dergisi Seri A: Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım. 2007; 6(1): 81 - 94.
Vancouver Özçevik Ö,TÜRK Ş,BEYGO C,Tas E,Yaman H İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği. İTÜ Dergisi Seri A: Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım. 2007; 6(1): 81 - 94.
IEEE Özçevik Ö,TÜRK Ş,BEYGO C,Tas E,Yaman H "İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği." İTÜ Dergisi Seri A: Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, 6, ss.81 - 94, 2007.
ISNAD Özçevik, Özlem vd. "İstanbul'da deprem odaklı dönüşüm projesinin ana bileşenlerinin analizi: İETT blokları örneği". İTÜ Dergisi Seri A: Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım 6/1 (2007), 81-94.