The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison

Alper ERTÜRK, (Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Kocaeli, Türkiye)
NİGAR DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR, (Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Kocaeli, Türkiye)
Adnan CEYLAN (Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Kocaeli, Türkiye)
Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies
8 3
Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1-2 Sayfa Aralığı: 81 - 98 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison

Öz:
Bu çalışma, örgütsel iletişim ve bağlılığın örgütsel kimlik algısı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Hizmet ve imalat endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren firmalar örnekleme dahil edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz neticesinde, imalat endüstrisinde görev iletişimi örgütsel kimlik algısı üzerinde anlamlı etkiye sahipken, hizmet endüstrisinde kariyer iletişiminin örgütsel kimlik algısı üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin olduğu bulunmuştur. Bunların yanında sonuçlar, örgütsel iletişim ve kimlik algısı ile birlikte ele alındığında, duygusal bağlılığın örgütsel iletişim ve çalışanların kimlik algısı arasında tam ara değişken etkisi yarattığını göstermiştir. Bu çalışmada ayrıca, örgütsel iletişim ve bağlılığın örgütsel kimlik algısını artırıcı yöndeki etkileri de tartışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: örgütsel iletişim sektörel farklılıklar kurumsal kimlik karşılaştırma örgütsel bağlılık

Konular: İşletme İşletme Finans

Örgütsel İletişim ve Bağlılığın, Örgütsel Kimlik Algısı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Sektörel Bir Karşılaştırma

Öz:
This study examines the effects of organizational communication and commitment on organizational identification. We draw samples from organizations operating in service and manufacturing industries. In the analysis, career communication is found to be related significantly to organizational identification in the service industry, while task communication is related significantly to organizational identification in the manufacturing industry. The results also suggest that affective commitment, when combined with organizational communication and identification, fully mediates the relationship between organizational communication and employees' identification with the organization. This study has also some conclusions about the roles of organizational communication and commitment in fostering organizational identification.
Anahtar Kelime: organizational identity comparison organizational commitment organizational communication sectoral differens

Konular: İşletme İşletme Finans
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Albert, S. and Whetten, D.A. (1985). "Organizational Identity," in L.L.Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 263-296. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989). "Social Identity Theory and the Organization," Academy of Management Review, 14: 20-39.
  • Barker, J.R. and Tompkins, P.K. (1994). "Identification in the Self-Managing Organization: Characteristics of Target and Tenure," Human Communication Research, 21: 223-240.
  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) "The Mediator-Moderator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations," Journal of Personality and'Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
  • Blau, G.J. and Boal, K.M. (1987). "Conceptualizing How Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment Affect Turnover and Absenteeism," Academy of Management Review, 12(2): 288-300.
  • Brewer, M.B. (1981). "Ethnocentrism and Its Role in Interpersonal Trust," in M.B. Brewer and B.E.Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences: 345-360, New York: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brewer, M.B. and Kramer, R.M. (1986). "Choice Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Effects of Social Identity, Group Size and Decision Framing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 543-549.
  • Bullis, C.A. and Tompkins, P.K. (1989). "The Forest Rangers Revisited: A Study of Control Practices and Identification," Communication Monographs, 56: 287-306.
  • Bullis, C.A. and Bach, B.W. (1989). "Socialization Turning Points: An Examination of Change in Organizational Identification," Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53: 273-293.
  • Caldwell, D.E, Chatman, J.A. and O'Reilly, C.A. (1990). "Building Organizational Commitment: A Multifirm Study," Journal of Occupational Psychology, September: 245-261.
  • Cheney, G. (1983). "The Rhetoric of Identification and the Study of Organizational Communication," Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69(2): 143-158.
  • Cheney, G. and Tömpkins, P.K. (1987). "Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment," Central States Speech Journal, 38: 1-15.
  • Chreim, S. (2002). "Influencing Organizational Identification during Major Change: A Communication-Based Perspective," Human Relations, 55(9): 1117-1137.
  • Clampitt, P.G. and Downs, C.W. (1993). "Employee Perceptions of the Relationship between Communication and Productivity: A Field Study," Journal of Business Communication, 30(1): 5-28.
  • Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • DiSanza, J.R. and Bullis, C. (1999). "Everyone Identifies with Smokey the Bear: Employee Responses to Newsletter Identification Inducement at the US Forest Service," Management Communication Quarterly, 12: 347-399.
  • Dutton, J.E. and Dukerich, J.M. (1991). "Keeping an Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity in Organizational Adaptation," Academy of Management Journal, 34: 517-554.
  • Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M. and Harquail, C.V. (1994). "Organizational Images and Member Identification," Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 239-263.
  • Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P. and Ouwerkerk, J. (1999). "Self-Categorization, Commitment to the Group and Group Self-Esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity," European Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 371-389.
  • Frank, A. and Brownell, J. (1989). Organizational Communication and Behavior: Communicating to Improve Performance. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Fontenot, J. and Scott, C.R. (2000). "Correlates of Organizational Identification Moderated by Measurement Scale, Organizational Type and Publication Date: A Meta-Analysis." Paper presented at the 50th Annual Convention of the ICA, Acapulco, Mexico, June.
  • Foy, N. (1994). Empowering People at Work. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
  • Harquail, C.V. (1998). "Organizational Identification and the Whole Person: Integrating Affect, Behavior and Cognition," in D.A. Whetten and PC. Godfrey (eds.), Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations: 223-231. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Huff, C, Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1989). "Computer Communication and Organizational Commitment: Tracing the Relationship in a City of Government," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19- 1371-1391.
  • Iyer, V.M., Bamber, E.M. and Barefield, R. (1997). "Identification of Accounting Firm Alumni with Their Former Firm: Antecedents and Outcome," Accounting, Organizations and Society (April/May):315-336.
  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R.L. (1972), The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2 nd ed. New York: Wiley.
  • Kets de Vries, M.F. (1988). "Origins of Charisma: Ties That Bind the Leader and the Led," in J.A.Conger and R.N. Kanungo (eds.), Charismatic Leadership: 237-252.
  • Kramer, R.M. and Brewer, M.B. (1984). "Effects of Group Identity on Resource Use in a Simulated Commons Dilemma," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 1044-1057.
  • ___(1986). "Social Group Identity and the Emergence of Cooperation in Resource Conservation Dilemmas," in H. Wilke, C. Rutte and D.M. Messick (eds.), Experimental Studies of Social Dilemmas: 205-234. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Long Publishing Company.
  • Lawler, E.E. (1989). "With HR Help, All Managers can Practice High-Involvement Management," Personnel, April: 26-31.
  • Lindholm, C. (1988). "Lovers and Leaders: Comparative Models of Romance and Charisma," Social Science Information, 27: 3-45.
  • Mael, F. and Ashforth, B.E. (1992). "Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification," Journal of Organizational Behavior, March: 103-123.
  • _____(1995). "Loyal from Day One: Biodata, Organizational Identification and Turnover among Newcomers," Personnel Psychology, 48: 309-333.
  • Mael, F.A. and Tetrick, L.E. (1992). "Identifying Organizational Identification," Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52: 813-824.
  • Meyer, J.P. and Allen, N.J. (1991). "A Three Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment," Human Resource Management Review: 161-189.
  • ____(1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  • Miller, V.D., Allen, M., Casey, M.K. and Johnson, J.R. (2000). "Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire," Management Communication Quarterly, 13: 626-658.
  • Myers, S.A. and Kassing, J.W. (1998). "The Relationship between Perceived Supervisory Communication Behaviors and Subordinate Organizational Identification," Communication Research Reports, 15: 71-81.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Penley, L.E. and Hawkins, B. (1985). "Studying Interpersonal Communication in Organizations: A Leadership Application," Academy of Management Journal, 28 (2):309-326.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). "Management as Symbolic Action: The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms," in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, (3): 1-52, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Polzer, J.T. (2002). "Explaining the Varying Effects of Organizational Identification on Cooperation: The Moderating Role of Subgroup Reputations." Working paper.
  • Postmes, T., Tanis, M. and DeWit, B. (2000). "A Meta-Analysis of Communication and Organizational Commitment: The Coldest Message Elicits the Warmest Feelings." Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
  • Postmes, T., Tanis, M. and DeWit, B. (2001). "Communication and Commitment in Organizations: A Social Identity Approach," Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4(3): 227-246.
  • Pratt, M.G. and Rafaeli, A. (1997). "Organizational Dress as a Symbol of Multilayered Social Identities," Academy of Management Journal, 40: 862-898.
  • Pratt, M.G. (1998). "To Be or Not To Be? Central Questions in Organizational Identification," in D.A. Whetten and PC. Godfrey (eds.), Identities in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations: 171-207. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Roueche, J.E. and Roueche, S.D. (1996). "Identifying the Strangers: Exploring Part-Time Faculty Integration in American Community Colleges," Community College Review: 23.
  • Sass, J.S. and Canary, D.J. (1991). "Organizational Commitment and Identification: An Examination of Conceptual and Operational Convergence," Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55: 275-293.
  • Schrodt, P. (2002). "The Relationship between Organizational Identification and Organizational Culture: Employee Perceptions of Culture and Identification in a Retail Sales Organization," Communication Studies, 53(2): 189-202.
  • Scott, C.R. (2002). "Organizational Member Identification during Communication-Based and Administrative Activities." Paper presented in the Organizational Communication and Information Systems Division at the Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO, August.
  • Siegel, PH. and Sisaye, S. (1997). "An Analysis of the Difference between Organization, Identification and Professional Commitment: A Study of Certified Public Accountants," Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 18: 149-165.
  • Smidts, A., Pruyn, A.H. and VanRiel, C.B.M. (2001). "The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige on Organizational Identification," Academy of Management Journal,49(5): 1051-1062.
  • Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986). "Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication," Management Science, 32: 1492-1512.
  • ____(1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Tajfel, H. (1972). "Social Categorization," in S. Moscovici (ed.), Introduction a la Psychologie Sociale. Paris: Larousse.
  • ______(1978). "The Achievement of Group Differentiation," in H. Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology oflntergroup Relations: 77-98. London: Academic Press.
  • ______(1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turner, J.C. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Van Knippenberg, D. and Sleebos, E. (2000). "Further Explorations of the Organizational Identification Concept: Identification versus Commitment." Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Van Knippenberg, D. and Van Schie, E.C.M. (2000). "Foci and Correlates of Organizational Identification," Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 137-148.
  • Wiesenfeld, B.M., Raghuram, S., and Garud, R. (1999). "Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization," Organization Science.
  • Zack, M.H. (1993). "Interactivity and Communication Made Choice in Ongoing Management Groups," Information Systems Research, 4(3): 207-239.
APA ERTÜRK A, DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N, CEYLAN A (2005). The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. , 81 - 98.
Chicago ERTÜRK ALPER,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR NİGAR,CEYLAN Adnan The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. (2005): 81 - 98.
MLA ERTÜRK ALPER,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR NİGAR,CEYLAN Adnan The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. , 2005, ss.81 - 98.
AMA ERTÜRK A,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N,CEYLAN A The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. . 2005; 81 - 98.
Vancouver ERTÜRK A,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N,CEYLAN A The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. . 2005; 81 - 98.
IEEE ERTÜRK A,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N,CEYLAN A "The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison." , ss.81 - 98, 2005.
ISNAD ERTÜRK, ALPER vd. "The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison". (2005), 81-98.
APA ERTÜRK A, DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N, CEYLAN A (2005). The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, 19(1-2), 81 - 98.
Chicago ERTÜRK ALPER,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR NİGAR,CEYLAN Adnan The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies 19, no.1-2 (2005): 81 - 98.
MLA ERTÜRK ALPER,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR NİGAR,CEYLAN Adnan The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, vol.19, no.1-2, 2005, ss.81 - 98.
AMA ERTÜRK A,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N,CEYLAN A The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies. 2005; 19(1-2): 81 - 98.
Vancouver ERTÜRK A,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N,CEYLAN A The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies. 2005; 19(1-2): 81 - 98.
IEEE ERTÜRK A,DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR N,CEYLAN A "The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison." Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, 19, ss.81 - 98, 2005.
ISNAD ERTÜRK, ALPER vd. "The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison". Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies 19/1-2 (2005), 81-98.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 13:15

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları